)
to ease this confusion, but I suspect not.
Ed Jones
Bibliographic and Metadata Services Coordinator
National University Library
9393 Lightwave Avenue
San Diego, California 92123-1447
+1 858 541 7920 (voice)
+1 858 541 7997 (fax)
and unambiguous results, even
if the cuteness of the original layout might be ignored. If it was felt
that some users might think Canadian bibliographies canadiennes, etc.,
was the actual title, a note and access point could always be made from
that form.
Ed Jones
-Original Message-
From
whether a given RDA
rule represents an actual change from AA2 or simply a rephrasing or
rearrangement. This would also help identify unintentional changes, resulting
when a rephrasing or rearrangement places a rule in a different context,
producing different, and unintended, results.
Ed Jones
�!��]���j�z��ם��m��m�+0�Yg���� ,+ �'�j�a�'��%n�Z��-���v���曊X���+zX�n\��Yhq�^��b}��z{bj
���*
��a���r�ݲڲ+(~ǫ���(��Lz���k�d^���q�ޱ���ب���� ���z�.�ǃz�+��b�v�t z�(���jW�|� E焖� I��I�x�m��M:�M9 ��D0
�NHDU4��4 � Įn7���-'�����ܢ{k�Y^u� z�)�)�Z+a���� ���zƮ�+�ܜ�{k�V�����گ*
and/or
access points as well.
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego)
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin M. Randall
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 7:28 AM
To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA
I would guess this represents a confusion between the pattern in Area 8
of ISBD(CR) [ISSN = Key title] and the pattern in Area 7 [Key title =
ISSN].
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego)
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
, Ed Jones wrote:
Kevin
Yes, a relationship may be expressed in the _form_ of an added entry (just
as we currently do in AACR2), but this is still a note and not necessarily
an added entry:
Continues: United States. Dept. of Labor. Annual report.
Ed
-Original Message-
From: Resource
The return of designations of function to name access points in
RDA--assuming author is among them--could, in theory at least, make
multiple-author displays possible (if that is desired in a particular
context).
Ed Jones
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource
not
that concerned about whether or not RDA declares the statement of
responsibility to be optional.
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego, Calif.)
optional, which would also render its
explicit keying unnecessary.
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego)
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roy Tennant
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 10:07 AM
of alternative label languages) to still
interpret the bibliographic record with reasonable accuracy.
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego)
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind
Sent
element, with its own symbolic label.
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego, Calif.)
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Attig
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 11:09 AM
To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC
/2007, Ed Jones wrote:
I think 7.4.2.0.1 might be better worded as follows:
An equivalent item is a specific item that was reproduced (e.g.
photographed, digitized) to make the resource being described.
All photoreproductions (microform, photocopy, digital image, etc.) are
the reproductions
An
equivalent item is a specific item that was reproduced (e.g.
photographed,
digitized) to make the manifestation being described. In this case, I
guess it would be a one-way relationship.
Renette
At 11:08 AM 7/17/2007, Ed Jones wrote:
I suppose if you were cataloging a unique item (say
is always a
manifestation of one or more items.
Ed Jones
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Maxwell
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 9:56 AM
To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] [CRCC
(ESC)
11200 93rd Ave. North
Maple Grove, MN. 55369
Work phone: 763-391-7183
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Jones
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 5:41 PM
To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA
My understanding is that American Libraries will be publishing the Yee and
Gorman piece shortly (for any who have not already read it in samizdat).
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego, Calif.)
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description
minimum) and
optionality are for implementation of the code and not for the code
itself.
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego, Calif.)
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Myers, John F.
Sent
, should be added to the bibliographic
record.
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego, Calif.)
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karen Coyle
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 8:53 AM
To: RDA-L
According to a news release posted on the JSC website, the four
principal national bibliographic agencies (BL, LAC, LC, and NLA) will
work together towards a common implementation of RDA by the end of 2009.
http://www.collectionscanada.ca/jsc/rdaimpl.html
Ed Jones
National University
The draft report and a cover letter are now available for review at:
http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/news/draft-report.html
Looks like a PRECIS string to me. Derek Austin would be pleased.
