RE: [Vo]:Colloquium at SRI

Thank a lot Jones Beene for this great and interesting report. If Holmlid process was some how creating dense material that enhanced the Stella type proton proton chain reaction, from deuteron proton reactions onwards that would already be amazing. That nucleons may actually disintegrate is

Re: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT

Well if Kaons are present on the up side we always thought something strange was going on in this process. Although energetically there is enough rest mass in Deuterium to produce a Kaon through some kind of low energy or collective trigger for the nucleons to trigger can it account for the

Re: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT

Yup I was also wondering about the different quarks in the Kaons. Was the signature in their data clear? Or was there some other reason they inferred Kaons as well as Pions? Sent from my iPhone > On 26 Oct 2015, at 08:03, Axil Axil wrote: > > K−, negatively charged

RE: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT

nt matter and antimatter types instantly. It is easier to accept that light energy from the laser is turned into matter and antimatter, especially since the color of the light changes the nature of the matter produced. Said in another way, different light makes different matter. On Mon, Oct 26, 2

RE: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT

at light energy from the laser is turned into matter and antimatter, especially since the color of the light changes the nature of the matter produced. Said in another way, different light makes different matter. On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com>

Re: [Vo]:Would Rydberg Matter in Cosmic Radiation.

tested > many years ago, and found not to be accurate. Apparently Pd-D cold fusion > does not benefit from higher muon flux. That could mean many things – > including the lack of deuteron fusion as the relevant explanation for excess > heat. > > From: Stephen Cooke > &

Re: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT

have a lot to read now and try to understand. > On 28 Oct 2015, at 01:05, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> The alternatives are also hard to explain, h

Re: [Vo]:Re: Would Rydberg Matter in Cosmic Radiation.

ed at the Pd-D system and muon > flux did not include the correct magnetic field and resonant conditions that > were present in the P-F testing. Muon flux polarization may be important > when interacting with two D inside a FCC lattice position in Pd with its B > field. > > Bob >

Re: [Vo]:Re: Casimir, ZPE and Holmlid

t; the LeClair reactor. >> >> DGT could start their reaction in a few hours because an electric arc is a >> powerful source of incoherent EMF power. >> >> Holmlid’s effect is difficult to duplicate because most replicators don’t >> have the patience to wait for weeks t

Re: [Vo]:Re: Casimir, ZPE and Holmlid

It's a nice process you are describing, but I'm curious how it can generate the mesons reported by Holmlid? Is there some mechanism based on this idea where mesons are produced or can they only generated by very high energy interactions with nucleons and require much higher energies than you

Re: [Vo]:Colloquium at SRI

of produced lepton and neutrinos produced. I'm curious how it can work I suppose we will need to wait to see the of their theory. Sent from my iPad > On 23 okt. 2015, at 16:54, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > From: Stephen Cooke > > Ø That nucleons may

RE: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT

different matter. On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: Could generation of +/- s quark pairs be the trigger for nucleon disintegration. Could each pair with an up quark to form kaons and force the disintegration of the nucleons from whi

Re: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT

Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> "*** If I understand correctly there are no sufficiently heavy elements >> available in Holmlids experiment for Kaons to form this way? …" >> >> This i

Re: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT

independently. I'm fully with you there Eric. I hope we get that verification someday. > On 28 okt. 2015, at 01:05, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> The alte

RE: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT

il.com> wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: The alternatives are also hard to explain, however: There is another alternative you didn't mention -- Holmlid has a fertile imagination and is confused and needs to pull in someone who

Re: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT

conditions to spawn Phi Mesons from nucleons, as the high energy cyclotrons used by DAPhiNE and TRIUMF. > On 26 okt. 2015, at 17:57, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Yup I agree with you Axil although I am no expert on these matters I also > don't know of

[Vo]:Would Rydberg Matter in Cosmic Radiation.

