- Original Message -
From: Tonghang Zhou
Subject: Re: New Thread - Air Travel and film
I understand there are 3 ways to undergo the detection: A) checked-in
luggage, B) X-ray machine at the gate for carry-on bags, C) the
beeping door that you go thru.
From what I'm hearing you
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: Re: New Thread - Air Travel and film
William,
Good to know - not necessarily good news. One option was to only take
the 67 and the little digicam. That way, I would only be carrying 120
film. You know how it comes in the airtight
William,
I'm going to be doing some checking into buying film there - the 120
variety may be a bit trickier and much more expensive on Maui. Same
goes for developing. But it certainly is worth checking into. I've
also heard of people having film shipped to their destination by a
carrier that
Tonghang wrote:
TZ Personally I don't think these security checks can prevent anything.
TZ It's just a harrassment for everyone. Even worse is that these
TZ guards seem to enjoy their new found status very much. This is
TZ not right.
Back in October on the Kennedy airport, I had to undergo
Bruce,
There are special x-ray bags sold here in the Czech Republic, each holds
from 6 to 20 rolls of film. I have not tested them but people on
discussion groups here say that they either go through the x-ray with no
problem or that the owner is obliged to take the rolls out of the bag
and put
Amazing.
Once upon a time, fellows of Penta Club discussed how one could grow
snow flakes in controlled environment. I suppose for me in Israel it
would be even more relevant...
Truly amazing work.
Thanks for sharing.
---
Boris Liberman
www.geocities.com/dunno57
Hi,
WR wrote:
I think it was Mike Wilson who had the most grief, perhaps he could shed some light.
Never solved my problem but it's not quite the same one. I find
that _some_ images of each gallery won't load. When I revisit
the same gallery it is always the same images but it does not
seem
Hi!
I am given the opportunity to buy Epson 2450 scanner (flat bed, but
seems to be the only reasonable one for scanning the film) for $250.
It is about one year old, one owner.
My questions would be:
1. Is it a fair price? What is a fair price?
2. What is the potential points of total failure
I have travelled recently with Provia 400F (35mm) without problems. I never
leave film in checked baggage. I put all my film, exposed and fresh, in a
jacket pocket and put that on the conveyor for the X-ray machine before I
put any other hand luggage on. I find the jacket and film cruise
Thanks Alan,
I guess I'll strick to Pentax, then.
Regards,
ukasz
===
www.fotopolis.pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
internetowy magazyn o fotografii
- Original Message -
From: Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
One thought I had was to use plastic film cassettes and walk through the
scanner. Since I bulk load most of my film, this could be an advantage. I
will try it on my next international flight.
Bob Rapp
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Bruce. Thanks for a interesting post that I can help with :)
Rule 1
NEVER, EVER travel with film in checked luggage. Do not put a boby with
film in checked luggage. The CTX 1500 (and newer) machines that they
have all over (LAX, SAF, and on HI) will trash all and any film
Rule 2
ARRIVE 20
THIS IS A DAMN THREAD ON GETTING THROUGH CUSTOMS AND SECURITY SCANS WITH
LOADED FILM. LEAVE YOUR DAMN GEOPOLITICAL MEWLING OUT OF THIS.
RIGHT TRACK? Stopping idiots who want to blow up planes in mid flight? I
presume you condone international terrorism then? Where the HELL are YOU
from anyway?
on 03.02.03 11:09, Boris Liberman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I am given the opportunity to buy Epson 2450 scanner (flat bed, but
seems to be the only reasonable one for scanning the film) for $250.
It is about one year old, one owner.
...
My purpose of using it would be to eliminate
Someone brings in a Sun each day for the cafeteria,I'll keep
an eye out for the article.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 23:21:23 EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: deer with arrow in head update- TPDML note
TPDMLers can check the Toronto
Alan Chan wrote:
I had these Sigma 24mm and 28mm few years back, both
manual focus.
Optically, both are great imho. However, both suffers from
flare problem and
substandard mechanical design, particularly the aperture
ring assembly. The
24mm even had worse rubber, aperture ring material and
Boris.
