On Feb 4, 2007, at 10:03 AM, Bob W wrote:
http://www.web-options.com/London3/
Very nice pics, but I'm getting Javascript errors.
Parliament Square was invaded by New Zealanders. Here's why:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waitangi_Day#Elsewhere_in_the_World
I didn't know about that... Waitangi
Thanks. I don't know what's causing the Javascript errors. It was
generated by Lightroom. I'm not going to investigate because the new
version will be here at the end of the month, and I shall assume for
the moment that it's fixed.
I didn't know about the giant haka etc. either. I was surprised
But you and I might be sekeleton pieces before that happens, if it
happens at all.
In this case who has been waiting all his life for something that
would never happen and as a consequence use less than ideal quality
optics?
Using DA lenses, at least, you know what you use NOW is the best
1/ As I understand, when Lightroom imports data it copies it to it own
storage area (which means I'd beter have anough space for it). And I
can backup the originals elsewhere once the import is done.
2/ Lightroom also stores previews, its database etc... Can I ask
Lightroom to store *everything*
Question one: What is chimping?
A dumb, derogatory term given to the practice of checking
exposures
on the LCD using the review function.
Oh, no. That's not chimping. Checking exposure (especially with
the
histogram) doesn't involve showing your capture to everyone else.
On 2/4/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question one: What is chimping?
A dumb, derogatory term given to the practice of checking
exposures
on the LCD using the review function.
Oh, no. That's not chimping. Checking exposure (especially with
the
histogram) doesn't
I use Windows Explorer to copy everything from my camera to a big
drive which I use exclusively for storing photos. Then I import them
into Lightroom.
You can tell Lightroom to reference them from their current location
or to copy them into Lightroom's own database.
I prefer the former because
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007, Thibouille wrote:
Yes but we shall see what DA17-70 Pentax will offer us... /4-5.6? /4 ?
/3.5-4.5 ? Mmm
According to Richard Day, who has some connection with Pentax UK, at
dpreview, it will be a DA 17-70mm IF-ED f/4 SDM (Pentax's USM).
--
--Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 15:04:13 -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Question 2 : I have photoshop elements 3.O I believe. Do I need to
upgrade
that?
PSE3 can be used with the latest version of Camera Raw, which is
v3.6. I would recommend upgrading to that version of the RAW
conversion plug-in,
Hi Thibouille,
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 10:00:00 +0100, Thibouille wrote:
1/ As I understand, when Lightroom imports data it copies it to it own
storage area (which means I'd beter have anough space for it).
I think you get the choice, either create copies (taking up much space)
or reference an
Thanks for looking Godfrey.
About the BTW. This has happened before. This is odd. It is displayed in
Norway, but it seem foreigners have difficulties accessing the site.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not Godfrey, but I'm using Lightroom right now preparing a large
slideshow, based on 1500 pictures. It is efficient sorting the images, and
tagging them with meta tags. They are well displayed, with a nice compare
function. After I realised the importance of free HD space it is fast enough
for
FWIW, the battery life on the D200 was supposed to be around 800-900
shots, according to the reviews.
At first, i was lucky to get 150 shots per battery. Now after a number
of cycles, i'm up to something like 300 shots per.
Maybe the Pentax battery needs a few charges to get up to speed as well.
I really do like the idea and the execution Paul. But damn, that facial
expression just kills it for me.
CW
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 6:35 PM
Subject: Re: PESO: The Blizzard
She's not Canadian. We smile in blizzards.
LOL
Good shot Paul. I,as others have said, like the red bag
Probably a good one to BW with the hi iso.
Dave
On 2/4/07, cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really do like the idea and the execution Paul. But damn, that facial
expression just kills
I quess i'm not a foreigner then, as it works for me.
Could be an ok background, but its hard to look at for a long period.
Could just be me, its a low pressure day here, and my sinus's are killing me.:-)
Dave
On 2/4/07, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for looking Godfrey.
About
My 300 F4 works well and feels solid.
My 100-300 is so so.
My 10-20 works well and feels solid.
Dave
On 2/3/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Owens wrote:
From what I've heard and also from limited personal experience,
Sigma lenses are very good optically, but suffer in build
I;m in agreement with all those above.
