Out of curiosity, have you been on welfare? Cause I don't remember it
being anything like you are describing.

Judah

On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Scott Stroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I said, I have no issue with trying to help those who want to help
> themselves.  Welfare, for example, was never meant to be a way of life, it
> was meant to help someone get back on their feet after rough times.  But we
> have generations of families on welfare with no incentive/initiative to get
> off.
>
> I am not saying its only the people's fault.  On the contrary, I think its
> mostly the system's fault.  The system makes it a) too easy to stay on or b)
> too hard to get off welfare.  We should be traching these people skills they
> can use to go get a job instead of just sitting around collecting a check
> and having babies to get more money.
>
> I am not sure if this has changed, but in New Jersey Medicaid used to cover
> reversal of a vasectomy. Correct me if I am wrong, but if you need to be on
> Medicaid, is it really a god idea to make it so you can have kids?  I don't
> think so.
>
> I would also say that this same attitude goes for the bailout bill.   I
> think any company *cough* AIG *cough* who continues to over spend on stupid
> shit should have the money taken back...with interest.  I am not saying I am
> totally against the bailout, but I think there should have been 'strings'
> attached as someone (i think sam) said.
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > Scott wrote:
>> > My biggest problem with the programs designed to help those in need are:
>> > 1. They don't seem to really help.
>> > 2. They are abused by people who do not need the services, but are just
>> too
>> > damned lazy.
>> >
>>
>> Couldn't agree more!  So do you and I agree in principle that:
>>
>> 1.) Wealth redistribution is an investment, but
>>
>> 2.) It's fraught with management problems such as timely course
>> corrections based on metics measured against goals.
>>
>> Thus,
>>
>> 3.) Some level of wealth redistribution is appropriate but the
>> programs should be considered as fiscal policy, should be founded on
>> sound management, and should include transparent measures.
>>
>> Would you agree?
>>
>>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:278420
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to