I have gotten ok results from colour 35mm negs,good results from BW
negs,and very good results from MF negs(6x6)on the 2450.I think JOC
gets good results from his 35mm colour stuff,so i think it could be
hit and miss.
On the whole,until i get something better,it fine.
Dave
Begin
Boris,
If the film you are planning on scanning is 35mm, then the 2450 is not the ideal
scanner. Specially if you are planning on making prints from the scanned images.
I recently purchased a Microtek Scanmaker 5900. I purchased it primarily for
scanning 120 film. It does a fair job at that.
Oliver Raymond wrote:
THIS IS A DAMN THREAD ON GETTING THROUGH CUSTOMS AND SECURITY
SCANS WITH LOADED FILM. LEAVE YOUR DAMN GEOPOLITICAL MEWLING
OUT OF THIS.
R-e-l-a-x, friend...
RIGHT TRACK? Stopping idiots who want to blow up planes in mid
flight? I presume you condone international
Hi, can someone help me.
I am looking for a message posted, I think, by Boz lately which had a
link to Pentax 'oddities' such as their first Af lens and some belt
clips or some such. Can anyone remember the link to help me find it
again?
Thanks
Thanks, Paul - glad you like them! The snowflakes are caught on glass, a
blue light and diffuser provide the background. The biggest challenge is
trying to focus, especially the 50mm f4 on ~300mm of extension!
- MCC
At 09:06 PM 2/2/2003 +, you wrote:
Wow! Awesome work, Mark. Did you
At 08:51 PM 2/2/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Stunning! Thanks, Mark, for taking and sharing them with us.
I'm sure that I saw two of them that were the same though - nah, can't be true
vbg
thanks,
frank
Thanks, Frank - they actually _do_ start to look alike after a while!
- MCC
- - - - - - - - -
He's selling off stuff to get one he found for $550.
Guess a car has more alure to a 15-/16-year-old
than does a camera. Wonder why.
Anyway, here's the stuff:
500ftz -- good condition -- $120
-- external wear but operates properly
A135 2.8 -- excellent condition --
$100
Rollie panorama head
Sorry boz - getting fed up with political junk and side swiping of US.
Yesterday one of the streets in the area was named after a firefighter
friend who lost his life Sep11. I personally worked on Wall street -
about 200 yards from WTC footprint, and had to run for my life on the
day: was too
Great, now we are going to have another 1,000 messages of unending
speculation on what Pentax may or may not have. Maybe Mike and Pal can start
an on-line, real time, 24x7 forum on the subject.
Oh, sorry, I didn't realize that the Pentax DSLR was off limits as a topic
too. Well, then, you
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003 23:38:24 -0800 (PST), Tonghang Zhou wrote:
I understand there are 3 ways to undergo the detection: A) checked-in
luggage, B) X-ray machine at the gate for carry-on bags, C) the
beeping door that you go thru.
My understanding has been that
(A) is very high risk these days
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003 10:24:28 +0100, Ondrej Maly wrote:
There are special x-ray bags [...]
I have no scientific evidence, but I believe that the best option today
might be the lead bag in carry on luggage, if you can't get all your
film in your pockets. With the lead bag, you'll get a hand check
Oliver wrote:
OR RIGHT TRACK? Stopping idiots who want to blow up planes in mid flight? I
OR presume you condone international terrorism then? Where the HELL are YOU
OR from anyway?
Romania, a terrorism haven.
OR They don't need to have security checks where you come from? Never had
OR any
Beautiful pictures, Mark. You perfected your technique indeed.
Servus, Alin
Mark wrote:
MC Last month's cold snap brought some really nice snow to west Michigan, and
MC the opportunity for more snow crystal photography. I just updated my
MC website with 30 new snow crystal
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Anyway, I am wondering what the current state of film
going through
the detectors is. Is there any noticeable damage
coming from the
x-ray machines? At what speed is the film
problematic?
... Bruce, I've flown domestic US numerous times since
last Nov. always with
- Original Message -
From: Collin Brendemuehl
Subject: OT: The tale of #2 son a Beetle
He's selling off stuff to get one he found for $550.
Guess a car has more alure to a 15-/16-year-old
than does a camera. Wonder why.
