The BMW UUC Digest 
Volume 2 : Issue 839 : "text" Format

Messages in this Issue:
  Re: HELP: Hurricane Katrina problem
  Re: HELP: Hurricane Katrina problem
  <E21> Market for the older stuff
  Re: <E21> Market for the older stuff
  wheel bearing wear and specs
  Re: wheel bearing wear and specs
  Re: wheel bearing wear and specs
  Re: BMW 1 Deer 0 or State Farm claim help needed.....
  Re: gas smell - 95 M3 question

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 07:59:41 -0500
From: Neil Maller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: HELP: Hurricane Katrina problem
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

on 10/19/05 1:01 AM, "Bob Sutterfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 
> The only data that can persuade the insurance underwriters would be actual
> recent sale prices of comparable cars.

I realize that the application of logic to insurance disputes is probably a
losing proposition, but didn't the original post say that the owner had just
purchased his E30 M3? So isn't the price he paid best evidence of this car's
value?

Neil
Fort Wayne, IN
96 M3      - Bastard child
03 525iT   - Sterling Grey Metallic
77 MGB     - Original owner, need to sell
05 Mini    - Cooper S with LSD!



------------------------------

Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 10:54:32 -0700
From: "Bob Sutterfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Neil Maller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: HELP: Hurricane Katrina problem
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Neil Maller wrote:
> Bob Sutterfield wrote:
> > The only data that can persuade the insurance underwriters
> > would be actual recent sale prices of comparable cars.
> 
> I realize that the application of logic to insurance disputes
> is probably a losing proposition, but didn't the original post
> say that the owner had just purchased his E30 M3? So isn't the
> price he paid best evidence of this car's value?

In their eyes, that data point is evidence only that a foolish purchaser paid 
too much.  In our conversations (is that a nice term for it?) the adjuster said 
the price I had recently paid for my pristine one-owner E21 was "unreasonable 
other than for the emotional value, which they can't compensate."
--
Bob Sutterfield
'86 E30 325e  bronzitbeige-met
'91 E30 318iS alpinweiß
'83 E21 320i  opalgrün-met (RIP, parting out)
'93 T4 EV MV Weekender Arktisches Weiß
BMWCCA #169277 GGC/RMC


------------------------------

Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 10:59:16 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected]
Subject: <E21> Market for the older stuff
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Bob's email prompted me to send this email. I'm in the mode of thinking
about selling my '77 320i. I have had plans to recondition it back to new,
but lately I'm thinking to sell it. There just doesn't seem to be a market
for the old E21's. Even the dismantlers aren't interested. Anybody know why
this is?
The other direction is to get a piece of land with a barn and store it till
the time is right.

Thanks, Kevin



 ---------------------------------------------------------------- 
 This  e-mail  communication is confidential and is intended only 
 for  the individual(s) or entity named above and others who have 
 been  specifically  authorized to receive it. If you are not the 
 intended  recipient,  please  do not read, copy, use or disclose 
 the  contents of this communication to others. Please notify the 
 sender  that  you have received this e-mail in error by replying 
 to  the e-mail.  Please then delete the e-mail and any copies of 
 it. Thank you.                                                   
 ---------------------------------------------------------------- 





------------------------------

Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:35:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Carlos Lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected]
Subject: Re: <E21> Market for the older stuff
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>There just doesn't seem to be a
> market
> for the old E21's. Even the dismantlers aren't interested. Anybody
> know why this is?

Yikes loaded question.  In my opinion, they're not that pretty to look
at, most of them nowadays are rust buckets, they don't have the appeal
that the 2002 has.  Performance wise they're pretty wimpy.  Not sure
how reliable they are but my '78 320i required a lot of maintenance and
since I didn't know sh!t from shinola at the time it was pretty
expensive to pay a mechanic in the Seattle area to fix it.

Of course mine was a frankenbimmer with an E12 3.0L motor in it which
come to think of it was probably the worst six cylinder to stick in
there.  I would've preferred a 2.5L M20.  Still I enjoyed driving it
and with Tokicos and KYBs and who knows what shorter springs it
actually rode pretty well.  Handled like crap though.  The E21 Recaro
seats were the best part about that car.  :-)

Carlos
x78 320i (330i) <--apparently it was brought back to life here in
Detroit, rescued from the junkyard that I gave it away to.


