Re: [talk-au] Maranda or Maranoa Road

Thanks Bob, it viewed fine in the Mapillary app. I’ve edit the map to Maranoa Road now. > On 11 Dec 2023, at 3:36 pm, Bob Cameron wrote: > > Hi Nev > > The Mapillary imagery at the eastern end at Carnarvon Hwy; > >

Re: [talk-au] Putting streams into OSM

I should add that I have only used the Surface Hydrology Lines from GeoScience Aust dataset for Qld catchments and as the data is drawn for many different sources across the country the perenniality may be not always be included. > On 26 May 2023, at 4:39 pm, nwastra wrote: > > Th

Re: [talk-au] Putting streams into OSM

The Surface Hydrology Lines covering all of Australia from GeoScience Aust is available for use in osm and has a perenniality columnAustralian Data Sourceswiki.openstreetmap.orgOn 26 May 2023, at 2:57 pm, Tom Brennan wrote:DCS Base and Topo don't distinguish between perennial and

Re: [talk-au] power=edge_server

Thanks for replies. I have sent an osm personal message to 设计在先 and if I get no reply, I will contact the supervisor. Nev > On 3 Nov 2022, at 9:10 am, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > >  > >> On Thu, 3 Nov 2022 at 06:04, Michael James wrote: >> This dataset is not any sort of computing system,

Re: [talk-au] Place name as name=Scarborough, Queensland, Australia

I expect the best solution for now is to revert the name to Scarborough and add the is_in tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:is_in I thought it was depreciated but seems to be useful in this case > On 21 Sep 2022, at 8:53 pm, Nev W wrote: > >

[talk-au] suspicious edits in Victoria need reverting?

Hi there is some recent mapping around southern Victoria and the greater Melbourne area that seem to be incorrect and need reverting but I am not familiar enough with the area to be sure. The new roads seem fictitious but could be proposed approximate new routes I suppose. Could mappers more

Re: [talk-au] Multiple web sites linked to car yard

Thanks Paul. > On 28 Jul 2022, at 5:50 pm, Paul Norman wrote: > > On 2022-07-28 12:29 a.m., nwastra wrote: >> This mapper has added about a dozen similar businesses to the same car >> wrecker yard. >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/freecarpickup/history#map=

[talk-au] Multiple web sites linked to car yard

This mapper has added about a dozen similar businesses to the same car wrecker yard. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/freecarpickup/history#map=19/-33.93048/150.99878 I assume this is ok as they are linked to the same physical location. I find it a bit unusual and thought you may be

Re: [talk-au] Assistance with ongoing disagreement regarding intersections

Mapbox has a helpful page on the present day preference of squared intersection mapping instead of the older X mapped method. I guess this has evolved over time due to clearer and higher resolution imagery.

Re: [talk-au] "Don't split ways if there is no physical separation"

Here is the osm location https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/-31.9881/115.9857 > On 4 Mar 2022, at 9:59 pm, ianst...@iinet.net.au wrote: > >  > This query was triggered by the following comment in another thread, but I’ll > start a new thread so as not to distract the original. > > “

Re: [talk-au] Help - Node relocation

Hi You just need to wait longer for the render of the OSM to catch up with your edit. Try refreshing your browser or try the Tor browser which which is unlikely to be caching the OSM tiles in the area. The node is deleted at the old address and there are two nodes for the business at the new

Re: [talk-au] Help - Node relocation

Hi please check if the two nodes for the business are still valid or needed. One has a note as follows which was added in 2021…. note=Administration, no childcare takes place here (resent to talk-au) > On 18 Feb 2022, at 2:20 pm, nwastra nwastra <mailto:nwas...@gmail.com&g

[talk-au] Deletion of walking tracks/paths

For info and with some regard to recent discussion of US Trails Working Group… I noticed a lot of paths being deleted by this user as requested by a National Park Ranger. I commented with some suggestions and received the following reply in comments...