When I was 16, I sold off a Crown Graphic and a whole whack
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
I will let those 24/7 locals select the where and when. I will be there,
maybe I can drag my sister along, though I doubt it...
As a non-local, I should have no problems coming in and meeting up. I just
ask that people consider that I'll have to
Pål,
Now a new 67 would excite me even more than a DSLR. Any more to the
rumor?
Bruce
Monday, February 3, 2003, 6:41:24 AM, you wrote:
PJ Seems I was wrong. I though the 67 was doomed. Apparently Pentax might show a new,
more compact 67 (will it be a digital solution as well?).
PJ
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I also bought a box of Epson heavyweight Matte (forgive me, I like matte
finish better) today so we'll see if these look better than the Kodak stuff
I just finished. The glossy stuf is so much mroe expensive anyway. One
thing I noticed, this
Bruce wrote:
Now a new 67 would excite me even more than a DSLR. Any more to the
rumor?
Nope. That's all I have for now. However, you are free to speculate. Since it is
supposedly smaller, I suspect a total redesign.
Anyway, the source is reliable so this seems to be real. Those who
Cotty wrote:
I can think of very
few threads at the moment that are as on topic as the forthcoming Pentax
DSLR, and I for one am interested in reading any and all info that is
forthcoming, including speculation.
Ok. Here it goes. As I've said previously the DSLR has a film sibling. It is
As with the KMount for 35mm, preservation of current lens usage is
important to me in a new 67. I would dearly love to see a 75mm leaf
shutter lens. The 90 is liveable, but not quite wide enough and is
not in production anymore. I've looked over the 67II and can't see
any radical way to shrink
This would answer the constant criticism of Pentax not having changeable
backs perhaps?
Man this is going to be a long month...
-Original Message-
From: Pål Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 February 2003 16:56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New 67 and new generation
Maybe it's a rangefinder.
HAR!
tv
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 12:15 PM
To: Pål Jensen
Subject: Re: New 67 and new generation of K-mount?
As with the KMount for 35mm, preservation of current lens usage is
-Original Message-
From: Pål Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Ok. Here it goes. As I've said previously the DSLR has a film
sibling. It is now being confirmed by other sources whose
reliability is unproven. Apparently, it might be bull, but
the name of the new camera is ist
A digital option for 67 is a joke. You're not going to get anywhere
near a full frame unless it's megabucks.
They need to start with 35mm, then do 645- which makes a lot more sense.
Rob Brigham wrote:
This would answer the constant criticism of Pentax not having changeable
backs perhaps?
Man
Hi!
Bill, from your response and from other responses I gather that Epson
2450 is a satisfactory film scanner, even for 35 mm film. It is not
top quality, but I suppose to expect a top film scanning quality from
flatbed scanner is at least illogical.
OTOH, at the moment I am struggling with
But you could put a 645 size sensor on an insert for a 67 based
system...
645 sales could be hit by claims that digital has now surpassed this.
Perhaps Pentax feel film based medium format has a longer future in 67
format. Not saying I agree, but its possible.
Besides the criticism of not
Boris.
My reply earlier to you went missing.I tried Veuscan trial version
last night and it looks like it might work well with the
2450(35 mm BW and Colour looked ok.
It scanned about the same time lenght as Epson software,but Epson
tneds to crash on me with big files.The vuescan did not.
For
On Mon, 03 Feb 2003 09:56:35 -0800 (PST),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forgot to add:
Check out the TSA web info re film -
http://www.tsa.gov/public/display?theme=56
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Anyway, I am wondering what the current state of
film
going through
the detectors is. Is there any
gfen wrote:
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
I will let those 24/7 locals select the where and when.
annsan sez
Would all of you who are planning to do this CC me when you chat about this - I
could then make a little
list that includes all of us in my address book - also I
In a message dated 03/02/03 16:48:08 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When I was 16, I sold off a Crown Graphic and a whole whack of
accessories
to buy a Mazda RX2.
It happens.
William Robb
Hey Bill,
You and I must have similar tastes in cars.
My first car was a Mazda
Boris,
Have you considered ordering from BH in New York? My own experience
and those of friends leads me to believe that they are very honest,
efficient, and reliable.
