. “narcissistic personality disorder.”
Roomsearching is this humour ??? Do you find this to be a laugh ??? Does aggression please you ???? . On Aug 6, 12:43 pm, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Marcus <[email protected]> wrote: > > . > > > Rodger, > > > I do this because of what it says on the label. > > > Advaita-Zen google discussion group. That’s what this is > > remember .. > > What have you done in Advaita or Zen to discuss about ? > Can you explain some of your personal spiritual experiences ? > > > This is not a forum foe insulting others. A chance for cowards blood- > > let into others without face to face reality. Or for onlookers to > > watch the fool and laugh. Like the court jester playing the fool. > > This is only perverse ego's at work. > > Sometimes I have posted very good things from Nisargadatta's or Ramana's > books. > They were not appreciated. Someone said "post your own opinions , don't post > this old shit". > I have been extremely disappointed with such an attitude. Why didn't you say > something when such things happen ? > You are just angry because your ego is being overshadowed by my Supreme > personality. > > > > > Roomsearching needs help ……………… continuous insults is the sign of a > > broken spirit. > > The mind is definitely in a disturbed state after realization. > Manonasa implies destruction of the mind. > But it does not have much power because the Self is in control. > Someone already said that I had a narcissistic personality disorder. > Someone said I have rejection issues and childhood abuse issues and that I > am gay. > Now you say I have a broken spirit. > I would not give a shit about whatever these people said even if they were > certified psychiatrists. > Of course, they would demand a fee from me to give me such judgements. > You guys are giving it to me for free. You could not save your lives with > your smattering of psychology. > > > > > We all need help from time to time ……… it’s having the courage to > > ask !!!! > > What help can you offer me ? I am in a state where I need no more help > > from anyone. > > > Rodger please don't suggest that continious insults are in any way > > associated with inner peace. > > Do you think slicing a cat in half is a sign of inner peace ? Have you seen > UG's videos on youtube? Continuous idiocy requires continuous insults. > > > > > Please ............. > > You must have a very terrible sense of humour. > > > > > > > . > > > On Aug 6, 11:06 am, Rodger <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Marcus, what do you get out of this? > > > > On Aug 6, 3:22 am, "Hughes, Marcus" <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > Roomsearching, what do you get out of this. They are laughing at you > > and using you as the fool. > > > > You present yourself as the hopeless case and they enjoy that, it makes > > them feel clever. > > > > > There is a better way ....... Please trust someone. Please let someone > > help you. > > > > > You don't have to be angry. > > > > > . > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: roomsearching [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > Sent: 05 August 2010 17:18 > > > > To: Hughes, Marcus > > > > Cc: Advaita-Zen > > > > Subject: Re: Here's an interesting question > > > > > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Marcus <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > . > > > > > Roomsearching why ??? > > > > > "It may show that you are an ignoranus in spiritual matters as well." > > > > > Your words can be so elegant and inspiring. Why do you repeatedly > > > > destroy your magic. What forces inside you create beauty, then spoil > > > > it. > > > > > The insults roomsearching, why ??? > > > > > Marcus, if you notice, I have spelt ignoramus as ignoranus. > > > > Don't you think that is beautiful ? > > > > > . > > > > > On Aug 5, 12:56 pm, roomsearching <[email protected]<mailto: > > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Kali, > > > > > > > Might have been the way you have said. As I said before I like to > > show > > > > > > off my igneranse. Did I do a Rodger ? :) > > > > > > It is spelt as ignorance. I know spelling is not important but don't > > be so > > > > > ignorant about English language. > > > > > It may show that you are an ignoranus in spiritual matters as well. > > > > > > > On Aug 4, 5:39 pm, Mahakali <[email protected]<mailto: > > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Anandanand > > > > > > > > it is the other way round. The philosophy of Advaita with its > > doctrine > > > > > > > of non-doership came before the doctrine of karma. > > > > > > > > Respectfully... > > > > > > > > Kali > > > > > > > > On Aug 4, 2:19 pm, Anandanand <[email protected]<mailto: > > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > We still have Kings, but they are known by different names. > > > > > > > > > I didn't get what is the doctrine of no-personal-choice. If > > that is no- > > > > > > > > doer-nothing getting done, then as per my knowledge this was to > > arrest > > > > > > > > the karma thing which went on to excess. Though I am not an > > expert on > > > > > > > > that. > > > > > > > > > On Aug 4, 2:59 pm, Mahakali <[email protected]<mailto: > > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > People