Yes, "right turn with right hand" is still on our agenda though we've recently been preoccupied with the budget and our attempt to increase the amount of Transportations Enhancements funding.

Once we get through the budget process (with increased funding I hope) we'll focus our efforts on the balance of our agenda. As you would expect, Complete Streets legislation remains one of our major legislative goals.

Kevin Hardman
Executive Director
Bicycle Federation of Wisconsin

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 13:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dar Ward <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Bikies] Signaling a right turn with the right hand
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

As far as I know...the DOT has every intention to introduce a change to the law allowing right turn signals with a straight right hand. They wanted to introduce this a few times in the past and various things have stopped it (blocked once by legislature, once the person who agreed to introduce it retired). I assume, but don't know for sure, that BFW has this on their lobbying agenda, but I could be wrong. It used to be.
?
I am not aware of any research that says it is safer...but I think it is more clear and easier to see from behind. And other states have approved the change.

Just a comment...signalling is nice, but it can't replace rear scanning as a safety measure. It doesn't matter how you signal or if you signal at all if you haven't checked behind you before changing lanes or in front of you before turning. And no cyclist is required to signal if doing so would cause them to lose control of their vehicle. It is communication, which is good....but it doesn't strictly prevent crashes.
-Dar
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

Reply via email to