----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]----
It sounds a little like you are saying if you don't have a piece of paper saying you are a mechanic then you are not one and you don't have enough brains to work on a airplane. I can find you all kinds of people with the so called smart paper that I wouldn't even think about letting them touch my A/C. You are correct in saying there is a legal issue however what I have found in my 68 years and of which about 50 of those years I have been involved with A/C the A&P's that seem to gripe about some of us doing our own maintenance think we are taking money out of there pocket or they are on a ego trip. I for one trust my own ability much more than I do some one else for varied reasons the main one being I fly the plane and haul only my family and I want the maintenance done to my satisfaction. Dick ----- Original Message ----- From: Partain, David Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 10:49 AM To: 'Ercoupe Technical discussion' Subject: [COUPERS-TECH] RE: Digest list: Ercoupe Technical discussion (moderated) ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]---- I've been monitoring the website for several months mostly because I bought an Ercoupe about 18 months ago and wish to learn from others with more knowledge in type than I have. Let me first say I am an A&P and teach Aviation Maintenance Technology at university level. I am disturbed by what I see as a lot of illegal maintenance being performed. Perhaps many of the questions are for information only, or perhaps many of you are A&Ps and I'm not aware of it, if so forgive me. If I am correct that many of you are performing illegal maintenance, hopefully it is from ignorance and not intent. FAR part 43 covers maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, and alterations; if you own a certificated aircraft you need a copy of this. Read paragraph 43.3, this will tell you "persons authorized to perform maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, and alterations". Pay particular attention to (g) as it tells you what maintenance you may perform as a pilot-owner (preventive maintenance with certain restrictions). When you guys start talking about engine rebuilding for idiots or replacing fuel tanks you are way beyond what you as a pilot-owner may do. FAR 43 appendix A paragraph (c) lists preventive maintenance and this list is all you can do as the pilot-owner ( there are limitations to even this ). There are additional things you can do under direct supervision of a mechanic. I have a feeling much of what you non-mechanics are doing is in order to reduce operating costs, I understand that but sooner or later you will get in trouble if you perform maintenance beyond the scope of what you are authorized to do. You may be saving money now but is it worth loosing your pilots license or worse, getting someone injured or killed. Enough preaching, the choice is yours. Dave N87114 -----Original Message----- From: Ercoupe Technical discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 1:00 AM To: Ercoupe Technical discussion Subject: Digest list: Ercoupe Technical discussion (moderated) ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]---- Message list: 1. 2. Re: [COUPERS-TECH] Nose Tank 3. [COUPERS-TECH] Anyone know about this plane? 4. Re: [COUPERS-TECH] Overhaul question 5. Re: [COUPERS-TECH] Nose Tank 6. [COUPERS-TECH] donuts for breakfast 7. [COUPERS-TECH] Screw size 8. [COUPERS-TECH] 9. 10. [COUPERS-TECH] Re: [COUPERS-TECH] 11. Re: [COUPERS-TECH] Screw size 12. [COUPERS-TECH] RE: [COUPERS-FLYIN] Re: [COUPERS-TECH] 13. Re: [COUPERS-TECH] Anyone know about this plane? 14. [COUPERS-TECH] Re: [COUPERS-TECH] Messages: From: To: Subject: ---------------------------- From: Greg Bullough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Pete Thomson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,'Coupetech' <[email protected]> Reply-To: Greg Bullough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [COUPERS-TECH] Nose Tank ---------------------------- From: "Robert Kind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected] Reply-To: "Robert Kind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [COUPERS-TECH] Anyone know about this plane? ---------------------------- From: "Larry Wilkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Matthew Lockwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Larry Wilkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [COUPERS-TECH] Overhaul question The overhaul manual for idiots can be found at your local magazine store, right next to all the fine publications from "Marvel" Larry ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hartmut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Matthew Lockwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Ercoupe Technical discussion (moderated)" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 12:38 PM Subject: Re: [COUPERS-TECH] Overhaul question > ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]---- > > > I think an idiot overhauling an aircraft engine is a really bad combination....;) > > Hartmut > > Matthew Lockwood wrote: > > > > ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]---- > > > > This question NOT related to the Continental engine, but I thought this > > knowledgeable group could help: > > > > Hi Folks, > > > > Is there a manual for overhauling a Lycoming engine available for the > > amateur builder? I am looking for something NOT along the lines of a tech > > manual, rather more of a "overhual guide for idiots" type book. Anyone > > know? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Matt > > N125ML under construction > > N2864H Ercoupe 415CD > > > > ================================================================== > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm > > ================================================================== > TO UNSUBSCRIBE go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm > > > ---------------------------- From: "Hank Gallagher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Pete Thomson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Hank Gallagher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [COUPERS-TECH] Nose Tank Hi Pete, The old style gauge just had a wire without a glass tube. Worked fine except for collecting H2O. Hank Gallagher Austin TX ----- Original Message ----- From: Hartmut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Pete Thomson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: 'Coupetech' <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 1:36 PM Subject: Re: [COUPERS-TECH] Nose Tank > ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]---- > > > Pete. > I had that too ones. The Glass tube came loose in flight and one could > really watch it slowly getting out of the holder. > Then it flew away and I was angry to have lost another 20 bucks, since > that tube was just a new order. > However Nothing bad happens. There was no gas siphoned out of the tank. > I think that is because the vent hole in front of the gas cap creates > pressure in the tank. So the suction from above will only suck air, no gasoline. > After all the older style wire floats are working the same way without > any problems. > > > Hartmut N3330H > > > Pete Thomson wrote: > > > > ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]---- > > > > Evening all, I had an experience which I thought I would ask for some > > input on. The glass tube on the nose tank gauge started coming out of > > the aluminum gas cap about 30 minutes after take off. It came out very > > slowly but was at about 1/4 inch out when I noticed. It did not appear > > to move any more but I thought about the syphoning issue and headed > > back for home, it was loose and came out easily on the ground. I fixed > > it and then continued my 4 hour flight. The question I have is this :- > > in your opinion is the hole through which the wire goes big enough to > > allow the propwash to syphon all the gas out of the header tank faster > > than the gas would normally get returned to the wing tanks? I am sure > > at least one of you has hit a bird or something and had this > > experience, my concerns were twofold, one running out of gas and two > > the fire hazzard from the gas getting on the alternator in the engine > > compt. Your thoughts and experiences with this would be appreciated. > > The nose tank gas cap on my Coupe is vented towards the front. > > Thanks,Pete > > > > ================================================================== > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm > > ================================================================== > TO UNSUBSCRIBE go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm > > > > ---------------------------- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [email protected] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [COUPERS-TECH] donuts for breakfast I have a set of rubber donuts and U cup seals to replace in my struts too. Do I have to remove the wings to do the replacement? Can I just remove the struts if I jack up the coupe and let the wheels hang down? Alan. N87333 ---------------------------- From: "Matthew Lockwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ercoupe Technical discussion \(moderated\)" <[email protected]> Reply-To: "Matthew Lockwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [COUPERS-TECH] Screw size In re-installing my wingtanks, I have somehow come up short on screws. Anyone know the AN (MS) number for the screws that attach the wing tanks to the spar? What size are the nutplates they screw into? Thanks, Matt N2864H ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ercoupe Technical discussion (moderated)" <[email protected]> To: "Ercoupe Technical discussion (moderated)" <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 2:00 AM Subject: Digest list: Ercoupe Technical discussion (moderated) > ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]---- > > > Message list: > > 1. Re: [COUPERS-TECH] Low speed carb setting??? > 2. [COUPERS-TECH] Nose Tank > 3. Re: [COUPERS-TECH] Low speed carb setting??? > 4. [COUPERS-TECH] Overhaul question > 5. Re: [COUPERS-TECH] Nose Tank > 6. Re: [COUPERS-TECH] Overhaul question > 7. > > Messages: > > From: "RICHARD Eddinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Dallas Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[email protected]> > Reply-To: "RICHARD Eddinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [COUPERS-TECH] Low speed carb setting??? > > What happens if you lean it when it is running rough. I have a 0-200 that runs rough at 1400 to 1600. I can lean it and it runs smooth at all power settings. Of course I might be a tad to lean at the other power settings which I haven't checked yet as I just purchased the engine to put in my Coupe. I also had some leaks in my tubes and it ran a bunch better after I tightened them. > Dick > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Dallas Larson > Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 2:03 