Would Rydberg Matter or UDD be more sensitive to muons from cosmic rays or may be even neutrinos? Than ordinary matter? Cosmic ray muons have can have high energy for example there are 1 1 GeV muons per sq meter per second. Their interaction with ordinary matter is very low. I think this

RE: [Vo]:Would Rydberg Matter in Cosmic Radiation.

I meant "encounter a 1 GeV muon" but neutrino encounters (with possibly even higher Energy) might also be potentially interesting if they can occur. > From: stephen_coo...@hotmail.com > Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 12:00:41 +0100 > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: [Vo]:Would Rydberg Matter in Cosmic

Re: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT

r is gone? > > We are at a stage in LENR where Niels Bohr was doing his exploration of the > structure of the atom. Holmlid needs to modify his experimental processes to > get as much info out of his experiment as he can. > > > >> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 7:15 AM, S

Re: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT

Could generation of +/- s quark pairs be the trigger for nucleon disintegration. Could each pair with an up quark to form kaons and force the disintegration of the nucleons from which the up quark comes? Each s quark has a rest mass of 100MeV. I'm not sure if there is a meson containing an s

RE: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT

in another way, different light makes different matter. On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: Could generation of +/- s quark pairs be the trigger for nucleon disintegration. Could each pair with an up quark to form kaons and force the disinteg

Re: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT

lmlid is the first. We can't wait for experts to develop out of > the vacuum. > >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> Yup with due respect to Holmlid who obviously has good well developed >> expertise in the

Re: [Vo]:Re: The vacuum is the glue that keeps the universe together.

t is an > artificial mathematical derivation that is useful for equation solving. > >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:28 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> Interesting ideas and points about the numbering system. I wonder what would >> b

Re: [Vo]:Re: The vacuum is the glue that keeps the universe together.

Interesting ideas and points about the numbering system. I wonder what would be the best most meaningful fundamental numbering system to use. With spin at least I suppose the current numbering system has the advantage of easily distinguishing fermions and Bosons. And gives insights for fermion

Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Optical Tornadoes with specific values for resonance

I just read this article in Space Daily: http://www.spacedaily.com/m/reports/UMD_discovery_could_enable_portable_particle_accelerators_999.html It includes some interesting aspects that I could not help wondering if they are relevant to Holmlid's experiment. But in particular the discussion

Re: [Vo]:Re: Casimir, ZPE and Holmlid

there are other and better combinations of increasing energy effects each lower energy effect opening the door to the next more energetic one. > On 30 Oct 2015, at 14:26, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > I did mention cosmic muons but I also be remember reading

Re: [Vo]:Re: Casimir, ZPE and Holmlid

I did mention cosmic muons but I also be remember reading that they have been mentioned elsewhere in the past i Sent from my iPhone > On 29 Oct 2015, at 21:25, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > From: Stephen Cooke > > Ø It's a nice process you are describing

RE: [Vo]:Would Rydberg Matter in Cosmic Radiation.

three mechanisms that produce energy: entanglement, particle production and magnetism. outputs The SPP produces heat, XUV and X-ray radiation, magnetism, and electrons as output. On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: 1 GeV could be enough to genera

RE: [Vo]:Re: The fifth force.

Thanks for that link Axil. It was very interesting to me in a couple of ways. By the way if magnetism affects space time in such a way I wonder what it says about spin. Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 21:34:43 -0400 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: The fifth force. From: janap...@gmail.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com

RE: [Vo]:Super strong glass is based on adding alumina

I like the idea of Jones Beene's test using light stimulation, it would be interesting to see some day, even if it proved negative it would tell us something. If positive even better. I wonder if the Spectrum when its in SSM would be interesting, Would this glass also be transparent to UV?

