Re: [Vo]:OFF TOPIC Open access ChatGPT

Terry Blanton wrote: Impact on education > Wow! >

Re: [Vo]:SARS-Cov-2 Origin

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-12-08/end-of-covid-zero-threatens-to-overwhelm-china-with-infections On Thu, Dec 8, 2022, 5:43 PM H Ucar wrote: > This is evident now since no animal ever found in the wild carrying the > original strain or its ancestor. > > Even though the release

Re: [Vo]:OFF TOPIC Open access ChatGPT

Impact on education https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-04397-7 On Fri, Dec 9, 2022, 12:04 PM Jed Rothwell wrote: > This thing is as good as your average tech support document written by a > human. Example: > > > How do you use the curl command? > > > > The curl command is a tool for

Re: [Vo]:OFF TOPIC Open access ChatGPT

This thing is as good as your average tech support document written by a human. Example: How do you use the curl command? The curl command is a tool for transferring data from or to a server. It supports a number of protocols, including HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, and SMTP. To use curl, you need to

Re: [Vo]:OFF TOPIC Open access ChatGPT

ChatGPT wrote: > The energy released in this dance, > Was harnessed to power our advance, > As a clean, endless source, > It's worth its weight in force, > Plasma fusion, the future of finance. > You can see this was generated by a program. It is slightly off-kilter. It sort of makes sense, but

Re: [Vo]:OFF TOPIC Open access ChatGPT

Esa Ruoho wrote: i've been loving this. btw, why not ask it about cold fusion, Jed? I did ask it, after I posted this message. Here are some responses. Some of them are remarkable. What is cold fusion? Cold fusion is a hypothetical type of nuclear reaction that would occur at or near room

Re: [Vo]:OFF TOPIC Open access ChatGPT

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 8 Dec 2022 16:09:05 -0500: Hi, [snip]

Re: [Vo]:SARS-Cov-2 Origin

This is evident now since no animal ever found in the wild carrying the original strain or its ancestor. Even though the release can be accidental, its spread to the world was intentional. It is too bad that a government cooperated with a parazite. On Sat, Dec 3, 2022, 22:45 Terry Blanton

Re: [Vo]:OFF TOPIC Open access ChatGPT

i've been loving this. btw, why not ask it about cold fusion, Jed? there's a macOS topbar / toolbar icon app that lets you click on the icon at the topbar, and start asking it questions. i've been asking it about free energy and helping me convert a bash script to python. the answers are pretty

[Vo]:OFF TOPIC Open access ChatGPT

ChatGPT is a remarkable, publicly available AI project. Open access ChatGPT is here: https://chat.openai.com/chat Here are sample queries I submitted: What happened in the battle of dan no ura (1185)? The Battle of Dan-no-ura was a naval battle fought on April 25, 1185 in the Shimonoseki

[Vo]:SARS-Cov-2 Origin

https://nypost.com/2022/12/03/scientist-who-worked-at-wuhan-lab-says-covid-man-made-virus/

Re: [Vo]:Nueralink Show and Tell

Today he is supposed to release all the Twit secrets. Should be of interest. On Thu, Dec 1, 2022, 1:07 PM Jed Rothwell wrote: > You have to give credit to Musk. That is a bold initiative. It seems they > are smart people making remarkable progress. > >

[Vo]:Uploaded ICARUS Systems manual

I uploaded this manual: Pons, S. and M. Fleischmann, *The ICARUS Systems, Isoperibolic Calorimetry: Acquisition, Research, and Utilities System*. 1995, Tokyo, Japan: Technova, Inc., 175 pages. https://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/PonsStheicaruss.pdf My introduction: This document is a user manual for

[Vo]:Plasma processed mesh now being tested in Mizuno replication

Here is a mesh that reportedly works well in a replication of Mizuno's experiment. The Pd is laid down with plasma processing, and it is very consistent across the entire mesh. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5D9Au1cAu0 The analysis of two samples of mesh (untreated and treated) provided

Re: [Vo]:Nueralink Show and Tell

You have to give credit to Musk. That is a bold initiative. It seems they are smart people making remarkable progress.

