On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Marcus <[email protected]> wrote:
> > . > > > Yes, Roomsearching, as I thought, chronic denial. Each time > reality confronts you, you deny it’s existence. That’s why you like > it here. That’s why you always respond with “nothing exists” All > your direct questions will be avoided. > You can enjoy your delusions. > > Now I understand. Thank you. Advaita feeds your need for denial. > By denial do you mean 'neti neti' ? Yes, denial to be bound by concepts, ideas, beliefs and mind stuff. I don't need to come here to be in reality though. I could easily say good bye to you all. But I enjoy some things here because of the blissful nature of reality and I do have to learn a million things about the Self. > > Each to there own good buddy …….. I just needed to push you a bit to > get to the truth. > And what is the truth ? That I have a mental problem ? hahahahah. Truth is free from all mind stuff you idiot. This is why I insult people to wake them from their delusions. Sometimes you need to give them a hard knock. A strong punch in the face usually does a good job but that would not be a permanent solution. > > Sorry for the intrusive nature of the questions but you have a tuff > outer shell. > And what did you find in the inner part ? Firstly, I find it extremely frustrating that you believe in psychology. Secondly I also find your knowledge of psychology and my psychology in particular ridiculously inadequate to come up with conclusions such as above. > > Welcome to Advaita ……….. where you are free from them all. You > create you. > There is no freedom in this forum or anywhere in the world. The freedom is already within you. > > Remember they don’t exist ……. You are safe here. > What happened to you Marcus ? > > I love you ………. > Its a bit gay and also a bit cliche now. Insults can convey far more love than your freaky love statements. > > > . > On Aug 6, 2:51 pm, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Marcus <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > . > > > > > “narcissistic personality disorder.” > > > > Vijaya Senthil Kumar tried to convince me a couple of times through > > personally emailing me that I have narcissistic personality disorder when > I > > told the group here by mistake that I am self-realized. Before I > mentioned > > that, everything was fine. Nobody had a problem with me. > > > > > > > > > Roomsearching is this humour ??? > > > > It is not humour. > > > > > > > > > Do you find this to be a laugh ??? > > > > Why are you so bitter ? > > > > > > > > > Does aggression please you ???? > > > > Why are you so aggressive ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > On Aug 6, 12:43 pm, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Marcus <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > . > > > > > > > Rodger, > > > > > > > I do this because of what it says on the label. > > > > > > > Advaita-Zen google discussion group. That’s what this is > > > > > remember .. > > > > > > What have you done in Advaita or Zen to discuss about ? > > > > Can you explain some of your personal spiritual experiences ? > > > > > > > This is not a forum foe insulting others. A chance for cowards > blood- > > > > > let into others without face to face reality. Or for onlookers to > > > > > watch the fool and laugh. Like the court jester playing the fool. > > > > > This is only perverse ego's at work. > > > > > > Sometimes I have posted very good things from Nisargadatta's or > Ramana's > > > > books. > > > > They were not appreciated. Someone said "post your own opinions , > don't > > > post > > > > this old shit". > > > > I have been extremely disappointed with such an attitude. Why didn't > you > > > say > > > > something when such things happen ? > > > > You are just angry because your ego is being overshadowed by my > Supreme > > > > personality. > > > > > > > Roomsearching needs help ……………… continuous insults is the sign of > a > > > > > broken spirit. > > > > > > The mind is definitely in a disturbed state after realization. > > > > Manonasa implies destruction of the mind. > > > > But it does not have much power because the Self is in control. > > > > Someone already said that I had a narcissistic personality disorder. > > > > Someone said I have rejection issues and childhood abuse issues and > that > > > I > > > > am gay. > > > > Now you say I have a broken spirit. > > > > I would not give a shit about whatever these people said even if they > > > were > > > > certified psychiatrists. > > > > Of course, they would demand a fee from me to give me such > judgements. > > > > You guys are giving it to me for free. You could not save your lives > with > > > > your smattering of psychology. > > > > > > > We all need help from time to time ……… it’s having the courage to > > > > > ask !!!! > > > > > What help can you offer me ? I am in a state where I need no more > help > > > > > from anyone. > > > > > > > Rodger please don't suggest that continious insults are in any way > > > > > associated with inner peace. > > > > > > Do you think slicing a cat in half is a sign of inner peace ? Have > you > > > seen > > > > UG's videos on youtube? Continuous idiocy requires continuous > insults. > > > > > > > Please ............. > > > > > > You must have a very terrible sense of humour. > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > On Aug 6, 11:06 am, Rodger <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Marcus, what do you get out of this? > > > > > > > > On Aug 6, 3:22 am, "Hughes, Marcus" <[email protected] > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Roomsearching, what do you get out of this. They are laughing > at > > > you > > > > > and using you as the fool. > > > > > > > You present yourself as the hopeless case and they enjoy that, > it > > > makes > > > > > them feel clever. > > > > > > > > > There is a better way ....... Please trust someone. Please let > > > someone > > > > > help you. > > > > > > > > > You don't have to be angry. > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: roomsearching [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > > > > Sent: 05 August 2010 17:18 > > > > > > > To: Hughes, Marcus > > > > > > > Cc: Advaita-Zen > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Here's an interesting question > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Marcus < > > > [email protected] > > > > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > Roomsearching why ??? > > > > > > > > > "It may show that you are an ignoranus in spiritual matters as > > > well." > > > > > > > > > Your words can be so elegant and inspiring. Why do you > repeatedly > > > > > > > destroy your magic. What