Re: [Vo]:A hybrid Holmlid-Hot-Cat experiment

It looks like an interesting idea and not too difficult an experiment to set up and to perform. If it shows promise it could easily be adapted to use different frequency light maybe even IR and UV to see how it affects the results. What ever its result It could potentially give a good data

Re: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

This is definitely a crazy train of thought on my part but it's got me wondering: Bearing in mind Holmlids detection of muons and possibility they come from decay of positive or negative pions along with the fact that they are generated in ultra dense deuterium. Is It possible that the nuclei

RE: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

I really enjoy browsing this site, the discussions are amazing. I recently on LENR Forum had some similar thoughts but since I am more an enthusiast than and far from a serious physicist so they are pretty speculative and I appreciate from the discussions here that there are also all sorts of

Re: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

they are inferred – from finding muons, > which can be detected. Hopefully, Ólafsson will address this issue of > detection on Thursday. > > > From: Stephen Cooke > > … Is It possible that the nuclei are sufficiently close that those pions or > virtual ones g

RE: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

You might be right Axil, These days I certainly tend to think there is some kind of collective disruptive or resonant behaviour that is exciting the nuclei or causing them to act this way. I acknowledge your good arguments and evidence for the formation of SPP's in these devices. It also seems

Re: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

Oct 2015, at 22:18, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > I guess there is a chance that they saw X-ray spectra from Pionic Deuterium > as well as inferring from muons of specific energy. It will be interesting to > see what he says on Thursday, I hope someo

RE: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

say he could well have another explanation. From: eric.wal...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 08:47:08 -0500 Subject: Re: [Vo]:MMDD Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration To: vortex-l@eskimo.com On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 2:21 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote:

RE: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

Oct 2015 08:47:08 -0500 Subject: Re: [Vo]:MMDD Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration To: vortex-l@eskimo.com On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 2:21 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: If any was produced we would need to balance this against those the energy required fo

Re: [Vo]:Publishing the Lundin/Lidgren paper

I'm glad it was published. I think it is unlikely that a theorist is going to find the complete theory in one simple step. In the same way it is unlikely that the first simple experiment will create just the right complete conditions for perfect LENR. But each one of these theories and

RE: [Vo]: How many atoms to make condensed matter?

Its very hard to see how a single flake can transform between a planar atomic crystal state and ultra dense linear paired vortex. But perhaps there is a mechanism based on energetic and state conservation effects. Assuming the effect is more classical and simple however could the switch between

Re: [Vo]:New force couples electron to neutron

Very interesting especially if a new force is implied. I do wonder though if the neutron cross- section is implicated somehow. This can also have a size several times that of the nucleus. Although Li7 has even number of neutrons which would have a neutron cross-section smaller than Li6 say I

Re: [Vo]:Evidence of LENR activity on Charon

I wonder if they can detect isotope ratios from an analysis of water ice or atmosphere from Pluto and Charon. That could be interesting Sent from my iPhone > On 01 Feb 2016, at 22:27, Axil Axil wrote: > > PLUTO’S MOON CHARON SHOWS FRACTURED SURFACE, SIGNS OF RECENT

Re: [Vo]:Electron plasma frequency

and frequency below that of the plasma frequency? Is it trapped as an evanescent wave ? Or is the transition inhibited some how? > On 26 feb. 2016, at 20:47, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Axil, > > I found this interesting but very clear and simply e

RE: [Vo]:Stimulated Beta decay of resonant nuclei?

Beta decay of resonant nuclei? To: vortex-l@eskimo.com On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: Has stimulated beta decay been considered here already? I found this old but interesting patent application by Rugerro Santilli from 2003 on line. http:

Re: [Vo]:Big surprise or big dud ?

Great find Axil. Did you already forward it to MFMP? It's interesting that they use Boron as a neutron shield too. That might be important for them to know too. > On 25 Feb 2016, at 05:25, Axil Axil wrote: > >

[Vo]:Electron plasma frequency

Apparently Silver or copper has a plasma frequency in the UV region which is why it reflects light of below these frequencies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_oscillation If i understand correctly at frequencies below the plasma frequency photon emission no longer propagates but instead

RE: [Vo]:Electron plasma frequency

:03 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: Apparently Silver or copper has a plasma frequency in the UV region which is why it reflects light of below these frequencies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_oscillation If i understand correctly at frequencies below the

Re: [Vo]:Electron plasma frequency

ir > energy into the vacuum. No gamma level EMF is released because the photons > are constrained indefinitely in a dark mode. > >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> Apparently Silver or copper has a pl

[Vo]:Stimulated Beta decay of resonant nuclei?