[Vo]:Nueralink Show and Tell

Elon Musk says human testing in 6 months. Https://youtu.be/btWKkjbX-uc

Re: [Vo]:The Ultraviolet Enlightenment

This, or something like, must be the explanation. The silver iodide-bromide layer is far too thin for an interference effect. It might also be a plasmon-polaritron effect which one might argue is the same thing. --- Original Message --- On Sunday, November 27th, 2022 at 9:08 PM, Robin

Re: [Vo]:The Ultraviolet Enlightenment

I don't remember reading anything about that. But in my personal experience, the plate reverts to a murky gray, with slightly darkened outlines of the colored areas. The original color of the over-exposed plate is sort of purplish black. MSf --- Original Message --- On Sunday,

Re: [Vo]:The Ultraviolet Enlightenment

Hi, Silver atoms may arrange themselves in clusters of a size matching the wavelength of the light. Then the clusters are selective for (resonate at) that wavelength. >On Sun., Nov. 27, 2022, 2:58 p.m. MSF, wrote: > >> >> This effect was studied extensively thoughout the 19th and early 20th

Re: [Vo]:The Ultraviolet Enlightenment

Wow... When you say the colours faded do you mean the plate reverted to being completely black again (i.e. its over exposed state)? Harry On Sun., Nov. 27, 2022, 2:58 p.m. MSF, wrote: > > This effect was studied extensively thoughout the 19th and early 20th > centuries, but in another field.

Re: [Vo]:The Ultraviolet Enlightenment

This effect was studied extensively thoughout the 19th and early 20th centuries, but in another field. Early researchers in photography noted the same effect and more in their experiments with Daguerrotype plates. A purposely over-exposed plate would turn very dark. If the plate was covered

Re: [Vo]:Expert Proposes a Method For Telling if We All Live in a Computer Program : ScienceAlert

This question is as old as computers and a college class mate wrote about this around 1975... The falsification is trivial as all mappings from reality to software are surjective that is a real= "nature state" is mapped to a  range of real number values. (So the reverse fails to be unique)

Re: [Vo]:Expert Proposes a Method For Telling if We All Live in a Computer Program : ScienceAlert

The actual shutdown routing... given the MADness of the War in Ukraine, seems to be rather evident and imminent. H LV wrote: "Computer. End program" On Tue., Nov. 22, 2022, 5:25 p.m. Terry Blanton, wrote:

Re: [Vo]:Expert Proposes a Method For Telling if We All Live in a Computer Program : ScienceAlert

"Computer. End program" On Tue., Nov. 22, 2022, 5:25 p.m. Terry Blanton, wrote: > > https://www.sciencealert.com/expert-proposes-a-method-for-telling-if-we-all-live-in-a-computer-program > > > Can we falsify the existence of a simulated universe? >

[Vo]:The Ultraviolet Enlightenment

This is a google english translation of a german article that was published in December in 2021. The Ultraviolet Enlightenment https://docs.google.com/document/d/178aIZp1ts5J1HCvWuZCkdoDvwbzp8tm_xiPGdonvPM8/edit?usp=sharing (The original article is here

[Vo]:Fwd: Appeal, version 2

Mainstream journalism is becoming a little more friendly toward cold fusion. So, various people have suggested we try to publish a letter or an op-ed in a major newspaper. Here is a draft we have come up with. We hope to publish this with as many signatures as we can muster, especially signatures

Re: [Vo]:Expert Proposes a Method For Telling if We All Live in a Computer Program : ScienceAlert

Maybe LENR is the " "The Thirteenth Floor" " ...  Terry Blanton wrote: https://www.sciencealert.com/expert-proposes-a-method-for-telling-if-we-all-live-in-a-computer-program   Can we falsify the existence of a simulated universe?

