I'm kind of surprised parties passed, to be honest. On Thu, Nov 23, 2017, 14:04 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus, < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I see this concern and this is why I am waiting on my courts overhaul. I > wish that fewer people were perpetrating their major plans, when the > underlying structure is like an airplane made out of cardboard and duct > tape trying to fly from San Fransisco to Tokyo. > ---- > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > > > On Nov 23, 2017, at 1:13 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, 23 Nov 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Aris Merchant > >> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Have you considered the advantages and disadvantages of having > >>> combined vs. separate proposal and CFJ currencies? Many systems I've > >>> seen separate the two. In fact The Economic System from a few years > >>> back (see G.'s thesis) had three usable currencies: one for proposals, > >>> one for increasing votes, and one for removing blots (I'd like a slot > >>> somewhere to stick a currency for that). You may want to get something > >>> like that going in your proposal, because it encourages > >>> specialization. One of the problems in the draft is that only two of > >>> the currencies have uses in the main game: coins and paper. That's > >>> good, but it means that people are going to be focused mainly on those > >>> resources. If you add 1 for CFJs (or reuse an existing one) and we add > >>> one for blots, as soon as that's ready, then there will be four > >>> mini-game currencies with game purposes, three specialized and one > >>> general. The monthly allowance would probably give out 1 (2 max) of > >>> each. > >> > >> Actually, I take back what I said here. I would appreciate if the > >> currencies stayed merged for now. I'm working on a secret project with > >> relates to this. Trigon, I can tell you about it privately if you > >> like, given that there's a significant amount of overlap. > > > > I've given up trying to fix or work on everything because everyone has > > some huge project and it feels like nobody's listening to anyone else. > > After politicians, I'm just going to sit back and vote for every huge new > > clashes-with-everything-else idea and enjoy the chaos. > > > > I mean, yesterday I gave up something as simple as defining the word > > "spend" because it has to support meaning like 4 different things > > depending on context. Better to just leave it undefined and have > > everyone choose on their own what they want it to mean. > >
