Dear LilyPonders,
I've found information on how to alter the second half of slurs which span a
line-break, but I can't find anything about adjusting the first half while
keeping the cloned half at the default.
I've constructed a simple example showing what happens when I break a
certain slur. In
Dear LilyPonders,
I've found information on how to alter the second half of slurs which span a
line-break, but I can't find anything about adjusting the first half while
keeping the cloned half at the default.
I've constructed a simple example showing what happens when I break a
certain slur. In
Thank you, Trevor and Mats.
Overriding the positions property did the trick!
David
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.ukwrote:
David Nalesnik wrote Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:16 PM
I've found information on how to alter the second half of slurs which
Hi,
According to Gardner Read: It is not necessary to repeat the accidental
before a tied note . . . The one exception to this general rule occurs when
the note or notes affected by the accidental and tied over the barline come
at the end of a system or at the bottom of the page. It is helpful to
Hi all,
I'm trying to understand how the Scheme markup command works, and I noticed
that it seems to work exactly the same way if one of the lines is commented
out, like so:
#(define-markup-command (vspace layout props amount) (number?)
This produces a invisible object taking vertical space.
Hi LilyPonders,
I'm trying to write a function which will make a slur more rounded by
adjusting its middle points while leaving the note-attachments the same. I
came up with something that works--except that
when I try to modify two slurs, both slurs take on the new values for the
second one.
Thank you so much, Neil--this works perfectly!
David
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi,
I have a question about accessing information about several related grobs at
once. For example, if I wanted to use information about a beam and a tuplet
number positioned above it in a single procedure, where would these grobs be
associated together, and how could I refer to them in turn?
Hi Lilyponders,
In the attached snippet, I want to connect the two staves with a dashed
barline between the staves, while retaining a solid barline within the
individual lines. (The bottom staff shows the two-voice structure of the
Handel melody on the upper staff.) How would I go about doing
Thank you, Robin--problem solved!
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Robin Bannister r...@dataway.ch wrote:
David Nalesnik wrote:
I want [...] a dashed barline between the staves, while retaining a
solid barline within the individual lines.
Add the following to your \layout{\context
Hi Bryn,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Bryn Hughes bryn.hug...@gmail.com wrote:
A related question: Does anyone have a template or resources for including
a Roman numeral/figured bass analysis underneath a staff (preferably a
piano staff)? I teach music theory and we routinely analyze
Hi Bryn,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Bryn Hughes bryn.hug...@gmail.com wrote:
This is wonderful! Thank you so much!
Glad you like it!
I should have an improved version fairly soon, and I'll be happy to post
that when it's ready. (Please let me know if you run into any problems, or
if
Hi Bryn,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Bryn Hughes bryn.hug...@gmail.com wrote:
I will, David. Thank you!
This may be an ignorant question, but it is possible to reference your .ly
file in another .ly file, so that it's easier to read the code I'm working
on?
Sure, you can save the
Hi Harm,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Thomas Morley
thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
Converting some files gave:
Not smart enough to convert minimum-Y-extent.
Vertical spacing no longer depends on the Y-extent of a
VerticalAxisGroup.
Please refer to the manual for
Hi Harm,
staves swapped around are not shown in the NR. So if we can make it
work, the snippet is worth to keep.
I haven't been able to make this work either. Whenever I use negative
values as in the original snippet I get programming errors such as insane
spring distance requested, ignoring
Hi Jay,
Is it possible to check whether the page is odd or even in creating
the score title markup. I'm setting a group of hymns and I'd like the
hymn number on the outside of the page.
:
The discussion at
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/reference-to-page-numbers
is
Hi Harm,
I attached a tarball with all fixed files (hope it's not to big).
Perhaps you could test compiling them. IIRC you use windows, it should
make no difference, but who knows ...
Everything compiles :) All I get are warnings with a few of the files.
I've attached the trimmed-down
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
- Original Message - From: Thomas Morley
thomasmorle...@googlemail.com**
To: James pkx1...@gmail.com
Cc: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net; David Nalesnik
david.nales...@gmail.com; lilypond-user lilypond-user
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.cawrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 12:07:09AM +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
I just downloaded the LSR.tarball from today and ran a last successful
test.
I'd like to send it to Sebastiano.
Please do.
Shall we
Hi Harm,
I just finished rewriting the description a moment ago. I'll fix it once
the update is through.
Anyway, I suppose I should add the file to the conversation. Please look
through it and see if it's accurate, and I'll take care of adding it when
the LSR is running 2.14.2.
