RS, would you mind clarifying something for me? When you say you told the group by mistake that you are self- realized,are you saying you now consider it a mistake to have told the group that,or are you saying that now you do not consider yourself as self-realized...that it was a mistake to think that you are/were?
On Aug 6, 8:51 am, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Marcus <[email protected]> wrote: > > . > > > “narcissistic personality disorder.” > > Vijaya Senthil Kumar tried to convince me a couple of times through > personally emailing me that I have narcissistic personality disorder when I > told the group here by mistake that I am self-realized. Before I mentioned > that, everything was fine. Nobody had a problem with me. > > > > > Roomsearching is this humour ??? > > It is not humour. > > > > > Do you find this to be a laugh ??? > > Why are you so bitter ? > > > > > Does aggression please you ???? > > Why are you so aggressive ? > > > > > > > . > > > On Aug 6, 12:43 pm, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Marcus <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > . > > > > > Rodger, > > > > > I do this because of what it says on the label. > > > > > Advaita-Zen google discussion group. That’s what this is > > > > remember .. > > > > What have you done in Advaita or Zen to discuss about ? > > > Can you explain some of your personal spiritual experiences ? > > > > > This is not a forum foe insulting others. A chance for cowards blood- > > > > let into others without face to face reality. Or for onlookers to > > > > watch the fool and laugh. Like the court jester playing the fool. > > > > This is only perverse ego's at work. > > > > Sometimes I have posted very good things from Nisargadatta's or Ramana's > > > books. > > > They were not appreciated. Someone said "post your own opinions , don't > > post > > > this old shit". > > > I have been extremely disappointed with such an attitude. Why didn't you > > say > > > something when such things happen ? > > > You are just angry because your ego is being overshadowed by my Supreme > > > personality. > > > > > Roomsearching needs help ……………… continuous insults is the sign of a > > > > broken spirit. > > > > The mind is definitely in a disturbed state after realization. > > > Manonasa implies destruction of the mind. > > > But it does not have much power because the Self is in control. > > > Someone already said that I had a narcissistic personality disorder. > > > Someone said I have rejection issues and childhood abuse issues and that > > I > > > am gay. > > > Now you say I have a broken spirit. > > > I would not give a shit about whatever these people said even if they > > were > > > certified psychiatrists. > > > Of course, they would demand a fee from me to give me such judgements. > > > You guys are giving it to me for free. You could not save your lives with > > > your smattering of psychology. > > > > > We all need help from time to time ……… it’s having the courage to > > > > ask !!!! > > > > What help can you offer me ? I am in a state where I need no more help > > > > from anyone. > > > > > Rodger please don't suggest that continious insults are in any way > > > > associated with inner peace. > > > > Do you think slicing a cat in half is a sign of inner peace ? Have you > > seen > > > UG's videos on youtube? Continuous idiocy requires continuous insults. > > > > > Please ............. > > > > You must have a very terrible sense of humour. > > > > > . > > > > > On Aug 6, 11:06 am, Rodger <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Marcus, what do you get out of this? > > > > > > On Aug 6, 3:22 am, "Hughes, Marcus" <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Roomsearching, what do you get out of this. They are laughing at > > you > > > > and using you as the fool. > > > > > > You present yourself as the hopeless case and they enjoy that, it > > makes > > > > them feel clever. > > > > > > > There is a better way ....... Please trust someone. Please let > > someone > > > > help you. > > > > > > > You don't have to be angry. > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: roomsearching [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > > > Sent: 05 August 2010 17:18 > > > > > > To: Hughes, Marcus > > > > > > Cc: Advaita-Zen > > > > > > Subject: Re: Here's an interesting question > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Marcus < > > [email protected] > > > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > . > > > > > > > Roomsearching why ??? > > > > > > > "It may show that you are an ignoranus in spiritual matters as > > well." > > > > > > > Your words can be so elegant and inspiring. Why do you repeatedly > > > > > > destroy your magic. What forces inside you create beauty, then > > spoil > > > > > > it. > > > > > > > The insults roomsearching, why ??? > > > > > > > Marcus, if you notice, I have spelt ignoramus as ignoranus. > > > > > > Don't you think that is beautiful ? > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > On Aug 5, 12:56 pm, roomsearching <[email protected]<mailto: > > > > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Kali, > > > > > > > > > Might have been the way you have said. As I said before I like > > to > > > > show > > > > > > > > off my igneranse. Did I do a Rodger ? :) > > > > > > > > It is spelt as ignorance. I know