Am Montag, 21. Dezember 2015, 19:07:01 schrieb Jean-Luc CECCOLI:
> Hello,
> 
> And sorry for replying so late.
> 
> > .../...
> > 
> > > RPD can name files to HHMMSSsubsec, a must with modern cameras that can
> > > take many photos within a second. DT can't.
> > 
> > Right, split seconds are not supported in dt. Could you provide a sampel
> > file where that is used? My cameras don't write anything smaller than a
> > second.
> Indeed. I've been searching (maybe not enough / the good way) and must admit
> you may be right : I couldn't find where Bibble/AfterShot and Rapid Photo
> Dowloader do retrieve split seconds from. I could find nothing about this
> using exiftools.
> But the fact is, both the software previously mentioned do allow to display
> this information. Could they happen to create this on their own, assuming
> that if they find more than one file within the same second, then they
> split that second into as many as files ? That is the only explanation that
> comes to my mind after reading your reply, and I must admit that I never
> had thought about this before, I thought it was normal with new cameras to
> be able to provide such information.

No idea.

> Regards,
> 
> J.-Luc

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users

Reply via email to