                
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Music Unlimited 
Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:02:13 -0500
From: "Roy T. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: wheel bearing wear and specs
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I recently replaced the rear wheel bearings on my car and I was amazed
that both the rear wheel bearings were going out at exactly the same
time.  Talk about quality control, that is manufacturing to spec on an
extreme level.  I was thinking if both the rears were going bad at the
same time then the fronts cant be far off.  I was wondering if I should
plan on replacing them (front hub assembly w/bearing) now rather than in
the cold winter months.  30 below is no time to be working on the car.
What is the average wear interval on front wheel bearings?  I have
133,000 miles right now with no signs of any failure. What are most
people getting for milage on an E36 for front wheel bearings?

As an aside I noticed that both the rear wheel bearings were failing
after replacing one bad one.  I had a rumble coming from the back and
after replacing one bearing I wanted to make sure everything was
installed correctly before I replaced the next. It was my first time
replacing the bearings. Anyway I took the car out for a spin and
realized I still had a rumble in the back but from the opposite side
this time and much quieter.  I could not hear the rumble of the second
(passenger) bearing until I replaced the drive side bearing.  I am sure
it was a coincidince that both were failing at the same time but I was
still impressed.  It takes a very good manufacturing quality control
program to have 2 items fail consistantly espescially over the course of
133,000 miles of wear. But now that both are replaced there is no noise
and everything seems perfect again.  I was just amazed by the BMW
manufacturing spec even thought it was probabbly random luck.  


Roy Collins
96 328i  - 133,000 miles and 2 new rear bearings... noise free again


------------------------------

Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:22:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Jim Bassett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: wheel bearing wear and specs
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

On Wed, October 19, 2005 12:02 pm, Roy T. Collins said:
> What is the average wear interval on front wheel bearings?  I have
> 133,000 miles right now with no signs of any failure. What are most
> people getting for milage on an E36 for front wheel bearings?

As a data point, I recently replaced the front wheel bearings on the M3 at
about 160K miles. No noticeable issues/noise/etc, more of a preventative
thing (I used a gift certificate from a Club Race to get 4 front bearings
- the race car NEEDED them :-))

The M3 saw ~10,000 track miles back in the day, and at one point I had to
replace one of the rear wheel bearings due to rumbling. The other rear one
is still original.

Hope that helps,
Jim Bassett
1998 M3/4
1993 325is #44 JP


------------------------------

Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 20:33:43 -0400
From: "marshall lytle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Roy T. Collins'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: wheel bearing wear and specs
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Rear bearings last a long long time on a street car.  Mine were at 175k when
I replaced them.  Fronts last a long time too on a street car.  150k miles
on my street car.

Race car, whole nuther story.  Fronts every season, rears every other
season. 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roy T. Collins
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 2:02 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [UUC] wheel bearing wear and specs

I recently replaced the rear wheel bearings on my car and I was amazed that
both the rear wheel bearings were going out at exactly the same time.  Talk
about quality control, that is manufacturing to spec on an extreme level.  I
was thinking if both the rears were going bad at the same time then the
fronts cant be far off.  I was wondering if I should plan on replacing them
(front hub assembly w/bearing) now rather than in the cold winter months.
30 below is no time to be working on the car.
What is the average wear interval on front wheel bearings?  I have 133,000
miles right now with no signs of any failure. What are most people getting
for milage on an E36 for front wheel bearings?

As an aside I noticed that both the rear wheel bearings were failing after
replacing one bad one.  I had a rumble coming from the back and after
replacing one bearing I wanted to make sure everything was installed
correctly before I replaced the next. It was my first time replacing the
bearings. Anyway I took the car out for a spin and realized I still had a
rumble in the back but from the opposite side this time and much quieter.  I
could not hear the rumble of the second
(passenger) bearing until I replaced the drive side bearing.  I am sure it
was a coincidince that both were failing at the same time but I was still
impressed.  It takes a very good manufacturing quality control program to
have 2 items fail consistantly espescially over the course of 133,000 miles
of wear. But now that both are replaced there is no noise and everything
seems perfect again.  I was just amazed by the BMW manufacturing spec even
thought it was probabbly random luck.  


