On 13/8/05, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Shot a few more pics on Woodward last night. I tried an even slower
shutter speed. This one is at 7/10ths of a second, f8, ISO 400. It was
shot just after the ball went down. And it's a Ford, which should
please of resident Ford man, Mr.
On 13/8/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
There were a bunch of teenagers there who had set up an inflatable
mini-tramp, and were running at top speed down the dune (half falling,
mostly out of control), then jumping onto the trampoline and into the
water. They looked like they
On 13/8/05, Juan Buhler, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm in the street in SF, in a flea market.
Someone has an ME winder, in the box, for $6.
If anyone's interested, send me an email within 10-15', and I'll grab
it for you.
I thought I was bad enough connecting up now and then in my Land Rover
Thanks, Don.
I aguess my answer to making bad shots is: The lens isn't good enough -
or - The AF is too slow.
The real reason is that I'm not careful enough to make shure the speed and
aperture is OK. Take a look at these. Click on the shots to examine my
descriptions:
Yes, I agree. It has a sort of timeless quality; could almost have been
taken in the 50s.
Mind you, it is Canada. :-)
John
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 08:34:28 +0100, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13/8/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
There were a bunch of teenagers there
Jens Bladt escribió:
A Tokina AT-X will be mine for appr. 700 Euro (870 USD) in Germany (EU: No
taxes):
http://tinyurl.com/cugh7
That's still a lot of money (sigh) for a 1-2 stops faster lens. But a little
cheaper than than the Sigma Telephoto 70-200mm f/2.8 EX APO IF HSM: appr
1100 USD. (BH
Thanks, Carlos. (What a whife!)
I agree, the F 70-210 realy is a very good lens. Sometimes I just wish I had
the extra speed.
So, MP Superstore shows the wrong photo. They seem to be selling the FA 2.8
80-200mm for 1400 USD? That's a very attractive price. (It's listed here at
5000 USD !! I can't
Jens Bladt wrote:
This sounds to me like a very good idea. I can certainly imagine myself
misplacing stuff all the time :-)
BTW: The ones I like best, judging from pics and description), among those
offered at ebay are:
The
Canon Eos vest
and the
Fotodiox vest (Deluxe Pro Photo Vest)
Jens Bladt
Thanks Cotty, and thanks to all who commented.
Paul
On Aug 14, 2005, at 3:31 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 13/8/05, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Shot a few more pics on Woodward last night. I tried an even slower
shutter speed. This one is at 7/10ths of a second, f8, ISO 400. It was
shot
On 14/8/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
The only drawback is that it makes you look like either a dweeb or a
pro. So people stare and try to charge you pro rate for photo tickets.
Hi Mike,
What is a photo ticket?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
Thanks for the comments, Frank. As far as the focal length, this was
taken with the lens at 7.8mm. From the Pentax description .this
7.8mm-39mm lens offers a focal range covering angles of view
equivalent to those of a 37.5mm-187.5mm lens in 35mm format.
On 8/13/05, frank theriault [EMAIL
Several years ago I was able to pickup a Vivitar Series I 70-210/3.5. Only
1/2 stop slower that a 2.8 and $100.00.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2005 6:37 PM
Subject: Dreaming of a fast 70-210mm or
Hi Jens:
I am afraid I can't show you any of my shots with the FA* 80-200 2.8, as
so far I have been too lazy to invest some time and effort to look for
an Internet server to exhibit some of my photos.
I also had the chance to play with the Sigma 70-200 2.8, it is
slightly sharper than the
Agreed, I've done much better with Tamron and Tokina.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Carlos Royo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2005 8:59 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: SV: Dreaming of a fast 70-210mm or 80-200mm AF zoom
snip
My experience with Sigma
Cotty wrote:
On 14/8/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
The only drawback is that it makes you look like either a dweeb or a
pro. So people stare and try to charge you pro rate for photo tickets.
Hi Mike,
What is a photo ticket?