[talk-au] Dedicated Indigenous Protected Areas 2020 dataset available for OSM

This import is complete now, apart from checking for OSMI errors in the next few days. I will review some I the island boundaries of the sea country IPAs in the future with a view to aligning more accurately to the land mass via satellite imagery. NevW

Re: [talk-au] Dedicated Indigenous Protected Areas 2020 dataset available for OSM

21, at 11:53 pm, Stéphane Guillou > wrote: > > Hi Nev > > That's great, thank you for doing this work! > > Just one note: I think you omitted to include your details as the main point > of contact for this import on the wiki. > > Cheers > > On 2

[talk-au] Dedicated Indigenous Protected Areas 2020 dataset available for OSM

Hi further progress on: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2021-November/015338.html I have completed the import info required but not posted to the import page as only a couple of IPAs add to the

[talk-au] Dedicated Indigenous Protected Areas 2020 dataset available for OSM

Hi the Commonwealth of Australia Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment has made the Dedicated Indigenous Protected Areas 2020

Re: [talk-au] Cycling on Victorian paths

Hi as you have been discussing reverting changesets, I thought I should mention that Ilya Zverev’s Simple Reverter seems to be out of action at present https://github.com/Zverik/simple-revert/issues/19 This discussion regarding 'Cycling on

Re: [talk-au] FYI Public Records VIC - Map Warper

Hi For info there is a map warper (or georeferencer) plugin for QGIS. Here is a tutorial https://www.qgistutorials.com/en/docs/3/georeferencing_basics.html > On 7 Sep 2021, at 5:02 pm, Adam Horan wrote: > > "what is it actually doing?" > > You use it to correct/align old maps to modern maps.

[talk-au] Strange friend request?

a young lady wearing sunglasses & a red & white, > polka-dotted top is it? :-) > > Thanks > > Graeme > > >> On Sun, 29 Aug 2021 at 11:12, nwastra wrote: >> I have also been added as a friend by user ‘Debra_Devries’ but on going to >> the link whi

[talk-au] Strange friend request?

I have also been added as a friend by user ‘Debra_Devries’ but on going to the link which seems legitimate, the user does not exist. Maybe my new friend has to do some edits before coming in to existence for the link? Thanks, nevw > On 29 Aug 2021, at 9:51 am, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > >

[talk-au] Dribl - attribution missing?

I checked the Ararat image and using two fingers to squeeze the image I see HERE copyright plus PSMA reference. > On 18 Apr 2021, at 10:10 pm, Sebastian Spiess wrote: > > I checked Boondah Reserve, > here the spotty buildings made it stand out as likely OSM to me. A commercial > supplier

Re: [talk-au] #hotosm-project-9679 #sssifirewater : buildings removal

Thanks Phil, I will reinstate the buildings in the next day or so and let you know of other issues too. Cheers, Nev > On 2 Nov 2020, at 2:03 pm, Phil Wyatt wrote: > > Hi there nwastra, > > If there are any other deletions with the firewater hashtags please feel free > to

[talk-au] #hotosm-project-9679 #sssifirewater : buildings removal

Hi I have noticed that a lot of buildings were removed in this edit and no explanation was given by changeset comment. The mapper replied "This was part of the firewater map-a-thon hosted by SSSI hosted last weekend. One of the validators requested for the building polygons to be removed"

[talk-au] Landgate data

Hi I noticed this edit this morning that is using data obtained from Landgate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Xebozone/history#map=18/-31.77734/115.95824 Do we have explicit permission to use their data? The

[talk-au] vine row tagging

Many vineyards have numbered rows with a tag on the end strainer posts to assist direction of workers, etc. These could be numbered using the addr interpolation scheme and then individual rows would not need to be mapped but does need a close survey. > On 15 Oct 2020, at 3:32 pm, Graeme

Re: [talk-au] Level 15, 16 dirty tiles - Regency to Pym

Hi Alex It takes some time for tiles at all zoom levels to be rendered but the database is updated immediately. The standard layer at osm.org will be updated before the other layers. > On 27 Aug 2020, at 12:14 pm, Alex Sims wrote: > > Hi, > > I’ve been having a bit of fun doing on the ground

[OSM-talk] Status of Who Did It?

