Just found a link to the self-subscribe app [1] for committers on the mailing lists page [2]. The mailing lists for podlings are at the end of the (long!) dropdown.
Cheers, Till [1] https://whimsy.apache.org/committers/subscribe <https://whimsy.apache.org/committers/subscribe> [2] http://apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html <http://apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html> > On May 11, 2015, at 10:07 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > I’ve also added this list to our incubation status page [1]. > > @Ian, could you add the new list to the readme when you update it again? > > Cheers, > Till > > [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/asterixdb.html > <http://incubator.apache.org/projects/asterixdb.html> > >> On May 11, 2015, at 9:45 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> is available now. >> Please subscribe to it, so that we can close the old list down. >> >> Cheers, >> Till >> >>> On May 9, 2015, at 9:14 AM, Till Westmann <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> I’ve requested a users mailing list using the request form at [1]. >>> The listed moderators are our mentors and 2 volunteers (Mike and I). >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Till >>> >>> [1] https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq/incubator >>> <https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq/incubator> >>> >>>> On May 3, 2015, at 11:41 PM, Mike Carey <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Cool! >>>> >>>> On 5/3/15 5:08 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >>>>> the way that moderation works at Apache is that moderators see candidate >>>>> messages in email with links to accept or reject. Reply with no >>>>> modifications works to accept the message. Reply-all accepts the message >>>>> and whitelists the sender. >>>>> >>>>> If no moderator takes action for several days, the message is deleted. >>>>> >>>>> Super simple and fast. The only obscure part is the the reply-all trick. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Mike Carey <[email protected] >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I could do it as well. (Does it just entail saying "this note may indeed >>>>>> pass" to a queue of msgs - a queue we'd all be trying to watch?) >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Mike >>>>>> >>>>>> On 5/3/15 1:11 PM, Till Westmann wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I agree with your feeling. If we decide to do it that way, I’m >>>>>>> volunteering to be another moderator. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Are there other volunteers? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On May 3, 2015, at 10:29 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected] >>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>> My feeling is it doesn't hurt to have more moderators rather than >>>>>>>> fewer. >>>>>>>> Judicious white-listing allows the amount of moderation traffic to be >>>>>>>> driven to very low levels so the load on the moderators is very, very >>>>>>>> low. >>>>>>>> The cost of losing a moderator without quite knowing it it higher, I >>>>>>>> think, >>>>>>>> than the load on a number of moderators. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected] >>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Well, the JIRA was not the right way to request this. >>>>>>>>> But before we do it the right way, we need a few moderators for the >>>>>>>>> list. >>>>>>>>> I assume that the mentors are the moderators for the other lists. >>>>>>>>> Is that the way it should be or should other PPMC members moderate as >>>>>>>>> well? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> Till >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On May 2, 2015, at 18:30, Till Westmann <[email protected] >>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Here’s the JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9580 >>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9580> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>> Till >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On May 2, 2015, at 5:39 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Ok, since nobody objected, I’ll ask for the users list. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>> Till >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 25, 2015, at 12:16 AM, Till Westmann <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Since this is just a procedural decision that has no impact outside >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> the AsterixDB podling, I think that the PPMC members (mentors + >>>>>>>>> initial >>>>>>>>> committer) are those who get to decide. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And as this is probably not a highly contested issue, we could take >>>>>>>>>>> this decision by lazy consensus [1], i.e. your proposal is accepted, >>>>>>>>> if >>>>>>>>> nobody objects within 72 hours. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>> Till >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 24, 2015, at 08:09, Mike Carey <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Given the discussions, I'd like to propose now that we close in >>>>>>>>>>>>> on a >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "two lists - dev and user" - answer to this one. I realize there >>>>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>> tradeoffs, but because we do have some users already who are decidedly >>>>>>>>> non-developer types - and more coming - I'd like to have a list "for >>>>>>>>> them" >>>>>>>>> that encourages them to be on it (by its topics and volume). Is >>>>>>>>> there a >>>>>>>>> way we can/should bring this to a vote/decision by those that get to >>>>>>>>> decide? (This will be our first case-study in a >>>>>>>>> post-joining-incubation >>>>>>>>> decision. :-)) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/24/15 5:46 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Till Westmann >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> I’m not completely sure that I want one. We currently have one and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it has some reasonable traffic and the discussions are at a >>>>>>>>> user-level. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Also all developers are subscribed to the user-list, so developers >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are aware of user problems but not necessarily the other way >>>>>>>>> around. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I think that works pretty well, but maybe a single list would work >>>>>>>>>>>>>> better. >>>>>>>>>> Thoughts from the other AsterixDB developers? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about automatically generated notifications, like Jira >>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit messages, etc.? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wouldn't recommend to push those to a user list? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jochen >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
