I believe the validators have already done that and have concluded that the
energy output can not be explain chemically or any other way other than the
hydrino. They have come out very strongly for Mills.
Though I do not have a horse in this race, I still find GUTCP and the hydrino
concept more satisfying and compelling than all the nano stuff, nanoplasmonics,
quantum mechanics, BEC, magetic monopole, superatom, soliton metaphasic
shielding explanation. You still have not explained how your nickel
nanostructure NAE can survive the temps.
Why do you insist that Hydrino is the wrong explanation? Mills has provided
spectral evidence for hydrino, hasn't he? Why do you believe DGT and their
mythical hyperion more than actual spectral evidence? Why do you insist on
your convoluted quantum mechanics BEC soliton explanation which certainly has
fewer evidence than what Mills has provided for his hydrino?
Just curious.
BTW, remember, the fact that I am saying this contrary to my own self interest
should at least be worth something.
Jojo
----- Original Message -----
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 4:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Is the SunCell a titanium burner?
To find where the Sun Cell power is coming from, experimental procedure as
follows:
Test the power of the electric arch only,
Then, add the TiCl2 and measure the power output.
Then add water is small steps and measure the associated power output
increase.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Jojo Iznart <jojoiznar...@gmail.com> wrote:
yea, there's oxygen from H20, but isn't the real question be "how much?"
Maybe you can do the math and compute the amount of oxygen and then
estimate the amount of titanium and then add 2 and 2 together and figure out if
there is enough chemical energy to explain the huge explosion.
For that matter, can you think of any substance that would produce that
level of explosion and blinding light from such miniscule amount?
Jojo
----- Original Message -----
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 3:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Is the SunCell a titanium burner?
Mills remarked that there is no oxygen available.
In the 20,000C plasma blast, the water will decompose into h2 and O. SO
there is oxygen.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Mike Carrell <mi...@medleas.com> wrote:
Optical instruments to quantitatively measure the radiant energy are
standard lab equipment and can be calibrated to NIST standards.
This is a bomb calorimeter. I do not think it incorporates optical
instruments. (A schematic of the calorimeter would have helped.) Plus, even
when you use NIST calibrated instruments, you should still calibrate.
Especially during a demonstration. It would not have taken long to set off a
small charge of some explosive. Or thermite.
Speculation about titanium is a distraction, for it is not involved
in the chemistry of the SunCell.
Well, we should speculate about whatever chemicals were in the
explosion. Mills remarked that there is no oxygen available. That is a start.
But what was there, and how much energy can it produce? And can we be sure the
bomb calorimeter is working, without a calibration?
The purpose of a demonstration is to teach the audience. To answer
questions. To persuade. It should simplify and clarify what is happening. It
cannot be full experiment that answers every question. It should be simple,
covering limited ground, because the audience cannot learn much in one hour.
- Jed
