On 22 Sep, 13:15, Quentin Anciaux <[email protected]> wrote: > Is mathematic dependant on human being from your point of view ? > > That's what I understand. Yes, exactly. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
- Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology m.a.
- Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology Bruno Marchal
- Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology Flammarion
- Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology Bruno Marchal
- Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology Flammarion
- Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology Quentin Anciaux
- Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology Flammarion
- Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology Quentin Anciaux
- Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology Flammarion
- Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology Quentin Anciaux
- Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology Flammarion
- Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology David Nyman
- Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology Flammarion
- Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology David Nyman
- Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology Flammarion
- Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology David Nyman
- Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology Flammarion
- Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology Bruno Marchal
- Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology Brent Meeker
- Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology David Nyman
- Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology Flammarion