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam L. Schiff
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 2:31 PM
To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA
Ripley
Published: Stuttgart : Reclam, 2005.
Herbert Geisen, editor
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego, Calif.)
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access on
behalf of J. McRee Elrod
Sent: Thu 12/6/2007 3:50 PM
To: RDA-L
This is an authority record for George Eliot from the BNF:
Eliot, George (1819-1880) pseudonyme forme internationale
Nationalité(s) : Grande-Bretagne
Langue(s) : anglais
Sexe : féminin
Responsabilité(s) exercée(s) sur les documents : Auteur
Naissance : 1819-11-12, Arbury Hall
And here is the record for Jan Morris. Note the absence of an element for
Sexe (implying no value has been supplied):
Morris, Jan (1926-) forme internationale
Nationalité(s) : Grande-Bretagne
Langue(s) : anglais
Responsabilité(s) exercée(s) sur les documents : Auteur
Naissance : 1926
Remember that RDA is being optimized as an online tool (with hyperlinks,
pop-up definitions, etc., rather than references to later or earlier
sections). Although a print version will be published, the online
version will presumably drive the design.
Ed Jones
National University (San
. This level of
granularity seems unlikely.
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego, Calif.)
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access on
behalf of J. McRee Elrod
Sent: Sun 12/30/2007 9:09 PM
To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L
The mapping of previously released drafts to the new structure of RDA
will be found on pages 23-26 of the cover letter to the current draft
(sections 2-4, 9)
Ed Jones
Bibliographic and Metadata Services Coordinator
National University (San Diego, Calif
body can be said to create a work.
Ed Jones
Bibliographic and Metadata Services Coordinator
National University (San Diego, Calif.)
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Actually, while MARC21 lacks an explicit content designator for forename
in personal name heading fields, the comma in subfield $a can act as a
surrogate when converting from MARC21 into a format that treats forename
as a discrete element.
Ed Jones
-Original Message-
From: Resource
with structured data
that makes this kind of guessing unnecessary, because it will always be
imperfect.
Jonathan
Ed Jones wrote:
Actually, while MARC21 lacks an explicit content designator for
forename
in personal name heading fields, the comma in subfield $a can act as a
surrogate when converting from
-BNC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Future of authority control?
Ed Jones wrote:
Of course, this brings up another question. We currently use surname,
forename as a default display. Is there any way to generate a
natural
order display from our data? I suspect not. The rule that would give
us Mark Twain
display forms for different
catalogs.
kc
Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
Ed Jones wrote:
Of course, this brings up another question. We currently use
surname,
forename as a default display. Is there any way to generate a
natural
order display from our data? I suspect not. The rule that would
give
a reason it's called natural order).
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego, Calif.)
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access on
behalf of J. McRee Elrod
Sent: Sun 1/20/2008 8:15 PM
To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L] Direct
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego, Calif.)
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of A. Ralph Papakhian
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 1:21 PM
To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L
forever on the finer
points, but in practice we'll muddle through.
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego)
I would further simplify it:
6.1.4.1.2
In constructing a variant access point for a work, include the preferred
access point for a person, family, or corporate body whenever this has
been included in the preferred access point for the work (see
6.1.1.1-6.1.1.6).
Ed Jones
National University
These should all represent variant access points on records for works
(authority records in the current system). Part of the confusion may arise
from the fact that examples under RDA instructions tend to exclude elements
that are not addressed in the related instruction, so in the first two
This might be reworded as Changes signaling a new manifestation
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karen Coyle
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 3:48 PM
To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA
Subject:
-contained, as is implied by the term catalog. I try to look at
RDA in this context.
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego, Calif.)