go to the Courts and Judges of their own countries > > with the > > > > > > > > > expectation of seeing justice done. What they actually find > > is a > > > > > > legal > > > > > > > > > system that favours the ones who can afford the best QC and > > knows how > > > > > > > > > to "the system works" (timeframes, arguments, negotiations, > > delays > > > > > > etc > > > > > > > > > etc). In most cases, justice is not done and is not even seen > > to be > > > > > > > > > done. > > > > > > > > > > Hence, the reason many people resort to religion for justice > > i.e. in > > > > > > > > > the hope to get justice in an afterlife. > > > > > > > > > > Also, don't forget that the doctrine of Karma was created > > shortly > > > > > > > > > after the doctrine of no-personal-choice was created. The > > Kings were > > > > > > > > > worried that, if people would think that the people were > > allowed to > > > > > > do > > > > > > > > > whatever they wanted, they feared that the poor would revolt > > against > > > > > > > > > them. Hence, they paid (bribed) the Brahmins who come out > > with the > > > > > > > > > idea that if the untouchables were so poor was because of > > something > > > > > > > > > they did in their previou lives (law of karma). As the masses > > trusted > > > > > > > > > and believed their Brahmins, they accepted to continue to > > live in > > > > > > > > > their low conditions and to live in poverty because the > > Brahmins said > > > > > > > > > so. > > > > > > > > > > Love > > > > > > > > > > A > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 4, 10:30 am, Anandanand <[email protected]<mailto: > > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Kali, > > > > > > > > > > > > as far as the local laws,rules and regulations are > > concerned, > > > > > > then, I > > > > > > > > > > > have to abide and respect them. As a citizen of a > > country, it > > > > > > would be > > > > > > > > > > > foolish and disrespecful to do otherwise. They are meant > > to allow > > > > > > > > > > > society to function as a whole. > > > > > > > > > > > So is Religion. The Judiciary has it's own drawback, so > > does > > > > > > religion. > > > > > > > > > > The difference being, the things are tangible, in most > > cases, in > > > > > > > > > > Judiciary, where as they are mostly intangible in the case > > of > > > > > > > > > > religion, making it in the form of beliefs. All this IMO. > > > > > > > > > > > In most places in the world, Judiciary has it's benifits. > > And > > > > > > places > > > > > > > > > > where it doesn't, are mostly in chaos. > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 4, 12:14 pm, Mahakali <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Anandanand > > > > > > > > > > > > as far as the local laws,rules and regulations are > > concerned, > > > > > > then, I > > > > > > > > > > > have to abide and respect them. As a citizen of a > > country, it > > > > > > would be > > > > > > > > > > > foolish and disrespecful to do otherwise. They are meant > > to allow > > > > > > > > > > > society to function as a whole. > > > > > > > > > > > > However, I do not see them as "beliefs" , I see them more > > as > > > > > > > > > > > instruments as part of the machinery put in place to run > > > > > > society.And, > > > > > > > > > > > of course, there is the right and the wrong of any law or > > > > > > regulation > > > > > > > > > > > and this can be taken personally or not as a belief or a > > personal > > > > > > > > > > > stand. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > Kali > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 4, 6:46 am, Anandanand <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Kali, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I meant "do not believe in anything (religion > > included)" > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you say the same for the trafic rules or the penal > > code ? I > > > > > > think > > > > > > > > > > > > not, just because that will penalise you materially. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 4, 2:04 am, Mahakali <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I meant "do not believe in anything (religion > > included)" as > > > > > > in every > > > > > > > > > > > > > possible thing. However,I suppose that when I say "I > > do not > > > > > > believe in > > > > > > > > > > > > > anything" I do not really mean as in "in anything" or > > > > > > "completely". I > > > > > > > > > > > > > still have my attachments but I do not have, > > anylonger, > > > > > > "strong" > > > > > > > > > > > > > beliefs of any sort. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I tend to question more often than I should. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You know the saying "when you see a Buddha in the > > road, kill > > > > > > him > > > > > > > > > > > > > (metaphorically)". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yours > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kali > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 3, 10:56 pm, Rodger <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kali, when you say you do not believe in anything, > > are you > > > > > > meaning you > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
