Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI wrote: > Look, I'm trying to follow the train of thought here with regards AGI. > It would be significant to AGI architecture if the contention was made > that first, existed consciousness, and then matter. It would probably > invert the life-cycle approaches we tend to follow in software > development. But all this informational noise is clouding the issue. > If it's not scientifically proven, no one can be right, or wrong. As > for consciousness, in the absence of a working architecture, most of > it is conjecture, and thus unprovable. However, there should be no > question that it slots into the top-5 AI questions. > > Rob
BLEH!! OCCAM'S RAZOR, HACK CHOP, CUT SLICE DICE..... Proposal: Consciousness is precisely what is described by this: https://coxlab.github.io/prednet/ Task: "microgranualize" neural networks into cortical column-equivalent units then wire them up as described in the previous link -> collect a billion dollar prize. Altertaitively, to prove me wrong: Provide a simpler theory that explains more. or prove that this theory fails in some fundamental way. -- Please report bounces from this address to a...@numentics.com Powers are not rights. ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T81817474dba9a838-M66b331e85eab61ec2b194c52 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups
