> As an attorney, I would highly recommend that the boards of both > organizations consult a professional mediator and dispense with the rest > of the posturing. Once an agreement was reached by both organizations, > THEN a membership vote could be called for by each club. At that point > there would be something concrete before the voting members which would > spell out exactly that on which they were voting and leave nothing to > speculation or persuasion by voting blocks. Pet owners could see > exactly what had been negotiated by their boards and vote to embrace or > reject that settlement. > I'd hate to see another vote which asked the wrong question or gave > rise to speculation and unfounded concerns.
This sounds like a perfect solution! Are there any board members on this list that can get this rolling? If not, anyone else game? Maybe we can put a petition together suggesting just this and get as many people to sign it as possible? Both Nationals are coming up very soon--we could get the petitions signed there! I would suggest getting as many non-breeders to sign it as possible too--show that there is support for it on all sides. Laura Lang ========================================================= "Magic Commands": to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL to start it up gain click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.