However its still a nice shot.
Dave
On 2/3/07, Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Marnie
thanks for looking and commenting.
If I ever need an excuse to buy a medium 6x6 format camera I have found it
now ;-)
Somehow I can't get over that 3:2
I like this one.
Nice and sharp, good comp and exposure.
Dave
On 1/31/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorting through some secondary slide storage, I came across this and
found that I still consider some of its shapes pleasing.
Guess it doesn't matter where you find them.
Jack
My 300 F4 works well and feels solid.
My 100-300 is so so.
My 10-20 works well and feels solid.
Dave
The Sigma 300 f/4 APO Macro is clearly a professional quality lens and it
shows both in build and optical performace, a forerunner of the EX series of
lenses. The early Sigma EX 70-200
Looking at the DA 50-200 on BH's site, they state offers focal lengths
equivalent (in the 35mm format) from 76.5mm to 306mm.
Now, I was thinking that the DA lenses have the image circle of the APS
sensor so shouldn't that just be a 50-200?
I guess I could check the 18-55 at 50mm and see how
Thanks, Ann,
You've pretty much summarized my 'secret' feelings about it. For me,
It's an aesthetically pleasing nudge recalled from a good place.
Jack
--- ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you are being too hard on yourself about it -
I like it quite a bit the way it is - I think
I don't really pick up on the sepia'. I do like the contrast and
wonder if a softer tone would compromise it.
An image I can spend time examining.
Like it!
Jack
--- Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Pentaxians
I really like this b/w sepia conversion of a view into the park
behind the
Appreciate it, David.
Jack
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like this one.
Nice and sharp, good comp and exposure.
Dave
On 1/31/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorting through some secondary slide storage, I came across this
and
found that I still consider
On 4/2/07, John Whittingham, discombobulated, unleashed:
The early Sigma EX 70-200 f/2.8 APO is right up there with the best
at that range, even the Canon L series and Pentax FA* lenses.
I don't know about optical quality, but I do know about build quality
between the Sigma and the Canon and I
On 2/4/07, Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Pentaxians
I really like this b/w sepia conversion of a view into the park behind the
Swiss National Museum in Zurich so far.
I hope it will be used in a winter tourism prospect next year but must
rescan it then with the best film scanner I
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5550821
Out for a drive and spotted this sign.
I didi not realize our trucks run on wood up here.
K10D in DNG record mode, adjust in CS and resize for web. One thing
noted, i shot this in Sunny WB but DNG showed it as shot wb of 7100.??
Dave
Thanks Godders. You're right. In fact I PhotoShopped it thinking I
would send it to some of my young ad biz friends who are trying to
build a portfolio. It might make a good spec piece. Perhaps a Coach ad.
Paul
On Feb 3, 2007, at 11:00 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Nice, Paul. Very commercial.
Thanks Alastiar. Just a bit of fun, but a good way to weather the
weather:-)
Paul
On Feb 3, 2007, at 6:58 PM, Alastair Robertson wrote:
Very nice - good selective colour and I think the cellphone and dark
glasses and high heels make it - who cares about the weather!
Alastair
On 2/4/07, Paul
Thanks. Yes, I was going for an ad look. The bag just happened to be
red. I converted it as a color shot, then changed it to BW. In BW, I
really missed the red bag, so I put it back.
Paul
On Feb 3, 2007, at 10:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/3/2007 3:18:59 P.M. Pacific
The early Sigma EX 70-200 f/2.8 APO is right up there with the best
at that range, even the Canon L series and Pentax FA* lenses.
I don't know about optical quality, but I do know about build quality
between the Sigma and the Canon and I can tell you that of the two there
is no contest -
I guess I must be doing too much chimping... :-)
My batteries don't last to long.
I do like the K10D review function better than the *istDS.
I can actually get a pretty good idea of sharpness with the zoom function.
And of course, I'm still reading the instruction manual and looking at
On 2/4/07, cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking at the DA 50-200 on BH's site, they state offers focal lengths
equivalent (in the 35mm format) from 76.5mm to 306mm.
Now, I was thinking that the DA lenses have the image circle of the APS
sensor so shouldn't that just be a 50-200?
