On 2 October 2013 10:15, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 September 2013 08:12, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com
wrote:
On 29 September 2013 10:05, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
How about saying that 70mph can only be valid on a way
of caution with the numeric limit.
Regards,
Peter
Colin
On 2013-09-29 10:14, Peter Miller wrote:
To attempt to summarise the situation:
- The maximum legal speed for any vehicle should be a number in
maxspeed following by mph.
- There should also be information available to say
I have just noticed that this response went only to Andy. Forwarding to to
the list now.
Peter
On 24 September 2013 14:26, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
Hi Peter,
Thanks for replying here.
Peter Miller wrote:
So...on the basis that we should tag what is there, we see
/listinfo/talk-gbhttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Peter Miller CEO
+44(0) 7774 667213
ITO World Ltd - Registered in England Wales - Registration Number 5753174
Office - 2nd Floor, 25 Lower Brook Street, Ipswich, IP4 1AQ.
Registered Office - 32 Hampstead Heath, London
.
Thoughts?
Regards,
Peter Miller (PeterIto)
On 23 September 2013 09:34, Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2013-09-21 at 22:09 +0100, Andy Street wrote:
I'd agree that maxspeed=national is insufficient as it is impossible
to tell what speed you can do in a built up area
regards
Brian
On 21 August 2013 15:52, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
Just to highlight some mapping ITO have just released, which was
developed with CPRE showing the construction, landuse and operation impacts
of the High Speed 2 line.
Many thanks for the hundreds
when we do so.
http://hs2maps.com/
Regards,
Peter
--
Peter Miller CEO
+44(0) 7774 667213
ITO World Ltd - Registered in England Wales - Registration Number 5753174
Office - 2nd Floor, 25 Lower Brook Street, Ipswich, IP4 1AQ.
Registered Office - 32 Hampstead Heath, London, NW3 1JQ
-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Peter Miller CEO
+44(0) 7774 667213
ITO World Ltd - Registered in England Wales - Registration Number 5753174
Office - 2nd Floor, 25 Lower Brook Street, Ipswich, IP4 1AQ.
Registered Office - 32 Hampstead Heath
meet the strict
requirements for 'proposed'.
Can I suggest that we work out what we believe are appropriate guidelines
here and then get them discussion on an appropriate international list and
also on the wiki?
Regards,
Peter Miller
ITO World Ltd
On 12 December 2012 09:37, Lester
Sounds good. Do however check out the code Thomas Wood wrote for a complete
NaPTAN importer a long time back.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NaPTAN/Import
Regards,
Peter
On 11 December 2012 21:55, Barry Cornelius barrycorneliu...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, Donald Noble wrote:
is if it is certain enough to
happy to be in OSM at all.
Regards,
Peter Miller (PeterIto)
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 7 December 2012 14:10, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
Just to say that I have added tagging and a relations for both of the
main road schemes mentioned specifically in the Autumn Statement.
Is there any actual benefit to doing this before construction
Google Maps as a primary source (which is called plagiarism)!
Regards,
Peter Miller (PeterIto)
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 15 November 2012 12:20, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
Just to say that I, along with a number of other people, have being doing
some OS Locator based updates to OSM over the past few days following the
release of the latest OS Locator update
On 27 September 2012 17:42, Jason Cunningham jamicu...@googlemail.comwrote:
As I mentioned earlier on it was speed limits for roundabouts along a dual
carriageway that led to me doing a bit of research on UK speed limit
legislation.
My 'notes' are below
On 20 September 2012 16:59, Gregory Williams
greg...@gregorywilliams.me.ukwrote:
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hill [mailto:o...@raggedred.net]
Sent: 20 September 2012 16:27
To: Talk GB
Subject: [Talk-GB] maxspeed changes
It seems that PeterITO is once again making changes
On 4 July 2012 09:39, Craig Loftus craigloftus+...@googlemail.com wrote:
However, there are also instances of highway=no, where roads have been
realigned or ripped up, should these also be removed from the database?
