atom-syntax  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-11 Eric Scheid
  • Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-11 James M Snell
  • Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-11 Julian Reschke
  • Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-11 Jan Algermissen
  • Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-11 Bob Wyman
  • Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-11 Jan Algermissen
• Re: AD Evaluation -- extensions Eric Scheid
  • Re: AD Evaluation -- extensions James M Snell
  • Re: AD Evaluation -- extensions Lisa Dusseault
• Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi Nicolas Krebs
  • Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi James M Snell
  • Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi James Holderness
  • Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi Robert Sayre
  • Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi James M Snell
  • Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi Robert Sayre
  • Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi James M Snell
  • Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi Robert Sayre
  • Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi Robert Sayre
  • Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi James M Snell
  • Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi James M Snell
  • Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi James M Snell
  • Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi James Holderness
  • Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi James M Snell
  • Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi James M Snell
  • Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi Robert Sayre
  • Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi James M Snell
  • Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi Paul Hoffman
  • Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi James M Snell
  • Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi Nicolas Krebs
• SPARQLing Roller Henry Story
• [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace Nicolas Krebs
  • Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace James M Snell
  • Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace Judy Piper
  • Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace Asbjørn Ulsberg
  • Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace Judy Piper
  • Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace James M Snell
  • Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace Judy Piper
  • Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace Asbjørn Ulsberg
  • Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace Martin Duerst
  • Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace Asbjørn Ulsberg
  • Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace Nicolas Krebs
  • Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace Nicolas Krebs
  • Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace Judy Piper
• Response to appeal by Robert Sayre dated 2006-08-29 IESG Secretary
  • Re: Response to appeal by Robert Sayre dated 2006-08-29 Julian Reschke
• Atom bidi James M Snell
• New version of License Draft James M Snell
• Python implementation of RFC4287, RFC4685 and APP Sylvain Hellegouarch
• Searching for Atom-enabled code John Panzer
  • Re: Searching for Atom-enabled code Joe Gregorio
  • Re: Searching for Atom-enabled code A. Pagaltzis
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-11.txt Internet-Drafts
• Re: [rss-public] Re: Bidirectional content in RSS James M Snell
• Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 James M Snell
  • Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Julian Reschke
  • Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Andreas Sewe
  • Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Thomas Broyer
  • Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Andreas Sewe
  • Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Andreas Sewe
  • Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 James M Snell
  • Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Stefan Eissing
  • Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 James M Snell
  • RE: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 David Hall
  • Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 James M Snell
  • Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Mark Nottingham
• PaceAtomBidi James M Snell
  • Re: PaceAtomBidi David Powell
  • Re: PaceAtomBidi James Holderness
  • Re: PaceAtomBidi James M Snell
  • Re: PaceAtomBidi James Holderness
  • Re: PaceAtomBidi James M Snell
  • Re: PaceAtomBidi James M Snell
  • Re: PaceAtomBidi David Powell
  • Re: PaceAtomBidi James M Snell
• Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Robert Sayre
  • Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Bjoern Hoehrmann
  • Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Robert Sayre
  • Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Paul Hoffman
  • Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Robert Sayre
  • Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? James M Snell
  • Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Paul Hoffman
  • Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Robert Sayre
  • Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Lisa Dusseault
  • Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Julian Reschke
  • Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? James M Snell
  • Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Eric Scheid
  • Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Elliotte Harold
  • Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Paul Hoffman
  • Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Julian Reschke
  • Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Martin Duerst
