election-methods-electorama.com  

Messages by Thread

• [EM] James--The burden of doubt, part 1 MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] James--The burden of doubt, part 1 James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Plurality advantage or FHC malfunction? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Kevin, co-operation/defection game of chicken. SDSC. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] One more thing about "Guilty till proven innocent" MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Condorcet/IRV politics James Green-Armytage
  • [EM] another Condorcet/IRV politics question James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] another Condorcet/IRV politics question Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Guilty till proven innocent, seriously mis-applied MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] burden of doubt and IRV/Condorcet politics James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Ted reply MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Preference criteria vs votes-only (was " CP: guilty till proven innocent") MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] approval doesn't meaningfully meet majority or mutual majority James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: Self-contradiction MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Re: Self-contradiction James Green-Armytage
  • [EM] Re: Self-contradiction MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Final Improved Preference Majority Criterion MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] AWP versus DMC and AM Chris Benham
  • [EM] Re: AWP versus DMC and AM Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] Groupings, alliances, friendly relationships Juho Laatu
• [EM] typo in contrived ad-hoc Preference Majority Criterion MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Cardinal Pairwise: Guilty till proven innocent MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Mike: self-contradiction James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Reply to A. A. about sloppy quoting MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Re: Reply to A. A. about sloppy quoting Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] parties working to throw out top-two primary in Washington State Araucaria Araucana
  • [EM] Re: parties working to throw out top-two primary in Washington State Araucaria Araucana
  • [EM] Re: parties working to throw out top-two primary in Washington State Russ Paielli
  • [EM] Re: parties working to throw out top-two primary in Washington State Araucaria Araucana
  • Re: [EM] Re: parties working to throw out top-two primary in Washington State Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] Re: parties working to throw out top-two primary in Washington State James Green-Armytage
  • [EM] Re: parties working to throw out top-two primary in Washington State Araucaria Araucana
  • Re: [EM] Re: parties working to throw out top-two primary in Washington State Russ Paielli
  • [EM] Re: parties working to throw out top-two primary in Washington State Paul Kislanko
• [EM] wv & Cardinal Pairwise fail Participation and Consistency. MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Re: wv & Cardinal Pairwise fail Participation and Consistency. Araucaria Araucana
  • [EM] Re: wv & Cardinal Pairwise fail Participation and Consistency. Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] James, reply to strategy reply (not to your original Mike: Strategy posting) MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Generic Name for the "Gerald Ford" candidate Simmons, Forest
  • [EM] Re: Generic Name for the "Gerald Ford" candidate Araucaria Araucana
  • [EM] Re: Generic Name for the "Gerald Ford" candidate Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] Cardinal Pairwise: Guilty till proven innocent MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Re: Cardinal Pairwise: Guilty till proven innocent Araucaria Araucana
  • Re: [EM] Cardinal Pairwise: Guilty till proven innocent James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: Mike: Misunderstanding MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] guilty until proven innocent James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Odd accidental posting MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] [email protected] MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Mike: misunderstanding James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: Contd, method proposals MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Re: Contd, method proposals Kevin Venzke
• [EM] James--Strategy, part 1 MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] James--Strategy, part 1 James Green-Armytage
• [EM] James--Choice voting article MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] James--Choice voting article James Green-Armytage
• [EM] RE: auto truncation Simmons, Forest
  • Re: [EM] RE: auto truncation Russ Paielli
• Re: [EM] Letter to author of voting system article Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Letter to author of voting system article James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: Contd, comments on your methods MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Re: Contd, comments on your methods Kevin Venzke
• [EM] James, Preference Pareto MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] "Be careful what you wish for" Araucaria Araucana
  • Re: [EM] "Be careful what you wish for" Russ Paielli
  • [EM] Re: "Be careful what you wish for" Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] direct democracy James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Paul, 23 April, '05, 0250 GMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus, BC MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Typo regarding day of month MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] James, 4/22/'05, 0220 GMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • RE: [EM] James, 4/22/'05, 0220 GMT Paul Kislanko
• [EM] BC, BeatpathWinner MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • RE: [EM] BC, BeatpathWinner Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Beatpath Criterion MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Dueling immune set definitions MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Dueling immune set definitions James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Markus, immune set MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Markus, immune set James Green-Armytage
• [EM] " Weak Burial Resistance" criterion Chris Benham
• [EM] contd, your method proposals MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] contd, your method proposals Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] contd, your method proposals Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] contd, your method proposals Markus Schulze
• [EM] Re: ATLO, defection, method/criterion model MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Re: ATLO, defection, method/criterion model Kevin Venzke
  • [EM] Re: ATLO, defection, method/criterion model MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Re: ATLO, defection, method/criterion model Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Approval, Pareto, & ICC MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Approval, Pareto, & ICC James Green-Armytage
• [EM] new definitions and criteria page James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] new definitions and criteria page Kevin Venzke
• [EM] typo regarding FAIR and _Extra!_ MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] NPR MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: James, your 6-candidate example MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] repetition James Green-Armytage