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brenndorfer, Thomas
Sent
record? Wouldn't the link occur at the level of the most
abstract entity that was appropriate, i.e. the work level, since the
component works in the collected stories would presumably remain
constant through the levels of abstraction?
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego, Calif.)
-Original
bibliographic
element in RDA will presumably be related to a given FRBR Group 1
entity?
Ed Jones
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martha Yee
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 12:35 PM
Description and Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernhard Eversberg
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 5:54 AM
To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA resource (?)
Ed Jones wrote:
To me resource corresponds to Vorlage in RAK-WB, and focus of the
description may
that, I think this is more a problem of MARC 21's double-duty
datafields (specifically 245 and 440) than of RDA.
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego, Calif.)
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
for those two elements--then it becomes a MARC problem.
Jonathan
Ed Jones wrote:
This is an artifact of the card catalog, where such double-duty
elements
made perfect sense. The elements involved are typically the title of
the resource being described and/or the title of the resource of which
: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Jones
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 12:46 PM
To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA Vocabularies Project
True: I had forgotten RDA 1.8.
-Original Message-
From: Resource
guidelines for creating
metadata?
I mean, there's nothing to prevent a given implementation community from
ignoring RDA entirely and doing whatever they want. But that sort of
defeats the purpose of RDA if we're _counting_ on that, no?
Am I missing something?
Jonathan
Ed Jones wrote:
Of course
Description and Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karen Coyle
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 5:17 PM
To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA Vocabularies Project
Ed Jones wrote:
RDA is meant to appeal to a variety of user communities, and some of
them may opt not to apply some
Does the statement below supersede the October 2007 agreement on
coordinated implementation of RDA among the BL, LAC, LC, and NLA? Or
will implementation outside the US be suspended as well pending the
outcome of the six-month review by LC, NAL, and NLM?
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego
My guess would be that the metadata Amazon received for this book was
library metadata rather than publisher metadata (since the latter would
have identified the publisher). I would NOT assume from this that
Amazon thought S.N. was anything other than a publisher name.
-Original Message-
into which RDA will be introduced is not very easy to
model, and I don't envy ALA Publishing in their efforts to do so.
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego)
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
mechanisms to data about a subset of offline resources).
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego)
of the whole. As for what we may
lose, this is always a danger, no matter what we do. An item in the
current issue of the journal _Science_ describes researchers' citation
behavior as becoming narrower as journals move online (DOI:
10.1126/science.321.5887.329a).
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego
Jim
Good questions. Remember that I was projecting ten years down the road,
several years after the dawning of the Age of Aquarius...
I didn't mean to imply that the information in a FRBR/RDA record is sacrosanct.
Both FRBR and RDA are derived from existing practice, and I expect that as
in the
bibliographic record for a member of the series. Otherwise, users
searching under variant series titles will not be able to find a
specific resource described in the catalogue that is searched under a
title appearing in that resource (3rd RDA objective under
Responsiveness to user needs).
Ed
which form is
standard and which is variant and and provides access from both? Why
add
options to do inefficiently what certain agencies have decided isn't
worth
doing effectively? Wasn't the point that the agencies thought the data
lacked value?
- Original Message -
From: Ed Jones
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karen Coyle
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 2:59 PM
To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Variant series titles in RDA
Ed Jones wrote:
To give one example of the problem: Berger's Duo for violoncello and
piano is part of a series that is identified
records for items digitized under the various GBS library projects, then there
will be a synergy between GBS and Open WorldCat to mutual advantage, and users
of GBS will be able to exploit the particular strengths of each.
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego)
-Original Message
.
Ed Jones
Assistant Director, Assessment and Metadata Services
National University Library
9393 Lightwave Avenue
San Diego, California 92123-1447
+1 858 541 7920 (voice)
+1 858 541 7997 (fax)
I would recommend people download Karen Coyle's ZIPped copy. It's quick
and easy.
http://www.archive.org/details/ResourceDescriptionAccessrdaDraftNov.2008
Just click on the HTML link.
Ed Jones
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
Thanks, Bernhard. This is extremely useful in reviewing RDA. One can
discover relatively easily whether the instructions work together or
whether additional modifications will be necessary. In lieu of an
online RDA at this stage, your prototype is a godsend.
Ed Jones
National University (San
-level
identifiers by some FRBR-based criteria.
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego, Calif.)
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernhard Eversberg
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 2:37 AM
My understanding of the last sentence of 6.27.1.1 is that the instructions
given under 6.27.3 are applied only for new expressions of an existing work
(not for the first expression), i.e. the instructions relate to distinguishing
these new expressions from the first one.
Ed Jones
National
to reform the way we create authority records, which
remains anchored in the needs of card catalogs.
Thom Hickey did a presentation on VIAF at ELAG 2008, and the PowerPoint
can be downloaded at
http://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/file/formulier/profielelaglt_i00117278_00
1.ppt
Ed Jones
National
this.
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego, Calif.)
PS: It should also be recalled that what we're calling URIs for persons,
etc., within our community derive from numbers originally assigned for ordering
printed card sets. Their primary purpose is still inventory control, even if
now virtual
PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Uniform titles
Ed Jones wrote:
Of course, in the interest of efficient machine mapping, wouldn't it
be
more sensible to record uniform titles (at least those that are
components of work or expression identifiers) in 1XX $t rather than
would throw up my hands and run away. They don't have that
choice.
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego, Calif.)
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:rd...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Mike Tribby
Sent: Thursday, July
less than
people hope, on the one side, or fear, on the other. Of course, if an
appropriate format ever emerges to carry RDA records-and is widely
adopted-all bets are off.
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego, Calif.)
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description
of additions to
the title of the work realized in the expression (e.g., War and Peace becomes
Война и мир. English).
Ed Jones
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:rd...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Karen Coyle
Sent: Wednesday
of the discrete elements are not
represented by controlled values. (Hence the value of any result set based on
a search on those elements involves a certain amount of serendipity.)
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego, Calif.)
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access
by code i
in LDR/18 (if a system wanted to strip such punctuation for its internal
storage or, conversely, add it).
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego, Calif.)
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:rd...@listserv.lac
they
are good enough for our own distinct purposes.
Ed Jones
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:rd...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Bernhard Eversberg
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 1:48 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
competing specific
contexts, FRBR-oo may be the most successful model for managing the crosswalks,
etc., between those contexts.
Ed Jones
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:rd...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Myers, John F
descriptions--the relationships
are conveyed to the human user but may evade the machine.
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego, Calif.)
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:rd...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Karen Coyle
] On Behalf Of Karen Coyle
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 1:48 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Contents of Manifestations as Entities
Quoting Ed Jones ejo...@nu.edu:
Only identifiers and, less happily, preferred access points can
provide a formal entity--relationship
[mailto:rd...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Karen Coyle
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 9:03 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Contents of Manifestations as Entities
Quoting Ed Jones ejo...@nu.edu:
I guess my problem is I don't see a problem. It makes perfect sense
structure.
Again, I'm only proposing this interpretation. I arrive at it by sort of
reverse-engineering RDA.
Ed
-Original Message-
From: Karen Coyle [mailto:li...@kcoyle.net]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 10:30 AM
To: Ed Jones
Cc: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: RE: [RDA-L
@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Contents of Manifestations as Entities
Quoting Ed Jones ejo...@nu.edu:
I guess my problem is I don't see a problem. It makes perfect sense
to me that FRBR treats these as relationships between entities when
it is useful to do so and as attributes
Miserables were entered in an added
entry in the bibs you mention, that relationship is indeed already
described.
Jonathan
Ed Jones wrote:
This will indeed be a challenge if/when we move to a Scenario 1 RDA
implementation (with work/expression records).
To take one example, the musical known
, but
then neither are elevators necessarily required in tall buildings. The stairs
will do.
