This message is printed even with a single default route, if you happen
to use the l2 sdm template.
--
Tassos
Everton da Silva Marques wrote on 14/04/2010 20:41:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:40:46PM -0400, Jeremy Parr wrote:
On 14 April 2010 11:57, Jeremy Parr<[email protected]> wrote:
I have an ME3400 running 12.2(46)SE that will not pass (much) more
than 1000pps through its copper gig port. The interface counters hover
around 1000pps tx/rx, while the bps rate fluctuates (presumable due to
the variable packet sizes getting thrown at it). There are no service
policys or rate limits applied to any of the interfaces. Any thoughts?
?5 minute input rate 1681000 bits/sec, 879 packets/sec
?5 minute output rate 7545000 bits/sec, 1012 packets/sec
I am also seeing the following in the logs....
%PLATFORM_UCAST-6-PREFIX: One or more, more specific prefixes could
not be programmed into TCAM and are being covered by a less specific
prefix
I hit that warning as well, IOS is 12.2(53)SE,
and the routing table is not huge. If you ever
find a clue, let me know...
ME3400#sh ip route summary
IP routing table name is Default-IP-Routing-Table(0)
IP routing table maximum-paths is 32
Route Source Networks Subnets Overhead Memory (bytes)
connected 1 3 256 608
static 0 2 192 304
internal 3 3516
Total 4 5 448 4428
ME3400#
ME3400#sh ip cef summary
IPv4 CEF is enabled for distributed and running
VRF Default:
30 prefixes (30/0 fwd/non-fwd)
Table id 0
Database epoch: 2 (30 entries at this epoch)
ME3400#
Cheers,
Everton
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Tassos
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