I guess
Thanks Ken.
On Feb 3, 2007, at 7:52 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Nice un Paul.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO: The Blizzard and the Bag
Sorry about that. It's here:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?
Nice winter scene.
Dave
On 2/4/07, Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Pentaxians
I really like this b/w sepia conversion of a view into the park behind the
Swiss National Museum in Zurich so far.
I hope it will be used in a winter tourism prospect next year but must
rescan it then
On 2/4/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/4/07, cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm easily corn-fusticated, you see.
You must be, you sent this to a Canon list.
LOL
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Cory,
I don't know about the DA50-200, but my DA16-45 shows an image like a
24-67 equivalent film zoom. The DA lenses are fine, the designs just
have a lot of light fall off at the edges... So much fall off that
they really aren't suitable for 35mm film cameras. Only the middle
2/3rds of the
On Feb 4, 2007, at 6:17 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5550821
Out for a drive and spotted this sign.
I didi not realize our trucks run on wood up here.
You're in Canada, right? ... ]'-)
K10D in DNG record mode, adjust in CS and resize for web. One
Is this with the K10D Bob.
I was hoping Pentax had that problem fixed.No problem with that, yet here.
Dave
On 2/4/07, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess I must be doing too much chimping... :-)
My batteries don't last to long.
I do like the K10D review function better than the
What the BH page is clumsily saying is that the DA50-200 on a Pentax
DSLR replaces the field of view range that a 75-300mm lens provides
on a 35mm film SLR.
G
On Feb 4, 2007, at 5:53 AM, cbwaters wrote:
Looking at the DA 50-200 on BH's site, they state offers focal
lengths
equivalent
On 4/2/07, John Whittingham, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'll amend that, I was referring to optical quality.
No argument. The Sigma 70-200 2.8 APO is a top performer.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
The diner was busy yesterday, breakfast took longer than usual.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/shakers.html
Shot with the K10, DA21 LTD.
f/8, 1/3 second, SR on.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Good one. The lens distortion makes it interesting. Great detail.
Paul
On Feb 4, 2007, at 10:37 AM, William Robb wrote:
The diner was busy yesterday, breakfast took longer than usual.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/shakers.html
Shot with the K10, DA21 LTD.
f/8, 1/3 second,
1/ As I understand, when Lightroom imports data it copies it to it own
storage area (which means I'd beter have anough space for it). And I
can backup the originals elsewhere once the import is done.
When you import files into Lightroom v4.1 beta, you can tell it to
- reference files in
So Bill, you did not really resist, did you? Now, how's DA 21 Ltd doing ;-).
On 2/4/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The diner was busy yesterday, breakfast took longer than usual.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/shakers.html
Shot with the K10, DA21 LTD.
f/8, 1/3
On 2/4/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 4, 2007, at 6:17 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5550821
Out for a drive and spotted this sign.
I didi not realize our trucks run on wood up here.
You're in Canada, right? ... ]'-)
Yes
Thanks all of you who replied.
Well, there is only one problem with Sigma 70-200 2.8 beside its
price. It is over 1 kg in weight. It would seem to me that I will have
to confine myself to focal lengths no longer than 200 mm and actually
I may even confine myself further making my 77 ltd the
Dave, I have the same issue with my K10D. The color temperatures seem
to be off the chart. But who cares really. I agree with Godfrey - I
can get the look I want, so why would I care. Probably next versions
of RAW converters that would have support of K10D PEFs will rectify
this somehow.
By the
- Original Message -
From: Boris LibermanSubject: Re: Peso: salt pepper shakers
So Bill, you did not really resist, did you? Now, how's DA 21 Ltd doing
;-).
It's a very good lens. I am teaching myself to appreciate the focal length,
as it isn't a field of view I have had a lot of
A small gallery, six pictures, from about a year ago at San Francisco's
Farmers' Market.
This is again from the series of
what-I-have-printed-up-recently-and-put-on-my-wall(s). The chard started out as
a much bigger horizontal. But to frame
them and put them up I needed another vertical.
Quite appetizing. I like the rhubarb pic best of all. Nice.
Paul
On Feb 4, 2007, at 11:21 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A small gallery, six pictures, from about a year ago at San
Francisco's
Farmers' Market.
