Inline.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lon Lentz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:34 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: How long?
>
>
>   The use of violence is not a civilization denegrator. Nuking baghdad
> would not be to get bin Laden. Our current course of action is the
> prudent one. Nuking Baghdad would be in retaliation for the Anthrax. The
> only reason we have not suffered greater biological or chemical attacks,
> other than our FBI and intelligence services, is that the people of the
> world know that they will be eliminated for such actions. And all those
> nuclear powers would be forewarned and their opinions heard, I'm sure.
> We have the power to eliminate every life form on this planet, and we
> have never thought lightly of it. It is a dead serious issue.

Exactly. Where does it stop?

>
>   Posit: Hussein is found to have been the source of the Anthrax used
> against us. What do feel would be the appropriate response of the US? I
> am seriously interested in what you think on this.

Try him in international court, the Hague. You don't kill an entire city.
Like his people have any control over what is happening there. They are not
like us, don't think like us, did not grow up in a republic like us, don't
have the same values as us, don't watch TV every night, don't drive all over
the place, don't have laws (in our past) protecting them from illegal search
and seizure or wiretapping. They have little in the way of personal rights
and nearly none as relates to the government. Summary executions are the
norm. He is a sick man and needs to be deposed. That is the course I would
recommend. We had the chance under Bush 1. He made a bad decision based on
the OIL issue, not what is good for the people of his country or ours.

>
>   And as to our willingness to commit great violence: What did we do for
> the 200 plus US Marines that died in Lebanon? Nothing. What did we do
> for the people who died on the Khobar towers bomb in Saudi? Nothing.
> What did we do for the first WTC bombing? Nothing (except put the
> criminals in prison). The 2 US embassy bombings in Africa? Nothing
> (except arrest, try, and convict those responsible). The Cole? Nothing
> again (except arrest more people). The US has one hell of a record of
> practicing restraint.

So what is point? What if we HAD retaliated? Might it be that 1 billion
Moslems would hate us instead of a handfull? Most Afghani's probably didn't
know crap about America before 9/11.

What you want is some people dead. You want us to puff out our chest and
kick some ass. Only, whose ass do you kick? The "people". What did they do.
Shit man, they are just trying to eak out a living. You don't see many fat
people in Iraq. Or people with all their teeth. Or medical centers, etc.

Man, what are we thinking? And Christmas around the corner. Sheesh.

-Gary

>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Will Swain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:42 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: How long?
>
>
> and nuking them is going to make it all ok? hundreds of thousands of
> innocent people die immediately, and many more for years to come. theres
> no
> guarantee that bin laden is even in the country. if I was him I probably
> wouldn't be.
>
> the situation will just escalate out of control. Pakistan has nukes.
> china
> will love you nuking people too I'm sure. the us will become even more
> hated
> than you say it is now. Jesus, I'd even hate your country if they did
> that
>
> the nuking route is an insane one.
>
> if the us legal system is such a joke then sort it out. but a so-called
> civilised country should possibly consider applying justice in the true
> sense of the word?
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to