Oh, and
Hi Harm,
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi David,
Sorry, I've just sent a tarball to Sebastiano. I hope that all is correct.
Everything compiles, and you fixed a number of things that didn't need
fixing--that has to be good enough :)
Hi Ornello,
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 7:20 AM, ornello dominik.hoer...@fun.de wrote:
What is the right way to write a grace note at the beginning of the score
(or
after a clef/time/key signature change)?
But this issue does not mention a workaround? Does anybody know a trick?
The trick in
Hi Ádám,
I just realized that the solution is not as good as it seemed to be. It
seems that if I use a markup, the distance between subsequent crotchets
won't be the same, as the first crotchet of the measure (the one that is
represented by the markup) will be placed a little more left than
Hi Ádám,
What about using proportional spacing and then moving the bar line slightly
to the right?
Attached is an attempt at automating this somewhat. I haven't tested it
extensively, but I hope it will be useful.
-David
barline-through-note01.ly
Description: Binary data
Hi again,
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 9:45 AM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Ádám,
What about using proportional spacing and then moving the bar line
slightly to the right?
Attached is an attempt at automating this somewhat. I haven't tested it
extensively, but I hope
Hi Zsolt,
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 4:43 PM, -Eluze elu...@gmail.com wrote:
Zsolt Cselényi wrote:
For the above the first line is broken after three bla-s and the hyphen
of the
last bla sticks out completely on the right.
hi
I think the paper-width is very short, too - is that your
Hi Ádám,
thank you a lot for this solution. It is much better than anything I
expected to achieve.
Glad to hear it!
-David
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 3:18 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On Mar 11, 2012, at 8:53 AM, James Harkins wrote:
At Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:12:35 +0100,
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
The best way to achieve that with current LilyPond is Scheme engravers.
There
Hi Mike,
Excellent work!
I'm glad you think so!
I've attached a new file that addresses some of the issues you identify
above:
--) It uses axis-group::width to box accidentals
Beautiful! Now there's really no need for the extra padding properties.
(I've kept them in the attached
Hi Nick,
I also played around with trying to make a callback function for \override
LaissezVibrerTie #'control-points, but although Lilypond gives no error on
the console, the LV tie doesn't appear at all when I try to use the
callback.
The following should work. (I've also substituted in a
Hi Nick,
I was trying to make a callback function to lengthen LV ties (thanks to
David Nalesnik for his help). It works fine when applied to single notes,
but on a chord, only one of the two ties is lengthened. Is this due to an
error in the code below or some more deep-rooted problem. If I
Hi Jonathan,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com wrote:
Oops, I sent this to lilypond@googlecode by mistake. Please ignore
there...
Hello,
In the following example the left hand gets rhythmically augmented.
What screwy thing am I doing?
This score
Hi Ádám,
Unfortunately the curly brace created for these four instruments is way
too wide. Is there a way to shrink the vertical size of the curly brace for
the GrandStaff (so that it would have the same width as the curly brace of
a GrandStaff consisting of only two instruments)?
Another
Hi Ádám,
this is quite weird. This code compiles fine. However, in my original score
it doesn't work. After some more experimenting, I figured out that the
problem is, that I have the \RemoveEmptyStaves in the \Staff context. After
removing that, it compiled just fine. Maybe it's some bug.
Hi James,
BTW, I didn't mention before, but it looks like I'm going to be using that
feathered-beam function, derived from work by David, and this box-notation
function, also coming from David's work.
Oh, I just helped out a bit with that one--thanks definitely go to Harm.
So David -- I
Hi Nick,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.netwrote:
I'm using define-markup-command to simplify the indication of barring for
a single chord, but what I have at the moment defaults to being centred on
the note, and the vertical line indicating how many
Hi Ádám,
I tried to use the frame engraver of this thread, but I was unable to do
so. I'm constantly getting 'syntax error, unexpected EVENT_IDENTIFIER'
errors and the LilyPond compiler won't recognize the \frameStart and
\frameEnd commands. The only thing I changed was the version number
Hi James,
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 9:22 AM, James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am perfectly ripping my hair out trying to get multimeasure rests to
display properly in another staff, over a cadenza. Reduced example
illustrates.
Possibly the following thread will be useful to
Hi Paul,
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.netwrote:
On 10/04/12 06:56, Paul Morris wrote:
Thomas Morley wrote:
Am 9. April 2012 03:25 schrieb Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com
p...@paulwmorris.com:
Hello, Is there a way to manually move some of the
Hi Paul,
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com wrote:
Thanks David and Nick! More below...