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [COUPERS-TECH] Low speed carb setting??? > > ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]---- > > > > Any carb specialists out there? > Recently my coupe runs rough at rpm speeds from 800 to 11-1200, especially when the engine is warm like when I'm taxing after flying. It sounds like it is running on two cylinders. The spark plugs are black which obviously indicates it is running too rich. It runs great at higher speeds. Run-up procedure was normal. We adjust the mixture screw and nothing seems to make a difference. In fact, we turned it all the way in and it still kept running the same. At idle speeds, my mechanic said the exhaust was dark. > Fifty hours ago(over a year and a half) we had the carb off for cleaning and float adjustments. At that time, it apparently was sucking air, not getting enough fuel and I had to have the carb heat on to keep it running. We replaced several gaskets. If my memory serves me correct, I think they were on the induction tubes. But, regardless, after installing and adjusting the idle mixture, it ran beautifully. Now, we are getting too much fuel. > I suppose we'll have to remove the carb again. What a pain!!! It is a Stromberg carb. We have to remove all the cowling, propeller, several baffles. and even a couple of the induction tubes to get the $@&*?# carb out. Is this the standard procedure for removing a carb from a coupe? That takes longer than servicing the carb. Is there an easier way? > I, also, noticed a lot of blue fuel stain on the inside of the bottom cowling. I don't see any dripping with engine off. Last week, assuming that the FBO fuel attendants topped-off my fuel, I flew a little less than two hours and took 15.6 gallons. Not good fuel economy! I am going to check it tomorrow after flying it over an hour today. Couldn't fill it as it started to rain. > When I approached the runway today, I pulled my carb heat on all the way and I thought the engine was going to quit on me. When I pushed it in about a quarter of an inch, it ran fine. > Thanks in advance for any info regarding this dilemma. > Dallas 93555 > Lakeville, MN > 952-892-6370 > 612-396-3884 cell > > > > ====================== > TO UNSUBSCRIBE go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm > > > ---------------------------- > From: Pete Thomson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Coupetech' <[email protected]> > Reply-To: Pete Thomson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [COUPERS-TECH] Nose Tank > > Evening all, I had an experience which I thought I would ask for some input > on. The glass tube on the nose tank gauge started coming out of the aluminum > gas cap about 30 minutes after take off. It came out very slowly but was at > about 1/4 inch out when I noticed. It did not appear to move any more but I > thought about the syphoning issue and headed back for home, it was loose and > came out easily on the ground. I fixed it and then continued my 4 hour > flight. The question I have is this :- in your opinion is the hole through > which the wire goes big enough to allow the propwash to syphon all the gas > out of the header tank faster than the gas would normally get returned to > the wing tanks? I am sure at least one of you has hit a bird or something > and had this experience, my concerns were twofold, one running out of gas > and two the fire hazzard from the gas getting on the alternator in the > engine compt. Your thoughts and experiences with this would be appreciated. > The nose tank gas cap on my Coupe is vented towards the front. Thanks,Pete > > > ---------------------------- > From: Hartmut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Dallas Larson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [COUPERS-TECH] Low speed carb setting??? > > Dallas. > > From what you are telling us , it seems your Carburetor is running rich > in general. > This would indicate a wrong adjusted or sticking float, which I would > check first. > I am sorry for you that you'd have to remove so many things to get the > carb out. But although I did not do it my self I can not recall my > mechanics complaining about removing all these parts you are talking about. > > Hartmut > > > Dallas Larson wrote: > > > > ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]---- > > > > Any carb specialists out there? > > Recently my coupe runs rough at rpm speeds from 800 to 11-1200, > > especially when the engine is warm like when I'm taxing after flying. > > It sounds like it is running on two cylinders. The spark plugs are > > black which obviously indicates it is running too rich. It runs great > > at higher speeds. Run-up procedure was normal. We adjust the mixture > > screw and nothing seems to make a difference. In fact, we turned it > > all the way in and it still kept running the same. At idle speeds, my > > mechanic said the exhaust was dark. > > Fifty hours ago(over a year and a half) we had the carb off for > > cleaning and float adjustments. At that time, it apparently was > > sucking air, not getting enough fuel and I had to have the carb heat > > on to keep it running. We replaced several gaskets. If my memory > > serves me correct, I think they were on the induction tubes. But, > > regardless, after installing and adjusting the idle mixture, it ran > > beautifully. Now, we are getting too much fuel. > > I suppose we'll have to remove the carb again. What a pain!!! It > > is a Stromberg carb. We have to remove all the cowling, propeller, > > several baffles. and even a couple of the induction tubes to get the > > $@&*?