Roy Collins
96 328i  - 133,000 miles and 2 new rear bearings... noise free again

Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]


__________________________________________________________________________
In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW CCA.

UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate Short
Shifter - accept no substitutes!
908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com


------------------------------

Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 21:09:02 -0500
From: neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: UUC Digest <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: BMW 1 Deer 0 or State Farm claim help needed.....
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

The others were correct in most of what they said, except that the 
insurance company is not entitled to the cage, etc. (mods). Well, that 
could even be partially correct, depending upon your state's laws.
Of course, it goes without saying, so I'll say it anyhow - your mileage 
may vary, but the company is entitled to whatever was installed on the 
car on the date of loss, ASSuming that you expect them to pay for the 
whatever.
As a company, State Farm does not care as much that you added that stuff 
as the fact that it is there on the date of loss. I'm sure that most 
companies take a similar position. The value of a car is determined by 
the state of the car as of  the date it was damaged. This is, of course, 
excepting any illegal mod (removal of the airbag, window tint on the 
front windows, no cat, and so on), which is not covered anyhow.
IF it is totaled, you most likely have several options, again, depending 
upon your state's laws; let them have figure the value as it is (with 
the mods); let them figure the value in stock (without the mods) or 
incomplete form (with or without the stock parts); keep the car; let 
them take the whole car; keep some of the parts but let them take the rest.
This is beside the option of ORS (Owner Retained Salvage, which most 
people incorrectly refer to as buying it back - in most cases, the 
insurance co never takes possession of the car or title, only records 
the transaction with the secretary of state or BMV, so they never own 
the car, and title is never tagged as salvage). There may be some states 
in which ORS is not an option, or comes with a catch, such as not 
allowing ORS w/o a salvage title, not allowing ORS ever, or in the case 
of IL, not allowing ORS if the car is 7 or less years old.

I dare not give any advice, as that invariably starts a flame war with 
those who'd like to see you stick it to the man, aside from saying keep 
an OBjective view on the proceedings and keep the dialog open and 
flowing. The best way to make sure that you don't get what you want or 
think you deserve is to demand stuff, piss off the other guy and/or 
throw threats around.

Neil
State Farm auto claim rep for 6 years
(until last month - now a Michigan auto underwriter)

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 08:07:25 -0500
From: "Batt, Jeff \(GE Healthcare\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: gas smell - 95 M3 question
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Hello all,

I have a question regarding the common "top of gas tank" leak:  My leak
(in a sept '94 built) '95 M3 seems to have returned (it's on the pass
side).  At first I figured that I just can't put a hose clamp on
correctly, but after replacing the 2 hose clamps and the 5" diam rubber
gasket (that goes between the tank and the pump top) - and actually
replacing both twice - I have a new suspicion.  

After watching my tank (Filling it up and then by driving with the tank
covers off and watching for leaks at every stoplight or pulling
over)...it seems to be leaking from one or both of the electrical
connections (around the plastic housings/connectors) that plug into the
top of the pump cover.

Has anyone seen this before?  Is there an easy fix (epoxy on the inside
or something) or should I look at replacing the plastic pump top?

Thanks, Jeff 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Bassett
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 12:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [UUC] gas smell - 95 M3

On Wed, April 6, 2005 6:46 am, Batt, Jeff \(GE Healthcare\) said:
> I believe there are 3 possible leak points that could cause this 
> (please correct me if I'm wrong) - 1) inlet hose clamp, 2) outlet hose

> clamp, 3) gasket to top of tank.

Yep. If the hose clamps are the original crimp-type, remove them and
replace them with the screw-type hose clamps.

> Assuming it is this gasket...does anyone have a part number/name

Replacing this is also a good idea. Use this site to look up the part
number:
http://www.realoem.com/bmw/

Cheers,
Jim Bassett
1998 M3/4
1993 325is #44 JP

Search the
ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]


________________________________________________________________________
__
In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW
CCA.

UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate
Short Shifter - accept no substitutes!
908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com


------------------------------

End of [bmwuucdigest] digest(9 messages)
**********

Reply via email to