This is again from the series of
Thanks for that info Boris.
As a natter of fact, i have just finished downloading LR beta 4.1 to try.
Dave
On 2/4/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave, I have the same issue with my K10D. The color temperatures seem
to be off the chart. But who cares really. I agree with Godfrey -
This is one that i don't see in the archives or any were else, so i;ll resend.
Flash is upgraded and i tested it the other day.
The first dozen or so on camera shots were all WAY underexposed, then
all of a sudden, they were pretty good, maybe 1/2 stop under.
I tried the wireless, and it works,
In a message dated 2/4/2007 8:33:54 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quite appetizing. I like the rhubarb pic best of all. Nice.
Paul
=
Thanks, Paul. Oh, it's rhubarb, not chard (that's the one I cropped).
Guess I need a quiz on identifying your vegetables.
This is a quick picture I took with it of the girl who tried to victimise
me.
Dang, she don't have no black eye! I thought you said you were gonna give
her one! :-)
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I had a chance to buy a SMC-F 135mm 2:8 off of eBay and took a chance
(BIN $99 + shipping). I am usually a zoom guy, but I am slowly
building my prime lens options. I find the F135 is a pretty sharp
performer but the contrast is a little flat.. It is nothing that
cannot be punched up in post
I wonder if I can convince you to enable me with nice FA * 200/2.8
that you most probably have ;-).
On 2/4/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Boris LibermanSubject: Re: Peso: salt pepper shakers
So Bill, you did not really resist, did you? Now,
I rather like this one, Paul. Nice job!
--
Bruce
Saturday, February 3, 2007, 3:35:12 PM, you wrote:
PS You probably missed part of the url. Try this:
PS http://tinyurl.com/292tx6
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I have read about Tamron 70-300 and looked at sample images. It is
not that much better than FA 80-320 if at all... Several people also
reported that it suffers from CA as well, so the sample variation
seems to be significant.
I've read a few reviews on the Tamron and most seemed quite
I'll amend that, I was referring to optical quality.
No argument. The Sigma 70-200 2.8 APO is a top performer.
I just wish I'd had it with me on Friday walking round the park instead of
the FA 135, I'm still working on some Cormorant shots 8)
John
On Feb 3, 2007, at 9:31 PM, Mat Maessen wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/05.htm
I like it, but it seems like it's missing something. Maybe a bit of
toning to the image?
Was this the one that you printed in sepia as you mentioned in a
previous post to the list? I could
Simple and familiar, yet a light and unique image.
Not a criticism, but my immediate thought was that the salt should be
on the darker left side...as though it matters (not).
Equally unimportant, I might have brushed off the few grains on caps.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enjoyed the veggie gallery. Placements kept me interested.
Good kitchen gallery material.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A small gallery, six pictures, from about a year ago at San
Francisco's
Farmers' Market.
This is again from the series of
OK, after 24-or-so hours of work I have my web site up and running on a
new host... mostly. My former host lost connectivity on Monday and I
grew increasing suspicious about how they were handling it... until I
lost all patience yesterday and signed up with a new hosting company.
All that's
Yes but we shall see what DA17-70 Pentax will offer us... /4-5.6? /4 ?
/3.5-4.5 ? Mmm
According to Richard Day, who has some connection with Pentax UK, at
dpreview, it will be a DA 17-70mm IF-ED f/4 SDM (Pentax's USM).
That sort of makes sense. It'd be a natural step-up from the kit lens
Since we're into the mundane, I'm adding to the food groups by pulling
a fruit shot from my site Blossoms/Etc gallery.
Shot a number of years back. Placed it on a light box which was sitting
in a patch of sunlight on my living room floor.
I held a hand mirror to reflect the sunlight to the shaded
What I like:
The curve of the path and the greater curve of the trees
The strong outline of the trees
What I don't like:
The total loss of sky behind the trees
I'd almost like to see a lower angle or a slightly wider angle to
accentuate the curves.
--
Bruce
Saturday, February 3, 2007,
K10D in DNG record mode, adjust in CS and resize for web. One
thing
noted, i shot this in Sunny WB but DNG showed it as shot wb
of 7100.??
