My 2 cents, Steve * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
I had to shoot a wedding where flash was not allowed... AND... I was
not allowed closer than about 20 feet to the couple during the
ceremony. My 70 - 200 2.8 IS saved the day. I shot almost the entire
ceremony at 2.8, and was able to set ISO at no higher than 600, and
still get clear, handheld shots at about 1/30 shutter. This lens paid
for itself right then and there, I can think of no other lens that
would have worked so well in this situation. When the combination of
the 2.8 and IS is needed... it is NEEDED! I would not think of buying
the F4 non IS version. Save the money and get the best... you never
regret buying the best when you need it!
- Re: EOS 70-200 f/4 vs f/2.8IS Harman Bajwa
- Re: EOS 70-200 f/4 vs f/2.8IS Nanou Peter
- RE: EOS 70-200 f/4 vs f/2.8IS Marc Lawrence
- RE: EOS 70-200 f/4 vs f/2.8IS Harman Bajwa
- RE: EOS 70-200 f/4 vs f/2.8IS leeuwtje
- RE: EOS 70-200 f/4 vs f/2.8IS Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- RE: EOS 70-200 f/4 vs f/2.8IS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: EOS 70-200 f/4 vs f/2.8IS Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- Re: EOS 70-200 f/4 vs f/2.8IS Bob
- Re: EOS 70-200 f/4 vs f/2.8IS W S
- Re: EOS 70-200 f/4 vs f/2.8IS Steve Parrott
- RE: [inbox] Re: EOS 70-200 f/4 vs f... Chip Louie
- RE: EOS 70-200 f/4 vs f/2.8IS Ken Lin
- RE: EOS 70-200 f/4 vs f/2.8IS Jeff LeFever
- RE: EOS 70-200 f/4 vs f/2.8... Ken Lin
- PFs was : EOS 70-200 f... Ken Durling
- Re: EOS 70-200 f/4 vs ... Bob
- Re: EOS 70-200 f/4 vs ... Cotty
- RE: EOS 70-200 f/4... Ken Lin
- Re: EOS 70-200 f/4... Cotty
- RE: EOS 70-200 f/4... Ken Lin