Has stimulated beta decay been considered here already? I found this old but interesting patent application by Rugerro Santilli from 2003 on line. http://www.google.com/patents/US20030016774 Is it already known here? Given current ideas from Norman Cook and Andrea Rossi on the extended

RE: [Vo]:Stimulated Beta decay of resonant nuclei?

interesting too ;) From: eric.wal...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:57:26 -0600 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Stimulated Beta decay of resonant nuclei? To: vortex-l@eskimo.com On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: Has stimulated beta decay been considered here a

Re: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung, characteristic X-Ray's Rydberg matter and Ions

Sorry a couple of time I said nuclei but I meant atoms. This is about electron atom interactions not nucleus excitations. Sent from my iPad > On 11 mrt. 2016, at 23:33, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > I'm wondering if there is an explanation for clean

Re: [Vo]:Re: Bremsstrahlung experimental note

Hi Axil a couple of quick questions? Was it confirmed the pulse was only a few seconds? I thought they only spotted it in the spectrum at the end of longer session but are not sure exactly when and how long it lasted once initiated? I have been trying to find papers and references on high

[Vo]:Bremsstrahlung, characteristic X-Ray's Rydberg matter and Ions

I'm wondering if there is an explanation for clean Bremsstrahlung emissions with out characteristic X-Rays apart from Axil's interesting explanation (which maybe the correct one) of broad spectrum emissions from SPP. First some well known background about Bremsstrahlung that I'm sure you are

Re: [Vo]:Re: Bremsstrahlung experimental note

Thanks Mark, That makes it clear and sounds like a good analysis. I will certainly stay tuned and am looking forward to the re-runs greatly. You are making very good and thorough analysis. Stephen > On 12 mrt. 2016, at 00:45, Mark Jurich <jur...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Step

Re: [Vo]:Re: Bremsstrahlung experimental note

le. > > I say that all these "Dark Mode" objects share a dualism with the > astronomical black hole which allows them to do unexpected things like > catalyze LENR. > >> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com>

[Vo]:Collision Cascades and Electron Phonon Coupling

Bearing in mind the recent finding of high energy Bremsstrahlung like spectra by MFMP and references to 100 keV stimulation elsewhere in the literature. I wonder if Collision cascades of ions can become important in these systems. They usually become relevant with ion collisions of a few 10s

Re: [Vo]: MFMP GS5.3 - a replication

This small band of engineers and makers thinkers and analysts are doing amazing and very important work. They are a true fellowship holding on to an ideal for LOS, independent and thorough testing and open discussion and analysis, doing something for all people. This is so important in these

[Vo]:UDH, UDD, degenerate matter and white dwarf stars

If UDD and UDH is actually equivalent to electron degenerate matter it might be similar to the materials proposed to form white dwarf stars: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_dwarf https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degenerate_matter White dwarfs are thought to no longer have fusion and associated

RE: [Vo]:UDH, UDD, degenerate matter and white dwarf stars

Here is another interesting link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray_binary White dwarf are in fact quite faint and the radiation is normally attributed to left over energy from gravitational collapse. X-ray stars are much brighter at X-ray wavelengths than optical wavelengths. Xray stars as

[Vo]:photobeta decay

I recently came across the concept of photobeta decay. Photoneutron or Photoproton decay is a well known process which occurs when very high MeV photons of sufficient energy and characteristics interact with nuclei and can result in the emission of Protons or Neutrons providing the associated Q

Re: [Vo]: E-Cat progress

”… but I have a feeling that it will not involve > neutrons. > > From: Stephen Cooke > > @Jones Beene. Are you sure that they are not both correct? You said something > interesting about the medical use of Ni62 and how both Ni62 and Ni64 form > radio active iso