I think highway=no is typically used as a temporary tag to try to stop
On 1 July 2012 22:49, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 30/06/2012 15:11, SomeoneElse wrote:
Obviously mapping things that aren't there any more is a bigger
issue
Has there been discussion about this outside talk:railway? If there hasn't
I'm a bit annoyed that a niche user
On 29 May 2012 16:05, Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.comwrote:
I think Peter was planning on making the ITO boundaries available as a
traceable layer, but haven't heard anything about this recently.
You are right. It should be possibly to use ITO Map tiles in Potlatch and
JOSM,
of a wider expansion of ITO's activities. If there are any top
notch C++ programmers out there who are looking for a new job and who fancy
living in the normally dry county of Suffolk then do please send me your cv.
Regards,
Peter Miller
ITO World Ltd
On 9 April 2012 18:59, Andrew andrewhain...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
Some of the bus stops imported from NaPTAN in the Teddington/Hampton area
appear
to have been deleted where they duplicated stops entered by a mapper who
has not
accepted the Contributor Terms. As the stops will disappear from
on the tiles because
the service was introduced prior to OGL being finalised and before the OSM
switch over to ODbL was very serious. We will update the text at a suitable
time.
Regards,
Peter Miller
ITO World Ltd
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB
to
compare the positions of bus stops in OSM between current NaPTAN data and
OSM and also to highlight where stops are missing, duplicated or are
missing ATCO codes etc.
Regards,
Peter
** **
Cheers
Andy
** **
*From:* Peter Miller [mailto:peter.mil...@itoworld.com]
*Sent
,
Peter Miller
ITO World Ltd
BZ
__**_
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-gbhttp://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing
wanting a direct link to Potlatch? We do have lots
more on the way btw, including clickthroughs for individual features.
Peter
Graham.
On 13 March 2012 20:21, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
I am pleased to be able announce that ITO Map now has a bunch of new map
views
I have just added a new coastline VMD comparison map to ITO Map which
focuses on high water, low water from VMD, coastline from OSM and also
tidal and non-tidal rivers.
http://www.itoworld.com/map/189
I have also made some adjustments to the VMD - Water comparison to align
the colours and symbols
On 17 March 2012 10:22, Henry Gomersall h...@cantab.net wrote:
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 10:15 +, Peter Miller wrote:
I have just added a new coastline VMD comparison map to ITO Map which
focuses on high water, low water from VMD, coastline from OSM and also
tidal and non-tidal rivers
://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/10486240
[3] http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1986944
** **
** **
*From:* Andy Robinson [mailto:ajrli...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* 23 January 2012 22:39
*To:* 'Peter Miller'; 'David Earl'
*Cc:* 'Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org'
*Subject:* RE: [Talk-GB
We had a discussion recently about getting a usable source of route data
for HS2.
I am pleased to say that it is on data.gov.uk and is available on an OGL
license.
http://data.gov.uk/dataset/hs2-gis-route
Can we get to use this as a backdrop in Potlatch or JOSM to get the route
added?
Regards,
On 23 January 2012 20:27, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
On 23/01/2012 20:21, Jason Cunningham wrote:
Good to see the data being released,
But I don't believe this proposed route should yet be added to OSM.
You'll regularly here the phrase map what's on the ground, but we
On 10 January 2012 13:19, Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz wrote:
**
On 10/01/2012 13:43, Peter Miller wrote:
On 10 January 2012 12:07, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
On 10/01/2012 11:44, Peter Miller wrote:
Is there no way in this case to formally 'claim' the IPR
On 10 January 2012 13:53, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
On 10/01/2012 13:46, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Michael Collinson wrote:
+1 to Richard's suggestion odbl=clean
Just a tiny little clarification - this isn't something I've dreamed up,
it's a real live tag with 9,000
On 10 January 2012 18:19, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
Just noticed that this response when to Andy alone. Copying to the list.