I have been using Latest OSM Edits per Tile by Pascal Neis for my local area while whodidit is down https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-tiles > On 27 Jul 2020, at 11:28 pm, Mateusz Konieczny via talk > wrote: > > See > https://github.com/simon04/whodidit > linked on top of the page, >

Re: [OSM-talk] river - stream

I am not very familiar with the iD editor but I notice that where a stream and highway cross, what boxes and dropdowns are offered depends what you have selected. If you have the stream selected you will be offered tunnel/culvert/layer/etc as options. If you have the highway selected you will

[talk-au] "Hidden" National Park boundary

Apr 2019, at 1:26 pm, nwastra wrote: > > corrected link... > Looks like plenty of edits in the area by Scott and Fizzie … > https://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/?zoom=12=-28.07234=153.43583=BTT > > <https://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/?zoom=12=-28.

[talk-au] "Hidden" National Park boundary

corrected link... Looks like plenty of edits in the area by Scott and Fizzie … https://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/?zoom=12=-28.07234=153.43583=BTT <https://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/?zoom=12=-28.07234=153.43583=BTT> Nev > On 22 Apr 2019, at 1:20 pm, nwast

[talk-au] "Hidden" National Park boundary

Hi Graeme the boundary of Burleigh Head National Park was last updated using CAPAD 2016 http://www.environment.gov.au/land/nrs/science/capad/2016 (CAPAD 2018 should be out soon) and the later 2018 download of Protected areas of

[talk-au] more SEO spam?

We seem to be getting a lot of business edits in this form lately with only a name and description tag, often with address details or just spam in the description tag. As is usual with spam like business edits, they use a throw away email to make the edit and you never get a response from any

Re: [talk-au] State Forest boundaries

later info on github. https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/3656 <https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/3656> Very disappointing from my point of view. nevw > On 26 Jan 2019, at 5:44 pm, nwastra wrote: > > > Hi > the gazet

Re: [talk-au] State Forest boundaries

If a specific protect_class seems seems too uncertain I guess protection_title= State Forest would be sufficient. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:protection_title Nevw > On 26 Jan 2019, at 5:44 pm, nwastra wrote: > > > Hi > the gazetted State Forest boundaries a

[talk-au] State Forest boundaries

Hi the gazetted State Forest boundaries are not rendered currently on the default map on the OpenStreetMap (OpenStreetMap Carto). landuse=forest is considered as forestry use and natural=wood are natural wooded areas not subject to forestry but both are rendered the same. When the State Forest

[talk-au] OSM Carto features are missing on the map outside the Europe and in rural places.

On the OSM Forum > Rendering maps OpenStreetMap Carto (default map on OSM.org) kokio mentioned that are discussing currently what features are missing on the map outside the Europe and in rural places. I thought this might be an opportunity for us to raise anything you think is relevant from an

Re: [OSM-talk] problem with the public GPX lines in my JOSM

Here is a related query from the help site: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/66689/what-does-unordered-mean-in-visibility-option-for-gps-traces > On 12 Nov 2018, at 8:11 pm, Tom Hughes wrote: > > On 12/11/2018 09:58, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > >> I would expect this to come from some

Re: [OSM-talk] How to get an overview of multiple gpx on OSM map?

Using gpsvisualizer, you can load a maximum of 10 Mb of unzipped gpx files. If you zip these into one file it will be a bit over 1 Mb and can be loaded in one go. > On 4 Nov 2018, at 7:12 am, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > gpsvisualizer.com

[talk-au] Fwd: [OSM-talk] How to get an overview of multiple gpx on OSM map?

Ooops, this was sent in error to wrong newsgroup. sorry > Hi > I have used http://www.mygpsfiles.com/app/ > where you can select a years of gpx tracks and drag and drop on to the map > but it only has google, etc maps. > > I just tried JOSM and used the left

[OSM-talk] How to get an overview of multiple gpx on OSM map?

