election-methods-electorama.com  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [EM] Election via Proxies Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Election via Proxies Abd ulRahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Election via Proxies Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Election via Proxies Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] IRV with approval Sean Harris
  • Re: [EM] IRV with approval Abd ulRahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] IRV with approval James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] IRV with approval Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Canadians on the way... stephane.rouillon
  • RE: [EM] Canadians on the way... James Gilmour
• [EM] Markus, 18 May, '05, 0423 MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] More Paul MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] strange 2-dim. fun example Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] criteria compliance and strategic vulnerability James Green-Armytage
  • [EM] criteria compliance and strategic vulnerability Chris Benham
  • [EM] criteria compliance and strategic vulnerability Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] criteria compliance and strategic vulnerability Kevin Venzke
  • [EM] criteria compliance and strategic vulnerability Chris Benham
• [EM] Comments on Alex's 2nd Arrow posting MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Comments on Alex's 2nd Arrow posting Bill Clark
• [EM] Markus--Who introduced SSD to EM? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Paul doesn't understand something that I said MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • RE: [EM] Paul doesn't understand something that I said Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Re: Criteria reply MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] DMC/RAV and FBC Russ Paielli
• [EM] One more thought on Arrow Alex Small
• [EM] Re: The issue of comments about Arrow's impossibility theorem MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Comments on additional posting about Arrow's CC MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Criteria reply MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Criteria reply Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] Criteria reply Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Criteria reply Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Criteria reply Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Criteria reply Abd ulRahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Criteria reply Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Criteria reply Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] Criteria reply Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Criteria reply Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] Criteria reply Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Criteria reply Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Criteria reply Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Criteria reply Markus Schulze
• [EM] The issue of comments about Arrow's theorem MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • RE: [EM] The issue of comments about Arrow's theorem Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] The issue of comments about Arrow's theorem Curt Siffert
  • Re: [EM] The issue of comments about Arrow's theorem Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] The issue of comments about Arrow's theorem Curt Siffert
  • Re: [EM] The issue of comments about Arrow's theorem Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] The issue of comments about Arrow's theorem Abd ulRahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] The issue of comments about Arrow's theorem Curt Siffert
  • [EM] The issue of comments about Arrow's theorem Alex Small
• [EM] FBC MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] FBC Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Need copy of digest issue 22 (never received) RLSuter
• [EM] Re: Name Capitalization. enforcement, etc. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Paul: Logical arguments MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: WV methods fail FBC with 3 candidates MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Re: WV methods fail FBC with 3 candidates Kevin Venzke
• [EM] arrow's, wikipedia part II Curt Siffert
• [EM] RE: assumption of sincere ballots (was Approval Later-no-Harm) Simmons, Forest
  • [EM] RE: assumption of sincere ballots (was Approval Later-no-Harm) Chris Benham
• [EM] Goodbye Gerrymandering. stephane.rouillon
  • Re: [EM] Goodbye Gerrymandering. Curt Siffert
  • Re: [EM] Goodbye Gerrymandering. Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] WV methods fail FBC with 3 candidates Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Name capitalization. Utopian ideals. Enforcement. MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • RE: [EM] Name capitalization. Utopian ideals. Enforcement. Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] Name capitalization. Utopian ideals. Enforcement. James Green-Armytage
  • RE: [EM] Name capitalization. Utopian ideals. Enforcement. Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Arrow's Theorem flawed? Curt Siffert
  • [EM] Re: Arrow's Theorem flawed? Araucaria Araucana
  • RE: [EM] Re: Arrow's Theorem flawed? Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] Re: Arrow's Theorem flawed? Bart Ingles
  • RE: [EM] Re: Arrow's Theorem flawed? Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] Re: Arrow's Theorem flawed? Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] Re: Arrow's Theorem flawed? Curt Siffert
  • Re: [EM] Re: Arrow's Theorem flawed? Bill Clark
  • Re: [EM] Arrow's Theorem flawed? Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] Arrow's Theorem flawed? Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] irony Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] irony Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] irony Russ Paielli
• [EM] problematic participants Andrew Myers
  • Re: [EM] problematic participants Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] London newspaper campaigning for voting reform Stephen Turner
  • RE: [EM] London newspaper campaigning for voting reform James Gilmour
• [EM] Clarification MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Summary--Unstated CC assumptions MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Saddam Declares Victory! Russ Paielli
  • [EM] over the top personal comments, revisited James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] over the top personal comments, revisited Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] over the top personal comments, revisited Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] update on classroom creation question James Green-Armytage
• [EM] link to web site James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Should we say a criterion implicitly doesnt apply to a method? MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Should we say a criterion implicitly doesnt apply to a method? Russ Paielli
• [EM] fixing DMC page on electowiki Araucaria Araucana
  • Re: [EM] fixing DMC page on electowiki Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] Re: fixing DMC page on electowiki Araucaria Araucana
  • Re: [EM] Re: fixing DMC page on electowiki Abd ulRahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Re: fixing DMC page on electowiki Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] Re: fixing DMC page on electowiki Russ Paielli
