bitcoin-development  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal for P2P Wireless (Bluetooth LE) transfer of Payment URI Eric Voskuil
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal for P2P Wireless (Bluetooth LE) transfer of Payment URI Paul Puey
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal for P2P Wireless (Bluetooth LE) transfer of Payment URI Paul Puey
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal for P2P Wireless (Bluetooth LE) transfer of Payment URI Eric Voskuil
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal for P2P Wireless (Bluetooth LE) transfer of Payment URI Paul Puey
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal for P2P Wireless (Bluetooth LE) transfer of Payment URI Eric Voskuil
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal for P2P Wireless (Bluetooth LE) transfer of Payment URI Paul Puey
• [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core 0.10.0rc4 tagged Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core 0.10.0rc4 tagged Wladimir
• [Bitcoin-development] Proposal for P2P Wireless (Bluetooth LE) transfer of Payment URI Paul Puey
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal for P2P Wireless (Bluetooth LE) transfer of Payment URI Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal for P2P Wireless (Bluetooth LE) transfer of Payment URI Mike Hearn
• [Bitcoin-development] determining change addresses using the least significant digits Isidor Zeuner
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] determining change addresses using the least significant digits Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] determining change addresses using the least significant digits Justus Ranvier
  • [Bitcoin-development] [SPAM] Re: determining change addresses using the least significant digits Luke Dashjr
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] determining change addresses using the least significant digits Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] determining change addresses using the least significant digits Jeff Garzik
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] determining change addresses using the least significant digits Justus Ranvier
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] determining change addresses using the least significant digits Gregory Maxwell
• [Bitcoin-development] Subject: Re: Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Will
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Subject: Re: Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Adam Weiss
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Subject: Re: Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Brian Erdelyi
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Subject: Re: Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Subject: Re: Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Will
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Subject: Re: Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Eric Voskuil
• [Bitcoin-development] Export format for xpub Levin Keller
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Export format for xpub Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Export format for xpub Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Export format for xpub Pavol Rusnak
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Export format for xpub Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Export format for xpub vv01f
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Export format for xpub Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Export format for xpub Pavol Rusnak
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Export format for xpub Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Export format for xpub Pavol Rusnak
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Export format for xpub Levin Keller
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Export format for xpub Pavol Rusnak
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Export format for xpub Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Export format for xpub Pavol Rusnak
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Export format for xpub Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Export format for xpub Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Export format for xpub Pavol Rusnak
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Export format for xpub Wladimir
• [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core 0.9.4 not on bitcoin.org? xor
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core 0.9.4 not on bitcoin.org? Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core 0.9.4 not on bitcoin.org? Gregory Maxwell
• [Bitcoin-development] var_int ambiguous serialization consequences Tamas Blummer
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] var_int ambiguous serialization consequences Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] var_int ambiguous serialization consequences Tamas Blummer
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] var_int ambiguous serialization consequences Pieter Wuille
• [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Brian Erdelyi
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Natanael
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Brian Erdelyi
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Natanael
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Natanael
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Brian Erdelyi
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Martin Habovštiak
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Brian Erdelyi
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware m...@bitwatch.co
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Brian Erdelyi
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Martin Habovštiak
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Martin Habovštiak
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Brian Erdelyi
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Eric Voskuil
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Brian Erdelyi
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Joel Joonatan Kaartinen
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Brian Erdelyi
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Pedro Worcel
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware devrandom
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Brian Erdelyi
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Brian Erdelyi
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Pedro Worcel
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Eric Voskuil
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Brian Erdelyi
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Brian Erdelyi
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Eric Voskuil
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Eric Voskuil
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware Eric Voskuil
• [Bitcoin-development] New BIP: protocol for multisignature payments Martin Habovštiak
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP: protocol for multisignature payments Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP: protocol for multisignature payments Martin Habovštiak
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP: protocol for multisignature payments Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP: protocol for multisignature payments Gavin Andresen
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP: protocol for multisignature payments Martin Habovštiak
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP: protocol for multisignature payments Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP: protocol for multisignature payments Martin Habovštiak
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP: protocol for multisignature payments Thomas Kerin
• [Bitcoin-development] Is there a way to estimate the maximum number of transactions per minute Bitcoin can handle as it is today? Angel Leon
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is there a way to estimate the maximum number of transactions per minute Bitcoin can handle as it is today? Allen Piscitello