On 10 January 2012 11:14, Andy Robinson ajrli...@gmail.com wrote:
Latest HS2 announcement today means that there will be a lot of
discussion
There are various waterway views available using ITO Map, as well as many
others.
They all have global coverage and are updated daily (rarely more than 24
delay on getting new data on the map).
http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/ito_map/main?view=3 (general water
view)
On 12 December 2011 13:58, fk270...@fantasymail.de wrote:
After watching the License Change View on OSM Inspector, I have decided
not to change any of the few red dots and ways marked in the OSM inspector.
Some ways have one old version by an anonymous or undecided author and up
to seven
On 29 September 2011 09:03, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 28/09/11 20:36, Peter Miller wrote:
A major inconvenience for me recently has been the return of the 'can't
load map' error message when using Potlatch 2 which I understand is some
sort of time-out between Potlatch
.
Regards,
Peter Miller
ITO World Ltd
itoworld.com
On 29 September 2011 09:13, thomas van der veen th.vanderv...@gmail.comwrote:
I have been tagging parts of the M3 and M27 recently, both lanes and
maxspeed. The map below really help with this, thanks for that. And I have
been mostly
A major inconvenience for me recently has been the return of the 'can't load
map' error message when using Potlatch 2 which I understand is some sort of
time-out between Potlatch and the server.
What needs to happen to get this resolved (in Potlatch or in the server as
appropriate)? Is that work
is a diagram and some modeling details from the UK schema if that
helps.
http://www.dft.gov.uk/transxchange/schema/2.0/examples/flexible/
I will be very interested to hear how you get on with this one.
Regards,
Peter Miller
ITO World Ltd
Feedback of all sort is much appreciated.
Cheers
I suggest that any 'temporary' speed limit change that will last more than 6
months could reasonably be tagged in maxspeed. Shorter periods should
probably use a maxspeed:temporary or some other suitable overriding tag?
Fyi, I have used 'proposed:maxspeed' to hold the intended new value where
(and remove these VMD layers) to sort out a gremlin in the code. We
expect to be able to re-release these layers (and add some interesting
new ones) within the next week.
Regards,
Peter Miller
Cheers,
Jason
On 28 June 2011 14:11, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
Here are three
On 29 June 2011 16:12, Graham Stewart (GrahamS) gra...@dalmuti.net wrote:
There was a similar case to this on the Help Centre recently:
http://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/5839/map-changes-for-personal-use-is-this-right
I suggest we need to make it more obvious to first-time users that
layers for a few days.
Regards,
Peter Miller
ITO World Ltd
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/UK-road-name-coverage-now-over-80-tp6529750p6529750.html
Sent from the Great Britain mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On 29 June 2011 18:02, Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29/06/2011 17:55, Peter Miller wrote:
I have also been very impressed with the initial results from the
visual comparison of OSM and OS Vector map district as well. We seem
to have an much to help the OS improve their data
in Norfolk during the summer then ITO would be happy to
supply drinks, pizzas etc to keep people's energy levels up!
Regards,
Peter Miller
ITO World Ltd
Great job everyone!
--
Borbus.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
Here are three new map views using Vector Map District roads data for ITO Map.
1) 'VMD - roads'. This is a view of vector map district roads colour
coded according to its internal classification system.
http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/ito_map/main?view=136
Colours
blue: motorway
dark green:
On 28 June 2011 14:23, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
I don't want to seem picky, but:
Colours
dark green: A road
dark red: Primary Road
could you swap these two over? At least locally the dark red
correspond to the ways we have tagged as trunk and the green as
primary. It just seems to
On 28 June 2011 15:34, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
All this from a quick look at my village. We cannot rely on this
data
without a survey.
