I found that Nelson report reporting KCO3 usage by DGT
http://ecatnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Summary-of-Visit-to-Defkalion.pdf
Key point claimed by DGT, like did ENEA at ICCF15 is that NAE are linked to
crystallography structure.
ENEA talk of 100 vs 101 (seems to be cutting plan family,
I support that ideas.
As you decide anyway.
2013/5/29 Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
Perhaps you can invite him back after a bit? Also maybe Abd? I miss him.
I miss Abd too. I wish he would not post walls of
If CB signal controls the eCat (which I doubt) then the problems of
overheating, positive feedback will be solved easily. This is not the case.
Otherwise a CB radio amateur could solve the eCat control issue if it was so
easy and COP infinite.
If EM enhances the reaction rate, then it should
Right, the brethren has so far brought us fission reactors, nuclear bombs
and hot fu$ion, crowning achievements for our children
Stewart
On Thursday, May 30, 2013, Eric Walker wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Jed Rothwell
jedrothw...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
Just buying nickel micro powder, I assume this comes slightly oxidized.
How would that be removed as a first step in preparing nickel powder for
LENR experiments?
Just heat in in a hydrogen environment at temperatures of a few hundred
degrees C?
I support him back. He is a a man of peace and understanding abd was
defending the religion of his and his friends.
2013/5/30 Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com
Dear Bill,
Please bring Abd back! He knows a lot LENR
and his unique error was answering to a nasty
troll.
Peter
On Thu, May
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:11 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
The theories of hot fusion were built up from research on plasmas
and they do work well when dealing with plasmas, but LENR is NOT occurring
in a plasma.
Are you sure? Maybe not a plasma; but, possibly close. DGT
Nickel oxide is removed pretty easily in H2 at about 310C. Once it is
removed, you will see the sintering begin at the same temperature. The
clean Ni surfaces begin to bond and the particles begin to grow. That is
why, in part you must add the catalyst powder - to prevent the wholesale
Yes - not a new idea. I remember some of my former colleagues working on this
in the 1980s in Harwell (UK). It was supposed to be a hush-hush project - but
then one day in '88 (I think) they turned up on TV talking all about it! (on
BBC's Tomorrow's World). Hmm. So 25 years later it might
Abd seemed reasonable and respectable.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.comwrote:
I support him back. He is a a man of peace and understanding abd was
defending the religion of his and his friends.
2013/5/30 Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com
Dear Bill,
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:19 PM Eric Walker wrote:
**
- We are told that the central reactor core is a 310 stainless steel
cylinder ( 3cm by 33cm). There is no port for introduction of H2. The
ends are cold welded closed.
The ends were cone-shaped AISI 316 steel caps that
That confirms it indeed, I wasn't aware Ni powder already sinters at around
300C. Good to know.
I wonder whether silica would do the job to prevent sintering of Ni (powder
or layered on top)
Recently I read Celani's patent application WO2011016014, where nickel
powder is oxidized and then a silica
Teslaalse,
If you have the glove box I would recommend doing all prep in an inert cover
like helium. It is a pet theory but I am positing that ambient gases limit the
milling or chemical activation of metal powders by reacting with the geometry
formation to dissipate the casimir force...
A glovebox filled with inert gas would help, I agree, but most of the Ni
Powder is shipped in non cealed jars or even envelopes so they are already
oxidized at arrival.
I also read that CO gas would help removing Ni oxide, perhaps at lower
temperatures. CO gas is tricky stuff though.
Maybe heating
Be careful, Ni powder is Dangerous Then Inhaled:
On Thu, 30 May 2013
11:54:41 +0200, Teslaalset wrote:
Just buying nickel micro powder, I
assume this comes slightly oxidized.
How would that be removed as a
first step in preparing nickel powder for LENR experiments?
Just heat
in in a
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:51 AM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Right, the brethren has so far brought us fission reactors, nuclear bombs
and hot fu$ion, crowning achievements for our children
I should clarify that I was trying to reproduce the inevitable and circular
logic that some
This must have been what Hoyt was talking about
http://www.technologyreview.com/news/515296/trained-on-jeopardy-watson-is-he
aded-for-your-pocket/?utm_campaign=newslettersutm_source=newsletter-weekly-
computingutm_medium=emailutm_content=20130530
attachment: winmail.dat
Here is the latest column from Gibbs:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2013/05/30/rossis-a-fraud-no-hes-not-yes-he-is-no-he-isnt/
This is pretty good, but it includes a profound misunderstanding of the
scientific method. Gibbs quoted someone and wrote:
Cold fusion has no definitive theory
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
That is completely wrong. In experimental science you never need to explain
how something works in order to confirm it is real. You just need to
replicate it and show there is no error in the instruments or techniques.
yes, be very careful. I (and at least two others I know have had health issues
resulting from nano nickel (pulmonary hypertension in my case, numbness, BP
problems...). The micron and are not too bad but the nano is HAZARDOUS.
