On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 4:32 PM, Alex Cotiugă <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > Adding more elements in the Themes section could make the `Themes` term to > loose its meaning for > what is configurable inside.As a user, I might be tempted to go first in > the Presentation section for > changing something like Logo. Because Skin and Color Themes have logo functionalities and also because the Look & Feel section description mentions you can change the Logo from there, these were the criteria based on what I've chosen the section. > Then, would we consider to make logo > changeable as is the profile > picture (making the logo editable directly in header)? > I don't understand this question. > > Thanks, > Alex > > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 4:18 PM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected] > > > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > As some of you know, in January we had another session of usability > tests > > > performed. As a result of those tests, I have prioritized [1] some > issues > > > that we might want to improve in our next 10.x+ Roadmaps. > > > > > > One of the entries from that list is: "Create a dedicated Logo section > in > > > Administration". > > > > > > Although we made some improvements in this area, users still struggle > to > > > find the Logo changing area (takes more than 3 minutes). Plus there is > a > > > lot of confusion between the Skin and ColorThemes overriding. > > > > > > This is a proposal to explicitly have a Logo section inside the Themes > > > section of Administration > > > http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/IdeaChangeLo > > go#HSolution1-1 > > > > > > Let me know what you think, > > > Caty > > > > > > [1] > > > http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/Usability/Ta > > sks5/Prioritization/ > > > > > > > > -- > > Thomas Mortagne > > >
