> My question has perhaps no sense at all. Is there a notion of quantum > computation done without any measurement?
Quantum lambda calculus by Andre van Tonder does not containt measurement. http://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0307150v5 >From the abstract, he proves equivalence between his quantum lambda calculus and quantum Turing machine (also without measurement). That's all I know in this respect for the moment. > Is there a purely unitary > transformation which "augment" the dimensionality of the initial > quantum machine. Does the notion of universal quantum dovetailing > makes sense. I am not too familiar with the process of dovetailing, but I'm fine with the general idea that there is program which systematically generates every possible C/Lisp code and in between steps of this generation it interprets parts of what is already generated. Can you sketch how should one think about such dovetailing in terms of classical logical gates, please? > I don't find my Shi papers, but from what I remind, it gives some good > argument about the difficulty of redefining the halting problem > (halting in which universe? ...). Good, your note about the halting problem helped to refine my google search to the extend that I've found the Shi paper you are talking about. Hereby, I also apologize to the authors of QTM Revisited paper, their reference was correct. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(02)00015-4 I'll read it. Regards, mirek --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---