Use a glove box, hood or something similar. I started with a
In a tragically amusing, black-humor, sort of way, the exact inverse
problem appears now to be going on in the neurophysiology of cognition:
Robert Hecht-Nielsen -- one of those responsible for resurrecting the field
of artificial neural networks two decades after it was deep-sixed by MIT in
the
Here's the thing about Watson: this is a production model computer. It is
not just a one-time tour de force computer that beats the world chess
champion or wins at Jeopardy.
I do not know if the prototype model that won at Jeopardy is what IBM will
sell, but it is clear they intend to start
Cool, this phenom obviously requires a lot of heads from different
disciplines to figure it out since it does not appear to follow the
straight and narrow from what I see.
On Thursday, May 30, 2013, Eric Walker wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:51 AM, ChemE Stewart
Two more questions to ask Watson:
1. What is Rossi's catalyst?
2. Is it warmer in the city or in the summer :-) .
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 7:29 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Watson, here
Here's the thing
“Recalescence” is very important in
understanding the Rossi effect, so I have removed typos and added to a
previous posting - in order to have this post indexed in the archive.
From: a former
Teslaalse,
I worry that the sintering is a result of oxidizing and
cleaning it that way would destroy the geometry you are trying to retain, I
would think there should be a chemical way to deoxygenate your powder in the
glove and then let it dry in the inert atmosphere. A small
Harry, imagine balls held in line by springs. If the end ball is pull
away with a force and let go, a resonance wave will pass down the
line. Each ball will alternately move away and then toward its
neighbor. If outside energy is supplied, this resonance will continue.
If not, it will damp
It is amazing that even though the science is still a mystery, there are
increasing levels of engineering advancements building the technology.
Wish I had time to study more
http://coldfusionnow.org/pre-loaded-hydrogen-fuel-an-engineering-answer-for-efficiency-ease-and-safety/
--
Ruby
I wrote that quote...
Cold fusion has no definitive theory – as yet, but the experimental
evidence is overwhelming: anomalous heat and transmutations can occur
within metallic-hydrides systems contained in small cells that sit on a
table-top
Ruby:
I don't think Jed was criticizing your statement,
Cold fusion has no definitive theory - as yet, but the experimental
evidence is overwhelming: anomalous heat and transmutations can occur within
metallic-hydrides systems contained in small cells that sit on a table-top
it was
On 5/30/2013 8:27 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:
it was Gibbs’ statement after it which was:
“Unfortunately that’s not a sound argument…”
Gibbs did not write that. Jed did.
- Joe
On 5/30/2013 9:00 AM, Barrera, Joseph wrote:
On 5/30/2013 8:27 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:
it was Gibbs’ statement after it which was:
“Unfortunately that’s not a sound argument…”
Gibbs did not write that. Jed did.
- Joe
Sorry, never mind, I was looking at the wrong article.
- Joe
From: Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 5:27:51 AM
The ends were cone-shaped AISI 316 steel caps that were
hot-hammered into the ends. I don't think they were welded.
This hot-hammering of the cone-shaped insert is a description of a
type of cold welding.
Yes Eric I can, but only in terms of my theory. As you know, I believe
small gaps are required that are created by stress relief. So, what
would Rossi have to react Ni with to create stress in the surface? The
reaction would have to result in a compound having a high melting
point, low
Dear Friends,
Endless discussions re the Professors Hot Cat Report; I repeat it shows
real excess heat. I wanted just to add a few ideas and a prediction for
which I am responsible and accountable, see:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/05/lenr-frontline-report-undecided-battle.html
Very truly
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.comwrote:
The monitoring of the input was comically inadequate, if there is any
possibility of deception, the blank run used a different power regimen,
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Rob Dingemans manonbrid...@aim.com wrote:
Hi,
You probably know the famous saying First they ignore you, then they
ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win.
It seems we are currently in the second stage and my instinct tells me
we might soon be
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.comwrote:
That's not the opinion of the majority of observers of the case. Deception
on this scale -- frauds and scams -- are utterly common. Scientific
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
The engineers at Elforsk disagree with Cude. They do not think this was a
farce. They know much more about measuring energy and electricity than he
does, so I suppose they are correct and he is wrong.