In a lot of places now you have to pay extra
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: Re: Photo Vest
In a lot of places now you have to pay extra to take photos. You have to
pay _a lot_ extra if you want to use the pictures professionally. One
place I went in had a ticket for about £2, no time limit. If you wanted
This one time, at band camp, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carlos - do you have any 2.8/80-200mm Pentax shots to show me (us)?
I purchased a Tokina 80-200 AT-X Pro off a fellow list member. The results
were surpising, a little soft at 200mm but good results like this
I only owned two Sigma lenses, hence I cannot speak generally about Sigmas.
However, the 70-210/3.5-4.5 APO Macro I owned for many years (before it was
stolen) was one of my best lenses ever (both mechanically and optically),
and my great appreciation for it was one of the two reasons because I
On 8/14/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought I was bad enough connecting up now and then in my Land Rover
for a gander - you're on the street? Don't tell me, you can get a hotspot
on the back of your *ist D ??
Yep, the latest firmware update runs Firefox... the keyboard sucks though
I have to second that, these are fantastic lenses that can be had quiet
inexpensively, though the difference is more like 2/3 stop.
Bill Owens wrote:
Several years ago I was able to pickup a Vivitar Series I 70-210/3.5.
Only 1/2 stop slower that a 2.8 and $100.00.
Bill
- Original
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: mike wilson
Subject: Re: Photo Vest
In a lot of places now you have to pay extra to take photos. You have
to pay _a lot_ extra if you want to use the pictures professionally.
One place I went in had a ticket for about £2, no time
Well, it's a slow list day, so I'll post another cruise pic. This one's
a Great Grape Cuda or Challenger. I'm guessing a Challenger. ISO 400,
FA 35/2, fi @ 1/3 second.
Paul
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3633673size=lg
I'm very happy with the performance of my Vivitar Series 1 70-210/3.5.
Very sharp and contrasty. However, I find my self using the DA 50-200
more and more, due to its size and excellent performance. The loss of a
stop plus isn't often a problem for me. However, I will pull out the
Vivitar when
On Aug 13, 2005, at 3:54 PM, frank theriault wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3631907size=lg
frank!
You've dashed the hope of your signature line and gone sharp on us.
How sad!! ...
]'-)
Great shot, really. Timeless. You've caught Youth and Summer in this
frame.
On Aug 14, 2005, at 12:39 AM, Cotty wrote:
I thought I was bad enough connecting up now and then in my Land Rover
for a gander - you're on the street? Don't tell me, you can get a
hotspot
on the back of your *ist D ??
I have logged into Amazon and checked a book price or two while in a
On Aug 14, 2005, at 8:40 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Well, it's a slow list day, so I'll post another cruise pic. This
one's a Great Grape Cuda or Challenger. I'm guessing a
Challenger. ISO 400, FA 35/2, fi @ 1/3 second.
Paul
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3633673size=lg
Gads,
On 14/8/05, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well, it's a slow list day, so I'll post another cruise pic. This one's
a Great Grape Cuda or Challenger. I'm guessing a Challenger. ISO 400,
FA 35/2, fi @ 1/3 second.
Paul
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3633673size=lg
On Aug 14, 2005, at 8:44 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I'm very happy with the performance of my Vivitar Series 1
70-210/3.5. Very sharp and contrasty. However, I find my self using
the DA 50-200 more and more, due to its size and excellent
performance. The loss of a stop plus isn't often a
On 14/8/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
In a lot of places now you have to pay extra to take photos. You have
to pay _a lot_ extra if you want to use the pictures professionally. One
place I went in had a ticket for about £2, no time limit. If you wanted
a pro ticket, it was
Back in 2001, I was in San Luis Obispo during a weekend drive along
the coast. In a photo store there, I found a K85/1.8 for I think $180
and a K30/2.8 for $99. I don't remember the prices exactly, but they
turned out to be a bargain. I wasn't familiar with those lenses, so I
went to the local
Cotty wrote:
On 14/8/05, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well, it's a slow list day, so I'll post another cruise pic. This one's
a Great Grape Cuda or Challenger. I'm guessing a Challenger. ISO 400,
FA 35/2, fi @ 1/3 second.