Re: [Vo]: E-Cat progress

@Jones Beene. Are you sure that they are not both correct? You said something interesting about the medical use of Ni62 and how both Ni62 and Ni64 form radio active isotopes Ni63 and Ni 65 if irradiated by neutrons. Could this be part of the process some how? For the LENR device maybe Ni65 is

RE: [Vo]:Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

I'm not sure about stimulate decay by Neutron spallation of these very stable nuclei as this would require huge energies normally associated with high energy particle collisions, (unless those energies can be reached by accumulation or resonance somehow). I guess this is your point also. I do

[Vo]:Lunar LENR?

OK OK… I know this thought and question way way out there... and probably puts me in the lunatic fringe… I Apolo-gise for that ;) Sorry couldn't resist. I wonder if there is evidence of LENR on the moon or LUNAR LENR? The moon is: 1. In vacuum 2. Has had many thermal cycles (quite long though ~

RE: [Vo]:Lunar LENR?

Hmmm Interesting paper: DETECTION OF X-RAY FLUORESCENCE LINE FEATURE FROM THE LUNAR SURFACE 1234 Y. Kamata , T. Takeshima , T. Okada , and K. Terada http://www.u.phys.nagoya-u.ac.jp/uxge/publication/pdf/kamata99_2.pdf.

RE: [Vo]:Lunar LENR?

. Because these particles are metastable, these exotic neutral particles (ENP) will decay in time if their stores of energy are not replenished in an ongoing process. On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: OK OK… I know this thought and question w

RE: [Vo]:Rossi and IH have received the ERV Report

Thanks for the thought provoking post… I agree. Group think and consensus can be more powerful, more widespread and more damaging than any planned or determined conspiracy. People identify with and feel part of a social/political group or organisation and go along with what they think their

[Vo]:Lev Berstein patent: US 20140192941 A1?

Has this patent from Lev Berstein been reviewed here? Is he a known player in LENR? I found this patent online: Method of acceleration of nuclear transmutation of isotopes by carrying out exothermic reactions US 20140192941 A1 http://www.google.com/patents/US20140192941 which on brief reading

Re: [Vo]:Next Big Future - goes out on a limb

Hi Jed, Do you or your contact know by any chance who initially introduced the ERV to the project? Was it AR, IH, or someone else? It seems his role was not for the public verification of the plant but rather as an independent arbitrator between IH and AR. There have been a lot of

Re: [Vo]:Details of the Thermacore runaway in 1996

Wow so this triggered at room temperature? I wish we new more about this test and its products, especially with the hindsight of all that's been learnt in the 20 years since. It's an interesting topic much needed now. I miss reading these scientific discussions on vortex-l. Has any one tried

[Vo]:Relationship between Slow neutron capture cross section and neutron spallation energy

Is there a relationship between the cross-section for slow neutron capture in particular nuclei and the nucleus excitation energy needed in the nucleus to cause neutron spallation? For example B10 has a high neutron cross-section. Is there s relationship between this and the energy needed for

[Vo]:p and B11 colliding beam fusion

Has this paper already been looked at here? apologies if it has. http://w3fusion.ph.utexas.edu/ifs/ifsreports/919_wong.pdf The resonance proton cross-sections and proton beam energies in the 100's of keV range look interesting to me.

RE: [Vo]:1 MW of heat in a 6,500 sq. ft. facility without industrial ventilation would be fatal

In the interest of clarity hopefully: Here is a link containing containerised mobile boilers which you might find interesting. I'm not yet clear if they are used inside buildings, Also they are for oil and gas boilers rather than electrical ones but I think you will agree there is a passing

RE: [Vo]:Some questions about H(1) ultra dense hydrogen.