I am saying this because I have recently been scanning 35mm negs with a
flatbed scanner and it is a VERY time consuming
tom,
Ok, that would shrink it quite a bit. Guess I just have to think even
more Radical. :)
Bruce
Monday, February 3, 2003, 9:34:00 AM, you wrote:
t Maybe it's a rangefinder.
t HAR!
t tv
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February
Rob,
The odd thing there is that it sounds to be smaller. Adding an
interchangeable back would probably make it larger - like the Mamiya
RB. Unless, of course, you didn't count the back in your measurements
for the body size.
Bruce
Monday, February 3, 2003, 9:38:32 AM, you wrote:
RB But
Lasse Karlsson wrote:
John M. wrote:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 09:41:09 -0500, you wrote:
If I wanted to have an aggravating, pointless discussion, I would
go
talk to my wife.
BR
I refrained from replying to Bruce to ask him if I could supply the name
of a good divorce lawyer because
I
Michael,
I have both the Epson 2450 and the Minolta Scan Dual II Film scanner.
I have not found either to be significantly faster than the other. The
only real advantage that I see right now is by using Vuescan for
speed. It can handle batch scans on the Minolta.
The path Boris is planning on
Would all of you who are planning to do this CC me when you
chat about this -
Could you guys please include me as well, in case my plans for that
weekend fall through? Thx.
Amita
Rob Brigham wrote:
But you could put a 645 size sensor on an insert for a 67 based
system...
But there's already AF and full automation for the 645Nii, so it makes
more sense to stick with that.
645 would still be a crop.
R
I did not know that you are a security check person.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Oliver Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Päivä: 03. helmikuuta 2003
CBWaters wrote:
T
I also bought a box of Epson heavyweight Matte (forgive me, I like matte
finish better) today so we'll see if these look better than the Kodak stuff
I just finished. The glossy stuf is so much mroe expensive anyway. One
thing I noticed, this Epson paper is one-sided, as
Thanks Bruce,
I thought maybe the film scanners would have some software to fix the
dust and scratches. Trying to fix all that stuff in PS is what is
taking me so much time. It's very tedious.
Michael
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Michael,
I have both the Epson 2450 and the Minolta Scan Dual II
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Would all of you who are planning to do this CC me when you chat about this - I
could then make a little
list that includes all of us in my address book - also I toss the PDML stuff
regularly and keep every
shred of email that isn't from strangers in
What: The PDML NY area meeting.
Where: NYC.
When: 2/23/03?
Who:
bruce rubenstein, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
butch black, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
herb chong, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ann sanfedele, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bob kelly, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cesar matamoros, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
amita guha, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
me!,
-Original Message-
From: gfen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
OK, so, here's who's expressed interest thus far.. and I
belive the 23rd
(Saturday) is the day of choice? Who's interested, and
whatever to do?
The 23rd is a Sunday. I could come Sunday, not Saturday the 22nd.
I
Hi Boris;
Your reasoning is fine. If your needs are modest and you can get your return
on investment in a year then go for it. As far as reliability I have owned
an Epson 636 scanner for nearly 4 years now with no trouble. Flatbeds are
generally reliable and should last for years.
BUTCH
Each
(god, its taken me like a half dozen tries to send this, I'm not sure when
I became this stupid, but it hurts...it hurts)
From rec.photo.equipment.medium-format
http://www.hasselblad.com/news/newsItem.asp?secId=224itemId=2534iShowYear=20
03
Uh-oh, they used that businesspeak buzzword,
Hey Mike, your trolling now for another thread full of endless speculation.
You know what I think of it. You gonna offer us more 'secret/insider knowledge' that
you can't say anything more about. Give it a rest...
Bob S.
In a message dated 2/3/2003 8:38:15 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL
Manhattan sounds good to me. I will probably be coming in via Metro North,
so a starting point easily accessible by public transportation would be
good.