Near here I zoomed in on the ways that are in VMD and not OSM. We
have footways along the seafront where the black lines are (not
worked out what
On 21 June 2011 22:02, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
On 21 June 2011 21:32, Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com wrote:
At the moment I can't get into ITO OSM Analysis at all. If I enter the URL
http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/main?showMinor=true
We have created a new speed limit layer which renders both mph and
km/h speed limits on the same map. In addition to showing speed limits
it also shows sections of speed limit enforced using average speed
camera as a black border to the road (using either
enforcement:maxspeed=average). There are
We believe that OSM Analysis is now fixed and up to date. Apologies
for the inconvenience and do of course let us know if we are wrong
about that!
Regards,
Peter Miller
ITO World Ltd
On 22 June 2011 09:35, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
On 21 June 2011 22:02, Peter Miller
On 11 June 2011 14:22, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
Fyi we are doing some investigation in ITO into adding OS
VectorDistrict 'road missing' data on the OS Locator tiles or possibly
onto an alternative map layer. The aim being to make tracing of roads
On 12 June 2011 20:36, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
ITO are probably not the best people to set up maintain simple mirrors
of existing content. Are there not 100 sites where a mirror could be
set up and maintained? Why is the OS site not sufficient anyway
On 12 June 2011 15:41, Michael Brewer mich...@thebrewerfamily.co.uk wrote:
I'd find it really useful to filter what is displayed,
to limit e.g. to showing only bridleways.
Basically, I'm trying to plot cycleable routes through
the countryside, and it would be nice to avoid distracting
On 11 June 2011 09:09, Bob Kerr openstreetmapcraigmil...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
So the question is, who is going to come forward and write the bot, and who
is going to come forward to write documentation.
Any takers?
Yup! I agree that we are now at a point where we agree that not
everyone likes
attribution has been applied to the
posters, if indeed that is what has happened and will work with our
client to get the situation resolved asap.
We will provide an update to this list later today.
Regards,
Peter Miller
ITO World Ltd
On 10 June 2011 11:04, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote
On 10 June 2011 11:20, Chris Jones roller...@sucs.org wrote:
On 08/06/11 07:58, Peter Miller wrote:
Warwickshire is the biggest gainer/looser with 33 new names; over half
of the districts have got at least one new road and there are now only
8 places still at 100%. We do have 51 at over 99
be soon
or might not be for a month or more. Sorry I can't be definite but it
just depends on when we can a chance to sneek in a few hours work on
it.
Thanks for the suggestion which certainly will move it up our priority stack.
Regards,
Peter Miller
ITO World Ltd
End users of the map are much more
course.
Regards,
Peter Miller
ITO World Ltd
Compare and contrast with http://osm.org/go/erU5Lvdkm- .
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Onward-travel-posters-tp6461416p6461640.html
Sent from the Great Britain mailing list archive
On 9 June 2011 09:33, Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be better if ITO put long-roads-without-names in a separate
layer, because at the moment they dominate the completeness map.
My strategy has been to deal with the long roads first and then go
back and deal with
On 9 June 2011 10:41, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Peter Miller peter.miller@... writes:
1) A list of not:names that orginated from OS Locator but where OS
Locator does not currently contain that error. The challenge is that
not all not:name entries in OSM will have originated from error
On 9 June 2011 10:44, Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/06/2011 10:09, Peter Miller wrote:
Indeed, here is a map showing verified/surveyed+souce:name in dark
red, source:name without verified/surveyed in orange and any instances
of verified/surveyed without source:name as blue
On 9 June 2011 12:14, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Peter Miller peter.miller@... writes:
I have not used commercial mapping while creating the map, but some
errors in Navteq, TeleAtlas and AA naming locally have subsequently
come to my attention subsequently and I see no reason why
On 9 June 2011 13:30, Graham Stewart gra...@dalmuti.net wrote:
Fyi, here is the full list of content in the source:name field for
Suffolk and bits of Cambs,Norfolk and Essex (ordered by frequency of
occurrence)!
Well that nicely demonstrates what a complete mess the source tags are!