I hardly look at the numbers. I set WB at whatever makes
whites white
and grays gray ...
Godfrey
I keep my cameras on daylight white
Thanks to Bruce all others who looked.
Paul
On Feb 4, 2007, at 12:07 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
I rather like this one, Paul. Nice job!
--
Bruce
Saturday, February 3, 2007, 3:35:12 PM, you wrote:
PS You probably missed part of the url. Try this:
PS http://tinyurl.com/292tx6
--
Hello Markus,
At first, it seemed a little busy without immediately grabbing my
attention. But I looked around the photo and rather liked looking.
Almost like I was there looking around. I think the trees masking all
the buildings so I can't clearly see any of them is kind of cool. All
in all
mmm stop that I have not enough money already ... ;)
2007/2/4, Lawrence Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007, Thibouille wrote:
Yes but we shall see what DA17-70 Pentax will offer us... /4-5.6? /4 ?
/3.5-4.5 ? Mmm
According to Richard Day, who has some connection with Pentax UK, at
Looks virtually prehistoric. Like the lighted feeders' against the
darker trunk. Texture details always add much interest.
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, after 24-or-so hours of work I have my web site up and running on
a
new host... mostly. My former host lost
In a message dated 2/4/2007 10:14:55 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Enjoyed the veggie gallery. Placements kept me interested.
Good kitchen gallery material.
Jack
=
Thanks, Jack. I thought of that. :-) But little room in kitchen, so they are
gracing the
A lot less than with the D IMO but ANY ele ctronic device will act like that.
My Walkman, years ago did the same... wait 10 minutes whenitn says it
exhausted and you get 10 more minutes playing music.
2007/2/4, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is this with the K10D Bob.
I was hoping Pentax
Well, that makes it a little more interesting. I'd like more of a
20-80 constant 3.5 type lens with high optical quality for my wedding
work.
--
Bruce
Sunday, February 4, 2007, 1:32:29 AM, you wrote:
LK On Sat, 3 Feb 2007, Thibouille wrote:
Yes but we shall see what DA17-70 Pentax will
In a message dated 2/4/2007 10:41:48 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since we're into the mundane, I'm adding to the food groups by pulling
a fruit shot from my site Blossoms/Etc gallery.
Shot a number of years back. Placed it on a light box which was sitting
in a patch
except histogram which depends on WB AFAIK
2007/2/4, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
K10D in DNG record mode, adjust in CS and resize for web. One
thing
noted, i shot this in Sunny WB but DNG showed it as shot wb
of 7100.??
I hardly look at the numbers. I set WB at whatever makes
whites
In a message dated 1/20/2007 1:28:31 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Was shooting today at a local Scottish Games event. This guy looklikes like
he was ready for beddy bye! :-)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/naptimeweb.jpg
Nice shot.
Maybe. I never use it.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Thibouille
Sent: 04 February 2007 19:11
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Bio Diesel
except histogram which depends on WB AFAIK
2007/2/4, Bob W [EMAIL
In a message dated 1/17/2007 3:28:56 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Had fun last evening experimenting with the DA70 lens while I was in
San Francisco. I also decided to give the Autoviewer flash display
gizmo a try.
http://www.gdgphoto.com/windowpeople/
Comments,
Was shooting today at a local Scottish Games event. This guy
looklikes like
he was ready for beddy bye! :-)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/naptimeweb.jpg
Nice shot. Really like it. While the woman thrower (heaver,
uh, not sure
what to call her)
Seems to be a complete whiteout...
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Went out to shoot a bit this afternoon in near-blizzard conditions.
Temperature was about -10 C with stiff winds and blowing snow.
Captured this with the K10D on continuous autofocus and the DA 50-200
at 200mm, F9, 1/250th, ISO
Still wimpy, Russian, (WWII), 50 caliber antitank rifle round.
K.Takeshita wrote:
On 2/03/07 5:38 PM, mike wilson, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04/02/07, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More likely a .22
Or baton round.
A BB from a modified air rifle perhaps?
Chimping the video...
http://www.sportsshooter.com/special_feature/chimping/
Sandra Hermann wrote:
Question one: What is chimping?