Oops i meant H(0) of course From: stephen_coo...@hotmail.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 17:19:02 +0200 Subject: [Vo]:Some questions about H(1) ultra dense hydrogen. Some questions about H(1) ultra dense hydrogen: Is it possible for H(1) to exist as only one pair of atoms

[Vo]:Some questions about H(1) ultra dense hydrogen.

Some questions about H(1) ultra dense hydrogen: Is it possible for H(1) to exist as only one pair of atoms in dense form or is a layer of additional pairs in a vortex is required to stabilise it? Does anyone know if H(1) matter would contain stable electron orbitals, or would the electrons be

Re: [Vo]:Some questions about H(1) ultra dense hydrogen.

larger cluster of pairs > is possible with no electrons – instead the charge is balanced by deflated > electrons captured in the dielectric. The paper is on the LENR-CANR site. > There is no “Rydberg matter” per se, but this dense state can be labeled as > IRH or inverted Rydberg

Re: [Vo]:Some questions about H(1) ultra dense hydrogen.

gt; IRH or inverted Rydberg hydrogen. > > From: Stephen Cooke > > Oops i meant H(0) of course > > Some questions about H(1) ultra dense hydrogen: > > Is it possible for H(1) to exist as only one pair of atoms in dense form or > is a layer of additional pairs in a vo

Re: [Vo]:Relationship between Slow neutron capture cross section and neutron spallation energy

Thanks Robin, > On 20 mei 2016, at 23:40, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: > > In reply to Stephen Cooke's message of Fri, 20 May 2016 12:04:22 +0200: > Hi, > [snip] >> Is there a relationship between the cross-section for slow neutron capture >> in particular nuclei and the nucleus excitation

Re: [Vo]:Relationship between Slow neutron capture cross section and neutron spallation energy

Very interesting link too, I'm just reading it. Are you based in the Netherlands by any chance? Sent from my iPad > On 20 mei 2016, at 23:40, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: > > In reply to Stephen Cooke's message of Fri, 20 May 2016 12:04:22 +0200: > Hi, > [snip] >> Is there a relationship between

Re: [Vo]:Re: Let's continue to think about passive vs active approach to LENR 's existentil problems

Hi Jed, do you know what the temperature of the steam was? I understood you mentioned that Jim said the pressure also rose, but I wonder if it was at air pressure if it might have explained the lack of apparent steam vapour? If the steam was much hotter than 100 deg C at air pressure it would

Re: [Vo]:Re: Let's continue to think about passive vs active approach to LENR 's existentil problems

will benefit somehow from what is done now and once all things are considered perhaps have a strong and accepted basis. > On 11 May 2016, at 16:08, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Jed, do you know wha

[Vo]:Rydberg Matter and electron orbitals

Has anyone looked at RM from the point of view of quantum mechanical electron orbitals? If so could you help me understand some crazy thoughts and questions I have about it ? I understand Rydberg hydrogen matter typically forms from excited hydrogen atoms in some way. Most literature seems to

Re: [Vo]:Validity of E-Cat 1 MW plant test

Hello Jed Have you ever looked at the pictures and technical description of the 1 MW ecat on this web site? It might save you some confusion. http://ecat.com/ecat-products/ecat-1-mw Stephen > On 16 mei 2016, at 23:18, Jed Rothwell wrote: > > Axil Axil

Re: [Vo]:LENR and the feline nature of the E-Cat

-of-industrial-boilers/ I agree the application is a puzzle, I'm curious to find out what it is some day. Thanks again for your earlier clarifications > On 14 mei 2016, at 18:30, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> w

Re: [Vo]:LENR and the feline nature of the E-Cat

to this kind of device especially if it's different temperature ranges, but it shows the kind of thing that is possible. > On 14 mei 2016, at 19:11, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Jed, > > thanks for your extended reply, I'm also far from bei

Re: [Vo]:LENR and the feline nature of the E-Cat

this is not the case, as the furnace it self might be much hotter? Stephen > On 14 mei 2016, at 19:11, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Jed, > > thanks for your extended reply, I'm also far from being able todo the HVAC > calculations so respect y

