] | Blog:
http://neimke.spaces.live.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Stovell
Sent: Monday, 20 October 2008 9:08 PM
To: listserver@ozsilverlight.com
Subject: Re: [OzSilverlight] Success or Failure of SL.?
An area of the Silverlight ecosystem that I think
to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
unlawful.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Paul Stovell
Sent: Monday, 20 October 2008 9:38 PM
To: listserver@ozsilverlight.com
Subject: Re: [OzSilverlight] Success or Failure of SL.?
An area of the Silverlight
] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Paul Stovell
*Sent:* Monday, 20 October 2008 9:38 PM
*To:* listserver@ozsilverlight.com
*Subject:* Re: [OzSilverlight] Success or Failure of SL.?
An area of the Silverlight ecosystem that I think will be interesting to
see is the third-party offerings
You want me to give you a run sheet of our entire game plan so you can run it
off to your buddies at Adobe, think again bazza :) think again! :)
Sorry, nice try but no cigar.
no, Scott, it's not that.
I actually don't cut much code anymore these days: analysis, design,
recommendations, etc.
Hi,
First on the AJAX/JavaScript comment: I completely agree. This is something
I mentioned in the Future of the web discussion panel at Tech Ed in
Sydney. I think that in the end JavaScript might be a stronger competitor to
Silverlight than Flash. JavaScript is getting significant faster in
: Re: [OzSilverlight] Success or Failure of SL.?
Hi,
First on the AJAX/JavaScript comment: I completely agree. This is something I
mentioned in the Future of the web discussion panel at Tech Ed in Sydney. I
think that in the end JavaScript might be a stronger competitor to Silverlight
than Flash
Current leaders:
Troll / fisherman of the year : Muhammed Niaz
Flamer / Flamee of the year : cough cough
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Jonas Follesø [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
First on the AJAX/JavaScript comment: I completely agree. This is something
I mentioned in the Future of the
and
the environment is nicer all round.
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Jonas Follesø
*Sent:* Monday, 20 October 2008 9:27 AM
*To:* listserver@ozsilverlight.com
*Subject:* Re: [OzSilverlight] Success or Failure of SL.?
Hi,
First on the AJAX/JavaScript
.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonas Follesø [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 20 October 2008 12:43 PM
To: listserver@ozsilverlight.com
Subject: Re: [OzSilverlight] Success or Failure of SL.?
True, but there is heaps of web designers out there who knows CSS and HTML. So
hI Jempson,
What you mean.?
Take care
Niaz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of ross jempson
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 6:39 AM
To: listserver@ozSilverlight.com
Subject: Re: [OzSilverlight] Success or Failure of SL
sorry you're being argumentative bazza :)
Scott, you think everyone is argumentitive if they don't blindly
swallow your used-car-salesman speil and choosing to look at the fine
print. Meh.
but Scott, while I have your attention, what's the behind the scenes
story with this?
:09 AM
To: listserver@ozSilverlight.com
Subject: RE: [OzSilverlight] Success or Failure of SL.?
- numbers of developers (no point coming up with cool
tools/technology if no one uses it)
- resources to help those developers (getting started / moving forward)
As I said before, iI think c
] On Behalf Of Barry Beattie
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 1:22 AM
To: listserver@ozsilverlight.com
Subject: Re: [OzSilverlight] Success or Failure of SL.?
sorry you're being argumentative bazza :)
Scott, you think everyone is argumentitive if they don't blindly
swallow your used-car-salesman speil
, think again bazza :) think again! :)
Sorry, nice try but no cigar.
Scott.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry Beattie
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 1:22 AM
To: listserver@ozsilverlight.com
Subject: Re: [OzSilverlight] Success
: Thursday, 16 October 2008 1:01 PM
To: listserver@ozsilverlight.com
Subject: Re: [OzSilverlight] Success or Failure of SL.?
Hi Muhammad,
I can't really comment on Flex but the little I've seen showed me that both
technologies were/are moving in similar directions, which you'd expect as they
have
Regards,
Muhammad Niaz
Software Engineer
Intagleo Systems Pvt Ltd.
+92 321 569 4195
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Stephen Price
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 10:01 AM
To: listserver@ozSilverlight.com
Subject: Re: [OzSilverlight] Success or Failure of SL.?
Hi
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Muhammad Niaz
Sent: Friday, 17 October 2008 12:13 AM
To: listserver@ozSilverlight.com
Subject: RE: [OzSilverlight] Success or Failure of SL.?
Hi Stephen,
I agree with your comments related to .NET expertise. But even though
I do't know about Flex
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | W: www.readify.nethttp://www.readify.net/
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jordan Knight
Sent: Friday, 17 October 2008 09:53
To: listserver@ozSilverlight.com
Subject: RE: [OzSilverlight] Success or Failure of SL.?
Lucky Silverlight has so many great
announcement very soon so stay posted.
Jordan.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jordan Knight
Sent: Friday, 17 October 2008 9:53 AM
To: listserver@ozSilverlight.com
Subject: RE: [OzSilverlight] Success or Failure of SL.?
Lucky Silverlight has so many great tools to crank out
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Damian Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually there's probably less work because XAML is a controlled and strict
environment the tooling is much better and can be trusted more. Using the
designer and palettes in Expression Web or VS2008 to build your CSS
, 17 October 2008 11:00 AM
To: listserver@ozsilverlight.com
Subject: Re: [OzSilverlight] Success or Failure of SL.?
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Damian Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually there's probably less work because XAML is a controlled and strict
environment the tooling is much
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry Beattie
Sent: Friday, 17 October 2008 11:00 AM
To: listserver@ozsilverlight.com
Subject: Re: [OzSilverlight] Success or Failure of SL.?
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Damian Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually there's probably less work
showing them how easy it is to go from PS / IL to Expression
Design/Blend is the goal.
how?
I'd put money on there being more C# developers out there
than Action Script developers
ahhh... but that's the mistake. You're saying developers can't
transfer their skills from one language to
70million for C#.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry Beattie
Sent: Friday, 17 October 2008 2:46 PM
To: listserver@ozsilverlight.com
Subject: Re: [OzSilverlight] Success or Failure of SL.?
showing them how easy it is to go from PS / IL
PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry Beattie [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 16 October 2008 8:46 PM
To: listserver@ozsilverlight.com
Subject: Re: [OzSilverlight] Success or Failure of SL.?
showing them how easy it is to go from PS / IL to Expression
Design/Blend is the goal.
how
To: listserver@ozSilverlight.com
Subject: RE: [OzSilverlight] Success or Failure of SL.?
Just on the success of SL in the RIA space...
The hard sell is going to be to the designers... they are in many ways
married to Adobe PS, but this doesn't they have to stay married to
Flash/Flex. They key
Hi Muhammad,
I can't really comment on Flex but the little I've seen showed me that both
technologies were/are moving in similar directions, which you'd expect as
they have a similar problem to solve.
I can say though, that learning XAML is not a waste given that WPF also uses
it. Anything you
27 matches
Mail list logo
