election-methods-electorama.com  

Messages by Thread

• [EM] Campaign reform MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Campaign reform Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] Campaign reform Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] Plurality criterion (Oops! X/Y mix-up) Chris Benham
  • RE: [EM] Plurality criterion (Oops! X/Y mix-up) Kevin Venzke
  • [EM] Plurality criterion (Oops! X/Y mix-up) Chris Benham
  • RE: [EM] Plurality criterion (Oops! X/Y mix-up) Kevin Venzke
• [EM] A problem, but not a problem for voters? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris: 3 Uniform factions, indecisive example MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Plurality crireion (was "There's indecisiveness, and then there's indecisiveness") Chris Benham
  • RE: [EM] Plurality crireion (was "There's indecisiveness, and then there's indecisiveness") Kevin Venzke
• [EM] MMPO vs PC MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] There's indecisiveness, and then there's indecisiveness MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • RE: [EM] There's indecisiveness, and then there's indecisiveness Kevin Venzke
  • [EM] There's indecisiveness, and then there's indecisiveness Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] There's indecisiveness, and then there's indecisiveness Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] Chris--That's good, stand by what you said MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Anthony: IRV strategy MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] strategy and method complexity and the advantage of minmax methods Anthony Duff
  • Re: [EM] strategy and method complexity and the advantage of minmax methods Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] strategy and method complexity and the advantage of minmax methods Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] strategy and method complexity and the advantage of minmax methods Juho Laatu
  • RE: [EM] strategy and method complexity and the advantage of minmaxmethods Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] strategy and method complexity and the advantage of minmax methods Abd ulRahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] strategy and method complexity and the advantage of minmax methods Juho Laatu
• [EM] RE: Fall Back Approval Simmons, Forest
• Re: [EM] Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters RLSuter
  • Re: [EM] Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters Russ Paielli
• [EM] Australian IRV voters (was" Does cycle-collapsing spoil MMPO's FBC compliance?") Chris Benham
• Re: [EM] Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota Abd ulRahman Lomax
  • [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota Araucaria Araucana
  • Re: [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota Abd ulRahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota Abd ulRahman Lomax
  • RE: [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of WomenVoters of Minnesota James Gilmour
  • RE: [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of WomenVoters of Minnesota Abd ulRahman Lomax
  • [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota Araucaria Araucana
  • Re: [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota Abd ulRahman Lomax
  • [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota Araucaria Araucana
  • Re: [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Does cycle-collapsing spoil MMPO's FBC compliance? MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Does cycle-collapsing spoil MMPO's FBC compliance? Anthony Duff
• [EM] The special tie rule works with MinMax(wv) and (margins) Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Election-methods Digest, Vol 12, Issue 10 Andrew Myers
• [EM] AERLO, not cycle-collapsing, gives Strong FBC to MMPO MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Thanks for Sprucing-Up answers MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] MAM algorithm? Gervase Lam
• [EM] preferences and approval with four candidates Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Possible Multi-Winner Pairwise techniques/algorithms (Part 3) Gervase Lam
• [EM] Possible Multi-Winner Pairwise techniques/algorithms (Part 2) Gervase Lam
• [EM] Fall Back Approval Simmons, Forest
  • RE: [EM] Fall Back Approval Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE:MMPO, contd Simmons, Forest
  • [EM] Re: MMPO, contd Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] Scott's Insanity method and Insanity Criterion MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Scott--BeatpathWinner & CSSD MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Introducing "Insanity Voting" - the only voting system which meets the Insanity Criterion Scott Ritchie
  • RE: [EM] Introducing "Insanity Voting" - the only voting system which meets the Insanity Criterion Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Introducing "Insanity Voting" - the only voting system which meets the Insanity Criterion Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: Russ's stories about me and computer programming MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Re: Russ's stories about me and computer programming Russ Paielli
• [EM] Markus: BeatpathWinner algorithm MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Markus: BeatpathWinner algorithm Russ Paielli
• [EM] Scott--BeatpathWinner & CSSD MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Scott--BeatpathWinner & CSSD Scott Ritchie
• [EM] suggestion for Approval/Pairwise method Russ Paielli
  • RE: [EM] suggestion for Approval/Pairwise method Kevin Venzke
  • [EM] suggestion for Approval/Pairwise method Chris Benham
• [EM] FBC vs some other criteria MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] FBC vs some other criteria James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Russ's stories about me and computer programs MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Russ's stories about me and computer programs Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] Russ's stories about me and computer programs Scott Ritchie
  • Re: [EM] Russ's stories about me and computer programs Markus Schulze
• [EM] Re: BeatpathWinner algorithm MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] James doesn't think people will favorite-bury in Condorcet MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] James doesn't think people will favorite-bury in Condorcet James Green-Armytage
• [EM] BeatpathWinner algorithm MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] BeatpathWinner algorithm Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] BeatpathWinner algorithm Curt Siffert
  • Re: [EM] BeatpathWinner algorithm Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] BeatpathWinner algorithm Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] BeatpathWinner algorithm Markus Schulze
• [EM] Oops--the comparison was with SD, not CWP MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Oops--the comparison was with SD, not CWP James Green-Armytage
• [EM] AERLO & CL-patch for MMPO MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] AERLO & CL-patch for MMPO Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] AERLO & CL-patch for MMPO Russ Paielli
• [EM] Not obviously untrue MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] minmax is not a good public election method James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Declaring victory? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voterstrategy Stephane Rouillon