Re: [Vo]:Expert Proposes a Method For Telling if We All Live in a Computer Program : ScienceAlert

All stored in AWS, no doubt. On Tue, Nov 22, 2022, 6:17 PM Robin wrote: > In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Tue, 22 Nov 2022 17:25:45 -0500: > Hi, > [snip] > > > https://www.sciencealert.com/expert-proposes-a-method-for-telling-if-we-all-live-in-a-computer-program > > > > > >Can we

Re: [Vo]:Expert Proposes a Method For Telling if We All Live in a Computer Program : ScienceAlert

In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Tue, 22 Nov 2022 17:25:45 -0500: Hi, [snip] >https://www.sciencealert.com/expert-proposes-a-method-for-telling-if-we-all-live-in-a-computer-program > > >Can we falsify the existence of a simulated universe? "Physicists have long struggled to explain why the

[Vo]:Expert Proposes a Method For Telling if We All Live in a Computer Program : ScienceAlert

https://www.sciencealert.com/expert-proposes-a-method-for-telling-if-we-all-live-in-a-computer-program Can we falsify the existence of a simulated universe?

Re: [Vo]:ICCF-23 Proceedings uploaded

Thank you for doing this Jed. It's so cool to be reading the proceedings 23 years after the first one. I always find something just mind blowing and this is no different. Dr Michael Swartz paper on Nitinol is just too cool. I was working on that way way back in the old days.Nitinol is a

Re: [Vo]:Cavitation (sonofusion) reactor from B-J. Huang et al.

Brings back so many memories of the cavitation anomalies we discussed in the distant past (Potapov, Yusmar, and of course Jim Griggs hydrosonic pump that Jed tested). Has anyone here dug into Moray B. King's speculation on plasmoid structures in nanobubbles that he hypothesizes may somehow duct

Re: [Vo]:Cavitation (sonofusion) reactor from B-J. Huang et al.

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 11 Nov 2022 13:12:22 -0500: Hi, Cavitation temperatures and pressures may break some water molecules apart into Oxygen & Hydrogen. The Oxygen combines with the Copper leaving excess Hydrogen which then may undergo LENR with Copper atoms, once it has

[Vo]:Cavitation (sonofusion) reactor from B-J. Huang et al.

Here is an interesting approach to what I assume is cold fusion: Huang, B.-J., et al., *Excess Energy from Heat-Exchange Systems.* J. Condensed Matter Nucl. Sci., 2022. *36*: p. 247-265. https://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BiberianJPjcondensedzi.pdf#page=257 Only a few people have tried this. Long

[Vo]:ICCF-23 Proceedings uploaded

At last! Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Condensed Matter Nuclear Science, Virtual Conference from Xiamen, China June 9–11, 2021 Biberian, J.P., ed. *J. Condensed Matter Nucl. Sci*. Vol. 36. 2022. https://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BiberianJPjcondensedzi.pdf To jump to

[Vo]:(Think Hutchison Effect) What if I said that with KW, MW or GW of EM correctly applied radiation I could affect something in space...

Would you think (assuming there was potentially something to be affected in the first place) that sounded plausible that enough EM energy given correct application that some effect could be developed? I think most would agree that EM energy affecting something in the background of space is

[Vo]:Sources of cold fusion database at LENR-CANR.org

Marianne asked me where all those references at LENR-CANR.org came from, and whether the papers are still available. I started with two databases. One was compiled by Ed Storms and the other by Dieter Britz. I combined them and I removed duplicates. Over time, I added many new papers. I explained

Re: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether"

On 19.10.2022 11:57, Jonathan Berry wrote: Like the other video it also uses Feynman diagrams, it doesn't directly mention the Lamb shift but it states that strength of electromagnetic fields is again related to all the possible outcomes with Feynman diagrams. This - Feynman diagrams -

Re: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether"

will pop up as I >> find nothing credible about cloud electrification ideas. >> >> >> >> *From:* bobcook39...@hotmail.com >> *Sent:* Monday, October 17, 2022 6:24 PM >> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com >> *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Arguments for an "A

Re: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether"

electrification ideas. > > > > *From:* bobcook39...@hotmail.com > *Sent:* Monday, October 17, 2022 6:24 PM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether" > > > > Electric permittivity and magnetic megmiabilityu of space necess

RE: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether"

...@hotmail.com Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 6:24 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether" Electric permittivity and magnetic megmiabilityu of space necessary to calculate the speed of light support the physical model of space and hence the concept of an anther.