David Nalesnik wrote:
Hi Paul,
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.netwrote:
On 10/04/12 06:56, Paul Morris wrote:
Thank you
Hi,
I tried \once \override but it didn't work.
It should. You can also move the override of BarLine later as I do below.
My problem however is, that the barline between my part 2 and three is
already shown in the color of the part 3 where I think it is defined and
belongs to part 2.
I
Hi Harm,
how about inserting: \override Staff.BarLine #'layer = #10 in the \layout
and
\once \override Staff.BarLine #'X-extent = #'(-0 . 0.5) for the
problematic BarLine.
Think it should do the trick:
Aha! Works beautifully.
--David
___
Hi Eluze,
I believe the issue here is that the barline is considered to _begin_ the
new measure rather than end the old one. I can't think of a way around
this except what James suggests. (Then there's the issue of the staff
lines underneath the bar line, to which I don't have a ready
Hi James,
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 3:32 AM, James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe a simple question: Is there a way to flatten the curve of a tie that
is as easy as overriding ratio for slurs?
You can override 'ratio for ties too:
\override Tie #'details #'ratio = #0.2
Another
Hi,
Oops--should have included the version. I'm using 2.15.37. With 2.14.2
and before you need the dollar sign:
shapeTie =
#(define-music-function (parser location offsets) (list?)
#{
\once \override Tie #'control-points = #(alter-curve $offsets)
#})
-David
Hi James,
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:58 AM, James Worlton jworl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:18 AM, James Worlton jworl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:59 AM, James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
James
On 13 April 2012 16:30, James Worlton jworl...@gmail.com
Hi,
Your override clears 'details except for 'ratio.
Err...don't think that's accurate, but the rest stands!
-David
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi Silvio,
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Silvio ARDITO silvioard...@gmail.comwrote:
I need the following layout:
[image: Immagine in linea 2]
The result is a copy and paste from 2 .ly.
The little up-right staff uses: *#(set-global-staff-size 11)* ;
the rest uses:
Hi,
Also, take a look at this snippet:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/snippets/staff-notation
That would be the one called Changing the staff size...!
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Hi Urs,
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de wrote:
Dear listers,
I thought it should be simple and straightforward, but I don't understand
how to put an arpeggio in brackets.
If I use this code I only get a very small parenthesis:
\version 2.15.36
\relative c' {
Hi again!
Here's something that works for arpeggios. The attached file is a bit
large because I needed to include several functions from stencil.scm to
draw the parentheses.
Oh, what ever was I thinking! No need at all for all that duplicated
code...
This is all you need:
\version
David,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:41 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com writes:
The examples are written to work with the latest versions. (I'm using
the current release candidate.)
Then one could use make-engraver.
True, true. My motivation
David,
.Any problems which
might result will only affect that multi-file run?
Basically every use of lilypond-book is a multi-file run. So are our
regtests.
Understood. I also won't upload this to the LSR at the current time since
it could potentially cause annoyances the next time it
Hi Phil,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
**
You're OK uploading it to the LSR providing you don't tag it with docs -
it's only those that are imported into the documentation system.
I'm just speaking here from the experience of checking a bunch of LSR
Hi,
Thank you. \laissezVibrer produces very short ties; is there a way to
modify
them so that they resemble normal ties?
You might find this thread helpful:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg70030.html
-David
___
Hi,
Unrelated issue: I notice that the original post with attached files hasn't
shown up on archive 2 on either -user or -devel, even though I sent that
post 13 hours ago. It appears on archive 1, but there the .ly file appears
as a binary data file, which I cannot open. Am I guilty of
Hi Urs,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de wrote:
Hello Jan-Peter,
thank you very much.
This seems to solve the problem. Maybe it's not perfectly robust, though.
The function now works when the number of lists exactly matches the number
of slur fragments. I'm not
Hi Urs,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 6:51 AM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Urs,
I've rewritten shape-slur so that you should be able to use lists of
offsets which don't match with the number of slur fragments. I've tested
it somewhat, but if you run into a problem, let me
Hi,
In some piano music, you may have three different levels, as it were, e.g.
a melodic line in the treble, played by the right hand, a deep bass
consisting of long notes in the left hand, and in between chords filling in
the time between the bass notes, also played by the left hand. In such
Hi Urs,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de wrote:
Hi David,
thank you for now. I'll look into it.
But isn't it very likely that I have to reshape a slur anyway when it
changes from broken to unbroken?
In that case I'd even say the errors are a 'feature' so you
Hi Urs,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de wrote:
Am 27.04.2012 19:30, schrieb David Nalesnik:
Hi Urs,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de wrote:
Hi David,
thank you for now. I'll look into it.