Paul
No Chargers in this batch. A supercharged Duster, but no Chargers. I'll
have to look for one later this week. Rainy weather moved in last
night, so I haven't been back out, but I'm hoping it clears out by
Tuesday. I'll be at home tomorrow, because my daughter and
granddaughter are arriving
Thanks Godfrey. Lots of fun.
On Aug 14, 2005, at 11:54 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Aug 14, 2005, at 8:40 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Well, it's a slow list day, so I'll post another cruise pic. This
one's a Great Grape Cuda or Challenger. I'm guessing a Challenger.
ISO 400, FA 35/2, fi @
Cotty wrote:
On 14/8/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
In a lot of places now you have to pay extra to take photos. You have
to pay _a lot_ extra if you want to use the pictures professionally. One
place I went in had a ticket for about £2, no time limit. If you wanted
a pro
From: Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bob.blakely.com/Cake_4.jpg Watch out - large file!
Thanks for the comments, Guys!
These are the particulars I forgot to include...
LX, SMCP 35-105/3.5 @ unknown/5.6, Combination soft box/bounce on camera -
white ceiling.
Regards,
Bob...
Well done Paul. The kid riding shotgun is soo clear - almost sharp.
Great technique.
Powell
Well, it's a slow list day, so I'll post another cruise pic. This one's
a Great Grape Cuda or Challenger. I'm guessing a Challenger. ISO 400,
FA 35/2, fi @ 1/3 second.
Paul
On 14/8/05, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
my daughter and
granddaughter are arriving from Scotland. Happy times.
Ach aye! Time for a wee dram!
Have a good time.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
-Original Message-
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have logged into Amazon and checked a book price or two
while in a local bookstore with my phone... Embarassing, eh?
but I hate to pay $40 for a book I can get for $25 by waiting
two days. ;-)
That's why
On Aug 14, 2005, at 10:02 AM, Bob W wrote:
That's why there'll be no more bricks mortar bookstores in a few
years.
Amazon will charge whatever they want, and we will have lost the
pleasure of
browsing for books. You won't be able to talk to knowledgable staff
about
the books. The town
Hi Godfrey
thanks for your comment.
The flowers and the fly had that saturated color, there was not manipulation
done on the computer later.
The red is indeed very strong ;-)
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 13,
Hi Paul
I find your experiments very interesting and would like to see more, maybe
combined with flash?
The Ford is well done.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2005 4:35 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re:
Hi Frank
I agree with all of the comments so far.
I lovely photo of a wonderful place, taken in the right moment and with a
good composition.
greetings
Markus
, as were the
spectators. I snapped a few, including this one:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3631907size=lg
Comments
Hi Pentaxians
I have two 55mm filters stuck together and would like to ask for
an advice to separate them.
I can not hold each of them easily to turn them because of the
little ring area, is there anything
I can do without damaging one of the filters?
greetings
Markus
- Original Message -
From: E.R.N. Reed
Subject: Re: Winder ME, anyone?
I have a reverse story -- one day I happened to be looking through my
recommendations list from Amazon and there was a book I'd never heard
of, but it looked really, really interesting. I happened to be passing
- Original Message -
From: Markus Maurer
Subject: How-to separate 2 stuck filters
Hi Pentaxians
I have two 55mm filters stuck together and would like to ask for
an advice to separate them.
I can not hold each of them easily to turn them because of the
little ring area, is there
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Aug 14, 2005, at 10:02 AM, Bob W wrote:
That's why there'll be no more bricks mortar bookstores in a few
years.
Amazon will charge whatever they want, and we will have lost the
pleasure of
browsing for books. You won't be able to talk to knowledgable staff
Hi Bill
I will buy gloves tomorrow and try your recommendation.
thanks!
