Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8

[Ray Amos]

Dan Honemann wrote:
> 
> > The 75-300 IS was just awful, not as
> > sharp as the 100-300, nor as good saturation.  But for me,
> > saturation is not as important as contrast, since I primarily
> > shoot B&W (and mostly nudes, at that!.)
> 
> Just how far away are those nudes you're shooting?!  For the price of
> the 100-400 IS, you could get the 85/1.2L or 135/2L and have change
> leftover--plus a much better lens for portraiture (IMO).

Dan,   I happen to know for a fact Dan's wife will not allow him
within 20 feet of these nudes and I think your suggestions will
not allow him to fill the frame as tight as he would like.

Ray Amos
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************