But isn't it very likely that I have
Hi Harm,
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Thomas Morley
thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
in 2.14.2 I used a function to manipulate the BarNumber-stencil. It
calls the value of the BarNumber as a string, via (ly:grob-property
grob 'text).
This doesn't work no longer with the
) as suggest by David
Nalesnik and I get the following error. Appreciate help.
This is how to do it:
\relative c'' {
\override Score.BarNumber #'break-visibility = #'#(#f #t #t)
\override Score.BarNumber #'stencil =
#(lambda (grob)
(let* ((stil (ly:text
Nick,
In the following, even though I've turned off the tuplet bracket
stencil, the tuplet number is still placed as though the stencil was
there:
\version 2.15.37
\relative c'' {
\set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4)
\override TupletBracket #'stencil = ##f
Hi again,
Since the number is positioned according to where the bracket would be,
you could override 'positions of TupletBracket:
\relative c'' {
\set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4)
\times 2/3 {
g8 fis g
\override TupletBracket #'positions = #'(3.34 . 3.34)
Hi Ming,
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:23 AM, MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com wrote:
Thank you, David. Is it possible not to print other numbers other than
the multiple of five's?
To to this, you only need to change one line of Harm's function (see below):
\relative c'' {
Err..
;; if you change 5 to 3 in the line below, you'll get a bar line
every three bars; if you change it to 10, every ten
;; bars; etc.
That's bar number of course!
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Hi Ming,
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 4:53 PM, MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com wrote:
Hi, David, I asked the wrong question. The right one: Can I just print
the multiple of fifth's (or 10's) only - the in between nar number should
be blank?
OK, I now see what you want. For that you can do
Helge,
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Eluze elu...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 01.05.2012 12:29, schrieb Helge Kruse:
Hello,
I am transcribing a score. I want to keep it as similar to the original
as possible.
In the following excerpt the C-sharp is continued with a tie on the next
line. The
Hi Jim,
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:59 PM, lilyp...@umpquanet.com wrote:
I have a first ending at the end of a line, which is nicely
spaced (vertically).
The second ending is at the beginning of the next line, and the
right end of the spanner is above a rehearsal letter (/mark
/default).
Even simpler:
#(define time-signature-hide-numerator
(lambda (grob)
(let ((denom (number-string (cdr (ly:grob-property grob 'fraction)
(grob-interpret-markup grob
(make-lower-markup 2 (make-number-markup denom))
So it is!
-David
Hi Urs,
Hi David,
as promised I tried out your updated function(s).
Well, you can't call this a complete test suite, but it seems to work
perfectly. Many thanks.
Attached is a version showing that it also/still works with phrasingSlurs.
I find the warnings very useful. I assume it isn't
Hi Urs,
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de wrote:
Hi David,
now I tested your new function.
OK, I didn't test more than the sources you provided, but I think they
give all the necessary combinations.
So my conclusion is: This is awesome!
I won't ever live
Hi,
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 5/9/12 8:01 AM, Choan Gálvez choan.gal...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice. But... it still results in the same ugly (to me) vertical
alignments: letters with ascendant strokes look nice, letters with
descendant strokes
Hi Carl,
I'm pretty sure he wants to use the *baseline* of the characters to align
relative to the staff line.
Ah, OK. Looking at the examples he's provided I see that that's exactly
what he wants.
So you can't use tab-note-head::print, since
it centers the *total extent* of the
Hi Choan,
This looks very nice and it's _exactly_ what I had in mind :)
Glad to hear it!
But that's my opinion, I'm not the OP -- Christopher Webster is.
Oops--seems I got lost...
-David
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Hi Harm,
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Thomas Morley
thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
2012/5/11 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com:
Hi David,
I thought a while about your function.
I'd like to suggest some changes. In the attached file you can see:
- Elimination of
So:
\shape #Slur #'( ...
Looks awful. Why not call it with the syntax used for any override?
\shape Slur #'( ...
Yes, it is pretty horrible. I didn't realize that LilyPond would accept
strings not enclosed in double quotes.
Thanks,
David
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Thomas Morley
thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi David,
2012/5/11 David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com:
I don't have 2.14.2 up to test, but this all should work there provided
you
add the # before the string?
So:
\shape #Slur #'( ...
I
Hi Urs,
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de wrote:
Am I right that you can't make a Stem dashed? I didnt find anything in
the IR.
What would then be the proper way to attach a dashed line to a note in
place of the Stem?
