On Tue, 04 Sep 2001 12:01:47 -0500, you wrote: >>Because Canon only recently "lost" its copyright on the USM and IS > >You're saying that Canon's patent expired? Wow. I'm a little confused by the IS copyright thing, because haven't other companies been using IS on video cameras for quite some time? Ken * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re: EOS AF Cannon vs. Minolta Michael Fontana
- Re: EOS AF Cannon vs. Minolta Snorre A. Selmer
- Re: EOS AF Cannon vs. Minolta Tim Munro
- RE: EOS AF Cannon vs. Minolta Robert Meier
- Re: EOS AF Cannon vs. Minolta Snorre A. Selmer
- Re: EOS AF Cannon vs. Minolta c . p . valentine
- Re: EOS AF Cannon vs. Minolta c . p . valentine
- Re: EOS AF Cannon vs. Minolta Ken Durling
- Re: EOS AF Cannon vs. Minolta Ken Durling
- Re: EOS AF Cannon vs. Minolta Roger Wong
- Re: IS (was EOS AF Cannon vs. Minolta) Ken Durling
- Re: IS (was EOS AF Cannon vs. Minolta) Robert Meier
- Re: EOS AF Cannon vs. Minolta Bob Sull
- Re: EOS AF Cannon vs. Minolta Bob Sull
- Re: EOS AF Cannon vs. Minolta Michael Fontana
- Re: EOS AF Cannon vs. Minolta F. Craig Callahan