It doesn't
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.comwrote:
First, the fact that this *source* of energy thousands of times more dense
than chemical has to be plugged in (to a high power line, no less) will
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
First, the fact that this *source* of energy thousands of times more
dense than chemical has to be plugged in (to a high power line, no less)
will turn most observers away.
There seems to be some convergence between Ed's theory and Hagelstein's
proposal of lossy resonance as a way to get energy out of the fused
nuclei in smaller quanta.
Hagelstein also has a significant patent for a phonon laser (US7411445)
that may have some relevance to hydroton behavior.
A
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
** **
*From:* Joshua Cude
** **
First, the fact that this *source* of energy thousands of times more
dense than chemical has to be plugged in (to a high power line, no less)
will turn most observers away.
Yes, thank you Mark. I agree with Jed.
Mark Gibbs is wrong in his reasoning
It should be clear that there are experimental results that have no
confirmed model to explain them.
This is the history of revolutionary science, which Gibbs should be
aware of.
On 5/30/13 8:27 AM,
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 5:51 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.comwrote:
But when they use 3-phase, when single would do, when the wiring is in
place ahead of time, when close associates chose the instruments which
Mark Gibbs writes:
You completely miss my point ... Ruby's argument dimisses Ethan's
argument by simply saying you're wrong and citing experimental
evidence that isn't accepted outside of the LENR community. You're
right, experiment trumps theory but only when you have an experiment
that can
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Berke Durak berke.du...@gmail.com wrote:
In fact I said the 3-phase input to the box was particularly unnecessary
*because* only single-phase was used for the box.
There are legitimate reasons to prefer 3-phase input. If the output
of the control box is a
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:02 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.netwrote:
Eric/JC:
I've read the report twice fully, and a few other times only to verify a
specific statement.
I still did not catch the significance that it was the output of the
control
box that was changed from 3ph to
No Alan, no relationship exist between my model and the one proposed
by Peter. You need to read the two ideas more carefully. I wish a
relationship existed, but sadly it does not. The cluster Peter
proposes to form does not occur in the same place in the material as
the Hydroton, it does
As Norman Ramsey pointed out in his preamble to the DoE's original review
of cold fusion: However, even a *single* short but valid cold fusion
period would be revolutionary.
We are so far beyond that benchmark as to render Mark's criterion absurd.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Ruby
Joshua:
You make that point all the time. It is one of your favorites, but it is
really unsupported speculation and not worth considering.
First, telling us how the majority of observers feel about the report is
clearly beyond your knowledge. As Eric suggested making those claims without
From: Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:12:17 AM
And didn't
the engineers at the Swedish Standards Institute test this
configuration without success. Have those engineers given an opinion
on the latest test? They know more than me too.
They terminated the
From: Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:13:43 AM
I have not seen perfectly good reasons for it. The reasons given that
you need input heat to control the heat seem like an excuse to keep
the power connected to me. Is there another example of a reaction
From: Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:38:17 AM
The 3-phase looks more like obfuscation to me.
Gee .. I'd better take my Electric clothes dryer in for de-obfuscating.
And there I was thinking it was trapped lint.
You want lots of power, you go straight to
Mark, why don't you ask and quote some who actually understand cold
fusion, like myself? I realize you consider me a believer. However,
have you considered why I have this belief? It is not based on my
imagination or on a pathology. It is based on the fact that I have
read and studied all
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Randy wuller rwul...@freeark.com wrote:
**
Joshua:
First, telling us how the majority of observers feel about the report is
clearly beyond your knowledge. As Eric suggested making those claims
without proof (poll, census, etc.) is not only unscientific it
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
From: Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:12:17 AM
And didn't
the engineers at the Swedish Standards Institute test this
configuration without success. Have those engineers given an
I should probably point out that Norman Ramsey had to threaten to resign as
co-chair from the DoE panel if they did not include that in the preamble.
Clearly Ramsey saw what Charles P. Beaudette has has documented in Excess
Heat:
The 5 week rush to judgement after the March 1989 press conference
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
A device with a COP of 3 is not better than a heat pump.
That's for MARCH, which was intentionally run at lower power, choosing
stability over COP.
Right. Three months of technical improvements gave a worse COP.
The
Hi,
On 30-5-2013 20:15, Alan Fletcher wrote:
From: Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:38:17 AM
The 3-phase looks more like obfuscation to me.