Re: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether"

ight support the physical model of space and hence > the concept of an anther. > > > > Bob Cook > > > > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows > > > > *From: *Jonathan Berry > *Sent: *Tuesday, October 11,

RE: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether"--added comment

Monday, October 17, 2022 3:24 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether" Electric permittivity and magnetic megmiabilityu of space necessary to calculate the speed of light support the physical model of space and hence the conc

RE: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether"

Berry<mailto:jonathanberry3...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 12:04 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether" Well if you consider all of the possible interactions that could happen with so-called virtual particles (whateve

Re: [Vo]:Johann Wilhelm Ritter (1776-1810)

Two more books about Ritter and Goethe were published recently, but they are both in German. 1) Goethe, Ritter und die Polarität : Geschichte und Kontroversen. 2021 (Goethe, Ritter and the Polarity: History and Controversies) 2) Ultraviolett - Johann Wilhelm Ritters Werk und Goethes Beitrag - zur

[Vo]:Risk and Scientific Reputation: Lessons from Cold Fusion

See: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2201/2201.03776.pdf Risk and Scientific Reputation: Lessons from Cold Fusion Huw Price, University of Bonn and Trinity College, Cambridge Abstract: Many scientists have expressed concerns about potential catastrophic risks associated with new

Re: [Vo]:Johann Wilhelm Ritter (1776-1810)

More about Ritter's research from Brittannica: A pharmacist in Liegnitz, Silesia, from 1791 to 1795, Ritter studied medicine at the University of Jena, where he taught until he gained the patronage of the duke of Saxe–Gotha. In 1800, only months after the English chemist William Nicholson

Re: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether"

Well if you consider all of the possible interactions that could happen with so-called virtual particles (whatever quantum field theory might call them) it calculates the exact value and is the "most successful calculation/prediction in physics". I can't judge the relative value of the model you

[Vo]:Johann Wilhelm Ritter (1776-1810)

I am going to the library today to get this book through an interlibrary loan. (At over $200 it is too pricey to buy): _Key Texts of Johann Wilhelm Ritter (1776-1810) on the Science and Art of Nature_ It is a translation of J. W. Ritter's work. I just learned about Ritter last month while

Re: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether"

So we know that the electric field from the Nucleus of a Hydrogen Nucleus can polarize the virtual particles and cause partial shielding, this results in the Lamb shift. This is standard model word salad. Virtual particles  are just a mathematical construct an thus never something real.

[Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether"

I would like to hear any counter points to these arguments. Firstly the Aether I am talking about IS NOT NECESSARILY the Luminiferous Aether/Ether considered disproven, though some arguments will go in that direction also. Hence the "Aether" in question could be Quantum fields theory, virtual

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion is Back (there's just one problem)

H LV wrote: Since she is respected astrophysicist with nearly 600 000 subscribers and > probably many more followers this video could potentially make cold fusion > research part of mainstream science. > It sure could help! I think a much bigger help would be if the X-Prize people follow

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion is Back (there's just one problem)

Since she is respected astrophysicist with nearly 600 000 subscribers and probably many more followers this video could potentially make cold fusion research part of mainstream science. Harry On Sun., Oct. 9, 2022, 9:26 a.m. Jed Rothwell, wrote: > This video is not bad. But I posted one one

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion is Back (there's just one problem)

This video is not bad. But I posted one one complaint in the comment section: "Hossenfelder says that no one was able to replicate several experiments. Some of those were replicated. No one has tried to replicate the others." My point is that if several people try to replicate an experiment but

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion is Back (there's just one problem)

Today the real reputation risk is to teach/promote Standard model nonsense. I made a summary of all crappy ideas these folks invented over the past 100 years:: https://vixra.org/abs/2209.0037 The central error has been made by Dirac that did claim a particle can act wave like and couples the

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion is Back (there's just one problem)

Sabine Hossenfelder is an astrophysicist who runs a "no nonsense" science channel. As she acknowledges in the video she is taking a risk talking about cold fusion because it is considered a reputation trap among physicists. Harry On Sat, Oct 8, 2022 at 1:55 PM H LV wrote: > "Cold Fusion is Back

[Vo]:Cold Fusion is Back (there's just one problem)

"Cold Fusion is Back (there's just one problem)" In a new video Sabine Hossenfelder discusses cold fusion https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbzcYQVrTxQ Harry