Question 2 : I have photoshop elements 3.O I believe. Do I need to upgrade
that?
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/mypics/698154
From: Paul
I'd have hit him first...
Bob W wrote:
Thanks. I had a very enjoyable and quite interesting day. When I saw
all the police I thought there was a demo in Parliament Square, which
is illegal now. So I thought I'd join in - I wouldn't care what the
demo was about, within reason, I'd do it just
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman
Subject: Re: Peso: salt pepper shakers
I wonder if I can convince you to enable me with nice FA * 200/2.8
that you most probably have ;-).
Sadly, I can't do that for you. I do have a nice Tokina 80-200/2.8.
I want to keep it though.
William
Photo.net seems to be down.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
You probably missed part of the url. Try this:
http://tinyurl.com/292tx6
--
--
The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
-- Anne Louise Germaine de Stael
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
It could have been nearly spent. From what I know the AK47 is very good
at penetration at medium and close range.
Bob W wrote:
More likely a .22
Or baton round.
A BB from a modified air rifle perhaps? ;-)
Sucker arrow from a toy crossbow?
Oh, wimpy
The tomato shot is easily my favorite. Two very neat patterns - the
diagonal baskets holding them and the colors of the tomatoes. Very
nicely seen and framed.
--
Bruce
Sunday, February 4, 2007, 8:21:23 AM, you wrote:
Eac A small gallery, six pictures, from about a year ago at San
$99 is a good deal for an F135/2.8. .Regards, Bob S.
On 2/4/07, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had a chance to buy a SMC-F 135mm 2:8 off of eBay and took a chance
(BIN $99 + shipping). I am usually a zoom guy, but I am slowly
building my prime lens options. I find the F135 is a
It's actually kind of a cool shot. I guess it is because of the angle
and how the shakers seem to be leaning out, thanks to the wide angle
lens. 1/3 second looks pretty sharp - seems the SR is a good thing.
Nice shot, Bill.
--
Bruce
Sunday, February 4, 2007, 7:37:50 AM, you wrote:
WR The
I'm still using a CRT, and while it's not readily apparent at web
resolution, in the browser, I was able to download the picture and see
the streak with Photoshop.
Cotty wrote:
On 3/2/07, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty,
It's gotta be my laptop monitor, but I see
I have to smile at your comment on the weight. After using an
80-200/2.8 from Tokina, I finally sold it because of weight. That is
what led me to the A 70-210/4. Optically as good, but much lighter
and usable than the 2.8 series of lenses. I had really hoped that
Pentax would have released the
Now I can open it. Funny.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
You probably missed part of the url. Try this:
http://tinyurl.com/292tx6
--
--
The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
-- Anne Louise Germaine de Stael
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I must say that the DA70 is on my short list at this time. Your shot
is very nice and only tempts me further.
--
Bruce
Sunday, February 4, 2007, 8:20:55 AM, you wrote:
WR - Original Message -
WR From: Boris LibermanSubject: Re: Peso: salt pepper shakers
So Bill, you did not
You're probably right. Silkypix, which supports the K10D PEF, is
showing the color temperatures right about where I expect them, so
other programs will probably also do that as they provide K10D
support.
--
Bruce
Sunday, February 4, 2007, 8:16:47 AM, you wrote:
BL Dave, I have the same issue
Markus,
I can see now where our Smithsonian Institute borrowed it's architecture.
Regards, Bob S.
On 2/4/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Markus,
At first, it seemed a little busy without immediately grabbing my
attention. But I looked around the photo and rather liked
http://www.canon.com/camera-museum/tech/l_plant/f_index.html
That's pretty intensive!
--
--
Cheers,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MichaelHamilton.ca
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Jack,
That's a good looking strawberry!
Part of you vegetables you can photograph at home series?
Regards, Bob S.
On 2/4/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since we're into the mundane, I'm adding to the food groups by pulling
a fruit shot from my site Blossoms/Etc gallery.
Shot a number
Dave, Yes...using the K10D. That's why I have 3 batteries.Bob S.
On 2/4/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this with the K10D Bob.
I was hoping Pentax had that problem fixed.No problem with that, yet here.
Dave
On 2/4/07, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess I
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