Markus
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2005 7:58 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: How-to separate 2 stuck filters
- Original Message -
At 01:58 PM 8/14/2005, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Markus Maurer Subject: How-to
separate 2 stuck filters
Hi Pentaxians
I have two 55mm filters stuck together and would like to ask for an
advice to separate them.
I can not hold each of them easily to turn them
You can also try tying a piece of string tightly around one of them and
using the leverage to twist it off the other.
Amita
There exists small plastic filter wrenches. They are little split ring
devices with handles sticking out and take up almost no room in the bag.
They come in a variety of sizes and each one fits a small range of filter
sizes. I own 4 which covers most all my filter sizes. I've used them several
This is what I use.
Paste together in your browser...
http://cgi.ebay.com/Lense-Filter-Wrench-2-pack-for-46-60-MM-filters-NEW_W0QQitemZ7537846308QQcategoryZ79000QQssPageNameZWD1VQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
Regards,
Bob...
-
The art of
But even if all the local bookstores are parts of chains, there is still a
good argument for buying from them rather from Amazon when you have the
chance. And that is that it keeps a lot of the money local, in the wages of
the staff, brings in ancillary work, such as cleaning, from the local area,
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, P. J. Alling wrote:
Bill Owens wrote:
Several years ago I was able to pickup a Vivitar Series I 70-210/3.5. Only
1/2 stop slower that a 2.8 and $100.00.
I have to second that, these are fantastic lenses that can be had quiet
inexpensively, though the difference is
I hope this paranoia gets quickly trampled.
http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,16202163%5E15306%5E%5Enbv%5E
,00.html
50-200mm is a brilliant zoom range. I'd love to have a 50-200 F2.8 :-\
Jens Bladt
cand. arch.
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 14. august 2005 18:02
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Dreaming of a fast
The Vivitar Series 1 3.5/70-210mm is MF, isn't it?
To me maunal focus is not realy an option for reportage work.
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 14. august 2005 20:38
Til:
Or, two flat rubber surfaces could work too. Try a pair of rubber
flip-flops or something like that. Do as Bill said, sandwiching the
filters, pressing and twisting.
j
On 8/14/05, Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bill
I will buy gloves tomorrow and try your recommendation.
thanks!
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote further down:
Bob W wrote directly below:
That's why there'll be no more bricks mortar bookstores in a few
years.
Amazon will charge whatever they want, and we will have lost the
pleasure of browsing for books. You won't be able to talk to
knowledgable
What kind of places would that be, Mike?
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 14. august 2005 16:12
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Photo Vest
Cotty wrote:
On 14/8/05, mike wilson,
LOL!
That's a really good one, William !
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 14. august 2005 16:32
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Photo Vest
- Original Message -
From: mike
Funny, when I first read that I thought Victorian was being used in
an editorial manner to describe the attorney general. Then I realized
it referred to the state of Victoria...
j
On 8/14/05, Powell Hargrave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope this paranoia gets quickly trampled.
Where I live there's alrady laws and regulations covering this field.
Try to check out what available information the local (photo)journalist
union may have on this issue.
Funny enough, I have just downloaded several documents about this - a few
minutes ago - from the Danish Journalist Union. I'm
Jens Bladt wrote:
What kind of places would that be, Mike?
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
I've already mentioned Prague Castle/Cathedral but there are plenty of
similar places that do the same. It seems to be abused by many if the
attraction has a high number of
Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've bought an awful lot from Amazon over the years, but almost only when I
haven't been able to get the book locally (which includes the West End of
London).
Support your local shops.
I have never bought anything from Amazon. Ever.
(Sometimes I buy from
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most places now, the only book shops are large chains such as Chapters or
BN. The small players are already forced out.
We've already witnessed it happen with camera stores, it'll happen soon
enough with bookstores.
Ah Bill, I wish you'd had a chance to
Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use the SMC Pentax-F 4-5.6/70-210mm a lot.
But it's often too slow.
The FA 2.8 Pentax 80-200mm is almost three times as expensive as a similar
Sigma lens.