# carb out. Is this the standard procedure for removing a carb > > from a coupe? That takes longer than servicing the carb. Is there an > > easier way? > > I, also, noticed a lot of blue fuel stain on the inside of the > > bottom cowling. I don't see any dripping with engine off. Last week, > > assuming that the FBO fuel attendants topped-off my fuel, I flew a > > little less than two hours and took 15.6 gallons. Not good fuel > > economy! I am going to check it tomorrow after flying it over an > > hour today. Couldn't fill it as it started to rain. > > When I approached the runway today, I pulled my carb heat on all > > the way and I thought the engine was going to quit on me. When I > > pushed it in about a quarter of an inch, it ran fine. > > Thanks in advance for any info regarding this dilemma. > > Dallas 93555 > > Lakeville, MN > > 952-892-6370 > > 612-396-3884 cell > > > > > > > > ================================================================== > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE go to: http://ercouperscom/lists.htm > > > ---------------------------- > From: "Matthew Lockwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Ercoupe Technical discussion \(moderated\)" <[email protected]> > Reply-To: "Matthew Lockwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [COUPERS-TECH] Overhaul question > > This question NOT related to the Continental engine, but I thought this > knowledgeable group could help: > > Hi Folks, > > Is there a manual for overhauling a Lycoming engine available for the > amateur builder? I am looking for something NOT along the lines of a tech > manual, rather more of a "overhual guide for idiots" type book. Anyone > know? > > Thanks, > > Matt > N125ML under construction > N2864H Ercoupe 415CD > > > > ---------------------------- > From: Hartmut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Pete Thomson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [COUPERS-TECH] Nose Tank > > Pete. > I had that too ones The Glass tube came loose in flight and one could > really watch it slowly getting out of the holder. > Then it flew away and I was angry to have lost another 20 bucks, since > that tube was just a new order. > However Nothing bad happens. There was no gas siphoned out of the tank. > I think that is because the vent hole in front of the gas cap creates > pressure in the tank. So the suction from above will only suck air, no gasoline. > After all the older style wire floats are working the same way without > any problems > > > Hartmut N3330H > > > Pete Thomson wrote: > > > > ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]---- > > > > Evening all, I had an experience which I thought I would ask for some > > input on. The glass tube on the nose tank gauge started coming out of > > the aluminum gas cap about 30 minutes after take off. It came out very > > slowly but was at about 1/4 inch out when I noticed. It did not appear > > to move any more but I thought about the syphoning issue and headed > > back for home, it was loose and came out easily on the ground. I fixed > > it and then continued my 4 hour flight. The question I have is this :- > > in your opinion is the hole through which the wire goes big enough to > > allow the propwash to syphon all the gas out of the header tank faster > > than the gas would normally get returned to the wing tanks? I am sure > > at least one of you has hit a bird or something and had this > > experience, my concerns were twofold, one running out of gas and two > > the fire hazzard from the gas getting on the alternator in the engine > > compt. Your thoughts and experiences with this would be appreciated. > > The nose tank gas cap on my Coupe is vented towards the front. > > Thanks,Pete > > > > ================================================================== > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE go to: http://ercouperscom/lists.htm > > > ---------------------------- > From: Hartmut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Matthew Lockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [COUPERS-TECH] Overhaul question > > I think an idiot overhauling an aircraft engine is a really bad combination....;) > > Hartmut > > Matthew Lockwood wrote: > > > > ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]---- > > > > This question NOT related to the Continental engine, but I thought this > > knowledgeable group could help: > > > > Hi Folks, > > > > Is there a manual for overhauling a Lycoming engine available for the > > amateur builder? I am looking for something NOT along the lines of a tech > > manual, rather more of a "overhual guide for idiots" type book. Anyone > > know? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Matt > > N125ML under construction > > N2864H Ercoupe 415CD > > > > ================================================================== > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm > > > ---------------------------- > From: > To: > Subject: > > > ---------------------------- > > > ================================================================== > TO UNSUBSCRIBE go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm > > > > ---------------------------- From: "dalijohn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ercoupe Tech List" <[email protected]> Reply-To: "dalijohn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [COUPERS-TECH] I found a spec sheet and a picture of an Aeronca "Chum". This aircraft has nearly the same spec's as the 'coupe. I was advertised as a low-wing, spin