forces inside you create beauty, then > > > spoil > > > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > > The insults roomsearching, why ??? > > > > > > > > > Marcus, if you notice, I have spelt ignoramus as ignoranus. > > > > > > > Don't you think that is beautiful ? > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > On Aug 5, 12:56 pm, roomsearching <[email protected] > <mailto: > > > > > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Kali, > > > > > > > > > > > Might have been the way you have said. As I said before I > like > > > to > > > > > show > > > > > > > > > off my igneranse. Did I do a Rodger ? :) > > > > > > > > > > It is spelt as ignorance. I know spelling is not important > but > > > don't > > > > > be so > > > > > > > > ignorant about English language. > > > > > > > > It may show that you are an ignoranus in spiritual matters as > > > well. > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 4, 5:39 pm, Mahakali <[email protected] > <mailto: > > > > > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Anandanand > > > > > > > > > > > > it is the other way round. The philosophy of Advaita with > its > > > > > doctrine > > > > > > > > > > of non-doership came before the doctrine of karma. > > > > > > > > > > > > Respectfully... > > > > > > > > > > > > Kali > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 4, 2:19 pm, Anandanand <[email protected] > <mailto: > > > > > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > We still have Kings, but they are known by different > names. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I didn't get what is the doctrine of > no-personal-choice. If > > > > > that is no- > > > > > > > > > > > doer-nothing getting done, then as per my knowledge > this > > > was to > > > > > arrest > > > > > > > > > > > the karma thing which went on to excess. Though I am > not an > > > > > expert on > > > > > > > > > > > that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 4, 2:59 pm, Mahakali <[email protected] > > > <mailto: > > > > > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > People go to the Courts and Judges of their own > countries > > > > > with the > > > > > > > > > > > > expectation of seeing justice done. What they > actually > > > find > > > > > is a > > > > > > > > > legal > > > > > > > > > > > > system that favours the ones who can afford the best > QC > > > and > > > > > knows how > > > > > > > > > > > > to "the system works" (timeframes, arguments, > > > negotiations, > > > > > delays > > > > > > > > > etc > > > > > > > > > > > > etc). In most cases, justice is not done and is not > even > > > seen > > > > > to be > > > > > > > > > > > > done. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hence, the reason many people resort to religion for > > > justice > > > > > i.e. in > > > > > > > > > > > > the hope to get justice in an afterlife. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, don't forget that the doctrine of Karma was > created > > > > > shortly > > > > > > > > > > > > after the doctrine of no-personal-choice was created. > The > > > > > Kings were > > > > > > > > > > > > worried that, if people would think that the people > were > > > > > allowed to > > > > > > > > > do > > > > > > > > > > > > whatever they wanted, they feared that the poor > would > > > revolt > > > > > against > > > > > > > > > > > > them. Hence, they paid (bribed) the Brahmins who come > out > > > > > with the > > > > > > > > > > > > idea that if the untouchables were so poor was > because of > > > > > something > > > > > > > > > > > > they did in their previou lives (law of karma). As > the > > > masses > > > > > trusted > > > > > > > > > > > > and believed their Brahmins, they accepted to > continue to > > > > > live in > > > > > > > > > > > > their low conditions and to live in poverty because > the > > > > > Brahmins said > > > > > > > > > > > > so. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Love > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 4, 10:30 am, Anandanand <[email protected] > > > <mailto: > > > > > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Kali, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as far as the local laws,rules and regulations > are > > > > > concerned, > > > > > > > > > then, I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have to abide and respect them. As a citizen of a > > > > > country, it > > > > > > > > > would be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > foolish and disrespecful to do otherwise. They > are > > > meant > > > > > to allow > > > > > > > > > > > > > > society to function as a whole. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So is Religion. The Judiciary has it's own > drawback, so > > > > > does > > > > > > > > > religion. > > > > > > > > > > > > > The difference being, the things are tangible, in > most > > > > > cases, in > > > > > > > > > > > > > Judiciary, where as they are mostly intangible in > the > > > case > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > religion, making it in the form of beliefs. All > this > > > IMO. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In most places in the world, Judiciary has it's > > > benifits. > > > > > And > > > > > > > > > places > > > > > > > > > > > > > where it doesn't, are mostly in chaos. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 4, 12:14 pm, Mahakali < > > > [email protected] > > > > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Anandanand > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as far as the local laws,rules and regulations > are > > > > > concerned, > > > > > > > > > then, I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have to abide and respect them. As a citizen of a > > > > > country, it > > > > > > > > > would be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > foolish and disrespecful to do otherwise. They > are > > > meant > > > > > to allow > > > > > > > > > > > > > > society to function as a whole. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, I do not see them as "beliefs" , I see > them > > > more > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > > > > > > instruments as part of the machinery put in place > to > > > run > > > > > > > > > society.And, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of course, there is the right and the wrong of > any > > > law or > > > > > > > > > regulation > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and this can be taken personally or not as a > belief > > > or a > > > > > personal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stand. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > ... > > > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - >
