Fair enough. On Thu, Nov 23, 2017, 16:36 Kerim Aydin, <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> > > I wasn't being sarcastic - I quite enjoyed yesterday's brouhaha and > it convinced me parties could be fun. But that's probably because > you were first to market. Everyone has their own separate ideas > how the underlying stuff (eg spending or justice or contracts) should > work and *all* of them are in construction or repair right now- that's > hard to build systems with, so I'll just enjoy what comes along with > parties and stop trying to run along behind with the repair truck. > > On Thu, 23 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > > > I'm kind of surprised parties passed, to be honest. > > > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017, 14:04 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus, < > > p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > I see this concern and this is why I am waiting on my courts overhaul. > I > > > wish that fewer people were perpetrating their major plans, when the > > > underlying structure is like an airplane made out of cardboard and duct > > > tape trying to fly from San Fransisco to Tokyo. > > > ---- > > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 23, 2017, at 1:13 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 23 Nov 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Aris Merchant > > > >> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>> Have you considered the advantages and disadvantages of having > > > >>> combined vs. separate proposal and CFJ currencies? Many systems > I've > > > >>> seen separate the two. In fact The Economic System from a few years > > > >>> back (see G.'s thesis) had three usable currencies: one for > proposals, > > > >>> one for increasing votes, and one for removing blots (I'd like a > slot > > > >>> somewhere to stick a currency for that). You may want to get > something > > > >>> like that going in your proposal, because it encourages > > > >>> specialization. One of the problems in the draft is that only two > of > > > >>> the currencies have uses in the main game: coins and paper. That's > > > >>> good, but it means that people are going to be focused mainly on > those > > > >>> resources. If you add 1 for CFJs (or reuse an existing one) and we > add > > > >>> one for blots, as soon as that's ready, then there will be four > > > >>> mini-game currencies with game purposes, three specialized and one > > > >>> general. The monthly allowance would probably give out 1 (2 max) of > > > >>> each. > > > >> > > > >> Actually, I take back what I said here. I would appreciate if the > > > >> currencies stayed merged for now. I'm working on a secret project > with > > > >> relates to this. Trigon, I can tell you about it privately if you > > > >> like, given that there's a significant amount of overlap. > > > > > > > > I've given up trying to fix or work on everything because everyone > has > > > > some huge project and it feels like nobody's listening to anyone > else. > > > > After politicians, I'm just going to sit back and vote for every > huge new > > > > clashes-with-everything-else idea and enjoy the chaos. > > > > > > > > I mean, yesterday I gave up something as simple as defining the word > > > > "spend" because it has to support meaning like 4 different things > > > > depending on context. Better to just leave it undefined and have > > > > everyone choose on their own what they want it to mean. > > > > > > > > > >