  • [EM] Re: fixing DMC page on electowiki Araucaria Araucana
  • Re: [EM] Re: fixing DMC page on electowiki Abd ulRahman Lomax
  • [EM] Welcome! / Procedural version of DFC Jobst Heitzig
  • [EM] Re: Welcome! / Procedural version of DFC Abd ulRahman Lomax
  • [EM] Re: fixing DMC page on electowiki Araucaria Araucana
  • Re: [EM] Re: fixing DMC page on electowiki Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] Arrow's Condorcet Criterion Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] Arrow's Condorcet Criterion Russ Paielli
  • [EM] Arrow's Condorcet Criterion MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • RE: [EM] Arrow's Condorcet Criterion Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Russ's criteriai postings MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Russ's criteriai postingse Russ Paielli
  • [EM] Over the top personal comments Rob Lanphier
  • Re: [EM] Over the top personal comments Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] Over the top personal comments Jobst Heitzig
  • [EM] Re: Over the top personal comments Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: "Approval Later-no-Harm", Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Re: "Approval Later-no-Harm", Russ Paielli
  • [EM] Re: "Approval Later-no-Harm", Chris Benham
• [EM] Part 2, Re: James, SFC MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Mike: CWP (was: SFC) James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Part 1, Re: James, SFC MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Mike: WV (was: SFC) James Green-Armytage
• [EM] James' mutually-contradictory critrerion definitions MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] James' mutually-contradictory critrerion definitions James Green-Armytage
• [EM] AWP vs. S/WPO James Green-Armytage
• [EM] general understanding of majority and mutual majority criteria? James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: Duverger's law and British elections MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] James, SFC , Contd. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Malfunctioning criteria MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Re: Malfunctioning criteria Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] Re: Malfunctioning criteria Russ Paielli
• [EM] 2004 baseball grid, revisited Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] "Approval Later-no-Harm", (was "AWP versus DMC and AM") Chris Benham
  • [EM] "Approval Later-no-Harm", (was "AWP versus DMC and AM") Chris Benham
  • [EM] Re: "Approval Later-no-Harm", Araucaria Araucana
  • [EM] "Approval Later-no-Harm", (was "AWP versus DMC and AM") Chris Benham
• [EM] British Election and Duverger's Law Alex Small
  • [EM] Re: British Election and Duverger's Law Araucaria Araucana
  • Re: [EM] Re: British Election and Duverger's Law Bart Ingles
  • RE: [EM] Re: British Election and Duverger's Law James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] British Election and Duverger's Law Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] British Election and Duverger's Law Anthony Duff
• [EM] James, SFC MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] James, SFC James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: Pareto MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: James, meaningfulness and sameness MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Mike: malfunctioning criteria? James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Markus--Your example does show that ERIRV(f) fails WDSC MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: AWP versus DMC and AM Chris Benham
• [EM] Markus--You didn't prove that ERIRV(fractional) fails WDSC MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Markus--You didn't prove that ERIRV(fractional) fails WDSC James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Pareto MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] percentage support continued Curt Siffert
  • Re: [EM] percentage support continued Dave Ketchum
  • RE: [EM] percentage support continued Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] percentage support continued Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] percentage support continued James Green-Armytage
• Re: [EM] proof that ER-IRV(fractional) meets WDSC? Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] proof that ER-IRV(fractional) meets WDSC? James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Does Approval pass Pareto? Which Pareto? MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Does Approval pass Pareto? Which Pareto? James Green-Armytage
• [EM] James--IRV mitigation compromises MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] proof that ER-IRV(fractional) meets WDSC? James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Accidental duplicate posting MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] James--Then CP passes SFC, with a patch MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] James, 5/3/05, 2135 MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] James, 4 March, '05, 0435 GMT (meaninfgulness and sameness) MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] James, 4 March, '05, 0435 GMT (meaninfgulness and sameness) James Green-Armytage
• [EM] RE: approval and pareto Simmons, Forest
  • Re: [EM] RE: approval and pareto James Green-Armytage
• [EM] RE: percentage support Simmons, Forest
• [EM] (humor) not the lesser of two evils Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] part 2 of Re: approval doesn't meaningfully meet majority or mutual majority MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Preferences and ballots typo MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Cardinal Pairwise fails SFC. MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Cardinal Pairwise fails SFC. James Green-Armytage
• [EM] percentage support Curt Siffert
  • RE: [EM] percentage support Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] percentage support Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] percentage support - residual approval weights Stephane Rouillon
  • Re: [EM] percentage support James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] percentage support Daniel Bishop
  • Re: [EM] percentage support Juho Laatu
  • [EM] Percentage Support MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Percentage Support Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: DMC/RAV vs. Approval James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] Re: DMC/RAV vs. Approval Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] Re: DMC/RAV vs. Approval James Green-Armytage
• [EM] DMC/RAV vs. Approval Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] DMC/RAV vs. Approval James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] DMC/RAV vs. Approval Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: Approval doesn't meaningfully meet Majority or Mutual Majority. MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Re: Approval doesn't meaningfully meet Majority or Mutual Majority. James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] Re: Approval doesn't meaningfully meet Majority or Mutual Majority. James Green-Armytage
• [EM] STV anomaly - Part of my vote went to someone who was not on my list Jim & Mary Ronback
  • [EM] Re: [stv-voting] STV anomaly - Part of my vote went to someone who was not on my li Colin Rosenstiel
  • Re: [EM] STV anomaly - Part of my vote went to someone who was not on my list Markus Schulze

• Earlier messages
• Later messages