You want lots of power, you go straight to three-phase. This is a test rig he's
using, so of course it's
Gibbs responded to my comment, and I responded back, as follows:
MG:
You completely miss my point … Ruby’s argument dimisses Ethan’s argument by
simply saying “you’re wrong” and citing experimental evidence that isn’t
accepted outside of the LENR community. You’re right, experiment trumps
theory
Cude:
You seem to be morphing into troll mode. Reasonable discussions with you are
apparently at an end.
Ransom
- Original Message -
From: Joshua Cude
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ethics of the E-Cat investigation put into
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
From: Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:38:17 AM
The 3-phase looks more like obfuscation to me.
Gee .. I'd better take my Electric clothes dryer in for de-obfuscating.
And there I was
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Mark, why don't you ask and quote some who actually understand cold fusion,
like myself?
Well, Ed, at least he quoted Elforsk. That's progress! The people Elforsk
do not understand cold fusion but they do understand electricity, IR
cameras, and the
If you remember this thread as follows:
* *
Entangled proton pairs show enhanced tunneling – 1/31/12
Why do entangled proton pairs pass through the coulomb barrier of a heavy
element nucleus with high probability in collisions with energies well
below those required to breach this barrier?
From: Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 11:44:00 AM
You want lots of power, you go straight to three-phase.
Right, but I thought the ecat was supposed to provide the lots of
power.
Of THERMAL power, yes, not of ELECTRICAL power.
They *changed* the power
Here is a comment at Forbes from someone who sounds like he should be
working on cold fusion with the rest of the superannuated geezers. Let's
see if we can find him.
- Jed
DONALD ANDERSON
I’m a Professor Ameritus in Electrical Engineering, Ph.D. was in developing
long-lived vacuum tubes with
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
From: Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 11:44:00 AM
You want lots of power, you go straight to three-phase.
Right, but I thought the ecat was supposed to provide the lots of
power.
Of
From: Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 12:16:19 PM
The paper says they *replaced* the triac with a control box.
OK -- in fig 6 (Dec) they show a blue-and-yellow CONTROL box and three triacs.
They don't have a picture for March, so we don't know if it includes
Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
The 3-phase looks more like obfuscation to me.
Gee .. I'd better take my Electric clothes dryer in for de-obfuscating.
And there I was thinking it was trapped lint.
That's hilarious!
You want lots of power, you go straight to three-phase. This is a
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not talking about initiating. I'm talking about sustaining. I have no
problem using electricity to initiate the ecat. But if it's a source of
energy, it should behave like one and be able to at least power itself.
On Wed, 29 May 2013, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Whoa! That seems precipitous. He did not seem so bad to me.
It was temporary, but may be permanent. Crackpot or no, if someone simply
cannot lower themselves to obeying the one basic rule here, and absolutely
will not apologize or even admit to
William Beaty bi...@eskimo.com wrote:
Whoa! That seems precipitous. He did not seem so bad to me.
It was temporary, but may be permanent.
Well, it isn't for me to tell you how to run things but . . .
I hope you issue a polite warning before you ban someone. As you said,
perhaps he did not
New Q A Between Nextme.it and Andrea Rossi
http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/05/new-q-a-between-nextme-it-and-andrea-rossi/comment-page-1/
Below is a Q A from the Journal of Nuclear Physics. The questions were
submitted by Roberta De Carolis from the Italian web site NextMe.it and
answered by
Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com mailto:joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
A match is needed to ignite a firecracker, but once ignited, the
explosion sustains itself.
A match is needed to start a campfire, but not to sustain it.
Cold fusion is not fire. It does not work the same
There seems to be a serious hangup over why a heat generating device needs some
form of heating input to sustain itself. The skeptics can not seem to get
their arms around this issue so I will make another short attempt to explain
why this is important.
To achieve a high value of COP the
I wrote:
. . . If you unplug a Rossi cell and try to make it self-sustain without
input, it will melt.
An analogy to fire may be useful to understanding, but you cannot engineer
a reactor based on analogies.
If we are going to do analogies, a more useful one would be to compare the
Rossi
Cold fusion seems to bring out the crazies. They do not think
rationally and they do not understand basic science, yet they are sure
they are right. I'm glad you are trying to keep them close to
reality. Your patience is amazing.
Ed Storms
On May 30, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I thought that the DC issue was put to rest. It can be easily shown that there
is not amount of diode trickery which can be put into the control box that will
confuse the primary power measurement. DC input has been eliminated so that is
not an issue due to direct observation by one or more
As dave explains it makes sense if the energy input provides cooling power.
Harry
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I wrote:
. . . If you unplug a Rossi cell and try to make it self-sustain without
input, it will melt.
