Thanks, Russell.
I believe "my slip is showing" that I did not follow the Mallah related
If someone concentrates on just certain topics, may miss something.
You are very kind

On 1/24/07, Russell Standish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 03:54:32PM -0500, John M wrote:
> >
> >   PS I still would appreciate to be directed to a short text explaining
> the essence of ASSA (RSSA?). J
> >
> It is in my book. Here is the relevant excerpt:
> \section[ASSA vs RSSA]{Absolute vs Relative Self Sampl\-ing Assumption}
> In the course of a lengthy, and at times heated debate between Jacques
> Mallah and myself, it became clear we were always arguing from
> disparate positions\cite{Mallah-Standish}. At the heart of our
> difference of opinion was how the strong self sampling
> assumption\index{self sampling assumption!strong|emph} should be
> applied. Jacques Mallah assumed that each observer moment had an
> absolute positive measure, and that our current observer moment is
> selected at random from that distribution.
> Since I accept the TIME postulate,\index{TIME postulate} only the
> birth moment is selected at random, according to the self sampling
> assumption. Thereafter, each observer moment's measure can be
> determined {\em relative} to its predecessor by means of Born's
> rule\index{Born rule}
> (\ref{proj-prob}). Arguing with this notion of observer measure, first
> person immortality follows provided the no cul-de-sac conjecture\index{no
> cul-de-sac conjecture} is
> true.
> The Everything List adopted the term {\em Absolute Self Sampling
>   Assumption}\index{self sampling assumption!absolute|emph} to
>   refer to Mallah's use of strong self sampling, and the {\em Relative
>   Self Sampling Assumption}\index{self sampling assumption!relative|emph}
> for the version I use.  Since this
>   debate took place, other debates have taken place between members of
>   the ``absolute'' camp, which includes such names as Jacques
>   Mallah,\index{Mallah, Jacques}
>   Saibal Mitra,\index{Mitra, Saibal} Hal Finney\index{Finney, Hal} and the
> ``relative'' camp which includes
>   Bruno Marchal,\index{Marchal, Bruno} Stathis
>   Papaioannou, and myself.
> \index{Papaioannou, Stathis}\index{Standish, Russell}
> Both of these ``camps'' appear to have internally consistent pictures.
> The fact that I'm not currently experiencing childhood, is for me
> strong evidence that the ASSA is an incorrect application of the
> strong self sampling assumption.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> A/Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
> Mathematics
> UNSW SYDNEY 2052                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Australia                      
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to