, once all
the heat losses were considered.
From: Bob Cook [mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 9:07 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electron Repulsion Versus Distance
I was not familiar with Nelson's invention. I am now. Its
Zell chrisz...@wetmtv.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, May 4, 2014 10:18 am
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Electron Repulsion Versus Distance
I did wonder about power gain, given that thermonic emission isn't very
efficient. I spoke with a very competent BSEE field engineer some years ago
From: David Roberson
You mention thermonic emission as being fairly inefficient. That made me
wonder how effeicient it would be if the emitting surface were well insulated
from the outside world. What if the radiation loss, the convection loss and
conduction losses could be essentially
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Chris Zell chrisz...@wetmtv.com wrote:
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2001/0040434.html
I assume you are familiar with Lawrence Nelson's patents in regard to
screened electrons.
Here is a copy of the patent with less moving images:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 7:56 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
One observation that appears valid is that electrons certainly occur in
pairs around nuclei.
This is an interesting thought. But note that the electrons in shells
around a nucleus are probably not in pairs due to some
@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 7:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electron Repulsion Versus Distance
Bob said:
The following quote from the abstract cited below from Nature seems like a lot
of hand waving to me.
Axil says:
From what I can tell, this theory of how the fractional quantum hall
.
--
*From:* Bob Cook [mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, May 01, 2014 2:36 PM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Electron Repulsion Versus Distance
Axil--
The Nature abstract, which I quoted, states that the that...the formation
of composite
Zell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 1:19 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Electron Repulsion Versus Distance
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2001/0040434.html
I assume you are familiar with Lawrence Nelson's patents in regard to
screened electrons
densities.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Apr 30, 2014 6:50 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electron Repulsion Versus Distance
Dave--
Also it has been my concept that the pair act like a -2 charge in an
atom
.
- Original Message -
From: David Roberson
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electron Repulsion Versus Distance
Bob,
I am a bit confused about how the electron pair acts like a -2 charge in an
atom according to your theory. Do
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 10:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electron Repulsion Versus Distance
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v406/n6798/abs/406863a0.html
Cooper instability of composite fermions
This should answer
below.
arXiv:1302.3225v2 [hep-th] 1 Nov 2013
Bob
- Original Message -
*From:* Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Wednesday, April 30, 2014 10:58 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Electron Repulsion Versus Distance
http://www.nature.com/nature
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electron Repulsion Versus Distance
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v406/n6798/abs/406863a0.html
Cooper instability of composite fermions
This should answer your question about cooper pairing and how it happens.
On Thu, May 1, 2014
Dave asked:
The fact that a pair of electrons can work together even though they are
repelled by the electric charge they possess leads me to wonder how they
ever work as a pair.
Just one more of the inconsistencies in modern fizzix dogma.
If the electron/hole is modeled as a dipole-like
Electrons can take on a large number of phases of matter based on how they
move relative to each other.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/12/121221233120.htm
The 500 phases of matter: New system successfully classifies
symmetry-protected phases
One possibility is that an electron
More...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composite_fermion
The Fractional Quantum Hall Effect causes a reduction in the charge of the
electron in quantum fractional steps.
A magnetic field generates two paired vortexes (magnetic flux quanta) to
form that are connected to the electron. The
in the following item: The
mechanism is not described very well in this item however.
arXiv.org nucl-ex arXiv:1401.1593v1
Bob
- Original Message -
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 8:06 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Electron
: Re: [Vo]:Electron Repulsion Versus Distance
Dave--
Also it has been my concept that the pair act like a -2 charge in an atom. The
dipole interaction distance is fairly short compared to the 1/r associated with
a bare charge. I also like to think of the attraction as a spin coupling
@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Wednesday, April 30, 2014 8:06 AM
*Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Electron Repulsion Versus Distance
Dave asked:
“The fact that a pair of electrons can work together even though they are
repelled by the electric charge they possess leads me to wonder how they
ever work as a pair
19 matches
Mail list logo
