Robert Meier schrieb:
>
> --- Thomas Bantel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've used the 50/1.4
> > reversed on the
> > 200/2.8L and they do quite well at 4:1. Of course
> > the combo is nowhere
> > near a specialised lens for this purpose, which is
> > available for
> > some mounts, probably also in T-mount, which can be
> > adapted to EOS.
>
> You could also use the Canon Macro 65mm lens that
> allows magnifications of 1:1 to 5:1. Not exactly cheap
> at around $1k, though. By the way, has somebody every
> used this lens?
No, I haven't used it. I feel I cannot justify that expense for my
quite rare macro needs. The other method had the advantage to be
absolutely free for me. I had the lenses already. And, while the
results would probably not convince a macro enthusiast, they were
reasonable enough for me.
Thomas Bantel
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