Hi I have used http://www.mygpsfiles.com/app/ where you can select a years of gpx tracks and drag and drop on to the map but it only has google, etc maps. I just tried JOSM and used the left side open icon select and load 3 years of gpx traces from my hard

Re: [talk-au] [OSM-talk] How to get an overview of multiple gpx on OSM map?

Hi I have used http://www.mygpsfiles.com/app/ where you can select a years of gpx tracks and drag and drop on to the map but it only has google, etc maps. I just tried JOSM and used the left side open icon select and load 3 years of gpx traces from my hard

Re: [talk-au] Correcting inland water features

More specifically... The watercourses are flagged as perennial or non-perennial or null *Should all those flagged as non-perennial be tagged as intermittent? Seems to be too few perennial but as others have mentioned Australian watercourses are predominantly intermittent.

[talk-au] Correcting inland water features

Hi Regarding GeoScience Australia Surface Hydrology datasets https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Catalogue

Re: [talk-au] Increased precision options for Australia - QZSS, SBAS or Galileo

There is expected to be improved gps accuracy in a few years time in Australia but unsure if usual gps units used by the public will show improved results but I expect they will. http://www.ga.gov.au/news-events/news/latest-news/ceo-statement-on-budget-2018-19 > On 12 Jun 2018, at 12:56 PM,

Re: [talk-au] Queensland Govt Spatial Catalogue

d use. > On 25 May 2018, at 4:05 PM, nwastra <nwas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I notice that when selecting, for example, the D'Aguilar National Park > multipolygon there is a part not included and those are tagged "Special > Management Area” in addition to having t

Re: [talk-au] Queensland Govt Spatial Catalogue

.@gmail.com> wrote: > > Keep up the good work Nev. When comparing I did notice the Queensland > Protected Areas data is more current than CAPAD 2016. > > On 24 May 2018 at 22:22, nwastra <nwas...@gmail.com > <mailto:nwas...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Thanks Andrew >

Re: [talk-au] Queensland Govt Spatial Catalogue

Thanks Andrew I am interested in using that data in Qld. I am currently using Capad 2016 data to update osm in Qld and have done much in the southeast. When that is done I will proceed with the Qld Protected Areas data and it will be a big help with forestry boundaries. I am updating each

[talk-au] poor business listing edits

I too have wasted a lot of time over many days trying to fix these problem edits and have come to the same conclusion. Trying to sort out what is right or wrong with each one cannot easily be solved by only referring to valid sources of data for use in OSM causing further dilemma. > On 21

[talk-au] poor business listing edits

Just a heads up that there has been a rash of poor edits in the past 24 hours or so with new editors listing their businesses but in doing so many have accidentally shifted other mapped items or added the wrong tags to their edits. Latest OpenStreetMap Contributors (last 7 Days) - Feed for

[talk-au] tagged links to photos

clarification….as on most of the yellow nodes in the Achavi link… > On 8 Apr 2018, at 12:31 PM, nwastra <nwas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Are we free to add tag links to images to OSM as in this. > http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=57903447 > The https://www.bushtrax.co

[talk-au] tagged links to photos

Are we free to add tag links to images to OSM as in this. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=57903447 The https://www.bushtrax.com site is copyrighted so I assume that such links to the photos need to be either accompanied by permission or disclaimer or suitable licence or display of the

Re: [talk-au] QldGlobe

There are only two changesets that specifically refer to QLDGlobe data being used and I have left a message for the mapper on the later of them suggesting ways it maybe resolved. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57806048 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57808506 Nev > On 6 Apr

[talk-au] QldGlobe

I see no mention of the Qld Govt dept Natural Resources Mines and Energy on the following web page which appears to be the most current page we should refer to. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors N > On 6 Apr 2018, at 2:19 am, nwastra <nwas...@gmail.com> wrote: >

[talk-au] QldGlobe

I assume the QldGlobe is just a different way to project all their datasets. Further info: https://www.dnrme.qld.gov.au/home/about-us/open-data > On 5 Apr 2018, at 11:05 pm, nwastra <nwas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I noticed a mapper quoting “Added watercourses, upgraded roads to te