Here's something I came up with. It's not
Hi again,
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:24 AM, David Nalesnik
david.nales...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Urs,
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de wrote:
Am I right that you can't make a Stem dashed? I didnt find anything in
the IR.
What would then be the proper way to attach
Hi Harm,
I suggest the code below. It's very close to your own but it seems to
avoid the problems.
When I tried your code out, the same problems happened for me! I concluded
that this is an issue with the viewer in LilyPondTool, and sure enough,
when I view PDF with external PDF-viewer, the
Hi,
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 3:05 AM, Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de wrote:
Hi David, Hi Thomas,
thank you very much!
I'm increasingly fascinated by LilyPond - and this mailing list.
And I'll definitely have to learn how to write Scheme functions myself ...
With your suggestions I can really
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:32 AM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.comwrote:
I've come up with a simpler variant which makes use of the 'dashed-line
function. (I didn't use this initially because I couldn't figure out how
to get the roundedness of the line segments to match the ordinary
Hi again,
Hmmm, Setting 'blot-diameter like I did actually affects regular stems
and the newly-drawn stems not at all...
So remove this line if you use the newer function:
(ly:output-def-set-variable! (ly:grob-layout grob) 'blot-diameter 0.8)
-David
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 6:41 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
Hey LilyPond users,
I have an exciting piece of news to share with you. LilyPond won LoMuS
2012, one of the most prestigious awards in the open source community for
musical software.
Congratulations!!
OK! This should do it.
Those functions using 'round-filled-box could be tailored to match the
capabilities of 'dashed-line.
The rewrite combines both of the approaches above: it uses
'round-filled-box for the stencil, and allows you to specify the length of
the dashes and the spaces in
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 1:39 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
I don't really understand the function, but maybe something like
(define (build-pos-list len on off)
(let helper ((lst '()) (next 0) (on on) (off off))
(if ( next len)
(helper (cons next lst) (+ next on) off on)
Hi Urs,
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de wrote:
Hi,
I am very much enjoying now to tweak slurs and other curves using offsets
instead of hardcoded control-points.
I wonder if it would be interesting to have a similar approach to grobs
with a positions property
Hi,
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
p.s.
Come to think of it, wouldn't this be a good place for a Scheme engraver
[written by someone who, unlike me, knows Scheme well]? To wit, if the
measures in a piece aren't all 4/4, then our
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Hi David,
I can't believe that this works :) !!
1. Let's thank all the people (Han-Wen, Jan, David K., etc.) who have done
such great work on the fundamentals, so that this actually works.
Hear, hear!
Hi,
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Jay Anderson horndud...@gmail.com wrote:
Slightly better would be to get rid of the bars-per-line define so
it's self-contained:
True, thank you--I've incorporated your suggestion below.
Thinking about this some more, I figure the next logical step is to
Hi Janek,
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.comwrote:
David,
a couple of thoughts:
- what about looping the break pattern? I.e. \consists
#(custom-line-breaks-engraver '(2 3 4)) = \consists
#(custom-line-breaks-engraver '(2 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 4 ... 2 3 4))?
Hi again Janek,
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 6:40 AM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Janek,
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Janek Warchoł
janek.lilyp...@gmail.comwrote:
David,
a couple of thoughts:
- what about looping the break pattern? I.e. \consists
#(custom-line
Hi Johan,
Please submit to LSR...
Will do. The LSR is running 2.14.2 right now, so I'll have to make some
changes. (In particular, the function uses David Kastrup's make-engraver
macro which is fairly recent.)
-David
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Hi Janek,
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi David all,
i want to make arpeggios longer (so that they overshoot the chords a
bit). I've modified your offsetBeamPositions function to work on
Arpeggios instead of Beams (that was easy), but i'm
Hi Janek,
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi David,
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 2:56 PM, David Nalesnik
david.nales...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, this incorporates your idea of looping. You specify a list as the
argument of the function
Hi Janek,
today i've found this snippet: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=646
The description says that it needs manual beaming to work, but i've
tried using it with 2.15.36 and manual beaming was not necessary!
The only downside i see is that non-kneed tuplets are positioned
wrongly, so
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 5:02 PM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.comwrote:
I'll have to investigate, but possibly the actual override of 'Y-offset
(or calling other functions related to Y) is having new effects. (You can
see one effect by adding \override TupletBracket #'bracket
Hi,
today i've found this snippet: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=646
The description says that it needs manual beaming to work, but i've
tried using it with 2.15.36 and manual beaming was not necessary!
The only downside i see is that non-kneed tuplets are positioned
wrongly, so one has
1 - 100 of 1748 matches
Mail list logo