[Vo]:Ukrainian fogbank

With all the wild talk and propaganda about Russia actually using nukes in the "special military operation" in Ukraine, it was only a matter of time before red-mercury and/or "fogbank" and/or "ballotechnics" made the rounds. If Ukraine really was a main supplier of this material, then that may

[Vo]:Copy of "Novum Organum" uploaded

This is somewhat off topic but -- I uploaded a copy of the book by Francis Bacon, "Novum Organum" (A New Instrument) written in 1620. It is here: https://lenr-canr.org/Collections/Novum%20Organum.docx You may want to download a copy. Let me explain what this is and why I uploaded it. Thomas

[Vo]:how we change the way the universe works.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether%27s_theorem Noether's theorem or Noether's first theorem states that every differentiable symmetry of the action

Re: [Vo]:New Wind Generator

In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Mon, 19 Sep 2022 20:36:23 -0400: Hi, They probably normally use rare-earth magnets ( these are very strong magnets ) for the rotor so that they don't need an electrical connection to the rotor which would in turn normally require the use of slip rings. By

Re: [Vo]:New Wind Generator

Back to butterflies and UFOs*,* UAPs. On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 8:59 PM Terry Blanton wrote: > As I said, premature dementia. > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 8:54 PM Terry Blanton wrote: > >> Ackshully, maybe it is simply a way to create a synchronous induction >> generator by using one of these

Re: [Vo]:New Wind Generator

As I said, premature dementia. On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 8:54 PM Terry Blanton wrote: > Ackshully, maybe it is simply a way to create a synchronous induction > generator by using one of these devices to transmit the DC for field and a > separate device to tap the AC from the induction coils. >

Re: [Vo]:New Wind Generator

Ackshully, maybe it is simply a way to create a synchronous induction generator by using one of these devices to transmit the DC for field and a separate device to tap the AC from the induction coils. I still would not explain some aspects of the patent claims. On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 8:36 PM

Re: [Vo]:New Wind Generator

In which case, I find this comment in the article quite puzzling: *The technology is called Twistact, and it will eliminate the need for expensive rare-earth magnets in large wind turbines.* On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 7:48 PM Robin wrote: > In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Mon, 19 Sep 2022

Re: [Vo]:New Wind Generator

In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Mon, 19 Sep 2022 18:57:41 -0400: Hi, >Seriously? yes. > >I think the answer lies in the patent on p. 24 of 36 under "Detailed >Description": > > > > > > > > >*Certain details are set forth below to provide a sufficientunderstanding >of embodiments of the

Re: [Vo]:New Wind Generator

Seriously? I think the answer lies in the patent on p. 24 of 36 under "Detailed Description": *Certain details are set forth below to provide a sufficientunderstanding of embodiments of the invention. However, itwill be clear to one skilled in the art that embodiments of theinvention may

Re: [Vo]:New Wind Generator

In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Mon, 19 Sep 2022 18:08:40 -0400: Hi, [snip] >With a battery to kick it off? Perhaps, but at a guess I would say that the Earth's magnetic field combined with the rotation caused by the wind might be enough to create a small current that would then grow

Re: [Vo]:New Wind Generator

With a battery to kick it off? On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 6:05 PM Bob Higgins wrote: > It probably allows it to be a self-excited alternator - like most > automotive alternators. The reliable rotary contact will eliminate the > wear factor in using the self-excited technology most likely. It

Re: [Vo]:New Wind Generator

It probably allows it to be a self-excited alternator - like most automotive alternators. The reliable rotary contact will eliminate the wear factor in using the self-excited technology most likely. It will require more copper, but no rare earth magnets. On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 3:41 PM Terry

Re: [Vo]:PEM electrolyzer - LENR capable?

Is that for real? I just posted an article from the same source which has me puzzled. Early stages of dementia? On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 8:15 PM Jones Beene wrote: > > https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/worlds-largest-electrolyzer-has-the-shape-of-screwdriver >

[Vo]:New Wind Generator

https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/new-method-could-change-way-wind-turbines-generate-electricity How does this work without a magnetic field? I'm still reviewing the patent: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/5f/e6/0e/649e2cfffcaa70/US8585413.pdf Granted in 2013 but only

[Vo]:PEM electrolyzer - LENR capable?

https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/worlds-largest-electrolyzer-has-the-shape-of-screwdriver

Re: [Vo]:Current Findings on the Undeniable Alien Presence

In reply to Vibrator !'s message of Fri, 16 Sep 2022 00:40:31 +0100: Hi, [snip] >Multiple independent captures in HD and 60 Hz, using fixed focal length >phone cams with fixed apertures, showing macroscopic quantum effects at >ranges down to a few centimetres, are all out of focus butterflies?

