I was under the impression that Jacqui followed up to my post last week
or so(??)
-rwr
"There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an
idiot."
- Steven Wright
Please review our ICANN Reform Proposal:
http://www.byte.org/heathrow
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Allen
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 11:06 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; discuss-list
> Subject: Re: Letters from Tucpws?
>
>
> Thanks Ross. Just a concern... ;o) Have you heard anything
> else (Decisions) on the referral lists yet? It's been a while
> since you said you were having a meeting about it.....
>
> Mikey
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Mike Allen'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Derek
> J. Balling'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'discuss-list'"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 7:39 AM
> Subject: RE: Letters from Tucpws?
>
>
> > I'm going to look into this a bit further to make sure that we have
> > our processes in ship-shape shape...(or something like that)...
> >
> >
> >
> > -rwr
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the
> shore like an
> > idiot."
> > - Steven Wright
> >
> > Please review our ICANN Reform Proposal:
> http://www.byte.org/heathrow
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Allen
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 8:09 AM
> > > To: Derek J. Balling; discuss-list
> > > Subject: Re: Letters from Tucpws?
> > >
> > >
> > > Exactly. Thank you. in the period since we have been
> > > established we have not had one support question their. They
> > > all go to our support box. If we ever did run into the
> > > problem of support stuff in the whois box, then we would
> > > contact everyone and remind them again of the procedures.......
> > >
> > > Mikey
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Derek J. Balling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Chuck Hatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Cc: "Mike Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> > > "discuss-list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 10:40 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Letters from Tucpws?
> > >
> > >
> > > > Support requests wouldn't be going to that address. His
> customers
> > > > would be sending to their normal "support" address that
> they have.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 10:16 PM, Chuck Hatcher wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Look, I don't want to argue about how to run a business.
> > > I'll do it
> > > > > my way, and you do it yours. But I wouldn't call waiting
> > > two days to
> > > > > answer a support request going the "Extra Mile"!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: Mike Allen
> > > > > To: Chuck Hatcher ; discuss-list
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 9:13 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: Letters from Tucpws?
> > > > >
> > > > > Exactly, but why eliminate potentially important email,
> > > when you can
> > > > > publish one and sift through it every 2 days and make
> > > sure nothing
> > > > > "Important" is coming your way? Please re-read your last
> > > email. Once
> > > > > again, we are going the "Extra-Mile" that we are not
> > > "Required"????
> > > > > ;o)
> > > > >
> > > > > Mikey
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: Chuck Hatcher
> > > > > To: Mike Allen ; discuss-list
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 7:31 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: Letters from Tucpws?
> > > > >
> > > > > Let me make sure I understand - I assume you're
> talking about the
> > > > > reseller contact email address (as opposed to
> technical contact).
> > > > >
> > > > > If you don't want to use email for reseller contact,
> you have the
> > > > > option of having the address not appear in the whois. You
> > > can use a
> > > > > url, or a phone number, or all the above, or nothing.
> My point is
> > > > > that if you DO publish an email address as a means of
> > > contacting you
> > > > > for registration support, you ought to at least skim
> through the
> > > > > messages sent to that address. If you think
> advertising an email
> > > > > address is just going to result in a lot of spam,
> then why do it?
> > > > >
> > > > > Personally, I like listing only the URL, and
> providing a support
> > > > > form on the website.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: Mike Allen
> > > > > To: Chuck Hatcher ; discuss-list
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 7:50 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: Letters from Tucpws?
> > > > >
> > > > > Come on dude. They are sending email to a public, mostly
> > > trash box.
> > > > > Yes, their e-mail is more important with the 200 emails a
> > > day we get
> > > > > from scum mining the who-is to send us porno offers!
> We scan the
> > > > > trash bin a couple times a week to make sure there is nothing
> > > > > "Important" but we make sure our customers know the
> boxes (Proper
> > > > > procedures) for any issues... Are you telling me you
> have time to
> > > > > sift through 200+ trash emails a day? It is called
> > > organization and
> > > > > I definatly don't need someone telling me how to do
> it as we have
> > > > > things running quite well and I can guarantee know
> one has "Ever"
> > > > > filed a complaint against us. We go the extra mile.
> Why? We don't
> > > > > have trash mail is our way every day!
> > > > >
> > > > > Things run quite well here. Just out of curiosity, how
> > > long have you
> > > > > been a reseller? If over a year, you too would be a fine tuned
> > > > > machine from all the scum and crap on a daily basis........
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Mike Allen, 4CheapDomains.Net
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > http://www.4CheapDomains.Net
> > > > > (812) 275-8425 - Office
> > > > > (815) 364-1278 - Fax
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: Chuck Hatcher
> > > > > To: Mike Allen ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 5:44 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: Letters from Tucpws?
> > > > >
> > > > > Are you saying email from Tucows is more important than
> > > email from
> > > > > your
> > >
> > > > > customers?
> > > > >
> > > > > I hate wading through spam as much as the next guy,
> but I would
> > > > > never filter email sent to a contact address I have
> > > published to the
> > > > > public. (And I can't think of a better way for Tucows to
> > > make sure
> > > > > you keep your "public" address updated than to use it for
> > > critical
> > > > > updates!)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: Mike Allen
> > > > > To: discuss-list
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 3:48 PM
> > > > > Subject: Letters from Tucpws?
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > Hoping Charles (But I think he is on vacation?) might
> shed some
> > > > > light. Should account teams etc announcement e-mails be
> > > sent to the
> > > > > email that we have designated as, let's say
> announcements? I have
> > > > > been receiving email to our address that is listed in the
> > > WHOIS that
> > > > > we filter for spam! I have a bad feeling we will loose a
> > > important
> > > > > message one day if this is not changed....
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe we are the only one, but seems odd that SRS sends
> > > us mail to
> > > > > the address that we list in the reseller area as our
> > > WHOIS info....
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Mike Allen, 4CheapDomains.Net
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > http://www.4CheapDomains.Net
> > > > > (812) 275-8425 - Office
> > > > > (815) 364-1278 - Fax
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> +------------------------------+--------------------------------+
> > > > | Derek J. Balling | "You can get more with
> a kind |
> > > > | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | word and a
> two-by-four, than |
> > > > | www.megacity.org/blog/ | you can with just a
> kind |
> > > > | | word."
> - Marcus |
> > > >
> +---------------------------------------------------------------+
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