spelling is not important but > > don't > > > > be so > > > > > > > ignorant about English language. > > > > > > > It may show that you are an ignoranus in spiritual matters as > > well. > > > > > > > > > On Aug 4, 5:39 pm, Mahakali <[email protected]<mailto: > > > > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Anandanand > > > > > > > > > > it is the other way round. The philosophy of Advaita with its > > > > doctrine > > > > > > > > > of non-doership came before the doctrine of karma. > > > > > > > > > > Respectfully... > > > > > > > > > > Kali > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 4, 2:19 pm, Anandanand <[email protected]<mailto: > > > > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > We still have Kings, but they are known by different names. > > > > > > > > > > > I didn't get what is the doctrine of no-personal-choice. If > > > > that is no- > > > > > > > > > > doer-nothing getting done, then as per my knowledge this > > was to > > > > arrest > > > > > > > > > > the karma thing which went on to excess. Though I am not an > > > > expert on > > > > > > > > > > that. > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 4, 2:59 pm, Mahakali <[email protected] > > <mailto: > > > > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > People go to the Courts and Judges of their own countries > > > > with the > > > > > > > > > > > expectation of seeing justice done. What they actually > > find > > > > is a > > > > > > > > legal > > > > > > > > > > > system that favours the ones who can afford the best QC > > and > > > > knows how > > > > > > > > > > > to "the system works" (timeframes, arguments, > > negotiations, > > > > delays > > > > > > > > etc > > > > > > > > > > > etc). In most cases, justice is not done and is not even > > seen > > > > to be > > > > > > > > > > > done. > > > > > > > > > > > > Hence, the reason many people resort to religion for > > justice > > > > i.e. in > > > > > > > > > > > the hope to get justice in an afterlife. > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, don't forget that the doctrine of Karma was created > > > > shortly > > > > > > > > > > > after the doctrine of no-personal-choice was created. The > > > > Kings were > > > > > > > > > > > worried that, if people would think that the people were > > > > allowed to > > > > > > > > do > > > > > > > > > > > whatever they wanted, they feared that the poor would > > revolt > > > > against > > > > > > > > > > > them. Hence, they paid (bribed) the Brahmins who come out > > > > with the > > > > > > > > > > > idea that if the untouchables were so poor was because of > > > > something > > > > > > > > > > > they did in their previou lives (law of karma). As the > > masses > > > > trusted > > > > > > > > > > > and believed their Brahmins, they accepted to continue to > > > > live in > > > > > > > > > > > their low conditions and to live in poverty because the > > > > Brahmins said > > > > > > > > > > > so. > > > > > > > > > > > > Love > > > > > > > > > > > > A > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 4, 10:30 am, Anandanand <[email protected] > > <mailto: > > > > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Kali, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as far as the local laws,rules and regulations are > > > > concerned, > > > > > > > > then, I > > > > > > > > > > > > > have to abide and respect them. As a citizen of a > > > > country, it > > > > > > > > would be > > > > > > > > > > > > > foolish and disrespecful to do otherwise. They are > > meant > > > > to allow > > > > > > > > > > > > > society to function as a whole. > > > > > > > > > > > > > So is Religion. The Judiciary has it's own drawback, so > > > > does > > > > > > > > religion. > > > > > > > > > > > > The difference being, the things are tangible, in most > > > > cases, in > > > > > > > > > > > > Judiciary, where as they are mostly intangible in the > > case > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > religion, making it in the form of beliefs. All this > > IMO. > > > > > > > > > > > > > In most places in the world, Judiciary has it's > > benifits. > > > > And > > > > > > > > places > > > > > > > > > > > > where it doesn't, are mostly in chaos. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 4, 12:14 pm, Mahakali < > > [email protected] > > > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Anandanand > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as far as the local laws,rules and regulations are > > > > concerned, > > > > > > > > then, I > > > > > > > > > > > > > have to abide and respect them. As a citizen of a > > > > country, it > > > > > > > > would be > > > > > > > > > > > > > foolish and disrespecful to do otherwise. They are > > meant > > > > to allow > > > > > > > > > > > > > society to function as a whole. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, I do not see them as "beliefs" , I see them > > more > > > > as > > > > > > > > > > > > > instruments as part of the machinery put in place to > > run > > > > > > > > society.And, > > > > > > > > > > > > > of course, there is the right and the wrong of any > > law or > > > > > > > > regulation > > > > > > > > > > > > > and this can be taken personally or not as a belief > > or a > > > > personal > > > > > > > > > > > > > stand. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > ... > > read more »