I have
: source:name=some other value
Light blue: source=survey or similar
Orange: source= OS or similar
Light purple: source=something other value
grey: no source:name or source provided
Regards,
Peter
On 9 June 2011 14:39, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
On 9 June 2011 13:30, Graham
On 9 June 2011 13:31, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Peter Miller peter.miller@... writes:
I have not used commercial mapping while creating the map, but some
errors in Navteq, TeleAtlas and AA naming locally have subsequently
come to my attention subsequently and I see no reason why
On 9 June 2011 17:53, Graham Stewart gra...@dalmuti.net wrote:
If you import data into an area that doesn't already have an active
community, the community will spring up more slowly or not at all.
But that logic suggests that we should actively *discourage* people from
doing any mapping, as
that a
manual survey has not been completed of the area and invite people to
take a look. It will free up human effort to do work that can't be
done by a computer.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OS_bot
Regards,
Peter Miller
(user:PeterIto)
___
Talk-GB
On 3 June 2011 11:45, TimSC mapp...@sheerman-chase.org.uk wrote:
Hi all,
Some stats on OSM coverage of Kent. I tried to pair the records of KCC
OpenKent with the OSM database. Assuming the KCC list is complete (which it
is usually, but not entirely), we can estimate OSM's coverage in the
On 8 June 2011 14:18, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Steve Doerr doerr.stephen@... writes:
I wonder if the good folks at ITO could devise a way to analyse the
not:name tags in the database and see whether any of them are now
redundant? In other words, are the OS correcting any of the mistakes
On 8 June 2011 09:39, TimSC mapp...@sheerman-chase.org.uk wrote:
On 08/06/11 08:15, Peter Miller wrote:
My experience is that the LWG never makes definitive statements!
I find that annoying sometimes but, if we are to follow to Spinoza's example
that we should made a ceaseless effort
and no
OS Open data when tracking down new roads! Why not see what is missing
in your area :)
http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/ito_map/main?view=5lat=52.310633029288894lon=-0.5165746127230731zoom=8
Regards,
Peter
Regards
Brian
On 8 June 2011 07:58, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote
We have releases a new Electricity generation map using ITO Map which
people might like to look at which colour-codes power stations by fuel
source (coal/nuclear etc). Take a look here:
http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/ito_map/main?view=106lat=51.822370189439184lon=0.6237611854769254zoom=9
It
On 26 May 2011 12:38, Borbus bor...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26/05/11 11:51, Peter Miller wrote:
We have releases a new Electricity generation map using ITO Map ... snip
That's convenient since I just tagged the gas fired and biomass CHP
plants at my university the other day. :)
Very good
On 18 May 2011 13:01, Andrew andrewhain...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
An editor has cleared the OSL difference analysis in the London Borough of
Harrow (http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/area?name=Harrow
)
with the unusually low score of 5 not:names out of 1800. As someone who
used
On 7 May 2011 18:45, Robert Whittaker (OSM)
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.comwrote:
On 5 May 2011 18:01, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
Should we add something about permissive and private paths to this view?
If
we had that then the job to do locally would be to convert all
On 6 May 2011 16:58, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Tom Chance wrote:
I completely agree that the tools aren't there yet, but could they
not have used OSM for their database?
In theory, yes. But there are huge costs to that, too. The effort required
to work with the
On 6 May 2011 18:42, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
It does however seem disappointing for them to be duplicating
some a lot of work.
I agree that the OSM data is not perfect however it is good
and could be even better very easily.
AIUI they're
On 5 May 2011 09:02, TimSC mappingli...@sheerman-chase.org.uk wrote:
Hi all,
I thought this UK list of orchards was interesting. It would be nice if
they were to release it as open data. Not sure if they traced it from some
restricted source though.
Just what I was thinking as well.