• [EM] RE: Election-methods Digest, Vol 10, Issue 34 Simmons, Forest
  • Re: [EM] RE: Election-methods Digest, Vol 10, Issue 34 Russ Paielli
  • [EM] Re: Election-methods Digest, Vol 10, Issue 34 Araucaria Araucana
  • Re: [EM] Re: Election-methods Digest, Vol 10, Issue 34 Russ Paielli
• [EM] James, your 6-candidate example MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] James, your 6-candidate example James Green-Armytage
• [EM] why ranking should be allowed for approved candidates only Russ Paielli
  • [EM] Re: why ranking should be allowed for approved candidates only Araucaria Araucana
  • Re: [EM] Re: why ranking should be allowed for approved candidates only Russ Paielli
  • [EM] Re: why ranking should be allowed for approved candidates only Araucaria Araucana
  • Re: [EM] Re: why ranking should be allowed for approved candidates only Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] Re: why ranking should be allowed for approved candidates only Russ Paielli
  • [EM] Re: why ranking should be allowed for approved candidates only Araucaria Araucana
  • [EM] auto-truncation Russ Paielli
  • [EM] Re: auto-truncation Araucaria Araucana
  • Re: [EM] Re: auto-truncation Kevin Venzke
  • [EM] Re: auto-truncation Araucaria Araucana
  • [EM] absentee ballots and GVI colors Russ Paielli
• [EM] Juho: strategy James Green-Armytage
  • [EM] Re: Juho: strategy Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Re: Juho: strategy James Green-Armytage
  • [EM] correction James Green-Armytage
  • [EM] Re: Juho: strategy Juho Laatu
• [EM] Mailing problems Juho Laatu
• Re: [EM] Kevin-- ATLO & LNHarm Kevin Venzke
• [EM] A question in classroom creation Michael A. Rouse
  • Re: [EM] A question in classroom creation James Green-Armytage
  • RE: [EM] A question in classroom creation Paul Kislanko
  • RE: [EM] A question in classroom creation Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] A question in classroom creation James Green-Armytage
  • RE: [EM] A question in classroom creation Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] A question in classroom creation Stephane Rouillon
  • Re: [EM] A question in classroom creation Juho Laatu
• [EM] relationship between DMC/RAV and Approval Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] relationship between DMC/RAV and Approval Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Kevin-- ATLO & LNC MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] More thoughts on approval margins Monkey Puzzle
  • [EM] Re: More thoughts on approval margins Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] IRV bill on Washington State Governor's desk Araucaria Araucana
  • Re: [EM] IRV bill on Washington State Governor's desk James Green-Armytage
  • [EM] Re: IRV bill on Washington State Governor's desk Araucaria Araucana
  • Re: [EM] Re: IRV bill on Washington State Governor's desk Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] Re: IRV bill on Washington State Governor's desk James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] Re: IRV bill on Washington State Governor's desk Bart Ingles
  • [EM] IRV questions... James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] Re: IRV bill on Washington State Governor's desk Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] Re: IRV bill on Washington State Governor's desk James Green-Armytage
• [EM] The idle and the working poor MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] minmax MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] minmax Kevin Venzke
  • [EM] minmax MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Re: [EM] LNHarm and ATLO Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] LNHarm and ATLO Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] LNHarm and ATLO Kevin Venzke
• [EM] A few compliances & noncompliances of DMC MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Re: A few compliances & noncompliances of DMC Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] James--Your example shows that my claim wasn't correct MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] James--Your example shows that my claim wasn't correct James Green-Armytage
• [EM] "one-line" definition of ASM/AM/AWP Araucaria Araucana
• Re: [EM] Simpson-Kramer definition Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Simpson-Kramer definition Markus Schulze
• [EM]Re: AWP versus AM (and DMC) oops! Chris Benham
  • [EM]Re: AWP versus AM (and DMC) oops! Chris Benham
• [EM] RE: Election-methods Digest, Vol 10, Issue 30 Simmons, Forest
  • Re: [EM] RE: Election-methods Digest, Vol 10, Issue 30 Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: Simpson-Kramer definition MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • RE: [EM] Re: Simpson-Kramer definition Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Re: Letter to author of voting system article MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • RE: [EM] Re: Letter to author of voting system article Paul Kislanko
  • [EM] Re: Letter to author of voting system article Araucaria Araucana
  • Re: [EM] Re: Letter to author of voting system article Eric Gorr
• [EM] Siimpson-Kramer definition MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • RE: [EM] Siimpson-Kramer definition Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] Siimpson-Kramer definition Curt Siffert
  • Re: [EM] Siimpson-Kramer definition Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Collecting Ordinal Information Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Collecting Ordinal Information Simmons, Forest
  • Re: [EM] Collecting Ordinal Information Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] Collecting Ordinal Information Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Re: Letter to an author of a voting system article RLSuter
• [EM] No, James, I don't refer to Simpson-Kramer as Plain Condorcet MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Mike's Mistake, part 2 MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Mike, what are we arguing about? MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Mike: strategy James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Letter to an author of a voting system article MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: fallacy Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: realization on method equivalence Chris Benham
• [EM] realization on method equivalence Russ Paielli
• [EM] Russ, 12 April, '05, 0530 GMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Mike's "mistake" Russ Paielli
  • [EM] Mike's mistake, part 2 Russ Paielli
• [EM] James, 4/11/05, 2227 MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Mike: what exactly are we arguing about? James Green-Armytage
• [EM] James, defensive strategy need, CW loss, majority wishes violations MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Normative criteria MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: RAV/DMC Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Optimally Sorted Pairwise Methods (AWP/ASM/AM/CWP) Araucaria Araucana
• [EM]Re: Normative criteria Chris Benham
• Re: [EM] RAV/DMC (was "majorities and ordinal-only pairwise methods") Kevin Venzke
  • [EM] Re: RAV/DMC Araucaria Araucana
• [EM] A proposal from a member of the public MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Normative criteria MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] I'm not going to waste more time replying to Russ MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] I'm not going to waste more time replying to Russ Russ Paielli
  • [EM] let Mike Ossipoff know what you think about his lies Russ Paielli

• Earlier messages
• Later messages