On May 29, 2009, at 9:28 AM, Jared Spool wrote:


On May 29, 2009, at 6:36 AM, James Page wrote:

I think the issue with using heuristic evaluations is the well known issue
with the evaluator effect.

Wow, James. You are *so* missing the point here.

Sure, there are evaluator effects in heuristic evaluations. But that has to do with *different* evaluators inspecting the *same* design.


If I understand James correctly, he is suggesting that if the evaluators knew which designers used personas then they would be biased from judging objectively which designs were more user-centered. That is, the so-called differences uncovered by the heuristic evaluation might only be biases introduced by the evaluators.

If this is the case (and it's not clear from the writeup exactly what was done), then the results of the study are biased.

Frank, could you shed some more light on this? Did the evaluators know which designs were done using personas and which were not?


Cheers,

Josh




Joshua Porter, Founder
Bokardo Design
Interface design & strategy for social web applications
phone: 508-954-1896
http://bokardo.com
[email protected]
twitter: bokardo



________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [email protected]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to