Darin and Steve,

I completely agree that off-peak usage should be free and peak usage should
pay more. I keep looking at my bandwidth graphs and see all this time from
midnight-noon-6pm that my fiber is basically sitting under-utilized yet i
am paying for full utilization 24/7/365. Not to mention backhaul capacity
throughout my entire network thats under-utilized those times. We are
fastly moving towards internet supplying all of a households TV watching
needs and we need to adjust pricing models accordingly to accommodate that
especially for capacity during the 6pm-midnight time frame.

On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 11:30 PM Steve Jones <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I forwarded your plotting to the boss, I really think there is something
> to it. We (industry) always look at "off peak" as overnight, rather than
> literal off peak, because of the morning peak. but I really think youre
> onto something golden
>
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 10:03 PM Darin Steffl <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Steve,
>>
>> We haven't implemented it yet but we're going to in January. We will only
>> slow down after reaching X amount of data per plan tier. We'll never charge
>> extra though as people hate unpredictable bills. They can choose to upgrade
>> to a plan with more high speed data during peak or learn to use less data
>> by adjusting quality settings, not leaving video on as background noise,
>> etc.
>>
>> Our primary goal for this is to reduce peak time congestion and make the
>> heaviest users pay more to fund the upgrades we're having to make earlier
>> than forecasted.
>>
>> Our customers expect good speedtests all hours of the day and right now
>> we're being hammered by abusive users so we need to take action. I won't
>> eat into our profit to upgrade gear we just deployed 1-2 years ago due to
>> bad users consuming 5-10x more than our average users. If they want to
>> stay, they have to pay up so I can afford to keep upgrading.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019, 9:38 PM Steve Jones <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Darin,
>>> this is a pretty fresh concept. Never looked at it from this
>>> perspective. I assume you would have a base X rate. with Free for all time
>>> outside the peak use times (I assume you would advertise this time frame,
>>> and have a contractual way of adjusting it)
>>> Average the use during peak time? and allow that average as a base, with
>>> anything beyond that as a UBB?
>>> I think youre on to something sexy here. Have you implemented this?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 7:40 PM Darin Steffl <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kurt,
>>>>
>>>> I touched in this in the other email thread but we are moving towards
>>>> having high speed data thresholds that only count data from noon to
>>>> midnight.
>>>>
>>>> It's targeting exactly the heavy use periods. We may tweak it to only
>>>> count from 6pm to 11pm but the data amounts would have to be lower then. We
>>>> would calculate what an average HD stream uses per hour, then tailor plans
>>>> to support that amount of usage for that time period.
>>>>
>>>> I would recommend never having overage charges though. Once a customer
>>>> hits the threshold, they will slow down and get an email from us. I'm a big
>>>> believer in having predictable bills. If the customer uses too much data
>>>> and slows down, they have the choice to pay more or stay slow until the
>>>> next bill cycle.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019, 6:28 PM Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The mobile guys also limit video resolution, I don’t know how they do
>>>>> it from a technical perspective, but for example AT&T has 3 “unlimited”
>>>>> plans – Starter, Extra and Elite.  They say Starter and Elite limit
>>>>> streaming to standard def, and only Elite can stream in high def.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It also seems streaming services will use whatever bandwidth is
>>>>> available to increase video quality.  The customer may not notice the
>>>>> difference.  Which means they may also not notice if you throttle their
>>>>> video speed.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Like there was an article complaining that 4K quality games with
>>>>> Google Stadia doesn’t look as good as 4K on a console.  I hope Stadia 
>>>>> falls
>>>>> on its face, but honestly, I look at the images in the article that are
>>>>> supposed to show the big difference in quality, and I can barely see it.
>>>>> Maybe because I’m not a gamer I don’t appreciate the difference.  Is it
>>>>> coincidence that the image in question is of Lara Croft’s butt?  Is that
>>>>> what this is all about?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.theverge.com/2019/11/18/20970297/google-stadia-review-gaming-streaming-cloud-price-specs-features-chrome-pixel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Mark - Myakka
>>>>> Technologies
>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 19, 2019 5:34 PM
>>>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] UBB - Usage Based Billing WAS: tired of
>>>>> entitled streamers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Kurt,
>>>>>
>>>>> We used to do UBB on our wireless system.  Most people were fine with
>>>>> it.  Had a few grumpy people as always.  Didn't scale well, got out of 
>>>>> hand
>>>>> rapidly as customer base grew.
>>>>>
>>>>> Currently on our fiber system we do the "unlimited" the cell guys
>>>>> invented.  You have unlimited Internet with no extra charges.  Once you go
>>>>> over a threshold we will throttle the speeds back.  We throttle the user
>>>>> down one package.  If they are on the 50 Mbps package they get throttle
>>>>> down to the 25 Mbps package.  Still very usable for most people.  Someone
>>>>> on the 100 Mbps package would drop to 75 Mbps.  Most people won't even
>>>>> notice that.
>>>>>
>>>>> We have always kept a perceived value on bytes for our customers.  I'm
>>>>> also a firm believer in tracking bandwidth to the user even if you don't 
>>>>> do
>>>>> UBB.  Our customers have 3 months worth of usage they can drill down to 
>>>>> the
>>>>> hour..  We are using radius accounting, so data is almost live.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Mark                            mailto:[email protected]
>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>
>>>>> Myakka Technologies, Inc.
>>>>> www.Myakka.com
>>>>>
>>>>> ------
>>>>>
>>>>> Tuesday, November 19, 2019, 5:55:45 PM, you wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Is anyone else doing Usage Based Billing? Or Peak UBB? We have noticed
>>>>> in the last 6 months huge exponential increases of streaming adoption
>>>>> especially between 6pm-midnight. Its almost getting unmanageable and we 
>>>>> are
>>>>> even using a Procera device. Problem is >50% of all traffic after 6pm is
>>>>> streaming and it doesn't matter we would pretty much have to block all
>>>>> other non-streaming traffic between those hours just to make room for the
>>>>> streaming demand.
>>>>>
>>>>> So we in essence have to design the network to perform during a peak
>>>>> window between 7pm-midnight and it just doesn't make financial sense for
>>>>> the network to be sitting there not being used 19 hours of the day.
>>>>>
>>>>> 100% of all new signups are asking us if we are "Unlimited" which has
>>>>> been a huge selling point for us. Has anyone made the jump to UBB and what
>>>>> was the reaction?
>>>>>
>>>>> My initial thoughts are first 500GB free and after that $10 for each
>>>>> block of 100GB past the first 500GB. Other factors are do we give free 
>>>>> data
>>>>> between midnight-6pm so not penalizing people that are not using during
>>>>> peak hours?
>>>>>
>>>>> Really, Really curious to hear if anyone has made the jump and what
>>>>> customer reaction has been. Something has got to happen....
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to