http://phys.org/news/2014-07-physicists-nature-high-temperature-superconductivity.html
Physicists unlock nature of high-temperature superconductivity
It's magnetism that eliminates the coulomb barrier that allows electrons to
stick together and form cooper pairs found in superconductivity.
Mills spectral evidences is pretty thorough and I can't understand that if
true, it came from some other mysterious process.
It match very well with the theoretical lines. It also looks like these
fingerprints have been verified by third parties. But I can't find
their reports for this at the
It occurred to me to consider the heat dissipation issue in terms of 100
watt incandescent light bulbs, acknowledging that most of the energy
emitted from an incandescent bulb is in the form of heat. So how many 100
watt incandescent bulbs would be equivalent to the 15 megawatts of excess
heat
From Steve High
It occurred to me to consider the heat dissipation issue in terms of
100 watt incandescent light bulbs, acknowledging that most of the
energy emitted from an incandescent bulb is in the form of heat. So
how many 100 watt incandescent bulbs would be equivalent to the 15
What if electron incorporate fast revolving magnetic dipole aka a rotating
bar magnet in a range of Zitterbewegung frequency?
So a steady magnet near to it will experience null or to little magnetic
interaction depending the angle between the dipole axis and the rotating
axis, however two
Steve High diamondweb...@gmail.com wrote:
So how many 100 watt incandescent bulbs would be equivalent to the 15
megawatts of excess heat energy? My math tells me 150,000. Mill's engineers
will need to come up with a way to disperse the heat of 150,000 100 watt
bulbs from a one by one by one
Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
I just love these revisionist historians. Whatever is politically correct
goes. Einstein did fail math when he was younger, but you won't find the
truth googling, much like you won't find it in wikipedia.
I have seen his report cards. You are
For nanoparticles, localized surface plasmon dipole oscillations can give
rise to a large range of intense colors of suspensions or sols containing
the nanoparticles. Nanoparticles and nanowires exhibit strong absorption
and emission bands in the ultraviolet-visible light regime that are not
I realized this morning that I am mixing up the proposed final product with
the proof of concept prototype that Mills says he can bring out in twenty
weeks, which would have much less of a heat dissipation issue. Mea Culpa
for that. Vortex is such an amazing sandbox to play in, gotta be real
It is not one spectral line Mills is showing, it's a battery that matches
theory quite well. Now if we want to be critical consider,
* Is it slightly above noise, was the shown spectral lines a one in a
hundred or even worse spectral capture?
* Is theory predicting hundreds of spectral lines and a
*It is not one spectral line Mills is showing, it's a battery that matches
theory quite well. Now if we want to be critical consider,*
The observation of the spectral line came first, then the theory was
designed to fit that data. If the production of the nanostructures are
consistent over time,
I think the 15 MW would be a continuous smoothed-out number related to the
10 MW of electric power that the proposed final product would emit
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Steve High diamondweb...@gmail.com wrote:
So how many 100 watt
Hi Kevin,
This is from an older thread, but the comment did not get through.
Basically, it is this. What is wrong with a COP of 1.68 on the early rounds of
development of a new technology?
It is almost as if Vortex, with all the claims floating around, has become
jaded by
The issue of heat dissipation being the achilles heel of the suncell appears to
be a persistent criticism on why the Suncell will not work commercially. I
think this opinion is misinformed and this problem really is relatively easy to
solve. The Suncell may fail based on some other issue -
The Sun Cell will produce a huge amount of RF. The wide spread deployment
of the Sun Cell will be the end of the smart phone era.
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
From Steve High
It occurred to me to consider the heat
Come on my friend. It's these kinds of hyper-scarmongerism that causes LENR
advocates to loose credibility.
Is there any reason why the suncell can not be installed inside a rudimentary
Faraday cage?
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent:
Its the same reason way the testers of Rossi's reactor must use a thermal
camera to measure temperature.
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Come on my friend. It's these kinds of hyper-scarmongerism that
causes LENR advocates to loose credibility.
No the assumptions is really not that parameterized. It was developed to
fit the atomic data, the hydrino was a consequence of that theory that came
after. the theory cannot have been adjusted after that, so there is no such
parameters in the theory. But the theory can produce a lot of spectral
OK was I was able to adopt an unreasonably open posture toward Mills's
presentation and spend time searching for the calorimetry in the
demonstration videos. What I found was intriguing enough to bother to do a
little more investigation and invest a bit of my personal credibility with
a physicist
Clarification:
Although I mentioned electron on Coulomb barrier issue on LENR context, I am
not sure about LENR model based on such a mechanism.
-Original Message-
From: ucar u...@verisoft.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014
In reply to James Bowery's message of Tue, 29 Jul 2014 14:22:19 -0500:
Hi James,
[snip]
OK was I was able to adopt an unreasonably open posture toward Mills's
presentation and spend time searching for the calorimetry in the
demonstration videos. What I found was intriguing enough to bother to do
Welcome to the dark side :-)
I, too was highly skeptical of BLP and hydrino until the most recent demos. To
me, what was convincing were:
1. The Bomb Calorimetry. Absent an egregious attempt at fraud, I think the
data is compelling. I think that any egregious fraud would easily be
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
Mills spectral evidences is pretty thorough and I can't understand that if
true, it came from some other mysterious process.
Perhaps it would help if we could move beyond generalizations and get
concrete.
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
there is critiques stemming from not believing in hydrinos
because the feel they must give up on QM, which perhaps is not true.
Perhaps hydrinos and QM are not incompatible; for example, maybe they're
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps hydrinos and QM are not incompatible; for example, maybe they're
dual, as you have suggested previously.
This has puzzled me also. A single transition is 27.2 eV which is in the
uV range not visible. Higher
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 4:53 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Why is this a miracle? Note that there are lots of Hydrino sizes, and
therefore different sizes are likely to predominate under different
circumstances. This could go a long way toward explaining the variability
in CF
experiments. In
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
With the hydrino explosion reportedly with 10,000 suns concentration ...
I have been trying to get a sense of what 10,000 suns would look like in
the lab. I can only imagine it would be bright. I tried to get some
More evidence is mounting for a view I have posited for some years now.
namely the dipole-like nature of subatomic 'particles'.
UCAR,
for a similar view, check out the 'Cordus conjecture'.
The Cordus conjecture [8] proposes that every particle has two
reactive ends, which are a small
I wrote:
I've always been a little uncomfortable with the way the testing done on
behalf of BLP at Harvard-Smithsonian CfA is characterized.
What I need to come clean with is that I've been a little unfair, here.
Because it turns out that the University of California at Berkeley has
provided
*http://www.greenstyle.it/defkalion-reattore-pronto-alla-fine-dellestate-e-nuova-joint-venture-americana-99057.html
http://www.greenstyle.it/defkalion-reattore-pronto-alla-fine-dellestate-e-nuova-joint-venture-americana-99057.html*
*Translated:*
by *Guido Grassadonio
I thought it was important to say more explicitly why I believe the Mills
demo calorimetry may be flawed. I hope the enclosed diagram will come
through to Vortex – I have seen others come through recently and I tried to
make this a small image file. If it doesn’t come through, I apologize.
Bob, if you view the video where the calorimetry was being demonstrated, it
appears that the heat was calculated from the temp rise. It seems to me that
if there was Qcond being conducted out of the conductor, it was ignore. That
means that the energy output was underestimated because Qcond
32 matches
Mail list logo