  • Re: [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voterstrategy Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Proof that the CDTT is monotonic Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Monotonicity example: CDTT,FPP vs CDTT//FPP Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Reply to December MMPO comments MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Reply to December MMPO comments Chris Benham
• [EM] CDTT, IRV is IRV with pre-elimination MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] CDTT, IRV is IRV with pre-elimination Chris Benham
  • [EM] CDTT, IRV is IRV with pre-elimination Chris Benham
• [EM] Possible Multi-Winner Pairwise techniques/algorithms (Part 1) Gervase Lam
  • Re: [EM] Possible Multi-Winner Pairwise techniques/algorithms (Part 1) Gervase Lam
• [EM] MMPO, contd. MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] minmax is not a good public election method James Green-Armytage
• Re: [EM] CDTT,IRV (Chris) Kevin Venzke
  • [EM] CDTT,IRV (Chris) Chris Benham
• Re: [EM] suggestion for MMPO/Approval hybrid Kevin Venzke
• Re: [EM] CDTT,IRV (James) Kevin Venzke
• [EM] CIBR examples, and its CC failure Bishop, Daniel J
  • Re: [EM] CIBR examples, and its CC failure Ken Kuhlman
  • [EM] Re: CIBR examples, and its CC failure Araucaria Araucana
  • Re: [EM] Re: CIBR examples, and its CC failure Ken Kuhlman
  • Re: [EM] Re: CIBR examples, and its CC failure Juho Laatu
• [EM] weak burial resistance criteria Chris Benham
• [EM] minmax is not a good public election method James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] minmax is not a good public election method Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] minmax is not a good public election method Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] minmax is not a good public election method James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] minmax is not a good public election method Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] minmax is not a good public election method James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] minmax is not a good public election method Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] minmax is not a good public election method James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] minmax is not a good public election method Kevin Venzke
• [EM] MMPO's name MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] MMPO's name Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Reward oiffensive truncation to avoid order-reversal? :-) MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Reward oiffensive truncation to avoid order-reversal? :-) Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Independence from Clones Criterion MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris: various topics James Green-Armytage
  • [EM] Chris: various topics Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Chris: various topics James Green-Armytage
  • [EM] weak burial resistance criteria James Green-Armytage
• [EM] CDTT,IRV James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] CDTT,IRV Kevin Venzke
  • [EM] CDTT,IRV Chris Benham
  • [EM] CDTT,IRV Chris Benham
• [EM] ER-IRV(whole) James Green-Armytage
  • [EM] ER-IRV(whole) Chris Benham
• [EM] RE: MMPO Simmons, Forest
• [EM] RE: CIBR Simmons, Forest
  • Re: [EM] RE: CIBR Ken Kuhlman
• [EM] MMPO MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Newbie de-lurks to propose a clone-proof Borda method Ken Kuhlman
  • Re: [EM] Newbie de-lurks to propose a clone-proof Borda method Eric Gorr
  • [EM] Newbie de-lurks to propose a clone-proof Borda method Ken Kuhlman
  • [EM] Newbie de-lurks to propose a clone-proof Borda method Ken Kuhlman
  • Re: [EM] Newbie de-lurks to propose a clone-proof Borda method Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] Newbie de-lurks to propose a clone-proof Borda method James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] Newbie de-lurks to propose a clone-proof Borda method Dave Ketchum
  • [EM] Newbie de-lurks to propose a clone-proof Borda method Chris Benham
• Re: [EM] MMPO, MinGS Kevin Venzke
  • [EM] suggestion for MMPO/Approval hybrid Russ Paielli
  • [EM] Re: suggestion for MMPO/Approval hybrid Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] RE: MMPO satisfies FBC in the general case Simmons, Forest
  • Re: [EM] RE: MMPO, FBC, Raynaud Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Clarification to people I don't reply to MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] The last time that I waste the time to reply to Markus MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Insignificant improvement is evil? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] FBC + majority defensive strategy criteria--2nd generation best methods MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] FBC + majority defensive strategy criteria--2nd generation best methods MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] FBC + majority defensive strategy criteria--2nd generation best methods Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Markus, 23 May, 0500 GMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] It's just that IRV isn't a significant reform MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] It's just that IRV isn't a significant reform Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] It's just that IRV isn't a significant reform Eric Gorr
• [EM] An attempt at a method satisfying FBC and SDSC Kevin Venzke
• [EM] MMPO satisfies FBC in the general case Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] MMPO satisfies FBC in the general case Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] MMPO satisfies FBC in the general case Russ Paielli
• [EM] Kevin--The 3-slot method MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Kevin--The 3-slot method, FBC, MMPO Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Month typo MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus, 22 Marach, '05, 0318 GMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Eurovision Song Contest results Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] RE: resistance to raffles (was assumption of sincere ballots) Simmons, Forest
• [EM] RE: assumption of sincere ballots Simmons, Forest
  • [EM] An interesting different method of combining results across a spectrum Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] An interesting different method of combining results across a spectrum Kevin Venzke
  • [EM] Re: An interesting different method of combining results across a spectrum Araucaria Araucana
  • [EM] RE: assumption of sincere ballots Chris Benham
• [EM] RE: fun example Simmons, Forest
  • RE: [EM] RE: fun example Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] RE: fun example Abd ulRahman Lomax
• Re: [EM] Re: A Condorcet-like method that satisfies FBC (I believe) Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Part 2, Re: Mike: Strategy MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Election via Proxies - correction Dave Ketchum
• [EM] New policy: No personal criticisms in on-topic discussion MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus, 19 May, '05, 0114 MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] A Condorcet-like method that satisfies FBC (I believe) Kevin Venzke
  • [EM] Re: A Condorcet-like method that satisfies FBC (I believe) Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] Election via Proxies Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Election via Proxies Abd ulRahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Election via Proxies Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Election via Proxies Abd ulRahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Election via Proxies Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Election via Proxies Abd ulRahman Lomax

• Earlier messages
• Later messages