  • Atom and bidi (was: Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard?) James M Snell
  • Re: Atom and bidi (was: Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard?) David Powell
  • Re: Atom and bidi (was: Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard?) David Powell
  • Re: Atom and bidi James M Snell
  • Re: Atom and bidi Eric Scheid
  • Re: Atom and bidi Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Atom and bidi James M Snell
  • Re: Atom and bidi Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Atom and bidi James M Snell
  • Re: Atom and bidi Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Atom and bidi Eric Scheid
  • Re: Atom and bidi James M Snell
  • Re: Atom and bidi Eric Scheid
  • Re: Atom and bidi James M Snell
  • Re: Atom and bidi Paul Hoffman
  • Re: Atom and bidi James M Snell
  • Re: Atom and bidi Robert Sayre
  • Re: Atom and bidi James M Snell
  • Re: Atom and bidi Robert Sayre
  • Re: Atom and bidi James M Snell
  • Re: Atom and bidi Robert Sayre
  • Re: Atom and bidi Robert Sayre
  • Re: Atom and bidi James Holderness
  • Re: Atom and bidi James M Snell
  • Re: Atom and bidi James Holderness
  • Re: Atom and bidi Robert Sayre
  • Re: Atom and bidi James M Snell
  • Fwd: Atom and bidi Henry Story
  • Re: Atom and bidi (was: Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard?) Karl Dubost
  • Clarify foreign markup: [was Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard?] Bill de hOra
  • Re: Clarify foreign markup: [was Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard?] Robert Sayre
  • Re: Clarify foreign markup: [was Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard?] A. Pagaltzis
  • Re: Clarify foreign markup: [was Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard?] Bill de hOra
  • Re: Clarify foreign markup: [was Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard?] Robert Sayre
  • Re: Clarify foreign markup: [was Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard?] A. Pagaltzis
• Atom Export Alastair Rankine
  • Re: Atom Export Bill de hOra
  • Re: Atom Export James M Snell
  • Re: Atom Export Alastair Rankine
  • Re: Atom Export James M Snell
  • Re: Atom Export Elliotte Harold
  • Re: Atom Export Alastair Rankine
  • Re: Atom Export A. Pagaltzis
  • Re: Atom Export Elliotte Harold
  • Re: Atom Export Alastair Rankine
  • Re: Atom Export James M Snell
  • Re: Atom Export Alastair Rankine
  • Re: Atom Export A. Pagaltzis
  • Re: Atom Export Alastair Rankine
  • Re: Atom Export A. Pagaltzis
  • Atom Export of source text Elliotte Harold
  • Re: Atom Export A. Pagaltzis
  • Re: Atom Export James M Snell
  • Re: Atom Export A. Pagaltzis
  • Re: Atom Export Elliotte Harold
  • Re: Atom Export James M Snell
  • Re: Atom Export A. Pagaltzis
• RFC 4685 on Atom Threading Extensions rfc-editor
• Atom Threading Extensions, RFC 4685 James M Snell
  • Re: Atom Threading Extensions, RFC 4685 Sylvain Hellegouarch
• Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07.txt Mark Nottingham
  • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07.txt Stefan Eissing
• WG Last Call for draft-ietf-atompub-protocol Paul Hoffman
  • Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-atompub-protocol James M Snell
  • Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-atompub-protocol Martin Duerst
  • Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-atompub-protocol Paul Hoffman
  • Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-atompub-protocol Sam Ruby
  • Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-atompub-protocol Tim Bray
  • Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-atompub-protocol Eric Scheid
  • URGENT: Remove atom:updated ordering requirement? Tim Bray
  • Re: URGENT: Remove atom:updated ordering requirement? John Panzer
  • Re: URGENT: Remove atom:updated ordering requirement? Henry Story
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-10.txt Internet-Drafts
  • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-10.txt Tim Bray
• versioning extension? Jan Algermissen
  • Re: versioning extension? Tim Bray
  • Re: versioning extension? Jan Algermissen
  • Re: versioning extension? Karl Dubost
  • Re: versioning extension? Jan Algermissen
  • Re: versioning extension? Tim Bray
  • Re: versioning extension? Lisa Dusseault
  • Re: versioning extension? Jan Algermissen
  • Re: versioning extension? Julian Reschke
  • Re: versioning extension? Andreas Sewe
  • Re: versioning extension? Thomas Broyer
  • Atom Revisions (was versioning extension?) Jan Algermissen
  • Re: Atom Revisions (was versioning extension?) James M Snell
• Private extensions and relation to atom elements James Aylett
  • Re: Private extensions and relation to atom elements James M Snell
  • Re: Private extensions and relation to atom elements James Aylett
  • Re: Private extensions and relation to atom elements James M Snell
  • Re: Private extensions and relation to atom elements James Aylett
  • Re: Private extensions and relation to atom elements Tim Bray
  • Re: Private extensions and relation to atom elements Tim Bray
  • Re: Private extensions and relation to atom elements James Aylett
• Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up James M Snell
  • atom liense extension (was Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) Mike Linksvayer
  • Re: atom liense extension (was Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) James M Snell
  • Re: atom liense extension (was Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) John Panzer
  • Re: atom liense extension (was Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) James M Snell
  • Re: atom liense extension (was Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) Thomas Roessler

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]