Jackson,

Maybe it’s time for me to be bluntly honest and open.  Because yes, my sarcasm 
is not becoming, but I am beyond frustrated and tired of what I see on this 
list.

It is hypocrisy in the extreme to read from certain individuals whining about 
other people not meeting deadlines considering their past track records.  It is 
up to individuals to figure out if they figure into this category or not.

It is hypocrisy in the extreme from people to sit on this list and cry about 
process and adherence to it when I see constant violations of it from the floor 
by the same people, who have never bothered to read the processes that govern 
the various forums they participate in.

It is hypocrisy in the extreme that people talk about accountability and about 
governance without bothering to understand the actual processes and governance 
that already exists.  

If people wish to talk about accountability and governance and timing – a.) 
look at your own track records b.) start behaving within the bounds of defined 
process c.) stop crying about what others say and actually say things that are 
productive and contribute d.) contribute something to the organization rather 
than believing that your only contribution is to attack those that are 
contributing their time and effort to this organization.

If this email doesn’t apply to you – so be it, please ignore it, if however you 
feel it does, that is your choice to make and you can take it to heart or fight 
it.

I’m kinda beyond caring at the pettiness I see on here – and while I am sleep 
deprived, at least if I continue to read the same boring attacks on those who 
are attempting to do things they will sooner or later put me to sleep

Written in my personal capacity

Andrew



On 16/09/2016, 1:56 PM, "Jackson Muthili" <jacksonmu...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Andrew Alston
    <andrew.als...@liquidtelecom.com> wrote:
    >
    > Thanks Jackson for your permission for me to speak, its hugely 
appreciated.
    
    :-)
    
    > Anyway, I'm off to have a nice drink and worry about things that actually 
matter :)
    
    On a more serious note :- yes theres freedom of speech and expression.
    Let this not be freedom of abuse and mocking others.
    
    Let us exercise good judgement and not underestimate power of words.
    Words can incite immense hatred, violence, or utter and extreme peace
    and harmony. Dont ridicule with anger just because someone disagrees
    with you ideologically on an issue. Dont raise your voice and gesture
    with anger and disgust over a trivial matter that can be solved with
    simple, respectful and harmonious dialogue. However much smarter you
    think you are than the individual(s) you are dialoguing with.
    
    You see when you mock, insult and belittle someone under the guise of
    freedom of expression, that person and all of his/her friends
    colleagues and sympathizers might behave the same towards you. And
    yours likewise. And the community will NEVER converge on issues of
    mutual benefit.
    
    Enjoy your weekend and take it easy on that nice drink ;-)
    
    >
    > Andrew
    >
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Jackson Muthili [mailto:jacksonmu...@gmail.com]
    > Sent: 16 September 2016 13:21
    > To: General Discussions of AFRINIC <community-discuss@afrinic.net>
    > Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] Accountability assessment
    >
    > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Andrew Alston 
<andrew.als...@liquidtelecom.com> wrote:
    >> It also worries me that people seem to restrict what OTHERS say.
    >>
    >> If Owen feels like he wishes to comment on something – he is as free
    >> to do so as anyone here is free to say anything.
    >
    > Has anyone restricted or stopped another from expressing themselves?
    >
    >> Why do you wish to censor some members of the community?  If you don’t
    >> like what they say – feel free to ignore it.
    >
    > I agree. Just as Alan has chosen to ignore Badrus emails.
    >
    >> It’s the same way it annoys me when people come to the floor in a PDP
    >> meeting and go “I THINK THIS DISCUSSION SHOULD END AND THIS POLICY
    >> SHOULD BE SCRAPPED RIGHT NOW”
    >>
    >> And “WHY ARE WE ENTERTAINING THIS POLICY IT HAS HAD NO COMMENTS SO ITS
    >> NOT SUPPORTED”
    >
    > There you go. It annoys you. And that's why others have always let you 
stand in the meeting and belittle and disparage others you dont like or agree 
with. its a free world after all.
    >
    >> Ignoring the process that specifically lays out a way things are
    >> supposed to go.
    >>
    >> Here is a big hint – don’t like something, you’re free to ignore it,
    >> or, in this case, free to bitch and whine about it – but honestly,
    >> whining about things because you don’t like what someone says without
    >> adding anything constructive to the debate just indicates a level of
    >> insecurity and is pretty boring.
    >>
    >> And well – that’s me exercising my freedom of speech and if you don’t
    >> what I’ve said here, you’re free to ignore it, or whine some more, not
    >> like it makes a difference to me.
    >
    > Exactly my point. Speak up freely. You are even free to abuse the 
docility of a community and belittle them as you wish. After all, you are 
exercising your freedom of speech.
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Community-Discuss mailing list
    > Community-Discuss@afrinic.net
    > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
    > _______________________________________________
    > Community-Discuss mailing list
    > Community-Discuss@afrinic.net
    > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
    
    _______________________________________________
    Community-Discuss mailing list
    Community-Discuss@afrinic.net
    https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
    


_______________________________________________
Community-Discuss mailing list
Community-Discuss@afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss

Reply via email to