Re: [Vo]:Current Findings on the Undeniable Alien Presence

Multiple independent captures in HD and 60 Hz, using fixed focal length phone cams with fixed apertures, showing macroscopic quantum effects at ranges down to a few centimetres, are all out of focus butterflies? And this is just one type of mini-UAP - there's others indexed in the list that don't

[Vo]:​astronomers are freaking out over bizarre rectangle shaped rings in space

quote “The six-pointed blue structure is an artefact due to optical diffraction from the bright star WR140 in this #JWST MIRI image,” McCaughrean wrote on Twitter. “But red curvy-yet-boxy stuff is real, a series of shells around WR140. Actually in space. Around a star.”

[Vo]:JWST reaction video ;-)

My God, it's full of stars! https://youtu.be/I0i-whGHf-Y Harry

Re: [Vo]:Current Findings on the Undeniable Alien Presence

In reply to Vibrator !'s message of Wed, 7 Sep 2022 02:09:17 +0100: Hi, [snip] >..i'm just amazed no one's remotely taken aback at seeing an autonomous >construct in antidesitter space flying around in people's back gardens - as >if that's a perfectly normal thing and why am i only just

Re: [Vo]:Current Findings on the Undeniable Alien Presence

..i'm just amazed no one's remotely taken aback at seeing an autonomous construct in antidesitter space flying around in people's back gardens - as if that's a perfectly normal thing and why am i only just discovering it now? For the love of god, LOOK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AE6vLJ2cxgs

RE: [Vo]:Max Planck quote

(Rutherford model). At least that’s how I understood it. From: Jonathan Berry Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2022 4:43 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Max Planck quote The latter (not covered by existing theory) because it is an aether.vortex that moves with the toroid. It wasn't

Re: [Vo]:Hubble Red shift and CMB as reflections from an aether.

In reply to H LV's message of Wed, 31 Aug 2022 23:09:16 -0400: Hi Harry, [snip] >On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 4:28 PM Robin >wrote: > >> In reply to H LV's message of Wed, 31 Aug 2022 11:04:43 -0400: >> Hi, >> >> 1) This is an interesting idea. >> > >Thanks > >2) Light bounces off particles anyway,

Re: [Vo]:Hubble Red shift and CMB as reflections from an aether.

On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 4:28 PM Robin wrote: > In reply to H LV's message of Wed, 31 Aug 2022 11:04:43 -0400: > Hi, > > 1) This is an interesting idea. > Thanks 2) Light bounces off particles anyway, regardless of whether or not people > believe this causes the red shift. Images > *are*

Re: [Vo]:transmitted and reflected pulses in a medium

In reply to H LV's message of Wed, 31 Aug 2022 18:53:39 -0400: Hi Harry, [snip] >Do they use cloaked camera drones to watch us? No, box-orbes. ;) > >Harry Regards, R. van Spaandonk Crops, not towns, should be planted on floodplains. Even the ancient Egyptians knew this.

Re: [Vo]:transmitted and reflected pulses in a medium

On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 6:55 PM Robin wrote: > > > > When they drop the notion that information transfer speed is limited by > the speed of light (i.e. special relativity), > they may actually catch up with the rest of the intelligent races in the > galaxy. > > Almost no one actually travels

Re: [Vo]:Hubble Red shift and CMB as reflections from an aether.

In reply to H LV's message of Wed, 31 Aug 2022 11:04:43 -0400: Hi, 1) This is an interesting idea. 2) Light bounces off particles anyway, regardless of whether or not people believe this causes the red shift. Images *are* blurry to some extent, however, if most of the scattering occurs soon

[Vo]:Hubble Red shift and CMB as reflections from an aether.