(3) Indeed
-Original Message-
From: J. McRee Elrod [mailto:m...@slc.bc.ca]
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 11:36 AM
To: Ed Jones
Cc: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Contents of Manifestations
it? Early days yet.
Ed
From: Karen Coyle [li...@kcoyle.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 3:15 PM
To: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access; Ed Jones
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Contents of Manifestations as Entities
Quoting Ed Jones ejo
, in the latter as an attribute of the work,
necessary to differentiate it from others of the same title. We're just not
used to disambiguating the string.
Ed Jones
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:rd...@listserv.lac
In practice, it will be a string that is part of a uniform title (Germany in
the example below):
Catholic Church.
[Treaties, etc. Germany, 1933 July 20]
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:rd...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca]
Ideally, a future data entry system would automatically search a place string
against a standard database and supply an appropriate URI, etc., to accompany
or replace (as appropriate) the transcribed data.
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description
ALA Representative
to the Joint Steering Committee
for Development of RDA
At 05:12 PM 6/29/2010, Ed Jones wrote:
I notice that RDA 0.0 uses ?clarify? and ?understand? rather than the
?contextualize? and ?justify? used in the FRAD text. Is this intentional? If
so, will FRAD
punctuation, triggered by the presence of tags and subfield codes. For
example, the presence of a 250 field would have triggered a . -- _preceding_
the data in that field; the presence of a 250 subfield $b would have triggered
a / preceding the data in that subfield.
Ed Jones
National
From: J. McRee Elrod [...@slc.bc.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 5:59 PM
To: Ed Jones
Cc: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Consolidated ISBD and RDA double punctuation
Ed Jones said:
If USMARC and its successors had been designed
The copyright sign is part of the Extended Latin (ANSEL) character set, which
is one of the MARC-8 character sets.
http://www.loc.gov/marc/specifications/specchartables.html
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
their differences stand out?
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego, Calif.)
. As a consequence, COUNTER
usage reports and similar collection development tools will tend to over-report
the popularity of these less-desired versions.
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego, Calif.)
-Original Message-
From: J. McRee Elrod [mailto:m...@slc.bc.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010
General
Conference and Assembly (IFLA 2010), 10-15 August 2010, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Amanda
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Ed Jones
ejo...@nu.edumailto:ejo...@nu.edu wrote:
By shifting to the user the burden of differentiating and selecting among the
various versions of a resource, we also
advantage of codes in the MARC leader (record label) and 008 to restrict a
search to resources instantly available to the user.
Ed Jones
National University (San Diego, Calif.)
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[rd
I've waited 30 years. I can wait a few more months.
It's worth recalling that even in the days of the card catalog, when the use of
Dept. (like U.S.) conserved precious space on the card, such abbreviations
were filed as though they were spelled out, and curiously enough users read
them as
considered useful for
creating record sets, it should be coded separately in a standardized way
elsewhere in the record. Otherwise, something like the following should
suffice:
http://lccn.loc.gov/75647252, http://marc21.info/element/260, [New York, etc.
Elsevier Inc., etc.]
Ed Jones
be displayed as c1998.
It seems to me that the number of strictly transcribed fields is very
small. Is this a full list?
- title proper
- subtitle
- statement of responsibility
- place
- publisher
kc
Quoting Ed Jones ejo...@nu.edu:
What we need to capture may be the key phrase here
and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Ed Jones
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 11:08 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Linked data
The transcribed fields correspond to ISBD areas 1-4 and 6 (245,
250, 362 [for
serials; other fields for some other
Please ignore my last message, the meaning of which must remain tantalizingly
obscure. The consequence of having too many open messages on my desktop at once
and unwittingly replying to the wrong one.
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and
categorization.
Ed Jones
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 9:03 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Cataloguing kits
there is a
newer version than version 1.0).
http://www.onixtools.de/downloads/ONIX_Code_Lists_Issue_7_Changes.pdf
Ed Jones
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Robert Maxwell
Sent
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