proof aircraft and the picture show it to be similar to the coupe with a twin tail. Has anyone ever seen or heard of this plane before? Web link attached below. http://www.aeronca.com/pictures/159.jpg http://www.aeronca.com/pictures/158.jpg DJ ---------------------------- From: To: Subject: ---------------------------- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected], [email protected] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [COUPERS-TECH] Re: [COUPERS-TECH] Dallas, Yes, Aeronca licensed the control system from Fred Weick.... See page 215 of Fred's autobiography From The Ground Up. Here Fred says there were only 1 of these built, and "I think I got a total of $15 in royalties". Thanks for the pictures. Harry ---------------------------- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [COUPERS-TECH] Screw size Matt: The screws that hold the wing tanks to the front spar are #10's. Most of them should be 1/2 inch long, however on the underside, near the fuselage, the screw(s) go through the belly skin and may need to be 5/8 or 3/4 inch long. I believe the proper nomenclature is AN526-1032R8 for the 1/2 inch long screws. (AN526C) if you want stainless screws. The longer ones would be R10 or R12. Lynn Nelsen ---------------------------- From: Pete Thomson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected], [email protected] Reply-To: Pete Thomson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [COUPERS-TECH] RE: [COUPERS-FLYIN] Re: [COUPERS-TECH] Harry, interesting to note the landing speed of 50 MPH and the gross weight of 1300 lbs. I wonder where this would fit in the new Sport Aviation category, stall speed is not given in the specs. The ailerons are a lot smaller as well,Pete -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 6:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [COUPERS-FLYIN] Re: [COUPERS-TECH] ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]---- Dallas, Yes, Aeronca licensed the control system from Fred Weick... See page 215 of Fred's autobiography From The Ground Up. Here Fred says there were only 1 of these built, and "I think I got a total of $15 in royalties". Thanks for the pictures. Harry ================================================================== TO UNSUBSCRIBE go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm ---------------------------- From: Sydney Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Robert Kind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Sydney Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [COUPERS-TECH] Anyone know about this plane? Yes, I guess now I know all about it. An orthopedic surgeon here in Wausau WI bought it yesterday. He knows very little about airplanes, and almost nothing about this one. The seller was Ron Beck, of Phoenix. The surgeon found out about me from a mutual friend, and, even though I told him it would cost him a lot to make it into a flying airplane (it hasn't flown since 1987 and the instrument panel and controls are out but are there) he is determined to buy it. Since I just happen to have an Ercoupe trailer, and since I am now retired, we are going to make the big expedition from Wausau to Deer Valley to pick it up in two weeks. Wish us luck. Syd Cohen Robert Kind wrote: > ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following > any advice in this forum.]---- > > To All: > > I noticed an Ercoupe on E-bay and wondered if anyone knows of this > plane and/or could give me some background into its history, etc. I > don't know the N-number, but it is at Deer Valley airport in the > Phoenix area and here is the link to view the plane: > > http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1864464256&r d= 1 > <http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1864464256&; rd =1> > > Thanks, > > Robert Kind > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: Click Here > <http://g.msn.com/1HM1ENUS/c144??PS=47575> > ================================================================== TO > UNSUBSCRIBE go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm . ---------------------------- From: Sydney Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: dalijohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Sydney Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [COUPERS-TECH] Re: [COUPERS-TECH] If you look closly at the bottom of /159.jpg is says "Licensed by Engineering and Research Corporation under Weick U. S. patent." Wow! Fred had a hand in this one also. Syd Cohen dalijohn wrote: >----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]---- > > >I found a spec sheet and a picture of an Aeronca "Chum". This aircraft has >nearly the same spec's as the 'coupe. I was advertised as a low-wing, spin >proof aircraft and the picture show it to be similar to the coupe with a >twin tail. Has anyone ever seen or heard of this plane before? Web link >attached below. > >http://www.aeronca.com/pictures/159.jpg >http://www.aeronca.com/pictures/158.jpg > > >DJ > > >================================================================== >TO UNSUBSCRIBE go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm > > > > >. > > > ---------------------------- ================================================================== TO UNSUBSCRIBE go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm ================================================================== TO UNSUBSCRIBE go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm ====================== TO UNSUBSCRIBE go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
