From: Skip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (...snip...) > So I stand by what I said, for my purposes, an upgraded "consumer" IS > 100-300 f4-5.6 would be more useful than adding IS to an already > excellent 70-200 f2.8 "L" lens. I think that Canon don't realease such a lens. I understand your needs... But a 100-300 IS USM is too close of a 75-300 IS USM for beeing produced... But perhaps in a far future, when Canon have already upgraded a lot of L lenses, it will release a new version of the 100-300 ! Who knows :) -- PhOTo -- vOYaGe -- GrAPhiSMe -- Portail : http://perso.magic.fr/drocha * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Ken Cravillion
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Skip
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Bob Talbot
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Daniel ROCHA
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Gary Russell
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Rafal Walas
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Skip
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Dan Honemann
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Daniel ROCHA
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Robert Meier
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Bob Talbot
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Wallace, Brian
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Bob Talbot
- EOS Re: frying eggs on camera bodies Tim Munro
- Re: EOS Re: frying eggs on camera bodies Yen-Yi Liu
- Re: EOS Re: frying eggs on camera bodies Daniel ROCHA
- Re: EOS Re: frying eggs on camera bodies Rodrigo Gimenez
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Bob Sull
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Rafal Walas
