And neither would have Saddam. Kind of a moot point isn't it? Fact is, Saddam was an agressor and acted without provocation. A coalition of countries led by the U.S responded. If part of that reason was economic, so be it. It was the right thing to do.
H. -----Original Message----- From: Benjamin Falloon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:39 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: The Anti Terrorism Act.. If anyone ever tells me the US went in to liberated Kuwait for justice and liberty, they must be on drugs. That was a war over OIL prices. If there was no oil in Kuwait, America would have done nothing. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