A Tokina 2.8 AT-X 80-200mm is only appr. 50% of the Sigma. This makes the
Pentax lens is 6 times as
Thanks Markus. I am going to try some with a bit of flash on trailing
curtain shutter, but the weather has turned. I'm hoping that i have
another chance to shoot a bit during the week. The cruise concludes
next Saturday.
Paul
On Aug 14, 2005, at 1:35 PM, Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Paul
I find
On 8/13/05, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day Frank,
An absolutely stunning shot.
Thanks, David.
You've caught the action at the perfect
moment, composition, focus DOF are all spot on.
I would have normally liked to pan this type of shot, to get motion
blur, and to separate the
BTW folks:
Bob Shell Defense Fund
c/o Davis Associates LLC.
9502-A Lee Highway
Fairfax, VA 22031
I'm sure anything you could contribute would be much appreciated.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
On 8/14/05, Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Frank
I agree with all of the comments so far.
I lovely photo of a wonderful place, taken in the right moment and with a
good composition.
greetings
Markus
Markus, Cotty, Godfrey, John,
Thanks for your thoughts and comments. I really
On 8/12/05, Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I resent this one since I got no reactions so far...
sorry if you see it twice.
Markus
I like the second one (fly on the flower) best, because of the bright
colours. The green fly is interesting.
The double-decker bees are interesting (At
On 8/14/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it's a slow list day, so I'll post another cruise pic. This one's
a Great Grape Cuda or Challenger. I'm guessing a Challenger. ISO 400,
FA 35/2, fi @ 1/3 second.
Paul
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3633673size=lg
The
Put on a pair of rubber gloves (dishwashing latex gloves will work).
Sandwich the two filters in the palms of your hands and twist them apart.
William Robb
Thanks, Bill. You solved my problem.
Lewis
_
Dont just search. Find.
As a result of an off-list discussion, I modified this one that I
initially posted yesterday, in two ways:
First, on the original, I sharpened only the jumper, and not the
background, with the result that the background is more OOF-looking
than on the print. On Version 1.1 I've sharpened the
Maybe, but more likely not.
Most places now, the only book shops are large chains such as Chapters or
BN. The small players are already forced out.
We've already witnessed it happen with camera stores, it'll happen soon
enough with bookstores.
William Robb
I think you are right. However,
My local cathedral has now completely banned amateur
photgraphy in its grounds. You can't even take a picture of
the exterior parts that are inside the cathedral precinct. I
imagine that the worst that would happen if you were caught
would be eviction.
You could always claim
Not quite a PAW shot, but I like the textures and the skew-ness of
everything in this photo. It seems a photo of a world where nothing
quite lines up exactly. From an evening in Liverpool ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/31p.htm
Comments and critique always appreciated.
On Aug 14, 2005, at 2:01 PM, frank theriault wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3634511size=lg
For reference, here's the original:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3631907size=lg
Hmm. I tend to like the original rendering more. I think it does a
better job of
On 8/12/05, Raimo K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great picture!
I agree with Raimo!
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On Aug 11, 2005, at 3:15 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
BTW, if you are going to be using an external monitor, keyboard and
mouse on your desktop anyway, you might consider the PowerBook 12
instead of the 15 as it is much smaller and easier for mobility.
Besides the smaller, non-widescreen
On 14/8/05, Markus Maurer, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hi Bill
I will buy gloves tomorrow and try your recommendation.
thanks!
Markus
Elbow length gloves work better. Get good quality rubber. Black's nice.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 14/8/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
My local cathedral has now completely banned amateur photgraphy in its
grounds. You can't even take a picture of the exterior parts that are
inside the cathedral precinct.
Why?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
Cotty wrote:
On 14/8/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
My local cathedral has now completely banned amateur photgraphy in its
grounds. You can't even take a picture of the exterior parts that are
inside the cathedral precinct.
Why?
Because.