When a wave pulse encounters a change in the density of a medium some of the energy of the pulse is transmitted and some of it is reflected. Suppose it is possible for a wave pulse to partially self-reflect by inducing a local change in the density of the medium as it travels through it. If this

Re: [Vo]:transmitted and reflected pulses in a medium

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 30 Aug 2022 21:01:22 + (UTC): Hi, [snip] >... then there's a quantum concept called "afterglow" ... > >which could explain a lot if it were not imaginary > >https://phys.org/news/2015-03-photon-afterglow-transmit-transmitting-energy.html When they

Re: [Vo]:transmitted and reflected pulses in a medium

... then there's a quantum concept called "afterglow" ... which could explain a lot if it were not imaginary https://phys.org/news/2015-03-photon-afterglow-transmit-transmitting-energy.html

Re: [Vo]:Max Planck quote

ere you feeling? > > > > A very tiny interaction with earth’s magnetic field? Or something else > that (AFAIK) isn’t covered by existing theory? > > > > *From:* Jonathan Berry > *Sent:* Monday, August 29, 2022 3:18 PM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* Re:

Re: [Vo]:transmitted and reflected pulses in a medium

There is a far more interesting open question. We assume that photons "fly" straight. Of course this work fine for short distance but does this also hold for millions, trillions of kilometers? Because all mass inherently rotates all mass inherits a minimal angular momentum. We also know

[Vo]:transmitted and reflected pulses in a medium

When a medium at rest is moved by a wave pulse does the wave pulse create a locally small variation of density in the medium? If it does then wouldn't some of the energy of the wave pulse be reflected back to the source of the wave pulse? If this is true then perhaps something analogous can

RE: [Vo]:Max Planck quote

Um…… if you tried to create a Mark’s coil, what were you feeling? A very tiny interaction with earth’s magnetic field? Or something else that (AFAIK) isn’t covered by existing theory? From: Jonathan Berry Sent: Monday, August 29, 2022 3:18 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Max

Re: [Vo]:Di Stefano preprint

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 29 Aug 2022 16:26:44 + (UTC): Hi, Closely spaced electrodes with water between them will have some capacitance. This results in a slight increase in electron density on the cathode. The increase in electron density may facilitate shielding, thus

Re: [Vo]:Max Planck quote

might move or pulse. > > > > Oh, and read Bernardo Kastrup’s books about consciousness. He is gonzo > deep. Such as his book “Materialism Is Baloney”. > > > > *From:* Jürg Wyttenbach > *Sent:* Monday, August 29, 2022 6:35 AM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subjec

Re: [Vo]:Di Stefano preprint

One curious detail which sounds crazy but is worth a passing mention is the physical similarity of the experiment to the design of Stanley Meyer's device. Has this ever been mentioned before? This experiment uses two closely spaced brass tubes, one of which is plated with iron. The results

Re: [Vo]:Max Planck quote

35 AM *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Max Planck quote According to the new SO(4) physics model all mass is EM mass and as a such can go into resonance with all other EM mass. If the energies match then an action may happen. Even more interesting is that EM fields in fact act/resonate i

[Vo]:Di Stefano preprint

See: Di Stefano, A. *Experimental Observation on the Lattice Energy Converter, preprint and PowerPoint slides*. in *ICCF24 Solid-state Energy Summit*. 2022. Mountain View, CA. https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/DiStefanoAexperiment.pdf This includes links to the video and to papers and a video

RE: [Vo]:Max Planck quote

or pulse. Oh, and read Bernardo Kastrup’s books about consciousness. He is gonzo deep. Such as his book “Materialism Is Baloney”. From: Jürg Wyttenbach Sent: Monday, August 29, 2022 6:35 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Max Planck quote According to the new SO(4) physics model all

Re: [Vo]:Max Planck quote

According to the new SO(4) physics model all mass is EM mass and as a such can go into resonance with all other EM mass. If the energies match then an action may happen. Even more interesting is that EM fields in fact act/resonate instantaneously. Only a follow up mass like action is limited

Re: [Vo]:Max Planck quote

Consider if there was no consciousness, matter and stars and life, but no consciousness, it is beyond comprehension, If something isn't seen by consciousness, does it really exist? Quantum physics often suggests it doesn't! After all we know that it's not just the photon, but also the electron

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >