How may arp entries is the device learning? Each one of them will translate to a /32 in the hardware FIB.
Ian On 4/14/10 10:41 AM, Everton da Silva Marques wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:40:46PM -0400, Jeremy Parr wrote: > >> On 14 April 2010 11:57, Jeremy Parr <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I have an ME3400 running 12.2(46)SE that will not pass (much) more >>> than 1000pps through its copper gig port. The interface counters hover >>> around 1000pps tx/rx, while the bps rate fluctuates (presumable due to >>> the variable packet sizes getting thrown at it). There are no service >>> policys or rate limits applied to any of the interfaces. Any thoughts? >>> >>> ?5 minute input rate 1681000 bits/sec, 879 packets/sec >>> ?5 minute output rate 7545000 bits/sec, 1012 packets/sec >>> >> I am also seeing the following in the logs.... >> >> %PLATFORM_UCAST-6-PREFIX: One or more, more specific prefixes could >> not be programmed into TCAM and are being covered by a less specific >> prefix >> > I hit that warning as well, IOS is 12.2(53)SE, > and the routing table is not huge. If you ever > find a clue, let me know... > > ME3400#sh ip route summary > IP routing table name is Default-IP-Routing-Table(0) > IP routing table maximum-paths is 32 > Route Source Networks Subnets Overhead Memory (bytes) > connected 1 3 256 608 > static 0 2 192 304 > internal 3 3516 > Total 4 5 448 4428 > ME3400# > > ME3400#sh ip cef summary > IPv4 CEF is enabled for distributed and running > VRF Default: > 30 prefixes (30/0 fwd/non-fwd) > Table id 0 > Database epoch: 2 (30 entries at this epoch) > > ME3400# > > Cheers, > Everton > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
