election-methods  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [EM] STV when applied to choosing pizza toppings James Gilmour
• Re: [EM] Range voting zero-info strategy simulation Simmons, Forest
  • [EM] RE : Re: Range voting zero-info strategy simulation Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Range voting zero-info strategy simulation Simmons, Forest
  • Re: [EM] Range voting zero-info strategy simulation Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Majority Is When? Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Condordet Criterion & Method Dave Ketchum
• [EM] IRV... Jonathan Lundell
  • Re: [EM] IRV... David Cary
• [EM] Range Voting Strategy Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] Range Voting Strategy Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Range Voting Strategy Juho
  • [EM] RE : Re: Range Voting Strategy Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: Range Voting Strategy Juho
  • Re: [EM] Range Voting Strategy Juho
  • Re: [EM] Range Voting Strategy Jobst Heitzig
  • [EM] Range Voting strategy Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] Range Voting strategy Juho
  • [EM] Range Voting Strategy ws
• [EM] IRV theorem Warren Smith
• [EM] Range voting fails IIA? Warren Smith
• [EM] Range voting fails IIA David Cary
  • Re: [EM] Range voting fails IIA Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Range voting fails IIA Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Range voting fails IIA Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Range voting fails IIA Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Range voting fails IIA David Cary
  • Re: [EM] Range voting fails IIA Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Range Voting fails IIA MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Thompson insurance like voting for a legislature raphfrk
• [EM] "punchscan" competition for three-ballot Brian Olson
• [EM] Electoral college competition rule raphfrk
• [EM] Oh my God, they patented Nanson's method mrouse1
• Re: [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule mrouse1
  • Re: [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule Jonathan Lundell
  • Re: [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule mrouse1
  • Re: [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule raphfrk
• [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule Brian Olson
  • Re: [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule Brian Olson
  • Re: [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule Jonathan Lundell
  • Re: [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule Brian Olson
  • Re: [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule Stephane Rouillon
  • Re: [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule raphfrk
• Re: [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits mrouse1
  • Re: [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits Juho
  • Re: [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Old U.S. Adversary Poised for Comeback - washingtonpost.com Allen Smith
• [EM] Ranked Preference benefits Juho
  • [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits Juho
  • Re: [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits Chris Benham
  • [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits raphfrk
  • [EM] using single seat elections as a first stage for a PR election raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits Juho
  • Re: [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits Juho
  • Re: [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits Juho
  • Re: [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits Juho
  • Re: [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits Juho
  • [EM] Ranked Preferences Juho
  • Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences Juho
• [EM] IFNOP method (continued) mrouse1
• [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation Warren Smith
  • [EM] RE : Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (Warren) Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation raphfrk
• [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (Dave) Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (Dave) Dave Ketchum
  • [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (Dave) Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (Dave) Dave Ketchum
  • [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (Dave) Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (Dave) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation raphfrk
  • [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk) Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk) raphfrk
  • [EM] RE : Re: RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk) Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk) raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk) raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk) raphfrk
  • [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Michael Poole
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Michael Poole
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Michael Poole
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Michael Poole
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Michael Poole
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Michael Poole
  • [EM] RE : Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] RE : Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] RE : Re: RE : Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: RE : Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: RE : Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: RE : Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: RE : Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions David Cary
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation David Cary
  • Re: [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Re: RE : Re: Ranked Preferences, Range Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: RE : Re: Ranked Preferences, Range Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: RE : Re: Ranked Preferences, Range Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, Range Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, Range Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Candidate Strengths and Significance of Defeats Simmons, Forest
  • Re: [EM] Candidate Strengths and Significance of Defeats Juho
• Re: [EM] EM: "10 Steps to Repair American Democracy" RLSuter
• [EM] EM: "10 Steps to Repair American Democracy" for only $2.99 on Amazon.com, forwarded from Steven Hill Chris Benham
• [EM] Addendum to condorcet method theory Antonio Oneala
  • Re: [EM] Addendum to condorcet method theory Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Addendum to condorcet method theory David Cary
  • Re: [EM] Addendum to condorcet method theory Antonio Oneala
  • Re: [EM] Addendum to condorcet method theory David Cary
  • Re: [EM] Addendum to condorcet method theory Antonio Oneala
  • Re: [EM] Addendum to condorcet method theory Markus Schulze
• [EM] Ranked Preferences Juho
  • Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences Juho
  • Re: [EM] ranked preferences Simmons, Forest
  • Re: [EM] ranked preferences Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] ranked preferences Juho
  • Re: [EM] ranked preferences Simmons, Forest
  • Re: [EM] ranked preferences Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] ranked preferences Juho
  • Re: [EM] ranked preferences Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Juho
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Juho
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Juho
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Juho
  • [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Juho
  • Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Juho
  • Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Chris Benham
  • [EM] RE : Re: Ranked Preferences, Range Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: Ranked Preferences, Range Juho
  • [EM] RE : Re: RE : Re: Ranked Preferences, Range (Juho) Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: RE : Re: Ranked Preferences, Range (Juho) Juho
  • Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Jonathan Lundell
  • Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Juho
  • Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Juho
  • Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Juho
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections David Cary
  • [EM] RE : Re: Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Simmons, Forest
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• Re: [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods) mrouse1
  • Re: [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods) raphfrk
• [EM] defense versus offense Simmons, Forest
• [EM] vote pact Simmons, Forest
  • Re: [EM] vote pact raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] vote pact Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] No One To Vote For? Dave Ketchum
• Re: [EM] Unicameral single-member + PR in Germany (Re: CompetitiveDistricting Rule) James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] Unicameral single-member + PR in Germany (Re: CompetitiveDistricting Rule) Stephane Rouillon
  • Re: [EM] Unicameral single-member + PR in Germany (Re: CompetitiveDistricting Rule) James Gilmour
• [EM] Condorcet + IRV completion? Andrew Myers
  • Re: [EM] Condorcet + IRV completion? Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Condorcet + IRV completion? Chris Benham
• [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods) mrouse1
  • Re: [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods) Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods) Juho
  • Re: [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods) raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods) Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods) raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods) Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods) Juho
  • Re: [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods) raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods) mrouse1
  • Re: [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods) mrouse1
• [EM] a feasible and powerful approximation to proxy democracy James Green-Armytage

• Earlier messages
• Later messages