I'd much rather hear this than all the mean spirited, ill-reasoned
ranting we've been subjected to lately.
tv
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 2:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tantalizing news
Hey
MC Last month's cold snap brought some really nice snow to west Michigan, and
MC the opportunity for more snow crystal photography. I just updated my
MC website with 30 new snow crystal photographs. These were shot with an
MC Mz-S, AF360 flash, various extension tubes, bellows, and either a
Remember the guy who moved away from Manassas in the Civil War after the
First Battle of Bull Run, to get away from the fighting, to a peaceful place
called Appomattox...and the surrender was signed in his living room.
(Am I remembering this correctly?)
Yes, you are. Mr. McLean. First
Michael,
I have found that the Epson 2450 does a better job on that front than
the Minolta film scanner. I believe that the diffused light source in
the lid makes the difference. I have taken some dirty slides and
found that on the Epson they are not nearly as bad. Probably 2-3
times cleaner.
Ryan,
But everyone is already saying that Canon 1DS is competing head to
head with 645 already. Why bother? The next generation of chips will
probably surpass it. On the film front, there still may be advantages
(cost for sure) in using 67. In the end, maybe it will have a longer
life than
I'll add the list-cliche me too! as well :-)
I live upstate, but Amtrak gets me there...
-Mat
Amita Guha wrote:
Could you guys please include me as well, in case my plans for that
weekend fall through? Thx.
Mike,
Anytime there is an acquisition, changes are going to happen.
Philosophies between the companies. Usually the Acquirer is more
money oriented (that's why they are doing the acquiring). That will
always have an effect on how business is done in the future - Sales,
Marketing and Support can
Bruce wrote:
I've looked over the 67II and can't see
any radical way to shrink the size. I'm sure little cuts here and
there would shrink it a bit - maybe using more materials like in the
MZ-S would reduce it's weight a bit more.
It can anything from update of the current version to a 6X7
Rob wrote:
Seriously, this statement is a little strange. I think we had all
expected it to be 'mid-level'. Its not going to be an MZ-60 type thing
is it??
You cannot take the rumors at this stage litterally. It probably only means that it is
competitively priced and not top of the line.
Rob wrote:
This would answer the constant criticism of Pentax not having changeable
backs perhaps?
Very unlikely as this will make the camera larger, not smaller. Besides, I suspect the
interchangeable back crowd will go digital real soon, if not already. No, this is
again the MF field
Me, too. It actually gives me something that I'm willing to converse
about on this list. Keep it up!
Bruce
Monday, February 3, 2003, 11:27:54 AM, you wrote:
t I'd much rather hear this than all the mean spirited, ill-reasoned
t ranting we've been subjected to lately.
t tv
-Original
Just got back from a trip from DC/Baltimore to The Grand Canyon. I just
asked the security guys to hand inspect my film. They had no issues. I had
ASA 50, 100 and 400 films and they were extremely polite about not x-raying
them.
To make it quick and easy I had the film in zip-lock bags at the
Please remember there are a number of women on this list, too.
And that's another good thing about this list. I used to teach photography
at a girls' school, and it was nice to be able to point out that there have
been significant female photographers virtually from the medium's beginnings
until
ALL the signs (and the new Federal security staff) warn against ANY speed
film in checked baggage. Carry it on and ask for hand inspection regardless
of film speed (the signs in security say anything below 800 is safe. I
wasn't going to push it.).
Christian Skofteland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
-Original Message-
From: gfen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
ack! it is 2/22/03, look up - look at subject line --
compare to calendar on
wall.
annsan tsktsks :)
2/22 is the Friday, I thought more people were compelled
for the
The only downside to the PZ-20, a wonderful, inexpensive little camera, is that
owning one will make you buy a PZ-1p right away.
--
Bob Keefer
Keefer Photography
(541) 914-9259
www.bkpix.com
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, tom wrote:
You're looking at last year's calendar. 2/22/03 is a Saturday.
-cough-
Actually, I was. Whoops.
--
http://www.infotainment.org - more fun than a poke in your eye.
http://www.eighteenpercent.com- photography and portfolio.
Dually noted and recorded,Bob.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Keefer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 12:17:18 -0800
To: Pentax group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PZ-20 owners
The only downside to the PZ-20, a wonderful, inexpensive little
camera, is that
Does the possible damage apply to both negative and slide film?