[talk-au] QldGlobe

I noticed a mapper quoting “Added watercourses, upgraded roads to tertiary roads as per QLDGlobe.” in some of his changesets in the Innisfail area. So using data from the https://qldglobe.information.qld.gov.au/ The few areas I checked displayed very high resolution imagery and would be useful

Re: [talk-au] LPI NSW Base Map land parcel numbers

t we can't mass > import everything from the LPI base map under the current permission. > > I'm working on getting the OSMF CC BY waiver signed too, and they've > mentioned the possibility of opening more datasets under CC BY, but both of > those are likely at least a few months a

Re: [talk-au] LPI NSW Base Map land parcel numbers

Tks, all the LPI stuff is a fantastic resource. Nev > On 22 Mar 2018, at 5:44 am, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > They are house numbers and can be used in OSM. > >> On 22/03/18 01:53, nwastra wrote: >> I found this discussion from Jan 2017 whic

[talk-au] LPI NSW Base Map land parcel numbers

in se Qld. So a further question Can the LPI NSW Base Map land parcel numbers be used as correct house numbers, aside from the possibility of having multiple units on one parcel. Nev > On 21 Mar 2018, at 10:13 pm, nwastra <nwas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi > can I use fro

[talk-au] LPI NSW Base Map land parcel numbers

Hi can I use from the LPI NSW Base Map what I presume to be land parcel numbers, to add house numbers to houses I have mapped using only the LPI imagery in Tathra recently? Not sure if they are lot numbers or house numbers on Base Map or if it is permissible to use them on the OSM.

[talk-au] Tathra Fires

I have finished most of northern half and will leave rest for others to finish. Nev > On 19 Mar 2018, at 12:55 pm, Nick Hocking wrote: > > I'll map all the houses in Tathra tonight unless someone else beats me to it. > ___ >

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Carto release v4.6.0

Matthils Did I mis-read this.. “- Do not render small national parks and nature reserves” At what zoom levels are they not rendered? Surely these are still rendered when zoomed in close on the map and I would consider a higher priority of importance that most other stuff that is rendered. N

[talk-au] Check please: Lower Heidelberg & McAuthur Rds, Ivanhoe East

your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of Talk-au digest..." >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Check please: Lower Heidelberg & McAuthur Rds,Ivanhoe >> East >> (nwastra) >> _

[talk-au] Check please: Lower Heidelberg & McAuthur Rds, Ivanhoe East

Hi these business addition edits wrecked the Lower Heidelberg Rd / McAuthur Rd roundabout intersection https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/gnsgroup/history#map=19/-37.77289/145.06001 I was not able to easily revert these, so can someone who is familiar with the area check that it is ok. The

Re: [talk-au] I want to add a national park

We do have permission to use the CAPAD data and CAPAD 2014 data has been added extensively to OSM in Australia. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Imports https://www.environment.gov.au/land/nrs/science/capad Download link CAPAD 2014:

[talk-au] Tag physical business location with their PO Box number

Hi In addition to the tags like contact:phone contact:email addr:housenumber addr:street, etc almost all businesses in Australia that have a physical presence on the ground also have PO Box number as part of their address and use that for their business correspondence. Is contact:pobox=* the

[talk-au] Phone numbers

Mapper @tastrax appears to be using a maproulette challenge to fix these, presumably in Tasmania. I am not familiar with the program myself. Nev > On 6 Sep 2017, at 8:41 pm, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've had a small look at what is presently in the data base. > There are a lot

[talk-au] Collaborative Australian Protected Areas Database (CAPAD) 2016

y CC-BY 3.0 so we may > still be OK to go. > > It'll take a while for me to recreate the processing I did on CAPAD2014 and > I'm not sure when I'll have time to do it. > > On 29/8/17 10:16, nwastra wrote: >> Further to my previous query… >> I have viewed the thr

[talk-au] Collaborative Australian Protected Areas Database (CAPAD) 2016

Further to my previous query… I have viewed the thread leading to these… https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2017-February/011272.html https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2017-March/011302.html and assume that the permission part is ok and the import is still on track.