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is there a way to estimate the maximum number of transactions per minute Bitcoin can handle as it is today? Nick Simpson
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is there a way to estimate the maximum number of transactions per minute Bitcoin can handle as it is today? Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is there a way to estimate the maximum number of transactions per minute Bitcoin can handle as it is today? Tom Harding
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is there a way to estimate the maximum number of transactions per minute Bitcoin can handle as it is today? Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is there a way to estimate the maximum number of transactions per minute Bitcoin can handle as it is today? Angel Leon
• [Bitcoin-development] SIGHASH_WITHINPUTVALUE slush
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] SIGHASH_WITHINPUTVALUE Alan Reiner
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] SIGHASH_WITHINPUTVALUE slush
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] SIGHASH_WITHINPUTVALUE Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] SIGHASH_WITHINPUTVALUE slush
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] SIGHASH_WITHINPUTVALUE Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] SIGHASH_WITHINPUTVALUE slush
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] SIGHASH_WITHINPUTVALUE Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] SIGHASH_WITHINPUTVALUE slush
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] SIGHASH_WITHINPUTVALUE Alan Reiner
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] SIGHASH_WITHINPUTVALUE Alan Reiner
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] SIGHASH_WITHINPUTVALUE Alan Reiner
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] SIGHASH_WITHINPUTVALUE slush
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] SIGHASH_WITHINPUTVALUE Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] SIGHASH_WITHINPUTVALUE Tamas Blummer
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] SIGHASH_WITHINPUTVALUE Alan Reiner
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] SIGHASH_WITHINPUTVALUE slush
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] SIGHASH_WITHINPUTVALUE Tamas Blummer
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] SIGHASH_WITHINPUTVALUE Adam Back
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] SIGHASH_WITHINPUTVALUE Adam Back
• [Bitcoin-development] Ensuring security of funds and preserving anonymity when using Bitcoin for e-commerce Jonathan Brown
• [Bitcoin-development] Securing wallet on paper U.Mutlu
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Securing wallet on paper Pavol Rusnak
• [Bitcoin-development] Why Bitcoin is and isn't like the Internet 21E14
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Why Bitcoin is and isn't like the Internet Aaron Voisine
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Why Bitcoin is and isn't like the Internet Alon Muroch
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Why Bitcoin is and isn't like the Internet odinn
• [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Rusty Russell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Douglas Roark
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Douglas Roark
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Gavin Andresen
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Douglas Roark
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Andrew Poelstra
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Dave Collins
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Rusty Russell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures David Vorick
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Matt Whitlock
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Alex Morcos
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Gavin Andresen
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Jeff Garzik
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Zooko Wilcox-OHearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures Pieter Wuille
• [Bitcoin-development] Request for Comment: Bitcoin Wallet Privacy Ratings Criteria Kristov Atlas
• [Bitcoin-development] The legal risks of auto-updating wallet software; custodial relationships Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The legal risks of auto-updating wallet software; custodial relationships Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The legal risks of auto-updating wallet software; custodial relationships Matt Whitlock
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The legal risks of auto-updating wallet software; custodial relationships Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The legal risks of auto-updating wallet software; custodial relationships Matt Whitlock
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The legal risks of auto-updating wallet software; custodial relationships Tamas Blummer
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The legal risks of auto-updating wallet software; custodial relationships Matt Whitlock
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The legal risks of auto-updating wallet software; custodial relationships Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The legal risks of auto-updating wallet software; custodial relationships Tamas Blummer
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The legal risks of auto-updating wallet software; custodial relationships Justus Ranvier
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The legal risks of auto-updating wallet software; custodial relationships Tamas Blummer
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The legal risks of auto-updating wallet software; custodial relationships Justus Ranvier
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The legal risks of auto-updating wallet software; custodial relationships odinn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The legal risks of auto-updating wallet software; custodial relationships Roy Badami
• [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for encoding? Richard Brady
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for encoding? Matt Whitlock
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for encoding? Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for encoding? Jeff Garzik
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for encoding? Jeff Garzik
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for encoding? Richard Brady
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for encoding? Jeff Garzik
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for encoding? Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for encoding? Richard Brady
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for encoding? Alan Reiner
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for encoding? Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for encoding? Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for encoding? Gavin Andresen
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for encoding? Brian Hoffman
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for encoding? Ross Nicoll
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for encoding? Isidor Zeuner
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for encoding? Ross Nicoll
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for encoding? Isidor Zeuner
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for encoding? Jorge Timón
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for encoding? Jeff Garzik
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for encoding? Nicolas DORIER
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for encoding? Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for encoding? Nicolas DORIER
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for encoding? Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for encoding? Jeff Garzik
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for encoding? Nicolas DORIER

• Earlier messages
• Later messages