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 5:21 PM
Subject: Re: New Thread - Air Travel and film
- Original Message -
From: Cesar
Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please remember there are a number of women on this list, too.
And that's another good thing about this list. I used to teach photography
at a girls' school, and it was nice to be able to point out that there have
been significant female photographers
Bill,
Great information!
Thanks,
Bruce
Monday, February 3, 2003, 12:00:58 PM, you wrote:
BL Bruce wrote:
BL An interesting angle for me is that the 120 roll film is spooled on
BL plastic cores so theoretically I could walk through the metal detector
BL with them on my person. Has anyone
Please remember there are a number of women on this list, too.
Yeah, there are, what, four of us? g We lost that nice lady from New
Zealand, right?
I could probably say a few choice words about Pentax husbands, as well,
but I'll save that for another day. vbg
Frank usually does the TPDML,and he still talks to us,so it cannot
be that bad of a jobG
btw ALL 6 of us managed to get together in one spot for a change,
even though Aaron was a captaive audienceg Hopefully
Vic can make one, one of these days.
Dave
On
I'm still resisting the PZ-1p
--- David Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dually noted and recorded,Bob.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Keefer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 12:17:18 -0800
To: Pentax group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PZ-20 owners
I checked a calendar Fri is the 21st, Sat 22nd, Sun 23rd. We are off to a
great start gang. VBG
BUTCH
Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself.
Hermann Hess (Damien)
Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just discovered a very inexpensive source for inkjet inks,
Tyler-Martin (www.tylermartin.com). Canon inks for my S800, for instance,
are $11.95 at the CompUSA down the street, whereas Tyler-Martin's
equivalents are $2.95 or $2.85. I haven't used these
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 01:39 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Me, too. It actually gives me something that I'm willing to converse
about on this list. Keep it up!
Bruce
Me, too. Spill yer guts.
Dan Scott
I don't think the words fine art and affordable go together in the same
sentance :)
Feroze
Mark Roberts Wrote:
Wow, their prices are amazing. Do keep us informed as to how the stuff
works. Could really take the sting out of home printing.
Now if I could just find a way to make fine art
I use Mozilla, which is the same as Netscape basically, but it is the open
source version of it.
http://www.mozilla.org
One of the nicest features is the tabbed browsing. New windows open in the
same browser window, and ad a tab for the new window, rather then a complete
new seperate window.
But does it work, I just need to browse the net, and see the PUG, not too
much to ask for is it?
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: PUG access.
I use Mozilla, which is the same
Hi All,
Does anyone have any experience with the 2.5/28mm (not 2.8) Panagor
wideangle (62mm filter, it is multicoated. I think it was made by Kino
Precision Optics and also marketed as Vivitar (series 1?)
I can buy one, mechanical its feel very nice, but I don't have the time this
moment to
Thanks for all the suggestions. Ken Archer had the hoods mentioned and
brought them and some of his other goodies over today. I ended up
buying the hood for the 85-210/4.5 and he picked up the tab for lunch,
too. :-) Don't get deals like that too often.
Thanks again,
Dan Scott
In 000c01c2c96e$e323e080$6a55ef9b@angel, on 01/31/03
at 11:22 PM, Feroze Kistan [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
|But does it work, I just need to browse the net, and see the PUG,
|not too much to ask for is it?
I ditched netscape in favour of mozilla over a year ago and have had
no complaints WRT
If I recall, Pentax also had a patent for a new AF
system along with the KAF3 mount.
I wonder how different this AF will be. Cross sensors?
More AF pts? Faster?
Peter
--- Pål_Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob wrote:
This would answer the constant criticism of Pentax
not having
Hi, Mike and Mark,
I have a friend who's a children's librarian at the Toronto Public Library. If such
a book exists, my guess is that she'll know of it.
I've sent her an e-mail, and I'll let you (and the list) know if she's familiar with
it.
regards,
frank
Mike Johnston wrote:
Mark
It seems that with DSLR's that entry-level is more
like a mid-level 35mm SLR.
The Canon D60 Nikon D100 are entry-level DSLR's
for both companies, and are based on mid-level 35mm
SLR's.
Go figure...
Peter
--- Pål_Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob wrote:
Seriously, this statement
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