Re: [Vo]:Re: LENR and the feline nature of the E-Cat

Hi Jed, I understood that he did indeed have 4 250 kW units in the container which he used for the test. The older 50 or so smaller units were also in the container as back up units but were never used in 1 year test, only the 250 W units were used apparently. There are pictures I think on

Re: [Vo]:LENR and the feline nature of the E-Cat

> On 14 mei 2016, at 20:43, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> Regarding the waste heat, you mentioned that all the waste heat can't be >> transferred to the water? But surely if the heat source

Re: [Vo]:Re: LENR and the feline nature of the E-Cat

Hi Jed, This is probably a naive question on my part, so I apologize for that. But in the interest of clarity I wonder if the definition of "excess heat" and "heat balance" is the same for all parties. I strongly expect it is of course. It seems from what you said that the technicians

Re: [Vo]:Rydberg Matter and electron orbitals

Thanks Eric for this information. Sent from my iPad > On 12 mei 2016, at 03:46, Eric Walker wrote: > > With regard to excited electrons in non-s-shell orbitals, keep in mind the > precession of the orbital around the atomic center. I presume it will cause a > p-shell

Re: [Vo]:Rydberg Matter and electron orbitals

is removed from the system. > >> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> Has anyone looked at RM from the point of view of quantum mechanical >> electron orbitals? If so could you help me understand some crazy thou

Re: [Vo]:Rydberg Matter and electron orbitals

I am quite curious if it is the switch from a P orbital to and S orbital or visa versa is what causes it to switch to from H(1) to H(0). Perhaps the electrons still remain in an excited state in the other orbital. > On 11 mei 2016, at 21:03, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com&

Re: [Vo]:LENR and the feline nature of the E-Cat

Hi Jed, I wonder if I'm missing something? You said a the 1 MW ecat plant would cook people in the warehouse? I'm for sure no boiler expert but I have recently checked on line and if we look at other boilers with other heat sources it seems that steam boilers of MW size are rather typical for

Re: [Vo]:Re: LENR and the feline nature of the E-Cat

Hello Jed, I'm clearly no expert and do not claim to be but there are interesting examples of electrical boilers on the Internet. Here is an interesting link to a electrical water heater that seems comparable to an e-cat unit.

Re: [Vo]:Re: LENR and the feline nature of the E-Cat

trusted LENR representatives as well as yourself get to see that data more clearly some day. Stephen > On 15 mei 2016, at 15:00, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> This is probably a naive quest

Re: [Vo]:Re: LENR and the feline nature of the E-Cat

worked with electric boilers on Vortex who could clarify. I would just like to understand what are the real constraints without perhaps incorrect speculation. Stephen > On 15 mei 2016, at 20:50, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 12:28

Re: [Vo]:Proposed Satellite Meeting to the 43rd EPS Meeting on Plasma Physics on LENR

Great looks like a promising meeting. I hope it gets positive attention, I feel maybe the time is right but we will see. Sent from my iPhone > On 04 May 2016, at 15:30, Jed Rothwell wrote: > > See: > >

Re: [Vo]:Penon described the position of flow meter

Jed.. nice square bracketing. What if we remove those... and assume the ERV's English is fine. Have you considered the external tank could be located at the external plant close to the condensor? In fact everything we say is speculation and can be interpreted how we want depending how we want

Re: [Vo]:Penon described the position of flow meter

ish bickering. I intend to wait from now on for real data not opinions and if that is not forthcoming then I wait with curiosity for the Judgement. Sent from my iPhone On 21 Feb 2017, at 16:12, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com<mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com>> wrote: Stephen

[Vo]:Co59 Beta decay rates on Magnetar surface

I wonder if the following linked recent paper can be interesting to some here especially Axil and Eric? http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10509-016-2830-0 It's concerning changes in beta decay rates in the presence of magnetic fields on magnetars. I have so far only read the abstract

  1   2   >