An analogy to fire may be
There are advantages to using a three phase power input that have been pointed
out. Measurements of 3 phase systems are done every day so this is not
important.
If Cude can show a real test that proves 3 phase measurements are not accurate,
then someone will listen. Until that time, he can
I agree Dave, I have been providing this explanation for several years
without any effect. I'm glad you are adding your voice. The critical
point at which the temperature must be reduced depends on the degree
of thermal contact between the source of energy (the Ni powder) and
the sink (The
Josh, what is common sense now becomes ancient history when the newest theories
come out. How do you think men learned to fly heavier than air crafts when it
was common sense that this was not possible. It took a couple of open minded
and brilliant engineers to do what could not be done by
By Tomorrow one presumes he means tomorrow in the literary sense.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a comment at Forbes from someone who sounds like he should be
working on cold fusion with the rest of the superannuated geezers. Let's
see if
The COP will be higher outside on a wintery windy night.
Harry
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
I agree Dave, I have been providing this explanation for several years
without any effect. I'm glad you are adding your voice. The critical point
at
thanks for the reminding.
I should not have read AE van Vogt books when teenager...
I would be mainstream and happy.
2013/5/30 Berke Durak berke.du...@gmail.com
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
wrote:
That is completely wrong. In experimental science you
David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Josh, what is common sense now becomes ancient history when the newest
theories come out. . . .
You need to realize that all knowledge does not reside within your
understanding. All of us should be open to learning new concepts and it is
about
If someone is looking for an analogy they could look at the behavior of a power
transistor mounted on a heat sink. For this exercise assume that the collector
is directly connected to a power source. Apply enough base drive to obtain a
relatively large collector current.
If you adjust the
From: Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 2:07:34 PM
thanks for the reminding.
I should not have read AE van Vogt books when teenager...
I would be mainstream and happy.
Or Jack Vance, who just died aged 96 :
According to an article in the swiss journal NET Journal that has been
published earlier in february 2013, a group of business partners of Andrea
Rossi visited his new laboratory in Ferrara the day 14 of december 2012.
The group saw the ongoing experiment and could take some pictures. The
pictures
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Thu, 30 May 2013 07:38:13 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Are you sure? Maybe not a plasma; but, possibly close. DGT
speculates that highly energized hydrogen has the electron in a
extreme elliptical orbit and, when at its apogee, the nucleus is
exposed for a brief
Big-bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) theory, together with the precise WMAP
cosmic baryon density, makes tight predictions for the abundances of the
lightest elements.
Deuterium and 4He measurements agree well with expectations, but 7Li
observations lie a factor 3 - 4 below the BBN+WMAP prediction.
Claudio C Fiorini claudio.c.fior...@gmail.com wrote:
In the Levi report, the test started 13 of december and ended 17 of
december. This is compatible with this article. Maybe, it was decided later
to continue the test after december 15.
This confirms (by the published picture), that during
To my best understanding, in energetic hydrogen the electron orbits move
further away from the nucleus, not closer.
* *
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sommerfeld_ellipses.svg
Quantum mechanically a state with abnormally high *n* refers to an atom in
which the valence electron(s) have been
This is not a quantum mechanical model. The actual wavefunction for anjy n,
l=0 is spherical.
2013/5/30 Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To my best understanding, in energetic hydrogen the electron orbits move
further away from the nucleus, not closer.
* *
What if LENR = dark/vacuum energy = http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.4507
On Thursday, May 30, 2013, Axil Axil wrote:
Big-bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) theory, together with the precise WMAP
cosmic baryon density, makes tight predictions for the abundances of the
lightest elements.
Deuterium and
I notice that in the pictures they are twisted pairs; could it be a
transmission line.
--On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 8:57 PM -0400 David L Babcock
ol...@rochester.rr.com wrote:
If plenty of power is available, and stringent RF interference specs
don't need to be met, the simple wires will
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't buy it. The reactor is a sealed faraday cage, so it's not going to
care about ripple or dc vs ac. It's just a thermal interface.
The reactor might require or might be incompatible with low-frequency AC
magnetic
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:51 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
More interesting is when the electron is at perigee
Clearly this is based on the Bohr model, obsolete; but, could you
explain a bit more?! :)
If you believe in Puthoff's explanation for the non-radiating
electron, there is a rapid
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
I’m a Professor Ameritus in Electrical Engineering ... Everything I read in
the 29 page report, and following challenges as answered by the authors,
seems extremely convincing. All objections, typically suggesting fraud,
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