[talk-au] Collaborative Australian Protected Areas Database (CAPAD) 2016

Hi I had been expecting that valid explicit permission to use Collaborative Australian Protected Areas Database (CAPAD) 2016 to edit and add information to the OpenStreetMap would have been obtained by now but I assume that the legal licence compatibility issues need to be resolved. Is there

[talk-au] nodes of a business placed on a road

These edits are just nodes of a business placed on a road without a physical building coincidentally mapped. Is this allowed? Does a business need to have a physical building presence to be included in OSM? If these nodes were placed near the road instead would that be ok? *Corrected link:*

[talk-au] nodes of a business placed on a road

These edits are just nodes of a business placed on a road without a physical building coincidentally mapped. Is this allowed? Does a business need to have a physical building presence to be included in OSM? If these nodes were placed near the road instead would that be ok?

Re: [talk-au] Tagging - World Solar Challenge - Darwin to Adelaide

arching for a tag other than “highway=raceway” to > apply to the relation, like a bus route for example. > > Alex >> On 19 May 2017, at 8:12 pm, nwastra <nwas...@gmail.com >> <mailto:nwas...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> I am quite ok with the tagging as the

[talk-au] Tagging - World Solar Challenge - Darwin to Adelaide

rg/wiki/Tag:highway=raceway> seem to imply its >> an either/or thing. I’m searching for a tag other than “highway=raceway” to >> apply to the relation, like a bus route for example. >> >> Alex >>> On 19 May 2017, at 8:12 pm, nwastra <nwas...@gmail.com >>>

Re: [talk-au] Tagging - World Solar Challenge - Darwin to Adelaide

and updated and rerouted as it changes each year. Will be interesting to see others comments on the mapping of this race route. Nev > On 19 May 2017, at 8:42 PM, nwastra <nwas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I am quite ok with the tagging as the individual ways that make up the route

Re: [talk-au] Tagging - World Solar Challenge - Darwin to Adelaide

I am quite ok with the tagging as the individual ways that make up the route have not been altered. The relation maps out the route of the Solar Challenge Race. The route as I see it serves a dual purpose during the period of the race. The Solar Challenge vehicles, though racing within strict

Re: [talk-au] Stormwater drains

could also add substance=water if you think it is not obvious. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dpipeline > On 11 May 2017, at 8:49 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote: > >> >> drain or culvert. > >> Am I justified in retagging as man_made=pipeline

[talk-au] Fwd: New satellite imagery has been provided by DigitalGlobe

proper link https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58339 > Begin forwarded message: > > From: nwastra <nwas...@gmail.com> > Subject: New satellite imagery has been provided by DigitalGlobe > Date: 10 May 2017 at 3:52:07 PM AEST > To: OSM Austr

[talk-au] New satellite imagery has been provided by DigitalGlobe

New satellite imagery has been provided by DigitalGlobe … two new imagery layers for the purposes of editing, tracing and validating OSM. Read more on the forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=645539#p645539 It looks good in my area :)

Re: [OSM-talk] Finding duplicate cycleways

+1 > On 27 Apr 2017, at 7:39 PM, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > I fully agree on this. Please do not remove separate cycleways, unless they > are wrongly mapped cycle lanes (an error which I encounter from time to time) ___ talk mailing

Re: [talk-au] Fixing deletions

Hi Archivi is a good way to view a changeset https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47973757 https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47973783 There is a legend at the bottom left to

[OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

Thanks for the link Martin. It is well written and helps me a great deal on this matter. Nev > On 28 Mar 2017, at 8:27 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > > > 2017-03-27 23:17 GMT+02:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > >: > Source tags on

[OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

Jochen, ridding the osm of these unnecessary source tags seems like a good candidate for our MapRoulette challenge. :) Putting the sources on the objects has been deprecated for a while. The source should be put on the changeset only. If you are doing edits that involve several different

[OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

I am unsure what is the preferred way or best practice to tag the source for multipolygons. I currently put the source on the relation with all the rest of the tags, and only adding tags to individual ways or inner polygons if they are also part of a seperate entity like a fence or a body of

Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate ways in multipolygon relations

. Nev > On 19 Feb 2017, at 8:40 PM, nwastra <nwas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks Ed > OGR2OSM seems to be what I am looking for. > > Nev Wedding > >> On 19 Feb 2017, at 7:42 pm, "Ed Loach" <edlo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>

Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate ways in multipolygon relations

Thanks Ed OGR2OSM seems to be what I am looking for. Nev Wedding > On 19 Feb 2017, at 7:42 pm, "Ed Loach" wrote: > > Not sure about QGIS but have you looked at OGR2OSM? > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ogr2osm ___ talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Duplicate ways in multipolygon relations

…..Actually, all the overlapping ways in the current shapefile are where adjacent relations meet. > On 19 Feb 2017, at 2:04 PM, nwastra <nwas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi > is there a JOSM plugin to assist with duplicate ways? > > We have been given explicit permissio

[OSM-talk] Duplicate ways in multipolygon relations

Hi is there a JOSM plugin to assist with duplicate ways? We have been given explicit permission to use a good data set of shapefiles that define boundaries for the OSM. Using JOSM, my method is to select the shapefile relation for a particular National Park for instance then merge the

[talk-au] Parks Vic data

Hi I have found many problems with the Heathcote-Graytown National Park in Victoria. Is there a place from which I can download the boundary as we have done with the NSW LPI NPWSReserve - public/NSW_Administrative_Boundaries, so I sort out where the gazetted boundary is and then fix the

Re: [talk-au] New User Surge.

Apart from the addition of numerous poorly edited parks, numerous footways (even with no construction or visible path on the ground), water features, etc by the followers of this children's game, I am also dismayed to see that wide shared cement ways that most would have previously marked as

Re: [talk-au] Perth double park names

They appear to be mostly derived from the adjacent street names. Is this the signage at the parks? > On 7 Jan 2017, at 4:38 PM, nwastra <nwas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi > is there a reason why many Perth Parks have two names separated by a “/“ ? > http://overpass

[talk-au] Perth double park names

Hi is there a reason why many Perth Parks have two names separated by a “/“ ? http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/l66 If they need correcting, is there a local person able to correct the names?___ Talk-au mailing list

Re: [talk-au] Local Government Areas without Councils

Your suggestion of … 'the simplest solution, changing the term "Local Government Authority" to "Local Government Area" in the wiki. is acceptable’ is a good solution for me as all these areas need to appear on the map. nevw > On 23 Dec 2016, at 8:50 AM, cleary wrote: > > > >

Re: [talk-au] Yellow Creek Road

The signs can be seen quite well on Google Street View too. Seems quite odd as no maps I checked had that name on the road, though there are a few real estate sales mention the name and if you click on the True Local site for the local FM radio station location icon (next to the address) it

Re: [talk-au] Is it ok to add data from the yellow pages to OSM?

Wow, we finally have a use for the unsolicited paper copy that gets dropped at the front door each year :) > On 12 Nov 2016, at 1:14 PM, cleary wrote: > > > Use your favourite search engine to search for the many articles about > copyright in the yellow and white pages. You

Re: [talk-au] Is it ok to add data from the yellow pages to OSM?

I think the terms of use may preclude that https://www.yellowpages.com.au/pages/legal/terms > On 12 Nov 2016, at 12:00 PM, Luke Picciau wrote: > > I just got a 2017 copy of the yellow pages and instead of throwing it out > like normal I was wondering if the data

Re: [OSM-talk] Alternative to Pipermail?

There is http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/General-Discussion-f5171242.html but that site is very poor because it keeps putting a 'free resume' site into your browser so you are directed to that when you hit the back button. Because that happens to me on the nabble site i am quite pleased to use

Re: [talk-au] Tagging for the router

> > and in the rest of Australia as well In Victoria, drivers are allowed to perform u-turns at intersections with or without traffic signals and at breaks in the median unless there is a no U-turn sign(as shown on the right) displayed at that location or applying to that length of road. A