I suspect the powers (or maybe
Hi Frank,
There's something to be said for the new version. I like the
sharpneing, and I like the reduced highlights. I would choose it over
the original. But I think you can do better. In the new version, you've
lost all the shadow detail in the leaper's face. I'd go back to the
original and
Very inventive. A fascinating picture. Good work.
Paul
On Aug 14, 2005, at 6:44 PM, Marco Alpert wrote:
http://www.alpert.com/marco/pdml/peso21.html
Comments welcomed.
-Marco
Hi Frank
you overdid it for me.
The face of the jumper is too dark now and I don't mind the background and
the people there being a bit on the light and overexposed side because it
draws the attention more on the main subject.
Your second version is not an improvement for me therefore, maybe we
Hi Frank
I agree with your comments, the 2 bees shot is nice for me just for the
special moment and not for the exposure or composition.
thanks for looking
Markus
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2005 10:14 PM
To:
Hi Cotty
I will buy gloves tomorrow and *not* try the things your where probably be
thinking about when you wrote that ;-)
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2005 11:59 PM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: How-to separate 2
Cotty wrote:
On 14/8/05, Markus Maurer, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hi Bill
I will buy gloves tomorrow and try your recommendation.
thanks!
Markus
Elbow length gloves work better. Get good quality rubber. Black's nice.
Cheers,
Cotty
Then a set of glossy black knee length patent
Marco Alpert wrote:
http://www.alpert.com/marco/pdml/peso21.html
Comments welcomed.
-Marco
Geez! That camera (in front) is about the size of a 2 1/4 X 3 1/4 Crown
Graphic!
Thanks Paul
I like this series alot. Now with this Ford you're fair balanced.
I think I started @ Ford the day after they stopped T production.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: A Ford for Ken
Shot a few more pics on
This is what I use.
Paste together in your browser...
http://cgi.ebay.com/Lense-Filter-Wrench-2-pack-for-46-60-MM-filters-NEW_W0QQitemZ7537846308QQcategoryZ79000QQssPageNameZWD1VQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
Regards,
Bob...
--
Bob, thanks very much. I have a 77 mm. thin Heliopan polarizer
Folks -
I have a question - Fujifilm is coming out with S9000
a new camera. This one has 9 Megapixels, 10.7x
optical and 2x digital zoom. I really liked these
specifications very much. I have been trying to
analyze my digital requirements for quite some time
and looks like this one could be a
Folks -
I have a question - Fujifilm is coming out with S9000
a new camera. This one has 9 Megapixels, 10.7x
optical and 2x digital zoom. I really liked these
specifications very much. I have been trying to
analyze my digital requirements for quite some time
and looks like this one could be a
You're welcome Ken, and thanks for the comment.
On Aug 14, 2005, at 8:50 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Thanks Paul
I like this series alot. Now with this Ford you're fair balanced.
I think I started @ Ford the day after they stopped T production.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
This is what I use.
Paste together in your browser...
http://cgi.ebay.com/Lense-Filter-Wrench-2-pack-for-46-60-MM-filters-NEW_W0QQitemZ7537846308QQcategoryZ79000QQssPageNameZWD1VQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
Regards,
Bob...
--
P.S. These are 3.95-4.95 at BH. That eBay price is too high.
Joe
On 8/14/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Frank,
snip But I think you can do better.snip
Oh my God.
A highschool flashback.
cheers,
frank
vbg
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 8/14/05, Marco Alpert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.alpert.com/marco/pdml/peso21.html
Comments welcomed.
That is very weird. I had a print done up this week with the
intentions of posting it as a PAW, but had second thoughts because
seeing it in print, I decided I just didn't like
On 8/14/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not quite a PAW shot, but I like the textures and the skew-ness of
everything in this photo. It seems a photo of a world where nothing
quite lines up exactly. From an evening in Liverpool ...
On 8/12/05, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GOD
I knew he used a Pentax, but I didn't know he was on this list.
If He is, He's a lurker, because I don't recall seeing any posts from
Him (and I'd have likely remembered that...).
vbg
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