Would
On 5 May 2011 10:45, monxton gm...@jordan-maynard.org wrote:
On 04/05/2011 15:57, Peter Miller wrote:
Here is a global map view showing highway=footway in blue and
highway=path in brown.
http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/ito_map/main?view=97
There is indeed something like an 80/20
On 5 May 2011 15:49, Robert Whittaker (OSM)
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.comwrote:
Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
You may wish find the 'surfaces' view more useful for getting a general
insight into path density around the UK and elsewhere. This view does in
fact mirror
On 5 May 2011 17:03, Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion. Take a look at this one which I hope does
roughly what you have asked for with the exception that I have coloured
'other designations' with a off-yellow (as used for unrecognised values in
other
On 5 May 2011 17:28, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
On 05/05/2011 16:40, Peter Miller wrote:
http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/ito_map/main?view=87
First reaction - thank you - that will be _extremely_ useful.
Second reaction - have I really forgotton to add footpath
,
Peter Miller
ITO World (user:Peterito)
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
it if you want to come back to it.
Regards,
Peter Miller
--
Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB
On 2 May 2011 05:44, Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) te...@teddy.ch wrote:
Hi Peter
On 05/01/2011 10:49 AM, Peter Miller wrote:
Just to say that I have just set Stefan Bethke up as an admin. There are
now two administrators, myself and Stefan which is much better.
I would like to also say how
want
the map to look like and therefore what we want the rendered to do!
Regards,
Peter Miller
___
Talk-transit mailing list
Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
the response time from the
server than Potlatch 1. Whatever the cause, it must be very off-putting for
an newbie trying to edit for the first time.
Anyone else getting this and have any other information or work-rounds?
Regards,
Peter Miller
(user: PeterIto
On 1 May 2011 11:57, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
Anyone else getting this and have any other information or work-rounds?
It's actually an API issue rather than a P2 issue. P2 is simply saying
either the API refused to send any data or I couldn't get any
railway lines,
platforms and connecting passages/stairs/escalators.
http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/ito_map/main?view=79
Regards,
Peter Miller (PeterIto)
ITO World
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org
On 26 April 2011 14:37, Jerry Clough : SK53 on OSM sk53_...@yahoo.co.ukwrote:
On 26/04/2011 12:38, Thomas Wood wrote:
On 04/26/11 12:04, Peter Miller wrote:
Baker Street. There are three separate nodes tagged
'railway=station,name=Baker Street' (one for each line served). In
reality
of these are the right tag for
this purpose.
When we agree what the tags should be used then ITO can host an overlay map
showing the view and maintain it going forward using ITO Map.
We might even be able to get the National Byways website to include a slippy
map on their website based on it.
Regards,
Peter
On 20 April 2011 12:11, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
What tagging would you expect us to use within OSM to identify
something as being part of this network?
Just route=bicycle, name=National Byway should be enough IMO. I wouldn't
really call
need or other or it may get
canned in the near future if we don't need it any more!
Regards,
Peter
On 20 April 2011 12:23, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
On 20 April 2011 12:11, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
What tagging would you
On 19 April 2011 10:30, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Lennard wrote:
Any unambiguous tagging scheme you can think of would be fine.
(railway=abandoned_station would also be possible)
This variant has the added benefit that it would make it into most current
rendering databases
Andy Allan just asked me a question privately about changes I have made to
layers in Wandsworth which has prompted me to do a post here saying what I
have been up in order to rationalise use of the layers in East Anglia,
London and now Kent.
The ITO Map 'Layers' view highlighted a huge amount of
, I am not going to let it worry me.
I expect them to do their job and ensure that it works and I will get on
with mapping.
Regards,
Peter Miller
(user:PeterIto)
TimSC
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
On 19 April 2011 14:49, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
On 19/04/2011 14:31, Peter Miller wrote:
... railways at layer=1 or -1
Well, that might be correct if they're at layer -1 or +1 relative to a
feature that hasn't been mapped yet. A conversation with the original
On 19 April 2011 14:50, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com
wrote:
Andy Allan just asked me a question privately about changes I have made
to
layers in Wandsworth which has prompted me to do a post here saying
On 19 April 2011 15:20, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Matt Williams li...@milliams.com wrote:
On 19 April 2011 15:50, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm assuming his map layers view has some logic that layers tags only
apply to ways
1 - 100 of 697 matches
Mail list logo
